skip to main content
10.1145/3501247.3531582acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

You Have Earned a Trophy: Characterize In-Game Achievements and Their Completions

Authors Info & Claims
Published:26 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Achievement systems have been actively adopted in gaming platforms to maintain players’ interests. Among them, trophies in PlayStation games are one of the most successful achievement systems. While the importance of trophy design has been casually discussed in many game developers’ forums, there has been no systematic study of the historical dataset of trophies yet. In this work, we construct a complete dataset of PlayStation games and their trophies and investigate them from both the developers’ and players’ perspectives.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

WS22_S3_121.mp4

mp4

722.3 MB

References

  1. True Achievements. 2021. True Achievements. https://www.trueachievements.com/. Accessed: 2021-11-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. How Long To Beat. 2021. How Long To Beat. https://howlongtobeat.com/. Accessed: 2021-11-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Capps, Rod Fergusson, Greg McClanahan, Cory Stockton, and David Vonderhaar. 2013. Designing Compelling Achievements Microtalks. https://www.gdcvault.com/play/1018089/Designing-Compelling-Achievements. accessed Nov 1, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mia Consalvo. 2009. Cheating: Gaining advantage in videogames. Mit Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carlos Cruz, Michael D Hanus, and Jesse Fox. 2017. The need to achieve: Players’ perceptions and uses of extrinsic meta-game reward systems for video game consoles. Computers in Human Behavior 71 (2017), 516–524.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Edward L Deci, Richard Koestner, and Richard M Ryan. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation.Psychological bulletin 125, 6 (1999), 627.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 11, 4 (2000), 227–268.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. David Easley and Arpita Ghosh. 2016. Incentives, gamification, and game theory: an economic approach to badge design. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC) 4, 3 (2016), 1–26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Sony Interactive Entertainment. 2008. Firmware (v.2.40) Walkthrough Part 2: Trophies. https://blog.playstation.com/2008/06/30/firmware-v240-walkthrough-part-2-trophies/. accessed Nov 1, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gamesrader. 2020. The fastest PS4 Trophies: Earn 14 Platinums in 12 hours. https://www.gamesradar.com/easiest-ps4-platinum-trophies/. accessed Nov 1, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Matt Gardner, Joel Grus, Mark Neumann, Oyvind Tafjord, Pradeep Dasigi, Nelson F. Liu, Matthew Peters, Michael Schmitz, and Luke S. Zettlemoyer. 2017. AllenNLP: A Deep Semantic Natural Language Processing Platform. arXiv:1803.07640Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Grid Sage Games. 2018. Achievements. https://www.gridsagegames.com/blog/2018/05/achievements. accessed Nov 1, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Juho Hamari and Veikko Eranti. 2011. Framework for Designing and Evaluating Game Achievements.. In Digra conference, Vol. 10. Citeseer, 9966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Luheng He, Kenton Lee, Mike Lewis, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2017. Deep semantic role labeling: What works and what’s next. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 473–483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Stephanie Heintz and Effie Lai-Chong Law. 2015. The game genre map: A revised game classification. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 175–184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Mikael Jakobsson. 2011. The achievement machine: Understanding Xbox 360 achievements in gaming practices. Game Studies 11, 1 (2011), 1–22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mark R Lepper, David Greene, and Richard E Nisbett. 1973. Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the” overjustification” hypothesis.Journal of Personality and social Psychology 28, 1(1973), 129.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ian Lewis, Kristy de Salas, and Lindsay Wells. 2013. Features of achievement systems. In Proceedings of CGAMES’2013 USA. IEEE, 66–73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Markus Montola, Timo Nummenmaa, Andrés Lucero, Marion Boberg, and Hannu Korhonen. 2009. Applying game achievement systems to enhance user experience in a photo sharing service. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era. 94–97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. OpenCritic. 2021. Best Video Games of 2021. https://opencritic.com/browse/all/2021. accessed Apr 15, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Kunwoo Park, Meeyoung Cha, Haewoon Kwak, and Kuan-Ta Chen. 2017. Achievement and friends: Key factors of player retention vary across player levels in online multiplayer games. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion. 445–453.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. PSN Profiles. 2021. PSN Profiles. https://psnprofiles.com/. Accessed: 2021-11-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Andrew K Przybylski, C Scott Rigby, and Richard M Ryan. 2010. A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of general psychology 14, 2 (2010), 154–166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). Association for Computational Linguistics, Hong Kong, China, 3982–3992. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D19-1410Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Peng Shi and Jimmy Lin. 2019. Simple bert models for relation extraction and semantic role labeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05255(2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kristin Siu and Mark O Riedl. 2016. Reward systems in human computation games. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 266–275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sony. 2021. Supplemental Information for the Consolidated Financial Results for the Fourth Quarter Ended March 31, 2021. https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/IR/library/presen/er/pdf/20q4_supplement.pdf. Accessed: 2021-11-01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Olli Sotamaa. 2010. Achievement Unlocked: rethinking gaming capital. Games as services 73(2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. S Shyam Sundar. 2012. Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction. In Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindsay Wells, Aran Cauchi-Saunders, Ian Lewis, Lorenzo Monsif, Benjamin Geelan, and Kristy de Salas. 2016. Mining for Gold (and Platinum) PlayStation Network Data Mining. In Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. 304–312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Jie Zhou and Wei Xu. 2015. End-to-end learning of semantic role labeling using recurrent neural networks. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 1127–1137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. You Have Earned a Trophy: Characterize In-Game Achievements and Their Completions
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          WebSci '22: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022
          June 2022
          479 pages
          ISBN:9781450391917
          DOI:10.1145/3501247

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 26 June 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate218of875submissions,25%
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)28
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format