skip to main content
10.1145/3502060.3503662acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesbecbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigating the impact of CoViD-19 on the activities of a Department of General Medicine

Authors Info & Claims
Published:14 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

CoViD-19 has placed the health systems of many countries in further crisis. The elective surgeries were canceled and the staff of several departments, including general medicine, underwent a reallocation to deal with the health emergency. In a context of economic fragility, in recent years the use of indicators for measuring health quality and performance has acquired more and more importance. Access limited only to emergency-urgency cases within hospitals has however produced a benefit in improving the appropriateness of admissions. In this study the value of parameter sets obtained in year 2019 (pre-pandemic) and year 2020 (during the pandemic), including Length of Stay and Diagnostic Related Group (DRG) Weight, of the Department of General Medicine of the University Hospital of Salerno 'San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona' in Salerno (Italy) were compared using statistical analysis and logistic regression. The statistical analysis shows an increase in the DRG Weight in 2020, so an increase of the complexity of the cases treated and a greater appropriateness of hospitalizations.

References

  1. Givi B, Schiff BA, Chinn SB, Safety Recommendations for Evaluation and Surgery of the Head and Neck During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;146(6):579–584. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0780Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Uyaroğlu, O.A., Başaran, N.Ç., Ozisik, L., Karahan, S., Tanriover, M.D., Guven, G.S. and Oz, S.G. (2020), Evaluation of the effect of COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety severity of physicians working in the internal medicine department of a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional survey. Intern Med J, 50: 1350-1358. https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.14981Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Smith P. Part 1: Principles of performance measurement. In: Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges and prospects. Copenahgen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. WHO Regional Office for Europe. The Tallinn charter: health systems for health and wealth. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mainz J. Developing evidence-based clinical indicators: a state of the art methods primer. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:5i–11.doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg084pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14660518Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:523–30.doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzg081pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14660535Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Boerma T, AbouZahr C, Evans D, Monitoring intervention coverage in the context of universal health coverage. PLoS Med 2014;11:e1001728. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001728pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25243586Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McGlynn EA. The outcomes utility index: will outcomes data tell us what we want to know? Int J Qual Health Care 1998;10:485–90.doi:10.1093/intqhc/10.6.485pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9928587Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. de Koning J, Burgers J, Klazinga N. Appraisal of indicators through research and evaluation (AIRE). Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitch K. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cesarelli, G., Montella, E., Scala, A., Raiola, E., Triassi, M., & Improta, G. (2020, November). DMAIC Approach for the Reduction of Healthcare-Associated Infections in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the University Hospital of Naples ‘Federico II’. In European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (pp. 414-423). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ponsiglione A M, Ricciardi C, Improta G, Orabona G D, Sorrentino A, Amato F and Romano M 2021 A Six Sigma DMAIC methodology as a support tool for Health Technology Assessment of two antibiotics Math. Biosci. Eng. 18 3469–90Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Latessa I, Fiorillo A, Picone I, Balato G, Trunfio T A, Scala A and Triassi M 2021 Implementing fast track surgery in hip and knee arthroplasty using the lean Six Sigma methodology TQM J. 33 131–47Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Cesarelli, G., Scala, A., Vecchione, D., Ponsiglione, A. M., & Guizzi, G. (2021, February). An Innovative Business Model for a Multi-echelon Supply Chain Inventory Management Pattern. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1828, No. 1, p. 012082). IOP Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Improta, G., Luciano, M. A., Vecchione, D., Cesarelli, G., Rossano, L., Santalucia, I., & Triassi, M. (2020, November). Management of the Diabetic Patient in the Diagnostic Care Pathway. In European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (pp. 784-792). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Improta, G., Ponsiglione, A. M., Parente, G., Romano, M., Cesarelli, G., Rea, T., ... & Triassi, M. (2020, November). Evaluation of Medical Training Courses Satisfaction: Qualitative Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process. In European Medical and Biological Engineering Conference (pp. 518-526). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Improta, G., Converso, G., Murino, T., Gallo, M., Perrone, A., & Romano, M. (2019). Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in dynamic configuration as a tool for Health Technology Assessment (HTA): the case of biosensing optoelectronics in Oncology. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), 18(05), 1533-1550Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Improta, G., Simone, T., & Bracale, M. (2009). HTA (Health Technology Assessment): a means to reach governance goals and to guide health politics on the topic of clinical Risk management. Proceedings of the 11th World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering (IUPESM 2009), Munich, Germany, September 7-12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Ricciardi, C., Gubitosi, A., Lanzano, G., Parisi, S., Grella, E., Ruggiero, R., ... & Improta, G. (2021). Health Technology Assessment Through the Six Sigma Approach in Abdominoplasty: Scalpel vs Electrosurgery. Medical Engineering & PhysicsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Quentin W. Measuring healthcare quality. In: Busse R, ed. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. WHO and OECD: Copenhagen, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Damberg CL, Sorbero ME, Lovejoy SL, An evaluation of the use of performance measures in health care. Rand Health Q 2012;1:3.pmid:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28083210Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Improta, G., Ricciardi, C., Cesarelli, G., D'Addio, G., Bifulco, P., & Cesarelli, M. (2020). Machine learning models for the prediction of acuity and variability of eye-positioning using features extracted from oculography. Health and Technology, 10(4), 961-968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Improta, G., Mazzella, V., Vecchione, D., Santini, S., & Triassi, M. (2020). Fuzzy logic–based clinical decision support system for the evaluation of renal function in post‐Transplant Patients. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 26(4), 1224-1234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Giovanni, Improta “Health worker monitoring: Kalman-based software design for fault isolation in human breathing.” (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ricciardi, C., Ponsiglione, A. M., Converso, G., Santalucia, I., Triassi, M., & Improta, G. (2020). Implementation and validation of a new method to model voluntary departures from emergency departments. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering: MBE, 18(1), 253-273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Investigating the impact of CoViD-19 on the activities of a Department of General Medicine
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            BECB 2021: 2021 International Symposium on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Biology
            August 2021
            262 pages
            ISBN:9781450384117
            DOI:10.1145/3502060

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 14 February 2022

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format