Medhavi Sabherwal
ABSTRACT
Dance is a field of study expressed through a series of improvised or choreographed movements and steps that involve arms, legs, and torsos extending across physical space. When these activities shift online, the challenges for performance and teaching are more novel than those found in verbal or text-based communication. This paper discusses preliminary results from a qualitative study conducted to understand how performers and students adapted to online spaces when in-person events were not available. We examine how performers reconstructed the stage and overcame obstacles to building rapport with audiences. We also investigate how students assembled makeshift dance studios in the home and challenges they faced when trying to make sense of choreographed instructions. Preliminary analysis shows that existing technologies lack support for performing and learning dance online, and we conclude with suggestions for how more sophisticated systems might be designed to support embodied knowledge production and transfer.
Supplemental Material
- [1] Bernhard Fink, Bettina Bläsing, Andrea Ravignani, and Todd K. Shackelford. 2021. Evolution and functions of human dance. Evol. Hum. Behav., vol. 42, no. 4, (Jul. 2021), 351–360, DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.01.003.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- [2] Youhong F. Peng and Atau Tanaka. Body and Embodiment in Dance Performance. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement anrd Computing, October 2019, New York, NY, USA, 1–6. DOI: 10.1145/3347122.3359596.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [3] Richard Skarbez, Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., and Mary C. Whitton. A Survey of Presence and Related Concepts. ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 50, no. 6, 96:1-96:39, (November 2017), DOI: 10.1145/3134301.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [4] Paul Dourish. 2004. Where the action is: the foundations of embodied interaction. MIT press.Google Scholar
- [5] Dag Svanæs. Interaction design for and with the lived body: Some implications of merleau-ponty’s phenomenology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 20, no. 1, 8:1-8:30, (April 2013), DOI: 10.1145/2442106.2442114.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [6] Jackie (Junrui) Yang, Tuochao Chen, Fang Qin, Monica S. Lam, and James A. Landay. HybridTrak: Adding Full-Body Tracking to VR Using an Off-the-Shelf Webcam. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, April 2022, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3502045.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [7] Krzysztof Pietroszek. Virtual Reality as a Medium for Remote Class Participation. Immersive Learning Network Conference, (June 2019).Google Scholar
- [8] Ahsan Abdullah, Jan Kolkmeier, Vivian Lo, and Michael Neff. Videoconference and Embodied VR: Communication Patterns Across Task and Medium. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 5, no. CSCW2, 453:1-453:29, (October 2021), DOI: 10.1145/3479597.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [9] Jack. S.-K. Chang, Alison Doucette, Paul Clifton, Michael Nitsche, Timothy Welsh and Ali Mazalek. TASC: Combining Virtual Reality with Tangible and Embodied Interactions to Support Spatial Cognition. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, June 2017, New York, NY, USA, 1239–1251. DOI: 10.1145/3064663.3064675.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [10] Fan Jiang, Xubo Yang, and Lele Feng. Real-time full-body motion reconstruction and recognition for off-the-shelf VR devices. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry - Volume 1, December 2016, New York, NY, USA, 309–318. DOI: 10.1145/3013971.3013987.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [11] Zeynep Ahmet, Martin Jonsson, Saiful I. Sumon, and Lars E. Holmquist. Supporting embodied exploration of physical concepts in mixed digital and physical interactive settings. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction, January 2010, New York, NY, USA,, 109–116. DOI: 10.1145/1935701.1935723.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [12] Marco Gillies, Harry Brenton, and Andrea Kleinsmith, Embodied design of full bodied interaction with virtual humans. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Movement and Computing, August 2015, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. DOI: 10.1145/2790994.2790996.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [13] Paul Luff, Marina Jirotka, Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Christian Heath, and Grace Eden, “Embedded interaction: The accomplishment of actions in everyday and video-mediated environments,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 6:1-6:22, (April 2013), DOI: 10.1145/2442106.2442112.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [14] Michael Broughton, Jeni Paay, Jesper Kjeldskov, Kenton O’Hara, Jane Li, Matthew Phillips and Markus Rittenbruch. Being here: designing for distributed hands-on collaboration in blended interaction spaces. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group: Design: Open 24/7, November 2009, New York, NY, USA, 73–80. DOI: 10.1145/1738826.1738839.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [15] Christian Heath and Paul Luff. Media space and communicative asymmetries: preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 7, no. 3, 315–346, (December 1992), DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci0703_3.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [16] William W. Gaver, Gerda Smets, and Kees Overbeeke. A Virtual Window on media space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, USA, May 1995, 257–264. DOI: 10.1145/223904.223937.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [17] Susan R. Fussell, Leslie D. Setlock, Jie Yang, Jiazhi Ou, Elizabeth Mauer, and Adam D. I. Kramer. Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 19, no. 3, 273–309, (September 2004), DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci1903_3.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [18] Christian Heath and Paul Luff. Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, March 1991, New York, NY, USA, 99–103. DOI: 10.1145/108844.108859.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [19] Mike Fraser, Tony Glover, Ivan Vaghi, Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Jon Hindmarsh and Christian Heath. Revealing the realities of collaborative virtual reality. In Proceedings of the third international conference on Collaborative virtual environments, New York, NY, USA, September 2000, 29–37. DOI: 10.1145/351006.351010.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [20] Jon Hindmarsh, Mike Fraser, Christian Heath, Steve Benford, and Chris Greenhalgh. Fragmented interaction: establishing mutual orientation in virtual environments. In Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, New York, NY, USA, November 1998, 217–226. DOI: 10.1145/289444.289496.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [21] Carl Gutwin, Steve Benford, Jeff Dyck, Mike Fraser, Ivan Vaghi, and Chris Greenhalgh. Revealing delay in collaborative environments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, April 2004, 503–510. DOI: 10.1145/985692.985756.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [22] William W. Gaver, Abigail Sellen, Christian Heath, and Paul Luff. One is not enough: multiple views in a media space. In Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, May 1993, 335–341. doi: 10.1145/169059.169268.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [23] Jon Hindmarsh, Mike Fraser, Christian Heath, Steve Benford, and Chris Greenhalgh. Object-focused interaction in collaborative virtual environments. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 7, no. 4, 477–509, (December 2000), DOI: 10.1145/365058.365088.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [24] James Norris, Holger M. Schnädelbach, and Paul K. Luff. Putting things in focus: establishing co-orientation through video in context. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, April 2013, 1329–1338. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466174.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [25] Matthew J. Bietz, Nitesh Goyal, Nicole Immorlica, Blair MacIntyre, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Benjamin C. Pierce, Sean Rintel and Donghee Yvette Wohn. Social Presence in Virtual Event Spaces. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, April 2022, 1–5. DOI: 10.1145/3491101.3503713.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [26] Eva Hornecker and Jacob Buur. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, April 2006, 437–446. DOI: 10.1145/1124772.1124838.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [27] Qiushi Zhou, Cheng C. Chua, Jarod Knibbe, Jorge Goncalves, and Eduardo Velloso. Dance and Choreography in HCI: A Two-Decade Retrospective. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, May 2021, 1–14. DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445804.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [28] Jean-Philippe Rivière, Sarah F. Alaoui, Baptiste Caramiaux, and Wendy E. Mackay. Capturing Movement Decomposition to Support Learning and Teaching in Contemporary Dance. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., vol. 3, no. CSCW, 86:1-86:22, (November 2019), DOI: 10.1145/3359188.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [29] Manon Vialle, Sarah F. Alaoui, Melina Skouras, Vennila Vilvanathan, Elisabeth Schwartz, and Remi Ronfard. Visualizing Isadora Duncan’s movements qualities. In Creativity and Cognition, New York, NY, USA, (June 2022), 196–207. DOI: 10.1145/3527927.3532805.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [30] Robin Otterbein, Elizabeth Jochum, Daniel Overholt, Shaoping Bai, and Alex Dalsgaard. Dance and Movement-Led Research for Designing and Evaluating Wearable Human-Computer Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Movement and Computing, New York, NY, USA, June 2022, 1–9. DOI: 10.1145/3537972.3537984.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [31] Helena M. Mentis and Carolina Johansson. Seeing movement qualities. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, April 2013, 3375–3384. DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466462.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [32] Lian Loke and Toni Robertson. Moving and making strange: An embodied approach to movement-based interaction design. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 20, no. 1, 7:1-7:25, (April 2013), DOI: 10.1145/2442106.2442113.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [33] Jules Françoise, Sarah Fdili Alaoui, and Yves Candau. CO/DA: Live-Coding Movement-Sound Interactions for Dance Improvisation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, NY, USA, Apri 2022, 1–13. DOI: 10.1145/3491102.3501916.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [34] Cumhur Erkut and Sofia Dahl. Embodied Interaction through Movement in a Course Work. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Movement Computing, New York, NY, USA, June 2017, 1–8. DOI: 10.1145/3077981.3078026.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [35] Barbara Bradby. Performer-audience interaction in live concerts: ritual or conversation? In Musicians and their Audiences, Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
- [36] Lida Theodorou, Patrick G. T. Healey, and Fabrizio Smeraldi. Engaging With Contemporary Dance: What Can Body Movements Tell us About Audience Responses? Front. Psychol., vol. 10, 2019, Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00071Google ScholarCross Ref
- [37] Fereshteh Ghaljaie, Mahin Naderifar, and Hamideh Goli. Snowball Sampling: A Purposeful Method of Sampling in Qualitative Research. Strides Dev. Med. Educ., vol. 14, no. 3, (July 2017), DOI: 10.5812/sdme.67670.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [38] Gery W. Ryan and H. Russell Bernard. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods, vol. 15, no. 1, 85–109, (February 2003), DOI: 10.1177/1525822X02239569.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [39] James P. Spradley. Participant Observation. Waveland Press, 2016.Google Scholar
- [40] Silvia P. Urquijo, Stephen A. R. Scrivener, and Hilary K. Palmén. The Use of Breakdown Analysis in Synchronous CSCW System Design. In Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 13–17 September 1993, Milan, Italy ECSCW ’93, 1993, 281–293. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-2094-4_19.Google ScholarCross Ref
- [41] Milka Trajkova, Francesco Cafaro, and Lynn Dombrowski. Designing for Ballet Classes: Identifying and Mitigating Communication Challenges Between Dancers and Teachers. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference, New York, NY, USA, June 2019, 265–277. DOI: 10.1145/3322276.3322312.Google ScholarDigital Library
- [42] Tianyu He, Xiaoming Chen, Zhibo Chen, Ye Li, Sen Liu, and Junhui Hou and Ying He. Immersive and collaborative Taichi motion learning in various VR environments, (January 2017), 307–308. DOI: 10.1109/VR.2017.7892299.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Stage, Studio and Screen: Reimagining Dance Online
Recommendations
Body and Embodiment in Dance Performance
MOCO '19: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Movement and ComputingIn this paper, we describe the definition of the body being extended by the concepts of other disciplines, such as philosophy, where some define it as decided by the potential of its actions. Inspired by these philosophical ideas of the body, a dance ...
Beat my bass, pluck my drum
DIS Companion '14: Proceedings of the 2014 companion publication on Designing interactive systemsBeating a bass, plucking a drum -- new systems of instruments make it possible. In this paper we describe recent research into networked musical instruments for group improvisation; instruments that reciprocally influence each other's behaviour, making, ...
Comments