ABSTRACT
Digital systems for analyzing human communication data have become prevalent in recent years. This may be related to the increasing abundance of data that can be harnessed but can hardly be managed manually. Intelligence analysis of communications data in investigative journalism, criminal intelligence, and law present particularly interesting cases, as they must take into account the often highly sensitive properties of the underlying operations and data. At the same time, these are areas where increasingly automated, sophisticated approaches and tailored systems can be particularly useful and relevant, especially in terms of Big Data manageability. However, by the shifting of responsibilities, this also poses dangers. In addition to privacy concerns, these dangers relate to uncertain or poor data quality, leading to discrimination and potentially misleading insights. Other problems relate to a lack of transparency and traceability, making it difficult to accurately identify problems and determine appropriate remedial strategies.
Visual analytics combines machine learning methods with interactive visual interfaces to enable human sense- and decision-making. This technique can be key for designing and operating meaningful interactive communication analysis systems that consider these ethical challenges. In this interdisciplinary work, a joint endeavor of computer scientists, ethicists, and scholars in Science & Technology Studies, we investigate and evaluate opportunities and risks involved in using Visual analytics approaches for communication analysis in intelligence applications in particular. We introduce, at first, the common technological systems used in communication analysis, with a special focus on intelligence analysis in criminal investigations, further discussing the domain-specific ethical implications, tensions, and risks involved. We then make the case of how tailored Visual Analytics approaches may reduce and mitigate the described problems, both theoretically and through practical examples. Offering interactive analysis capabilities and what-if explorations while facilitating guidance, provenance generation, and bias awareness (through nudges, for example) can improve analysts’ understanding of their data, increasing trustworthiness, accountability, and generating knowledge. We show that finding Visual Analytics design solutions for ethical issues is not a mere optimization task with an ideal final solution. Design solutions for specific ethical problems (e.g., privacy) often trigger new ethical issues (e.g., accountability) in other areas. Balancing out and negotiating these trade-offs has, as we argue, to be an integral aspect of the system design process from the outset. Finally, our work identifies existing gaps and highlights research opportunities, further describing how our results can be transferred to other domains. With this contribution, we aim at informing more ethically-aware approaches to communication analysis in intelligence operations.
- AI Ethics Impact Group. 2020. From Principles to Practice An Interdisciplinary Framework to Operationalise AI Ethics. https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/WKIO_2020_final.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Nikolaos Aletras, Dimitrios Tsarapatsanis, Daniel Preoţiuc-Pietro, and Vasileios Lampos. 2016. Predicting Judicial Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: A Natural Language Processing Perspective. PeerJ Computer Science 2 (2016), e93. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.93Google ScholarCross Ref
- American Civil Liberties Union. 2016. Statement of Concern About Predictive Policing by ACLU and 16 Civil Rights Privacy, Racial Justice, and Technology Organizations. https://www.aclu.org/other/statement-concern-about-predictive-policing-aclu-and-16-civil-rights-privacy-racial-justiceGoogle Scholar
- Morgan G. Ames. 2015. Charismatic Technology. Aarhus Series on Human Centered Computing 1, 1 (2015), 12. https://doi.org/10.7146/aahcc.v1i1.21199Google ScholarDigital Library
- Morgan G. Ames. 2019. The Charisma Machine: The Life, Death, and Legacy of One Laptop per Child. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
- Louise Amoore. 2014. Security and the Claim to Privacy. International political sociology 8, 1 (2014), 108–112. http://dro.dur.ac.uk/14920/Google ScholarCross Ref
- Louise Amoore. 2019. Doubt and the Algorithm: On the Partial Accounts of Machine Learning. Theory, Culture & Society 36, 6 (2019), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419851846Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mike Ananny and Kate Crawford. 2018. Seeing Without Knowing: Limitations of the Transparency Ideal and its Application to Algorithmic Accountability. New Media & Society 20, 3 (2018), 973–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816676645Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florian M. Artinger, Sabrina Artinger, and Gerd Gigerenzer. 2019. C. Y. A.: Frequency and Causes of Defensive Decisions in Public Administration. Business Research 12, 1 (2019), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0074-2Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jef Ausloos. 2012. The ‘Right to be Forgotten’ – Worth remembering?Computer Law & Security Review 28, 2 (2012), 143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.006Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ciano Aydin, Margoth González Woge, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2019. Technological Environmentality: Conceptualizing Technology as a Mediating Milieu. Philosophy & Technology 32, 2 (2019), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-018-0309-3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Karen Barad. 2014. Diffracting Diffraction: Cutting Together-Apart. Parallax 20, 3 (2014), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jascha Bareis and Christian Katzenbach. 2021. Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics. Science, Technology & Human Values(2021), 01622439211030007. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211030007Google ScholarCross Ref
- Solon Barocas, Moritz Hardt, and Arvind Narayanan. 2017. Fairness and Machine Learning. Nips Tutorial 1(2017).Google Scholar
- Eric P.S. Baumer. 2015. Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies of Reflection. In Proceedings of the 33rd CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI), Bo Begole, Jinwoo Kim, Kori Inkpen, and Woontack Woo (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702234Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity, Medford MA.Google Scholar
- Stuart K. Card, Jock D. Mackinlay, and Ben Shneiderman. 1999. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John M. Carrol. 1999. Five Reasons for Scenario-Based Design. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Ralph H. Sprague (Ed.). IEEE Comput. Soc, 11. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1999.772890Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Correll. 2019. Ethical Dimensions of Visualization Research. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Stephen Brewster, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, Anna Cox, and Vassilis Kostakos (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300418Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. MIT Press, New York. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/43542Google ScholarCross Ref
- DataWalk Inc.2020. DataWalk. https://datawalk.com/Google Scholar
- Yves-Alexandre de Montjoye, César A. Hidalgo, Michel Verleysen, and Vincent D. Blondel. 2013. Unique in the Crowd: The Privacy Bounds of Human Mobility. Scientific Reports 3(2013), 1376.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erinç Dikici, Maël Fabien, Jan Horınek, Joshua Hughes, Miroslav Janošik, Marek Kovac, Petr Motlicek, Hoang H. Nguyen, Shantipriya Parida, Johan Rohdin, 2021. ROXSD: A Simulated Dataset of Communication in Organized Crime. ISCA Symposium on Security and Privacy in Speech Communication (2021), 32–36.Google Scholar
- Mennatallah El-Assady, Valentin Gold, Markus John, Thomas Ertl, and Daniel A. Keim. 2016. Visual Text Analytics in Context of Digital Humanities. In 1st IEEE VIS Workshop on Visualization for the Digital Humanities (Vis4DH) as part of the IEEE VIS 2016. https://scibib.dbvis.de/publications/view/686Google Scholar
- Geoffrey Ellis (Ed.). 2018. Cognitive Biases in Visualizations(1st ed. 2018 ed.). Springer International Publishing and Imprint: Springer, Cham.Google Scholar
- Virginia Eubanks. 2018. Automating Inequality: How High-tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor (illustrated edition ed.). St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2021. White Paper on Artificial Intelligence - A European Approach to Excellence and Trust. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0065&from=ENGoogle Scholar
- European Commission. 2021-04-21. Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts (COM/2021/206 final): Artifical Intelligence Act. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52021PC0206Google Scholar
- European Commission. 2021-12-09. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Improving Working Conditions in Platform Work (COM(2021) 762). https://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=24992&langId=enGoogle Scholar
- European Parliament and the European Council. 2016. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the Protection of Natural Persons with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation): GDPR.Google Scholar
- Europol. 2021. European Union Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA): A Corrupting Influence: The Infiltration and Undermining of Europe’s Economy and Society by Organised Crime. https://www.europol.europa.eu/cms/sites/default/files/documents/socta2021_1.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Jeffrey Fagan, Anthony A. Braga, Rod K. Brunson, and April Pattavina. 2016. Stops and Stares: Street Stops, Surveillance, and Race in the New Policing. Fordham Urban Law Journal 43, 3 (2016), 77.Google Scholar
- Maximilian T. Fischer, Devanshu Arya, Dirk Streeb, Daniel Seebacher, Daniel A. Keim, and Marcel Worring. 2020. Visual Analytics for Temporal Hypergraph Model Exploration. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 27, 2(2020), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030408Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maximilian T. Fischer, Frederik Dennig, Daniel Seebacher, Daniel A. Keim, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2021. Communication Analysis through Visual Analytics: Current Practices, Challenges, and New Frontiers. arxiv:2106.14802Google Scholar
- Maximilian T. Fischer, Daniel Seebacher, Rita Sevastjanova, Daniel A. Keim, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2021. CommAID: Visual Analytics for Communication Analysis through Interactive Dynamics Modeling. Computer Graphics Forum 40, 3 (2021), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14286Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sofie Flensburg and Signe Sophus Lai. 2020. Mapping Digital Communication Systems: Infrastructures, Markets, and Policies as Regulatory Forces. Media, Culture & Society 42, 5 (2020), 692–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443719876533Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cortney A. Franklin. 2005. Male Peer Support and the Police Culture. Women & Criminal Justice 16, 3 (2005), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1300/J012v16n03_01Google ScholarCross Ref
- William J. Frawley, Gregory Piatetsky-Shapiro, and Christopher J. Matheus. 1992. Knowledge Discovery in Databases: An Overview. AI Magazine 13, 3 (1992), 57. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v13i3.1011Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johannes Fuchs, Petra Isenberg, Anastasia Bezerianos, and Daniel A. Keim. 2017. A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies on Data Glyphs. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23, 7(2017), 1863–1879. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2549018Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander R. Galloway. 2012. The Interface Effect. Wiley.Google Scholar
- Clare Garvie and Jonathan Frankle. 2016. Facial-Recognition Software Might Have a Racial Bias Problem. The Atlantic (2016). https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2016/04/the-underlying-bias-of-facial-recognition-systems/476991/Google Scholar
- Lisa Gitelman. 2013. Raw Data is an Oxymoron. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
- Ben Green. 2018. Putting the J(ustice) in FAT. https://medium.com/berkman-klein-center/putting-the-j-ustice-in-fat-28da2b8eae6dGoogle Scholar
- Rachid Hadjidj, Mourad Debbabi, Hakim Lounis, Farkhund Iqbal, Adam Szporer, and Djamel Benredjem. 2009. Towards an Integrated E-mail Forensic Analysis Framework. Digital Investigation 5, 3-4 (2009), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diin.2009.01.004Google ScholarDigital Library
- Donna J. Haraway. 2017. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Experimental Futures (illustrated edition ed.). Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Paula Helm and Thilo Hagendorff. 2021. Beyond the Prediction Paradigm: Challenges for AI in the Struggle Against Organized Crime. Law and Contemporary Problems 84, 3 (2021), 1–17.Google Scholar
- Kathryn Henderson. 1991. Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering. Science, Technology & Human Values 16, 4 (1991), 448–473. http://sth.sagepub.com/content/16/4/448.shortGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Matthew Honnibal. 2019. SpaCy: An NLP library. https://www.spacy.ioGoogle Scholar
- Chris Jay Hoofnagle, Bart van der Sloot, and Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius. 2018. The European Union General Data Protection Regulation: What it is and What it Means. Information & Communications Technology Law 28, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2019.1573501Google ScholarCross Ref
- Branden Hookway. 2014. Interface. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- IBM. 2020. i2 Analyst’s Notebook. https://www.ibm.com/us-en/marketplace/analysts-notebookGoogle Scholar
- Sheila Jasanoff. 2015. Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In Dreamscapes of Modernity. University of Chicago Press, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226276663-001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wolfgang Jentner, Rita Sevastjanova, Florian Stoffel, Daniel A. Keim, Jürgen Bernard, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2018. Minions, Sheep, and Fruits : Metaphorical Narratives to Explain Artificial Intelligence and Build Trust. In Workshop on Visualization for AI Explainability at IEEE. https://bib.dbvis.de/uploadedFiles/minionssheepfruits.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Elizabeth E. Joh. 2017. Feeding the Machine: Policing Crime Data & Algorithms. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 26 (2017), 287.Google Scholar
- Samuel Kaski and Jaakko Peltonen. 2011. Dimensionality Reduction for Data Visualization. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 28, 2 (2011), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2010.940003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mareile Kaufmann, Simon Egbert, and Matthias Leese. 2018. Predictive Policing and the Politics of Patterns. The British Journal of Criminology 59, 3 (2018), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azy060Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel A. Keim, Gennady Andrienko, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Carsten Görg, Jörn Kohlhammer, and Guy Melançon. 2008. Visual Analytics: Definition, Process, and Challenges. In Information Visualization, Andreas Kerren (Ed.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4950. Springer, 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70956-5-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel A. Keim, Jörn Kohlhammer, Geoffrey P. Ellis, and Florian Mansmann. 2010. Mastering the Information Age Solving Problems with Visual Analytics. Eurographics Association.Google Scholar
- Stefanie Kemme, Iniobong Essien, and Marleen Stelter. 2020. Antimuslimische Einstellungen in der Polizei?: Der Zusammenhang von Kontakthäufigkeit und -qualität mit Vorurteilen und Stereotypen gegenüber Muslimen. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform 103, 2(2020), 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1515/mks-2020-2048Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye Jr. 1998. Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs 77(1998), 81.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rob Kitchin. 2017. Thinking Critically About and Researching Algorithms. Information, Communication & Society 20, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Kosara and Jock Mackinlay. 2013. Storytelling: The Next Step for Visualization. Computer 46, 5 (2013), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2013.36Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keita Kurita, Paul Michel, and Graham Neubig. 2020. Weight Poisoning Attacks on Pretrained Models. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Dan Jurafsky, Joyce Chai, Natalie Schluter, and Joel Tetreault (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg, PA, USA, 2793–2806. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.249Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeff Larson and Julia Angwin. 2016. Technical Response to Northpointe. ProPublica (2016). https://www.propublica.org/article/technical-response-to-northpointeGoogle Scholar
- Bruno Lepri, Nuria Oliver, Emmanuel Letouzé, Alex Pentland, and Patrick Vinck. 2018. Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-making Processes: The Premise, the Proposed Solutions, and the Open Challenges. Philosophy & Technology 31, 4 (2018), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0279-xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin Lipp. 2017. Analytik des Interfacing. Zur Materialität technologischer Verschaltung in prototypischen Milieus robotisierter Pflege. 1866-2447 10(2017), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.6094/behemoth.2017.10.1.948Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin Lipp, Paula Helm, Athanasios Karafillidis, and Roser Pujadas. 2022. Theorising Interfaces / Interface Theories. In EASST 2022.Google Scholar
- Yang Liu, Tim Althoff, and Jeffrey Heer. 2020. Paths Explored, Paths Omitted, Paths Obscured: Decision Points & Selective Reporting in End-to-End Data Analysis. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Regina Bernhaupt, Florian ’Floyd’ Mueller, David Verweij, Josh Andres, Joanna McGrenere, Andy Cockburn, Ignacio Avellino, Alix Goguey, Pernille Bjørn, Shengdong Zhao, Briane Paul Samson, and Rafal Kocielnik (Eds.). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376533Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kristian Lum and William Isaac. 2016. To Predict and Serve?Significance 13, 5 (2016), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00960.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Adrian Mackenzie. 2015. The Production of Prediction: What Does Machine Learning Want?European Journal of Cultural Studies 18, 4/5 (2015), 429–445.Google Scholar
- Kevin Macnish. 2018. The Ethics of Surveillance: An Introduction. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, London and New York.Google Scholar
- Christopher D. Manning and Hinrich Schütze. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. and London.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big Data: Die Revolution, die unser Leben verändern wird (1. ed ed.). Redline-Verlag, München.Google Scholar
- Ninareh Mehrabi, Fred Morstatter, Nripsuta Saxena, Kristina Lerman, and Aram Galstyan. 2021. A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys 54, 6 (2021), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob Metcalf and Kate Crawford. 2016. Where are Human Subjects in Big Data Research? The Emerging Ethics Divide. Big Data & Society 3, 1 (2016), 2053951716650211. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christoph Molnar. 2019. Interpretable Machine Learning: A Guide for Making Black Box Models Interpretable. Lulu, Morisville, North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Anouk Mols and Susanne Janssen. 2017. Not Interesting Enough to be Followed by the NSA. Digital Journalism 5, 3 (2017), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1234938Google ScholarCross Ref
- Helen Nissenbaum. 1994. Computing and accountability. Communications of the ACM 37, 1 (1994), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1145/175222.175228Google ScholarDigital Library
- Safiya Umoja Noble. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
- Nuix Pty Ltd. 2020. Nuix Discover and Nuix Investigate. https://www.nuix.com/productsGoogle Scholar
- Cathy O’Neil. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (1st edition ed.). Penguin Books UK.Google Scholar
- Palantir Technologies, Inc.2020. Gotham. https://www.palantir.com/palantir-gotham/Google Scholar
- Letizia Paoli. 2002. The Paradoxes of Organized Crime. Crime, Law and Social Change 37, 1 (2002), 51–97. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013355122531Google ScholarCross Ref
- Frank Pasquale. 2015. The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Judy C. Pearson. 2011. Human Communication(4th ed.). McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
- E. Ashby Plant and B. Michelle Peruche. 2005. The Consequences of Race for Police Officers’ Responses to Criminal Suspects. Psychological Science 16, 3 (2005), 180–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00800.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Roser Pujadas, Erika Valderrama, and Will Venters. 2020. Interfaces and the Dynamics of Digital Ecosystems: A Study of the Online Travel Ecosystem. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (2020).Google Scholar
- Cynthia Rudin. 2019. Stop Explaining Black Box Machine Learning Models for High Stakes Decisions and Use Interpretable Models Instead. Nature Machine Intelligence 1, 5 (2019), 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Dominik Sacha, Andreas Stoffel, Florian Stoffel, Bum Chul Kwon, Geoffrey P. Ellis, and Daniel A. Keim. 2014. Knowledge Generation Model for Visual Analytics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 12(2014), 1604–1613. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346481Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Sailer, Jan Hense, J Mandl, and Markus Klevers. 2014. Psychological perspectives on motivation through gamification. Interaction Design and Architecture Journal19 (2014), 28–37.Google Scholar
- Carlos Alberto Scolari. 2009. Mapping Conversations About New Media: The Theoretical Field of Digital Communication. New Media & Society 11, 6 (2009), 943–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336513Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Scott. 2017. Social Network Analysis(4th ed.). SAGE, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Daniel Seebacher, Maximilian T. Fischer, Rita Sevastjanova, Daniel A. Keim, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2019. Visual Analytics of Conversational Dynamics. In EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics (EuroVA)(EuroVA), Tatiana von Landesberger and Cagatay Turkay (Eds.). The Eurographics Association, Porto, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.2312/eurova.20191130Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrew D. Selbst. 2018. Disparate Impact in Big Data Policing. Georgia Law Review 52, 1 (2018), 3373.Google Scholar
- Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing Between Sense and Sensibility - CC ’05. ACM Press, Aarhus, Denmark, 49. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabian Sperrle, Astrik Jeitler, Jürgen Bernard, Daniel Keim, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2021. Co-Adaptive Visual Data Analysis and Guidance Processes. Computers & Graphics 100 (2021), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2021.06.016Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabian Sperrle, Astrik Jeitler, Jürgen Bernard, Daniel A. Keim, and Mennatallah El-Assady. 2020. Learning and Teaching in Co-Adaptive Guidance for Mixed-Initiative Visual Analytics. In EuroVis Workshop on Visual Analytics (EuroVA), Cagatay Turkay and Katerina Vrotsou (Eds.). https://doi.org/10.2312/eurova.20201088Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matthias Spielkamp. 2017. Inspecting Algorithms for Bias. MIT Technology Review(2017). https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/06/12/105804/inspecting-algorithms-for-bias/Google Scholar
- Florian Stoffel, Wolfgang Jentner, Michael Behrisch, Johannes Fuch, and Daniel A. Keim. 2017. Interactive Ambiguity Resolution of Named Entities in Fictional Literature. Computer Graphics Forum 36, 3 (2017), 189–200.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucille Alice Suchman. 2007. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Wouter van Atteveldt and Tai-Quan Peng. 2018. When Communication Meets Computation: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pitfalls in Computational Communication Science. Communication Methods and Measures 12, 2-3 (2018), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily Wall, John Stasko, and Alex Endert. 2019. Toward a Design Space for Mitigating Cognitive Bias in Vis. In 2019 IEEE Visualization Conference (VIS). IEEE, 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2019.8933611Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gregor Wiedemann, Seid Muhie Yimam, and Chris Biemann. 2018. New/s/leak 2.0 – Multilingual Information Extraction and Visualization for Investigative Journalism. In Social Informatics, Steffen Staab, Olessia Koltsova, and Dmitry I. Ignatov (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 11186. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01159-8_30Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tal Zarsky. 2016. The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making. Science, Technology & Human Values 41, 1 (2016), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Promoting Ethical Awareness in Communication Analysis: Investigating Potentials and Limits of Visual Analytics for Intelligence Applications
Recommendations
Visual Analytics Support for Intelligence Analysis
Intelligence analysts must explore and evaluate volumes of data, from narrative recordings of field agents to open source news articles. Insights from visual analytics projects and a hypothetical scenario show the potential of visual analytics to aid ...
Characterizing the intelligence analysis process through a longitudinal field study: implications for visual analytics
While intelligence analysis has been a primary target domain for visual analytics system development, relatively little user and task analysis has been conducted within this area. Our research community's understanding of the work processes and ...
Ethical norms for technical communication: Plato, Aristotle, and Clark's “rhetorical perspective”
In his "Ethics in Technical Communication: A Rhetorical Perspective," Gregory Clark argues convincingly that academicians and practitioners proceed from diametrically opposed assumptions in discussing ethics in the context of technical communication. ...
Comments