skip to main content
research-article

Pivoting an MCI Empowerment Program to Online Engagement

Published:14 January 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In the Spring of 2020, closures and safe distancing orders swept much of the United States due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper presents a case study of pivoting an in-person empowerment program focused on lifestyle interventions for people newly diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to an online program. Working as rapidly as possible to sustain participant engagement, our design decisions and subsequent iterations point to initial constraints in telehealth capabilities, as well as learning on the fly as new capabilities and requirements emerged. We present the discovery of emergent practices by family members and healthcare providers to meet the new requirements for successful online engagement. For some participants, the online program led to greater opportunities for empowerment while others were hampered by the lack of in-person program support. Providers experienced a sharp learning curve and likewise missed the benefits of in-person interaction, but also discovered new benefits of online collaboration. This work lends insights and potential new avenues for understanding how lifestyle interventions can empower people with MCI and the role of technology in that process.

References

  1. 1] Ronald D Adelman, Lyubov L Tmanova, Diana Delgado, Sarah Dion, and Mark S Lachs. 2014. Caregiver burden: a clinical review. Jama 311, 10 (2014), 1052--1060.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Costas A Anastasiou, Mary Yannakoulia, Meropi D Kontogianni, Mary H Kosmidis, Eirini Mamalaki, Efthimios Dardiotis, Giorgos Hadjigeorgiou, Paraskevi Sakka, Angeliki Tsapanou, Anastasia Lykou, et al. 2018. Mediterranean lifestyle in relation to cognitive health: results from the HELIAD study. Nutrients 10, 10 (2018), 1557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Arlene J Astell, Nicole Bouranis, Jesse Hoey, Allison Lindauer, Alex Mihailidis, Chris Nugent, Julie M Robillard, et al. 2019. Technology and dementia: the future is now. Dementia and geriatric cognitive disorders 47, 3 (2019), 131--139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Timothy W Bickmore, Everlyne Kimani, Ha Trinh, Alexandra Pusateri, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, and Jared W Magnani. 2018. Managing chronic conditions with a smartphone-based conversational virtual agent. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. 119--124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Jerome S Bruner. 1975. The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of child language 2, 1 (1975), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Rachel L Burton and Megan E O'Connell. 2018. Telehealth rehabilitation for cognitive impairment: randomized controlled feasibility trial. JMIR research protocols 7, 2 (2018), e43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Monia Cabinio, Federica Rossetto, Sara Isernia, Francesca Lea Saibene, Monica Di Cesare, Francesca Borgnis, Stefania Pazzi, Tommaso Migliazza, Margherita Alberoni, Valeria Blasi, et al. 2020. The use of a virtual reality platform for the assessment of the memory decline and the hippocampal neural injury in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: The validity of smart aging serious game (SASG). Journal of clinical medicine 9, 5 (2020), 1355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Clare Carroll, Catherine Chiodo, Adena Xin Lin, Meg Nidever, and Jayanth Prathipati. 2017. Robin: enabling independence for individuals with cognitive disabilities using voice assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 46--53.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Neil Charness and Walter R Boot. 2009. Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science 18, 5 (2009), 253--258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Sara J Czaja, Walter R Boot, Neil Charness, and Wendy A Rogers. 2019. Designing for older adults: Principles and creative human factors approaches. CRC press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Hiroko H Dodge, Jian Zhu, Nora C Mattek, Molly Bowman, Oscar Ybarra, Katherine V Wild, David A Loewenstein, and Jeffrey A Kaye. 2015. Web-enabled conversational interactions as a method to improve cognitive functions: Results of a 6-week randomized controlled trial. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions 1, 1 (2015), 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Guido Dorman, Agustín Alvarez Dengra, Adriana Fiorini, Belén Failla, Florencia Vallejos, Noelia Pontello, María Roca, and Julián Bustin. 2020. Experience and results with a telehealth treatment program in patients with cognitive disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Laura Fabbri, Irene Eleonora Mosca, Filippo Gerli, Leonardo Martini, Silvia Pancani, Giulia Lucidi, Federica Savazzi, Francesca Baglio, Federica Vannetti, Claudio Macchi, et al. 2019. The Games for Older Adults Active Life (GOAL) project for people with mild cognitive impairment and vascular cognitive impairment: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in neurology 9 (2019), 1040.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicola Gates, Maria A Fiatarone Singh, Perminder S Sachdev, and Michael Valenzuela. 2013. The effect of exercise training on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 21, 11 (2013), 1086--1097.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Serge Gauthier, Barry Reisberg, Michael Zaudig, Ronald C Petersen, Karen Ritchie, Karl Broich, Sylvie Belleville, Henry Brodaty, David Bennett, Howard Chertkow, et al. 2006. Mild cognitive impairment. The lancet 367, 9518 (2006), 1262--1270.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Yonas E Geda, Taryn C Silber, Rosebud O Roberts, David S Knopman, Teresa JH Christianson, V Shane Pankratz, Bradley F Boeve, Eric G Tangalos, and Ronald C Petersen. 2012. Computer activities, physical exercise, aging, and mild cognitive impairment: a population-based study. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol. 87. Elsevier, 437--442.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Benjamin M Hampstead, Krishnankutty Sathian, Anna Bacon Moore, Carrie Nalisnick, and Anthony Y Stringer. 2008. Explicit memory training leads to improved memory for face--name pairs in patients with mild cognitive impairment: Results of a pilot investigation. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 14, 5 (2008), 883--889. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 6, No. GROUP, Article 32. Publication date: January 2022. 32:24 Elizabeth D. Mynatt et al.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Benjamin M Hampstead, Krish Sathian, Pamela A Phillips, Akshay Amaraneni, William R Delaune, and Anthony Y Stringer. 2012. Mnemonic strategy training improves memory for object location associations in both healthy elderly and patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: A randomized, single-blind study. Neuropsychology 26, 3 (2012), 385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Chelsea E Hawley, Nicole Genovese, Montgomery T Owsiany, Laura K Triantafylidis, Lauren R Moo, Amy M Linsky, Jennifer L Sullivan, and Julie M Paik. 2020. Rapid integration of home telehealth visits amidst COVID-19: what do older adults need to succeed? Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18, 3 (2011), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Wenbo He, Meng Wang, Lili Jiang, Meixuan Li, and Xuemei Han. 2019. Cognitive interventions for mild cognitive impairment and dementia: An overview of systematic reviews. Complementary therapies in medicine 47 (2019), 102199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. D Heister, James B Brewer, Sebastian Magda, Kaj Blennow, Linda K McEvoy, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, et al. 2011. Predicting MCI outcome with clinically available MRI and CSF biomarkers. Neurology 77, 17 (2011), 1619--1628.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Elizabeth M Heitkemper, Lena Mamykina, Jasmine Travers, and Arlene Smaldone. 2017. Do health information technology self-management interventions improve glycemic control in medically underserved adults with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 24, 5 (2017), 1024--1035.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. J Hollander, M Ward, D Alverson, R Bashshur, A Darkins, H DePhillips, et al. 2017. Creating a framework to support measure development for telehealth. In Washington, DC: National Quality Forum.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Tiffany F Hughes, Jason D Flatt, Bo Fu, Chung-Chou H Chang, and Mary Ganguli. 2013. Engagement in social activities and progression from mild to severe cognitive impairment: the MYHAT study. International psychogeriatrics 25, 4 (2013), 587--595.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Maia Jacobs, Jeremy Johnson, and Elizabeth D Mynatt. 2018. MyPath: Investigating breast cancer patients' use of personalized health information. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. EGA Esther Karssemeijer, JA Justine Aaronson, WJ Willem Bossers, T Tara Smits, RPC Roy Kessels, et al. 2017. Positive effects of combined cognitive and physical exercise training on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A meta-analysis. Ageing research reviews 40 (2017), 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Laura Kooij, Wim G Groen, and Wim H van Harten. 2018. Barriers and Facilitators Affecting Patient Portal Implementation from an Organizational Perspective: Qualitative Study. Journal of medical Internet research 20, 5 (2018), e183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Linda CW Lam, Rachel CM Chau, Billy ML Wong, Ada WT Fung, Victor WC Lui, Cindy CW Tam, Grace TY Leung, Timothy CY Kwok, Helen FK Chiu, Sammy Ng, et al. 2011. Interim follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing Chinese style mind body (Tai Chi) and stretching exercises on cognitive function in subjects at risk of progressive cognitive decline. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 26, 7 (2011), 733--740.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Martha Larkin. 2002. Using Scaffolded Instruction To Optimize Learning. ERIC Digest. (2002).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Amanda Lazar, Hilaire J Thompson, Shih-Yin Lin, and George Demiris. 2018. Negotiating Relation Work with Telehealth Home Care Companionship Technologies That Support Aging in Place. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. L Maffei, Eugenio Picano, MG Andreassi, A Angelucci, Filippo Baldacci, Laura Baroncelli, Tatjana Begenisic, PF Bellinvia, Nicoletta Berardi, L Biagi, et al. 2017. Randomized trial on the effects of a combined physical/cognitive training in aged MCI subjects: the Train the Brain study. Scientific Reports 7 (2017), 39471.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Lena Mamykina, Elizabeth M. Heitkemper, Arlene M. Smaldone, Rita Kukafka, Heather J. Cole-Lewis, Patricia G. Davidson, Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Andrea Cassells, Jonathan N. Tobin, and George Hripcsak. 2017. Personal Discovery in Diabetes Self-Management. J. of Biomedical Informatics 76, C (Dec. 2017), 1--8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2017.09.013Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Riccardo E Marioni, Cecile Proust-Lima, Helene Amieva, Carol Brayne, Fiona E Matthews, Jean-Francois Dartigues, and Helene Jacqmin-Gadda. 2015. Social activity, cognitive decline and dementia risk: a 20-year prospective cohort study. BMC public health 15, 1 (2015), 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Andrew D Miller, Sonali R Mishra, Logan Kendall, Shefali Haldar, Ari H Pollack, and Wanda Pratt. 2016. Partners in care: design considerations for caregivers and patients during a hospital stay. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. 756--769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Aehong Min, Flannery Currin, Gustavo Razo, Kay Connelly, and Patrick C Shih. 2020. Can I Take a Break? Facilitating In-Home Respite Care for Family Caregivers of Older Adults. In AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 2020. American Medical Informatics Association, 850.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Irene Eleonora Mosca, Emilia Salvadori, Filippo Gerli, Laura Fabbri, Silvia Pancani, Giulia Lucidi, Gemma Lombardi, Leonardo Bocchi, Stefania Pazzi, Francesca Baglio, et al. 2020. Analysis of feasibility, adherence, and appreciation of a newly developed tele-rehabilitation program for people with MCI and VCI. Frontiers in Neurology 11 (2020), 1478. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 6, No. GROUP, Article 32. Publication date: January 2022. Pivoting an MCI Empowerment Program to Online Engagement 32:25Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Elizabeth D. Mynatt, Jim Rowan, Sarah Craighill, and Annie Jacobs. 2001. Digital Family Portraits: Supporting Peace of Mind for Extended Family Members (CHI '01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/365024.365126Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. J Olazaran, Rubén Muñiz, B Reisberg, J Peña-Casanova, T Del Ser, AJ Cruz-Jentoft, P Serrano, E Navarro, ML García de la Rocha, A Frank, et al. 2004. Benefits of cognitive-motor intervention in MCI and mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Neurology 63, 12 (2004), 2348--2353.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. World Health Organization et al. 2016. Global diffusion of eHealth: making universal health coverage achievable: report of the third global survey on eHealth. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Georgios Papamakarios, Dimitris Giakoumis, Manolis Vasileiadis, Konstantinos Votis, Dimitrios Tzovaras, Sofia Segkouli, and Charalampos Karagiannidis. 2014. A tool to monitor and support physical exercise interventions for MCI and AD patients. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 258--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Ronald C Petersen, Glenn E Smith, Stephen C Waring, Robert J Ivnik, Eric G Tangalos, and Emre Kokmen. 1999. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of neurology 56, 3 (1999), 303--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Casey Pierce, Robin Brewer, Elizabeth Morris, and Madia Essiet. 2018. Computer-Supported Health and Well-Being Services: A Systems Approach to Telehealth and Coaching Systems. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. 384--388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Margaret Richardson, Theodore E Zorn, and C Kay Weaver. 2002. Senior's Perspectives on the Barriers, Benefits and Negatives Consequences of Learning and Using Computers. Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Lena Rosenberg, Anders Kottorp, Bengt Winblad, and Louise Nygård. 2009. Perceived difficulty in everyday technology use among older adults with or without cognitive deficits. Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy 16, 4 (2009), 216--226.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Hanna Schneider, Malin Eiband, Daniel Ullrich, and Andreas Butz. 2018. Empowerment in HCI - A Survey and Framework. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18. ACM Press, Montreal QC, Canada, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173818Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Tina Shah, Andrea Borondy Kitts, Jeffrey A Gold, Keith Horvath, Alex Ommaya, Frank Opelka, Luke Sato, Gretchen Schwarze, Mark Upton, and Lew Sandy. 2020. Electronic Health Record Optimization and Clinician Well-Being: A Potential Roadmap Toward Action. NAM Perspectives (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Ashley Sineath, Lauren Lambert, Catherine Verga, Miranda Wagstaff, and Brooks C Wingo. 2017. Monitoring intervention fidelity of a lifestyle behavioral intervention delivered through telehealth. Mhealth 3 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Glenn E Smith, Melanie Chandler, Julie A Fields, Jeremiah Aakre, and Dona EC Locke. 2018. A survey of patient and partner outcome and treatment preferences in mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 63, 4 (2018), 1459--1468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Zafeiropoulos Stavros, Kounti Fotini, and Tsolaki Magda. 2010. Computer based cognitive training for patients with mild cognitive impairment (mci). In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on pervasive technologies related to assistive environments. 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Todd H Stokes, Erika S Poole, Christopher P Bonafide, Alain B Labrique, James H Willig, Chihwen Cheng, and May D Wang. 2011. Chronic Care Continuum (C3) mobile-ready life skills training for adolescents with chronic diseases. In Proceedings of the First ACM Workshop on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services for Healthcare. 1--2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Takao Suzuki, Hiroyuki Shimada, Hyuma Makizako, Takehiko Doi, Daisuke Yoshida, Kengo Ito, Hiroshi Shimokata, Yukihiko Washimi, Hidetoshi Endo, and Takashi Kato. 2013. A randomized controlled trial of multicomponent exercise in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. PloS one 8, 4 (2013), e61483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Masaya Tachikawa, Takuya Maekawa, and Yasuyuki Matsushita. 2016. Predicting location semantics combining active and passive sensing with environment-independent classifier. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 220--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Päivi Topo. 2009. Technology studies to meet the needs of people with dementia and their caregivers: a literature review. Journal of applied Gerontology 28, 1 (2009), 5--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Jannique GZ van Uffelen, Marijke JM Chinapaw, Willem van Mechelen, and Marijke Hopman-Rock. 2008. Walking or vitamin B for cognition in older adults with mild cognitive impairment? A randomised controlled trial. British journal of sports medicine 42, 5 (2008), 344--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Kayci Vickers, Amy Rodriguez, Felicia Goldstein, Ayotoni Ariyo, Suzette Binford, Gabrielle Campiglia, Gari Clifford, Jennifer DuBose, Elizabeth Mynatt, Megan Nare, et al. 2020. Cognitive Empowerment Program for Individuals with Mild Cognitive Impairment: Description and Preliminary Satisfaction Ratings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 101, 11 (2020), e107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Alice Watson, Timothy Bickmore, Abby Cange, Ambar Kulshreshtha, and Joseph Kvedar. 2012. An internet-based virtual coach to promote physical activity adherence in overweight adults: randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research 14, 1 (2012), e1. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., Vol. 6, No. GROUP, Article 32. Publication date: January 2022. 32:26 Elizabeth D. Mynatt et al.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Naomi Yamashita, Hideaki Kuzuoka, Keiji Hirata, and Takashi Kudo. 2013. Understanding the conflicting demands of family caregivers caring for depressed family members. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2637--2646.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Heather Young, Sheridan Miyamoto, Deborah Ward, Madan Dharmar, Yajarayma Tang-Feldman, and Lars Berglund. 2014. Sustained effects of a nurse coaching intervention via telehealth to improve health behavior change in diabetes. Telemedicine and e-Health 20, 9 (2014), 828--834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Steven H Zarit, Pamela A Todd, and Judy M Zarit. 1986. Subjective burden of husbands and wives as caregivers: a longitudinal study. The Gerontologist 26, 3 (1986), 260--266Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Pivoting an MCI Empowerment Program to Online Engagement

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
        Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 6, Issue GROUP
        GROUP
        January 2022
        992 pages
        EISSN:2573-0142
        DOI:10.1145/3511803
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 January 2022
        Published in pacmhci Volume 6, Issue GROUP

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader