ABSTRACT
Broadening participation in computer science (CS) for primary/elementary students is a growing movement, spurred by computing workforce demands and the need for younger students to develop skills in problem solving and critical/computational thinking. However, offering computer science instruction at this level is directly related to the availability of teachers prepared to teach the subject. Unfortunately, there are relatively few primary/elementary school teachers who have received formal training in computer science, and they often self-report a lack of CS subject matter expertise. Teacher development is a key factor to address these issues, and this paper describes professional development strategies and empirical impacts of a summer institute that included two graduate courses and a series of Saturday workshops during the subsequent academic year. Key elements included teaching a high-level programing language (Python and JavaScript), integrating CS content and pedagogy instruction, and involving both experienced K-12 CS teachers and University faculty as instructors. Empirical results showed that this carefully structured PD that incorporated evidence-based elements of sufficient duration, teacher active learning and collaboration, modeling, practice, and feedback can successfully impact teacher outcomes. Results showed significant gains in teacher CS knowledge (both pedagogy and content), self-efficacy, and perception of CS value. Moderating results -- examining possible differential effects depending on teacher gender, years of teaching CS, and geographic locale -- showed that the PD was successful with experienced and less experienced teachers, with teachers from both rural and urban locales, and with both males and females.
- Harry P Bahrick. 1984. Semantic memory content in permastore: fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113, 1 (1984), 1.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Albert Bandura. 1977. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84, 2 (1977), 191. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033--295X.84.2.191Google ScholarCross Ref
- Albert Bandura. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Paulo Blikstein and Sepi Hejazi Moghadam. 2018. Pre-college computer science education: A survey of the field. (2018). https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/pre-college-computer-science-education-report.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Code.org, CSTA, and ECEP Alliance. 2020. 2020 state of computer science education: Illuminating disparities. https://advocacy.code.org/2020_state_of_cs.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Quintin Cutts, Judy Robertson, Peter Donaldson, and Laurie O'Donnell. 2017. An evaluation of a professional learning network for computer science teachers. Computer Science Education 27, 1 (2017), 30--53. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2017.1315958Google ScholarCross Ref
- Linda Darling-Hammond, Ruth Chung Wei, Alethea Andree, Nikole Richardson, and Stelios Orphanos. 2009. Professional learning in the learning profession. Washington, DC: National Staff Development Council 12 (2009). http://www.learningforward.org/docs/pdf/nsdcstudy2009.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Brian Dorn and Allison Elliott Tew. 2015. Empirical validation and application of the computing attitudes survey. Computer Science Education 25, 1 (2015), 1--36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1014142Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael S Garet, Andrew C Porter, Laura Desimone, Beatrice F Birman, and Kwang Suk Yoon. 2001. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal 38, 4 (2001), 915--945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915Google ScholarCross Ref
- Google and Gallup. 2016. Computer Science Learning: Closing the Gap: Girls. https://services.google.com/fh/files/misc/computer-science-learning-closing-the-gap-girls-brief.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Google and Gallup. 2017. Computer Science Learning: Closing the Gap: Rural and Small-Town Districts. https://goo.gl/hYxqCrGoogle Scholar
- Shuchi Grover, Roy Pea, and Stephen Cooper. 2015. Designing for deeper learning in a blended computer science course for middle school students. Computer science education 25, 2 (2015), 199--237. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1033142Google Scholar
- Halil Ibrahim Haseski and Ilic Ulas. 2019. An investigation of the data collection instruments developed to measure computational thinking. Informatics in Education 18, 2 (2019), 297--319. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2019.14Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emily Hestness, Diane Jass Ketelhut, J Randy McGinnis, and Jandelyn Plane. 2018. Professional knowledge building within an elementary teacher pro-fessional development experience on computational thinking in science ed-ucation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 26, 3 (2018), 411--435. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181431/Google Scholar
- White House. 2016. FACT SHEET/ A Year of Action Supporting CS for All. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/05/fact-sheet-year-action-supporting-computer-science-allGoogle Scholar
- Erdogan Kaya, Ezgi Yesilyurt, Anna Newley, and Hasan Deniz. 2019. Examining the impact of a computational thinking intervention on pre-service elementary science teachers' computational thinking teaching efficacy beliefs, interest and confidence. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 38, 4 (2019), 385--392.Google Scholar
- Jiyoung Kim, Joshua Childs, Anne Leftwich, Kendra Montejos Edwards, Carol L Fletcher, and Katie Hendrickson. 2021. Landscape of Computer Science Teacher Qualification Pathway. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 1299--1299. https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/10.1145/3408877.3439635Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siu-Cheung Kong, Ming Lai, and Daner Sun. 2020. Teacher development in computational thinking: Design and learning outcomes of programming concepts, practices and pedagogy. Computers & Education 151 (2020), 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103872Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonia Koshy, Alexis Martin, Laura Hinton, Allison Scott, Bryan Twarek, and Kalisha Davis. 2021. The computer science teacher landscape: Results of a nationwide teacher survey. Retrieved (May 23, 2021) from https://csteachers. org/page/cs-teacher-landscape (2021). https://www.kaporcenter.org/the-computer-science-teacher-landscape-results-of-a-nationwide-teacher-surveyGoogle Scholar
- Susan Loucks-Horsley, Katherine E Stiles, Susan Mundry, Nancy Love, and Peter W Hewson. 2009. Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Corwin press, Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
- Allison Master, Sapna Cheryan, and Andrew N Meltzoff. 2016. Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls' interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of educational psychology 108, 3 (2016), 424. https://psycnet.apa.org/manuscript/2015--37516-001.pdfGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Lowell Matthews Jr and Pat Yongpradit. 2019. Addressing America's Growing Demand for Information Technology and Computer Science: The Case for Change in K-12 Education. Foundation for Excellence in Education (2019). https://www.excelined.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ExcelinEdCode.AddressingAmericasGrowingDemandforITandCS.TheCaseforChangeinK12Ed.June2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Microsoft. 2018. It's Computer Science Education Week, and we're here to help you make it great! https://blogs.microsoft.com/latinx/2018/12/05/its-computer-science-education-week-and-were-here-to-help-you-make-it-great/Google Scholar
- Lee Dee Miller, Leen-Kiat Soh, and Markeya S Peteranetz. 2019. Investigating the Impact of Group Size on Non-Programming Exercises in CS Education Courses. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Minneapolis,MN,USA, 22--28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287400Google ScholarDigital Library
- NCCWIT. 2019. Bridging the Encouragement Gap in Computing. https://ncwit.org/resource/practicingencouragement/Google Scholar
- Lijun Ni, Gillian Bausch, and Rebecca Benjamin. 2021. Computer science teacher professional development and professional learning communities: a review of the research literature. Computer Science Education (2021), 1--32. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021.1993666LGoogle Scholar
- Lijun Ni, Mark Guzdial, Allison Elliott Tew, Briana Morrison, and Ria Galanos. 2011. Building a community to support HS CS teachers: the disciplinary commons for computing educators. In Proceedings of the 42nd ACM technical symposium on Computer science education. 553--558. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2021. 1993666Google ScholarCross Ref
- V Darleen Opfer and David Pedder. 2011. Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research 81, 3 (2011), 376--407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markeya S Peteranetz and Anthony D Albano. 2020. Development and evaluation of the Nebraska Assessment of Computing Knowledge. Frontiers in Computer Science 2 (2020), 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.00011Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markeya S Peteranetz, Abraham E Flanigan, Duane F Shell, and Leen-Kiat Soh. 2018. Helping engineering students learn in introductory computer science (CS1) using computational creativity exercises (CCEs). IEEE Transactions on Education 61, 3 (2018), 195--203.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markeya S Peteranetz, Patrick M Morrow, and Leen-Kiat Soh. 2020. Develop-ment and validation of the computational thinking concepts and skills test. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Portland,OR,USA, 926--932. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366813Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert C Pianta. 2005. A new elementary school for American children. SRCD Social Policy Report 19 (2005), 4--5.Google Scholar
- Paul R Pintrich, David AF Smith, Teresa Garcia, and Wilbert J McKeachie. 1993. Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Ques-tionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement 53, 3 (1993), 801--813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024Google ScholarCross Ref
- Stephen W Raudenbush and Anthony S Bryk. 2002. Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Vol. 2. sage, London,England.Google Scholar
- Kathryn Rich, Carla Strickland, and Diana Franklin. 2017. A literature review through the lens of computer science learning goals theorized and explored in research. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. Seattle, WA, 495--500. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3017772Google ScholarDigital Library
- Peter J Rich, Stacie L Mason, and Jared O'Leary. 2021. Measuring the effect of continuous professional development on elementary teachers' self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking. Computers & Education 168 (2021), 104--196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104196Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean Ryoo, Joanna Goode, and Jane Margolis. 2015. It takes a village: Supporting inquiry-and equity-oriented computer science pedagogy through a professional learning community. Computer Science Education 25, 4 (2015), 351--370. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2015.1130952Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Schwarzhaupt, Joseph Wilson, Fanny Lee, and Melissa Raspberry. 2021. Teachers' engagement and self-efficacy in a PK--12 computer science teacher virtual community of practice. Journal of Computer Science Integration (2021). https://doi.org/10.26716/jcsi.2021.10.8.34Google Scholar
- U.N. Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2017. Cracking the code: Girls' and women's education in science, technology, engineering and mathe-matics (STEM). https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479Google Scholar
- Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 62, 318 (1967), 626--633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1967.10482935Google Scholar
- Jim Stanton, Lynn Goldsmith, Richards W Adrion, Sarah Dunton, Katie A Hen-drickson, Alan Peterfreund, Pat Yongpradit, Rebecca Zarch, and Jennifer D Zinth. 2017. Landscape Report: State-Level Policies Supporting Equitable K-12 Com-puter Science Education. https://www.edc.org/sites/default/files/uploads/State-States-Landscape-Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Jennifer Wang, Hai Hong, Jason Ravitz, and Sepehr Hejazi Moghadam. 2016. Landscape of K-12 computer science education in the US: Perceptions, access, and barriers. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education. Memphis, TN, USA, 645--650. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844628Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ruth Chung Wei, Linda Darling-Hammond, and Frank Adamson. 2010. Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges. (2010). https://edpolicy.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/professional-development-united-states-trends-and challenges.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Aman Yadav, Sarah Gretter, Jon Good, and Tamika McLean. 2017. Computational thinking in teacher education. In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking. Springer, 205--220.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Developing K-8 Computer Science Teachers' Content Knowledge, Self-efficacy, and Attitudes through Evidence-based Professional Development
Recommendations
Industry partnerships to support computer science high school teachers' pedagogical content knowledge
SIGITE '14: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference on Information technology educationThere is a critical need for computer scientists in the new digital age, a need that is not being met largely due to a lack of qualified computing teachers in K-12. In this project, we explore a three- year, on-the-job teacher preparation program (TEALS)...
Promoting the AI teaching competency of K-12 computer science teachers: A TPACK-based professional development approach
AbstractWith the rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI), the demand for K-12 computer science (CS) education continues to grow. However, there has long been a lack of trained CS teachers. To promote the AI teaching competency of CS teachers, a ...
Comments