Elodie Bouzekri
Guillaume Rivière
ABSTRACT
Evaluation of human–computer interfaces that aim at shaping users’ pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors should consider measuring participants’ affinity with nature: analyses of user studies in this context have to discriminate a possible effect on the results. This paper proposes to guide the choice between 21 questionnaires available in the literature measuring the Connectedness to Nature (CtN) construct. We thus share a review and an analysis that we made to choose one scale questionnaire for our needs of a user study recruiting in public places and a longitudinal user study aiming to evaluate the use and impact of shape-changing interfaces at workplaces to assist pro-environmental behavior. This paper analyzes questionnaires through eight criteria for Sustainable HCI user studies, reports some meta-analyses’ results, illustrates two questionnaire choices, then overviews the limitations of available questionnaires for user studies in HCI.
- Ernesto Arroyo, Leonardo Bonanni, and Ted Selker. 2005. Waterbot: Exploring Feedback and Persuasive Techniques at the Sink. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055059Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Danielle Bashan, Agathe Colléony, and Assaf Shwartz. 2021. Urban versus rural? The effects of residential status on species identification skills and connection to nature. People and Nature 3, 2 (April 2021), 347–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10176Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sieto D. Beckers. 2005. Measuring People’s Connection with Nature: Exploring the Relations Between People’s Implicit Connection with Nature, Their Explicit Conservation Behavior, and Their Affiliation with Technology. Master’s thesis. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.Google Scholar
- Eli Blevis. 2007. Sustainable Interaction Design: Invention & Disposal, Renewal & Reuse. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240705Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thijs Bouman, Linda Steg, and Henk A. L. Kiers. 2018. Measuring Values in Environmental Research: A Test of an Environmental Portrait Value Questionnaire. Frontiers in Psychology 9, Article 564 (April 2018), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00564Google Scholar
- Adrian Brügger, Florian G. Kaiser, and Nina Roczen. 2011. One for all? Connectedness to Nature, Inclusion of Nature, Environmental Identity, and Implicit Association with Nature. European Psychologist 16, 4 (Dec. 2011), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000032Google ScholarCross Ref
- Coral M. Bruni and P. Wesley Schultz. 2010. Implicit beliefs about self and nature: Evidence from an IAT game. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 1 (March 2010), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hronn Brynjarsdottir, Maria Håkansson, James Pierce, Eric Baumer, Carl DiSalvo, and Phoebe Sengers. 2012. Sustainably Unpersuaded: How Persuasion Narrows Our Vision of Sustainability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 947–956. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208539Google ScholarDigital Library
- Judith Chen-Hsuan Cheng and Martha C. Monroe. 2012. Connection to Nature: Children’s Affective Attitude Toward Nature. Environment and Behavior 44, 1 (Jan. 2012), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082Google Scholar
- Susan Clayton. 2003. Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, Susan Clayton and Susan Opotow (Eds.). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, Chapter 3, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.003.0005Google Scholar
- Susan Clayton, Sandor Czellar, Sonya Nartova-Bochaver, Jeffrey C. Skibins, Gabby Salazar, Yu-Chi Tseng, Boris Irkhin, and Fredy S. Monge-Rodriguez. 2021. Cross-cultural Validation of A Revised Environmental Identity Scale. Sustainability 13, 4, Article 2387 (Feb. 2021), 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042387Google Scholar
- John Cook, Naomi Oreskes, Peter T. Doran, William R.L. Anderegg, Bart Verheggen, Ed W. Maibach, J. Stuart Carlton, Stephan Lewandowsky, Andrew G. Skuce, Sarah A. Green, 2016. Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming. Environmental Research Letters 11, 4, Article 048002 (April 2016), 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Maxime Daniel and Guillaume Rivière. 2021. Exploring Axisymmetric Shape-Change’s Purposes and Allure for Ambient Display: 16 Potential Use Cases and a Two-Month Preliminary Study on Daily Notifications. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 47, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3442452Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maxime Daniel, Guillaume Rivière, and Nadine Couture. 2019. CairnFORM: A Shape-Changing Ring Chart Notifying Renewable Energy Availability in Peripheral Locations. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Tempe, Arizona, USA) (TEI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1145/3294109.3295634Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maxime Daniel, Guillaume Rivière, Nadine Couture, and Stéphane Kreckelbergh. 2016. Une analyse des Systèmes Interactifs et Persuasifs pour la maîtrise de l’énergie / An analysis of persuasive technologies for energy demand side management. In Actes de la 28e conférence francophone sur l’Interaction Homme-Machine (Fribourg, Switzerland). ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1145/3004107.3004111Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jody L. Davis, Jeffrey D. Green, and Allison Reed. 2009. Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, 2 (June 2009), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.11.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Judith I.M. De Groot and Linda Steg. 2007. Value Orientations and Environmental Beliefs in Five Countries: Validity of an Instrument to Measure Egoistic, Altruistic and Biospheric Value Orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 38, 3 (May 2007), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022107300278Google ScholarCross Ref
- Philippe Descola. 1996. Constructing natures: symbolic ecology and social practice. In Constructing Natures, Philippe Descola and Gisli Palsson (Eds.). Routledge, London, UK, Chapter 5, 82–102. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203451069Google Scholar
- Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1975–1984. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753625Google ScholarDigital Library
- Maximilian Dornhoff, Jan-Niklas Sothmann, Florian Fiebelkorn, and Susanne Menzel. 2019. Nature Relatedness and Environmental Concern of Young People in Ecuador and Germany. Frontiers in Psychology 10, Article 453 (March 2019), 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00453Google Scholar
- Paul Dourish. 2010. HCI and Environmental Sustainability: The Politics of Design and the Design of Politics. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Aarhus, Denmark) (DIS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1858171.1858173Google ScholarDigital Library
- Riley E. Dunlap and Kent D. Van Liere. 1978. The “New Environmental Paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education 9, 4 (July 1978), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875Google ScholarCross Ref
- Riley E. Dunlap, Kent D. Van Liere, Angela G. Mertig, and Robert Emmet Jones. 2000. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues 56, 3 (2000), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00176Google ScholarCross Ref
- Daniel D. Dutcher, James C. Finley, AE Luloff, and Janet Buttolph Johnson. 2007. Connectivity With Nature as a Measure of Environmental Values. Environment and Behavior 39, 4 (July 2007), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916506298794Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard J. Ellis and Fred Thompson. 1997. Culture and the Environment in the Pacific Northwest. American Political Science Review 91, 4 (Dec. 1997), 885–897. https://doi.org/10.2307/2952171Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julie Ernst and Stefan Theimer. 2011. Evaluating the effects of environmental education programming on connectedness to nature. Environmental Education Research 17, 5 (Oct. 2011), 577–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.565119Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brian J. Fogg. 1998. Persuasive Computers: Perspectives and Research Directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Los Angeles, CA, USA) (CHI ’98). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., New York, NY, USA, 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274677Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jon Froehlich, Leah Findlater, Marilyn Ostergren, Solai Ramanathan, Josh Peterson, Inness Wragg, Eric Larson, Fabia Fu, Mazhengmin Bai, Shwetak Patel, and James A. Landay. 2012. The Design and Evaluation of Prototype Eco-Feedback Displays for Fixture-Level Water Usage Data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2367–2376. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208397Google ScholarDigital Library
- Liuna Geng, Jingke Xu, Lijuan Ye, Wenjun Zhou, and Kexin Zhou. 2015. Connections with Nature and Environmental Behaviors. PloS One 10, 5, Article e0127247 (May 2015), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127247Google Scholar
- Anthony G. Greenwald, Debbie E. McGhee, and Jordan L.K. Schwartz. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74, 6 (June 1998), 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464Google ScholarCross Ref
- Terry Hartig, Florian G. Kaiser, and Peter A. Bowler. 1997. Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Technical Report ”Working Paper No. 5”. Institute for Housing Research, Uppsala Universitet, Gävle, Sweden.Google Scholar
- Lucy J. Hawcroft and Taciano L. Milfont. 2010. The use (and abuse) of the new environmental paradigm scale over the last 30 years: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 2 (June 2010), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lorenz Hilty, Wolfgang Lohmann, and Elaine M. Huang. 2011. Sustainability and ICT – An overview of the field. Notizie di Politeia XXVII, 104 (2011), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-55640Google Scholar
- Florian G. Kaiser and Mark Wilson. 2004. Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences 36, 7 (May 2004), 1531–1544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florian G. Kaiser, Sybille Wölfing, and Urs Fuhrer. 1999. Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 1 (March 1999), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0107Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elisabeth Kals, Daniel Schumacher, and Leo Montada. 1999. Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature. Environment and Behavior 31, 2 (March 1999), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056Google ScholarCross Ref
- Samantha Keaulana, Melissa Kahili-Heede, Lorinda Riley, Mei Linn N Park, Kuaiwi Laka Makua, Jetney Kahaulahilahi Vegas, and Mapuana CK Antonio. 2021. A Scoping Review of Nature, Land, and Environmental Connectedness and Relatedness. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 11, Article 5897 (May 2021), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18115897Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bran Knowles. 2013. Re-Imagining Persuasion: Designing for Self-Transcendence. In CHI ’13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI EA ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2713–2718. https://doi.org/10.1145/2468356.2479498Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bran Knowles, Lynne Blair, Paul Coulton, and Mark Lochrie. 2014. Rethinking Plan A for Sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3593–3596. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557311Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Kopnina. 2013. Evaluating education for sustainable development (ESD): Using Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes toward the Sustainable Development (EAATSD) scale. Environment, Development and Sustainability 15, 3 (June 2013), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-012-9395-zGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Stacey Kuznetsov and Eric Paulos. 2010. UpStream: Motivating Water Conservation with Low-Cost Water Flow Sensing and Persuasive Displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1851–1860. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753604Google ScholarDigital Library
- Thomas K. Landauer. 1997. Behavioral Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction(2nd ed.), Marting G. Helander, Thomas K. Landauer, and Prasad V. Prabhu (Eds.). North-Holland, Amsterdam, Chapter 9, 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481862-1.50075-3Google Scholar
- Lincoln R. Larson, Rachel Szczytko, Edmond P. Bowers, Lauren E. Stephens, Kathryn T. Stevenson, and Myron F. Floyd. 2019. Outdoor Time, Screen Time, and Connection to Nature: Troubling Trends Among Rural Youth?Environment and Behavior 51, 8 (Oct. 2019), 966–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518806686Google Scholar
- Mark R. Leary, Jessica M. Tipsord, and Eleanor B. Tate. 2008. Allo-inclusive identity: Incorporating the social and natural worlds into one’s sense of self. In Transcending Self-Interest: Psychological Explorations of the Quiet Ego. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, USA, Chapter 13, 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/11771-013Google Scholar
- Jennifer C. Mankoff, Eli Blevis, Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, Susan R. Fussell, Jay Hasbrouck, Allison Woodruff, and Phoebe Sengers. 2007. Environmental Sustainability and Interaction. In CHI ’07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, CA, USA) (CHI EA ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2121–2124. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240866.1240963Google ScholarDigital Library
- Constantinos C. Manoli, Bruce Johnson, and Riley E. Dunlap. 2007. Assessing Children’s Environmental Worldviews: Modifying and Validating the New Ecological Paradigm Scale for Use With Children. The Journal of Environmental Education 38, 4 (June 2007), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.4.3-13Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Martin and Sandor Czellar. 2016. The extended Inclusion of Nature in Self scale. Journal of Environmental Psychology 47 (Sept. 2016), 181–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.006Google ScholarCross Ref
- Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Anna Pirani, Sarah L. Connors, C. Péan, Sophie Berger, Nada Caud, Y. Chen, Leah Goldfarb, Melissa I. Gomis, Mengtian Huang, Katherine Leitzell, Elisabeth Lonnoy, J. B. Robin Matthews, Thomas K. Maycock, Tim Waterfield, Özge Yelekçi, R. Yu, and Botao Zhou (Eds.). 2021. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
- F. Stephan Mayer and Cynthia McPherson Frantz. 2004. The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 4 (Dec. 2004), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katarzyna Mikołajczak. 2019. Understanding connection with nature at an Amazonian deforestation frontier. Master’s thesis. Lancaster University, UK.Google Scholar
- Markus M. Müller, Elisabeth Kals, and Ramune Pansa. 2009. Adolescents’ Emotional Affinity toward Nature: A Cross-Societal Study. Journal of Developmental Processes 4, 1 (Jan. 2009), 59–69.Google Scholar
- Oscar Navarro, Pablo Olivos, and Ghozlane Fleury-Bahi. 2017. “Connectedness to Nature Scale”: Validity and Reliability in the French Context. Frontiers in Psychology 8, Article 2180 (Dec. 2017), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02180Google Scholar
- Elizabeth K. Nisbet and John M. Zelenski. 2013. The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology 4, Article 813 (Nov. 2013), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813Google Scholar
- Elizabeth K. Nisbet, John M. Zelenski, and Steven A Murphy. 2009. The Nature Relatedness Scale: Linking Individuals’ Connection With Nature to Environmental Concern and Behavior. Environment and Behavior 41, 5 (Sept. 2009), 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pablo Olivos, Juan I Aragonés, and María Amérigo. 2011. The Connectedness to Nature Scale and its relationship with environmental beliefs and identity. International Journal of Hispanic Psychology 4, 1 (Jan. 2011), 5–19.Google Scholar
- Laura Pasca, María Teresa Coello, Juan Ignacio Aragonés, and Cynthia McPherson Frantz. 2018. The equivalence of measures on the Connectedness to Nature Scale: A comparison between ordinal methods of DIF detection. PLOS One 13, 11, Article e0207739 (Nov. 2018), 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207739Google Scholar
- Helen E. Perkins. 2010. Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30, 4 (Dec. 2010), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.05.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Viviany Silva Pessoa, Valdiney Veloso Gouveia, Ana Karla Silva Soares, Roosevelt Vilar, and Leogildo Alves Freires. 2016. Escala de conexão com a natureza: evidências psicométricas no contexto brasileiro / Connectedness to nature scale: Psychometric evidence in Brazil. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas) 33, 2 (April 2016), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02752016000200009Google ScholarCross Ref
- James Pierce, Yolande Strengers, Phoebe Sengers, and Susanne Bødker. 2013. Introduction to the Special Issue on Practice-Oriented Approaches to Sustainable HCI. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 20, 4, Article 20 (Sept. 2013), 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2494260Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne-Caroline Prévot, Susan Clayton, and Raphael Mathevet. 2018. The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: Experience in nature matters. Environmental Education Research 24, 2 (Feb. 2018), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1249456Google ScholarCross Ref
- Christian Remy, Oliver Bates, Alan Dix, Vanessa Thomas, Mike Hazas, Adrian Friday, and Elaine M. Huang. 2018. Evaluation Beyond Usability: Validating Sustainable HCI Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173790Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Remy, Oliver Bates, Vanessa Thomas, and Elaine M. Huang. 2017. The Limits of Evaluating Sustainability. In Proceedings of the 2017 Workshop on Computing Within Limits (Santa Barbara, California, USA) (LIMITS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3080556.3080567Google ScholarDigital Library
- Brian Restall and Elisabeth Conrad. 2015. A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 159 (Aug. 2015), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.05.022Google Scholar
- Guillaume Rivière and Stephane Kreckelbergh. 2012. La StationENR pour sensibiliser aux énergies renouvelables par la modélisation de micro-réseaux [StationENR raises awareness on renewable energies by microgrids modeling]. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 2012 Conference on Ergonomie et Interaction Homme-Machine (Biarritz, France) (Ergo’IHM 2012 - Démonstrations). AFIHM, Grenoble, France, 63–66.Google Scholar
- Guillaume Rivière. 2020. L’Interaction Homme-Machine contre le changement climatique : retour sur une controverse / Human–Computer Interaction against Climate Change: Review of a Controversy. Journal d’Interaction Personne-Système 9, 1 (Jan. 2020), 3–12. Issue on Persuasive Interaction for SusTainabILity 2. https://doi.org/10.46298/jips.7101Google Scholar
- G. Salazar, K. Kunkle, and M. C. Monroe. 2020. Practitioner Guide to Assessing Connection to Nature. North American Association for Environmental Education, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Gabby Salazar, Martha C. Monroe, Catherine Jordan, Nicole M. Ardoin, and Thomas H. Beery. 2021. Improving Assessments of Connection to Nature: A Participatory Approach. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 8, Article 609104 (Jan. 2021), 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.609104Google Scholar
- Alexandra Schleyer-Lindenmann, Bruno Dauvier, Heidi Ittner, and Michel Piolat. 2016. Mesure des attitudes environnementales: analyse structurale d’une version française de la NEPS (Dunlap et al., 2000) / Measuring environmental attitudes: A structural analysis of a French version of the NEP Scale (Dunlap et al., 2000). Psychologie Française 61, 2 (June 2016), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2014.07.002Google Scholar
- Alexandra Schleyer-Lindenmann, Heidi Ittner, Bruno Dauvier, and Michel Piolat. 2018. Die NEP-Skala–hinter den (deutschen) Kulissen des Umweltbewusstseins / The NEP Scale – behind the (German) scenes of environmental concern. Diagnostica 64, 3 (July 2018), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000202Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martin Schrepp, Jörg Thomaschewski, and Andreas Hinderks. 2017. Design and Evaluation of a Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 6 (Sept. 2017), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2017.09.001Google Scholar
- P. Wesley Schultz. 2001. The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21, 4 (Dec. 2001), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227Google Scholar
- P. Wesley Schultz. 2002. Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology Of Human-Nature Relations. In Psychology of Sustainable Development. Springer, Boston, MA, USA, Chapter 4, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4Google Scholar
- P. Wesley Schultz, Chris Shriver, Jennifer J. Tabanico, and Azar M. Khazian. 2004. Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 1 (March 2004), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00022-7Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Wesley Schultz and Lynnette Zelezny. 1999. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: Evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 3 (Sept. 1999), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1999.0129Google Scholar
- Verónica Sevillano, José A. Corraliza, and Esther Lorenzo. 2017. Spanish version of the Dispositional Empathy with Nature scale / Versión española de la escala de Empatía Disposicional hacia la Naturaleza. Revista de Psicología Social 32, 3 (Sept. 2017), 624–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2017.1356548Google Scholar
- Michael Siegrist. 1996. Fragebogen zur Erfassung der ökozentrischen und anthropozentrischen Umwelteinstellung / Questionnaire of ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 27, 4 (1996), 290–294.Google Scholar
- M. Six Silberman and Bill Tomlinson. 2010. Toward an Ecological Sensibility: Tools for Evaluating Sustainable HCI. In CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI EA ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3469–3474. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1754003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aaron C. Sparks, Geoffrey L. Henderson, Shyam K. Sriram, and Eric R.A.N Smith. 2021. Measuring Environmental Values and Identity. Society & Natural Resources 34, 3 (March 2021), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2020.1817644Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul C. Stern, Thomas Dietz, and Gregory A. Guagnano. 1998. A Brief Inventory of Values. Educational and Psychological Measurement 58, 6 (Dec. 1998), 984–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058006008Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yolande Strengers. 2014. Smart Energy in Everyday Life: Are You Designing for Resource Man?Interactions 21, 4 (July 2014), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2621931Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kim-Pong Tam. 2013. Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology 34 (June 2013), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kim-Pong Tam. 2013. Dispositional empathy with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 35 (Sept. 2013), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.05.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suzanne C. Gagnon Thompson and Michelle A. Barton. 1994. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14, 2 (June 1994), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80168-9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edward O. Wilson. 1986. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674045231Google Scholar
- Matthew J. Zylstra, Andrew T. Knight, Karen J. Esler, and Lesley L.L. Le Grange. 2014. Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice. Springer Science Reviews 2, 1 (Dec. 2014), 119–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40362-014-0021-3Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Choosing a Questionnaire Measuring Connectedness to Nature for Human–Computer Interaction User Studies: Choisir un questionnaire mesurant le rapport à la nature pour des études utilisateur en Interaction Humain-Machine
Recommendations
Tangibilité et engagement dans un comportement environnemental : Vers une étude longitudinale: Tangibility and Engagement in Environmental Behavior: Toward a Longitudinal Study
IHM '22 Adjunct: Adjunct Proceedings of the 33rd Conference on l'Interaction Humain-MachineMany interfaces have been proposed to support environmental behavior in domestic spaces. However in France, according to INSEE we spent in 2019 1680 hours working on average, often in a dedicated place where an environmental behavior can also be ...
Comments