skip to main content
10.1145/3529190.3529220acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Leveraging Submovements for Prediction and Trajectory Planning for Human-Robot Handover

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 July 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The effectiveness of human-robot interactions critically depends on the success of computational efforts to emulate human inference of intent, anticipation of action, and coordination of movement. To this end, we developed two models that leverage a well described feature of human movement: Gaussian-shaped submovements in velocity profiles, to act as robotic surrogates for human inference and trajectory planning in a handover task. We evaluated both models based on how early in a handover movement the inference model can obtain accurate estimates of handover location and timing, and how similar model trajectories are to human receiver trajectories. Initial results using one participant dyad demonstrate that our inference model can accurately predict location and handover timing, while the trajectory planner can use these predictions to provide a human-like trajectory plan for the robot. This approach delivers promising performance while remaining grounded in physiologically meaningful Gaussian-shaped velocity profiles of human motion.

References

  1. Arash Ajoudani, Andrea Maria Zanchettin, Serena Ivaldi, Alin Albu-Schäffer, Kazuhiro Kosuge, and Oussama Khatib. 2018. Progress and prospects of the human–robot collaboration. Autonomous Robots 42, 5 (2018), 957–975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Marco Costanzo, Giuseppe De Maria, and Ciro Natale. 2021. Handover Control for Human-Robot and Robot-Robot Collaboration. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8 (2021), 132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Auke Jan Ijspeert, Jun Nakanishi, and Stefan Schaal. 2002. Movement imitation with nonlinear dynamical systems in humanoid robots. In Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 02CH37292), Vol. 2. IEEE, 1398–1403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Hermano Igo Krebs, Mindy L. Aisen, Bruce T. Volpe, and Neville Hogan. 1999. Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96, 8 (1999), 4645–4649. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.8.4645 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/content/96/8/4645.full.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Muriel Lang, Satoshi Endo, Oliver Dunkley, and Sandra Hirche. 2017. Object handover prediction using gaussian processes clustered with trajectory classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.02745(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alberto Leardini, Fabio Biagi, Andrea Merlo, Claudio Belvedere, and Maria Grazia Benedetti. 2011. Multi-segment trunk kinematics during locomotion and elementary exercises. Clinical Biomechanics 26, 6 (2011), 562–571.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ester Martinez-Martin and Angel P del Pobil. 2018. Personal robot assistants for elderly care: an overview. Personal assistants: Emerging computational technologies (2018), 77–91.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jan Peters and Stefan Schaal. 2008. Reinforcement learning of motor skills with policy gradients. Neural networks 21, 4 (2008), 682–697.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stefan Schaal. 2006. Dynamic Movement Primitives -A Framework for Motor Control in Humans and Humanoid Robotics. Springer Tokyo, Tokyo, 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/4-431-31381-8_23Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kyle Strabala, Min Kyung Lee, Anca Dragan, Jodi Forlizzi, Siddhartha S Srinivasa, Maya Cakmak, and Vincenzo Micelli. 2013. Toward seamless human-robot handovers. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 2, 1 (2013), 112–132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Holger Urbanek, A Albu-Schaffer, and Patrick van der Smagt. 2004. Learning from demonstration: repetitive movements for autonomous service robotics. In 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), Vol. 4. IEEE, 3495–3500.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. K. I. Williams and C. E. Rasmussen. 2006. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Vol. 2. MIT press Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Daniel M Wolpert, Jörn Diedrichsen, and J Randall Flanagan. 2011. Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12, 12 (2011), 739–751.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Wei Yang, Chris Paxton, Maya Cakmak, and Dieter Fox. 2020. Human grasp classification for reactive human-to-robot handovers. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 11123–11130.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PETRA '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments
    June 2022
    704 pages
    ISBN:9781450396318
    DOI:10.1145/3529190

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 11 July 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format