skip to main content
10.1145/3493229.3493306acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesscopesConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

FADE: FaaS-inspired application decomposition and Energy-aware function placement on the Edge

Published:13 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Lately, more and more applications are deployed on heterogeneous, power-constrained edge-computing devices. Bringing computation closer to the data, contributes both to latency and energy consumption reduction due to the elimination of excessive data transfers. However, while the main concern in such environments is the minimization of energy consumption, the heterogeneity in compute resources found at the edge may lead to Quality of Service (QoS) violations. At the same time, Serverless computing, the next frontier of Cloud computing has emerged to offer unprecedented elasticity by utilizing fine-grained, stateless functions. The reduction in the execution time and the modest memory footprint of such decomposed applications, allow for fine-grained resource multiplexing. In this work, we propose a methodology for application decomposition into fine-grained functions and energy-aware function placement on a cluster of edge devices subject to user-specified QoS guarantees.

References

  1. [n. d.]. Serverless Architecture Market. https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/serverless-architecture-market-64917099.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Mohammad Aazam, Sherali Zeadally, and Khaled A Harras. 2018. Offloading in fog computing for IoT: Review, enabling technologies, and research opportunities. Future Generation Computer Systems 87 (2018), 278-289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Tzenetopoulos Achilleas et al. 2021. FaaS and Curious: Performance implications of serverless functions on edge computing platforms. In International Conference on High Performance Computing. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ioana Baldini, Paul Castro, Perry Cheng, Stephen Fink, Vatche Ishakian, Nick Mitchell, Vinod Muthusamy, Rodric Rabbah, and Philippe Suter. 2016. Cloud-native, event-based programming for mobile applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Mobile Software Engineering and Systems. 287-288. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Adam Hall and Umakishore Ramachandran. 2019. An execution model for serverless functions at the edge. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Internet of Things Design and Implementation. 225-236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Eric Jonas, Johann Schleier-Smith, Vikram Sreekanti, Chia-Che Tsai, Anurag Khandelwal, Qifan Pu, Vaishaal Shankar, Joao Carreira, Karl Krauth, Neeraja Yadwadkar, et al. 2019. Cloud programming simplified: A berkeley view on serverless computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03383 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Charalampos Marantos, Konstantinos Salapas, Lazaros Papadopoulos, and Dimitrios Soudris. 2021. A flexible tool for estimating applications performance and energy consumption through static analysis. SN Computer Science 2, 1 (2021), 1-11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Olga Munoz, Antonio Pascual-Iserte, and Josep Vidal. 2014. Optimization of radio and computational resources for energy efficiency in latency-constrained application offloading. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 64, 10 (2014), 4738-4755.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fabian Pedregosa, Gaël Varoquaux, Alexandre Gramfort, Vincent Michel, Bertrand Thirion, Olivier Grisel, Mathieu Blondel, Peter Prettenhofer, Ron Weiss, Vincent Dubourg, et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of machine learning research 12, Oct (2011), 2825-2830. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Tobias Pfandzelter and David Bermbach. 2020. tinyFaaS: A lightweight faas platform for edge environments. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fog Computing (ICFC). IEEE, 17-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Farzad Samie, Vasileios Tsoutsouras, Dimosthenis Masouros, Lars Bauer, Dimitrios Soudris, and Jörg Henkel. 2019. Fast operation mode selection for highly efficient iot edge devices. IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 39, 3 (2019), 572-584.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. FADE: FaaS-inspired application decomposition and Energy-aware function placement on the Edge
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SCOPES '21: Proceedings of the 24th International Workshop on Software and Compilers for Embedded Systems
            November 2021
            48 pages
            ISBN:9781450391665
            DOI:10.1145/3493229
            • Editor:
            • Sander Stuijk

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 November 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            SCOPES '21 Paper Acceptance Rate7of15submissions,47%Overall Acceptance Rate38of79submissions,48%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader