skip to main content
10.1145/3534678.3539154acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reinforcement Learning-based Placement of Charging Stations in Urban Road Networks

Published:14 August 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The transition from conventional mobility to electromobility largely depends on charging infrastructure availability and optimal placement. This paper examines the optimal placement of charging stations in urban areas. We maximise the charging infrastructure supply over the area and minimise waiting, travel, and charging times while setting budget constraints. Moreover, we include the possibility of charging vehicles at home to obtain a more refined estimation of the actual charging demand throughout the urban area. We formulate the Placement of Charging Stations problem as a non-linear integer optimisation problem that seeks the optimal positions for charging stations and the optimal number of charging piles of different charging types. We design a novel Deep Reinforcement Learning approach to solve the charging station placement problem (PCRL). Extensive experiments on real-world datasets show how the PCRL reduces the waiting and travel time while increasing the benefit of the charging plan compared to five baselines. Compared to the existing infrastructure, we can reduce the waiting time by up to 97% and increase the benefit up to 497%.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

KDD22-apfp1966.mp4

mp4

73.5 MB

References

  1. 2022. Open Charge Map. Retrieved June 9, 2022 from https://openchargemap.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2022. OpenStreetMap. Retrieved June 9, 2022 from https://openstreetmap.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Sangjun Bae, Inmo Jang, Sébastien Gros, Balázs Kulcsár, and Jonas Hellgren. 2022. A Game Approach for Charging Station Placement Based on User Preferences and Crowdedness. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 23, 4 (2022).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Geoff Boeing. 2017. OSMnx: New Methods for Acquiring, Constructing, Analyzing, and Visualizing Complex Street Networks. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 65 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schulman, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba. 2016. OpenAI Gym. arXiv:1606.01540Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Woongchul Choi. 2020. Placement of Charging Infrastructures for EVs using K-Mean Algorithm and its Validation using Real Usage Data. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 7 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Qiushi Cui, Yang Weng, and Chin-Woo Tan. 2019. Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement Method for Urban Areas. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 10, 6 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bowen Du, Yongxin Tong, Zimu Zhou, Qian Tao, and Wenjun Zhou. 2018. Demand-Aware Charger Planning for Electric Vehicle Sharing. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Xiaoying Gan, Haoxiang Zhang, Gai Hang, Zhida Qin, and Haiming Jin. 2020. Fast-Charging Station Deployment Considering Elastic Demand. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrification 6, 1 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. David L. Greene, Eleftheria Kontou, Brennan Borlaug, Aaron Brooker, and Matteo Muratori. 2020. Public charging infrastructure for plug-in electric vehicles: What is it worth? Transp. Res. D 78 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Timo Krallmann, Martin Doering, Marek Stess, Timo Graen, and Michael Nolting. 2018. Multi-objective optimization of charging infrastructure to improve suitability of commercial drivers for electric vehicles using real travel data. IEEE EAIS) (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chen Liu, Ke Deng, Chaojie Li, Jianxin Li, Yanhua Li, and Jun Luo. 2016. The Optimal Distribution of Electric-Vehicle Chargers across a City. IEEE 16th ICDM (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Qi Liu, Jiahao Liu, Weiwei Le, Zhaoxia Guo, and Zhenggang He. 2019. Datadriven intelligent location of public charging stations for electric vehicles. J. Clean. Prod. 232 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Qiyu Liu, Yuxiang Zeng, Lei Chen, and Xiuwen Zheng. 2019. Social-Aware Optimal Electric Vehicle Charger Deployment on Road Network. Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGSPATIAL (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Xuyao Meng, Weige Zhang, Yan Bao, Yian Yan, Ruiming Yuan, Zhen Chen, and JingXin Li. 2020. Sequential construction planning of electric taxi charging stations considering the development of charging demand. J. Clean. Prod. 259 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu, David Silver, Alex Graves, Ioannis Antonoglou, Daan Wierstra, and Martin Riedmiller. 2013. Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:1312.5602Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Abood Mourad and Martin Hennebel. 2020. The Optimal Deployment of Recharging Stations for Electric Vehicles Based on Mobility Flows and Electric Grid Specifications. IEEE ISGT-Europe (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Antonin Raffin, Ashley Hill, Adam Gleave, Anssi Kanervisto, Maximilian Ernestus, and Noah Dormann. 2021. Stable-Baselines3: Reliable Reinforcement Learning Implementations. J Mach Learn Res 22, 268 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chenxi Sun, Tongxin Li, and Xiaoying Tang. 2021. Data-driven Electric Vehicle Charging Station Placement for Incentivizing Potential Demand. IEEE SmartGridComm (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Felix Tuchnitz, Niklas Ebell, Jonas Schlund, and Marco Pruckner. 2021. Development and Evaluation of a Smart Charging Strategy for an Electric Vehicle Fleet Based on Reinforcement Learning. Appl. Energy 285 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohammad M. Vazifeh, Hongmou Zhang, Paolo Santi, and Carlo Ratti. 2019. Optimizing the deployment of electric vehicle charging stations using pervasive mobility data. Transp. Res. A 121 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Lei Xu, Hasan Ümitcan Yilmaz, Zongfei Wang, Witold-Roger Poganietz, and Patrick Jochem. 2020. Greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles in Europe considering different charging strategies. Transp. Res. D 87 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Li Zeng, Timo Krallmann, Andrea Fiege, Marek Stess, Timo Graen, and Michael Nolting. 2020. Optimization of future charging infrastructure for commercial electric vehicles using a multi-objective genetic algorithm and real travel data. Evol. Syst. 11 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Weijia Zhang, Hao Liu, Fan Wang, Tong Xu, Haoran Xin, Dejing Dou, and Hui Xiong. 2021. Intelligent Electric Vehicle Charging Recommendation Based on Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the WWW (2021).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Zhenli Zhao, Lihui Zhang, Meng Yang, Jianxue Chai, and Songrui Li. 2020. Pricing for private charging pile sharing considering EV consumers based on noncooperative game model. J. Clean. Prod. 254 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Simon Árpád Funke, Frances Sprei, Till Gnann, and Patrick Plötz. 2019. How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Trans. Res. D 77 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reinforcement Learning-based Placement of Charging Stations in Urban Road Networks

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        KDD '22: Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
        August 2022
        5033 pages
        ISBN:9781450393850
        DOI:10.1145/3534678

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 August 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

        Upcoming Conference

        KDD '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader