skip to main content
10.1145/3504006.3504020acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmisncConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Online Review Comments affecting Purchase Intention: A Pilot Study.

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of COVID-19 since the end of 2019 has led many people to work for home, reducing economic activity in many countries except online shopping, which is thriving during the pandemic. However, shopping is not take-and-go activity,as it needs references to help make the decision. Buying goods online is not as convenient as buying at physical stores where the customers can check the actual state of goods, obtain recommendations from the clerks or compare it with other similar goods. All these physical activities are persuasions. However, the main references for buying online are online third-party comments and brand image. People noticed the comments online, whether positive or negative about the product. Consumers write comments on the Internet according to their different impressions on the brands. Therefore, how the brand image and online comments affect persuasion is worthy of study. This pilot study thus takes the purchase of mobile phones as an example to explore the factors of people's evaluation of comments and brand image. The analytical results of exploratory factor analysis show that the questionnaire design is suitable. The formal study can take these research results as a reference.

References

  1. [1] Fu, H., Manogaran, G., Wu, K., Cao, M., Jiang, S., & Yang, A. (2020). Intelligent decision-making of online shopping behavior based on internet of things. International Journal of Information Management, 50, 515-525.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. [2] Mukherjee, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2012). Wikisent: Weakly supervised sentiment analysis through extractive summarization with wikipedia. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases (pp. 774-793). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. [3] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Vazquez, E. E. (2021). Effect of an e-retailer's product category and social media platform selection on perceived quality of e-retail products. Electronic Markets, 31(1), 139-157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. [5] Tsao, W.C. and Hsieh, M.T. (2012), “Exploring how relationship quality influences positive e-WOM: the importance of customer commitment”, Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, Vol. 23 Nos 7/8, pp. 821-835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. [6] Oraedu, C., Izogo, E. E., Nnabuko, J., & Ogba, I. E. (2020). Understanding electronic and face-to-face word-of-mouth influencers: an emerging market perspective. Management Research Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. [7] Isabella, G., & Vieira, V. A. (2020). The effect of facial expression on emotional contagion and product evaluation in print advertising. RAUSP Management Journal, 55, 375-391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. [8] Che, H. L., Miin, J., Li, C. H., & Kuo, L. W. (2015). Online hotel booking: The effects of brand image, price, trust, value, on purchase intentions. Asia Pacific Management Review, 20, 1-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. [9] Pang, B., Lee, L., & Vaithyanathan, S. (2002). Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. arXiv preprint cs/0205070.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Hsieh, M. H., Pan, S. L., & Setiono, R. (2004). Product-, corporate-, and country-image dimensions and purchase behavior: A multicountry analysis. Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, 32(3), 251-270.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Fishbein, M., & Aszen, I.(1975). Beliefs, attitudes, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. [12] Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Baker, J., Levy, M., & Grewal, D. (1992). An experimental approach to making retail store environmental decisions. Journal of retailing, 68(4), 445.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Desmet, P. M. A. (2002). Designing emotions (Doctoral dissertation). Technical University of Delft, Industrial Design Engineering, Delft.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Loudon, D. L. & Bitta, A. J. (1988). Marketing strategy: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Marketing, 47(2), 12 - 25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] Romaniuk, J., & Sharp, B. (2003). Measuring brand perceptions: Testing quantity and quality. Journal of targeting, measurement and analysis for marketing, 11(3), 218-229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    MISNC '21: Proceedings of the 8th Multidisciplinary International Social Networks Conference
    November 2021
    94 pages
    ISBN:9781450396011
    DOI:10.1145/3504006

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate57of97submissions,59%
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format