skip to main content
10.1145/3491102.3517625acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Simulating Human Imprecision in Temporal Statements of Intelligent Virtual Agents

Published:29 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Research on intelligent virtual agents (IVAs) often concerns the implementation of human-like behavior by integrating artificial intelligence algorithms. Thus far, few studies focused on mimicry of cognitive imperfections inherent to humans in IVAs. Neglecting to implement such imperfect behavior in IVAs might result in less believable or engaging human-agent interactions. In this paper, we simulate human imprecision in conversational IVAs’ temporal statements. We conducted a survey to identify temporal statement patterns, transferred them to a conversational IVA, and conducted a user study evaluating the effects of time precision on perceived anthropomorphism and usefulness. Statistical analyses reveal significant interaction between time precision and agents’ use of memory aids, indicating that (i) imprecise agents are perceived as more human-like than precise agents when responding immediately, and (ii) unnaturally high levels of temporal precision can be compensated for by memory aid use. Further findings underscore the value of continued inquiry into cultural variations.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491102.3517625-video-preview.mp4

mp4

11.7 MB

References

  1. David Ahn, Sisay Fissaha Adafre, and Maarten de Rijke. 2005. Extracting Temporal Information from Open Domain Text: A Comparative Exploration. Journal of Digital Information Management 3, 1 (2005), 14–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Jan Allbeck and Norman I Badler. 2001. Consistent Communication with Control. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Non-Verbal and Verbal Communicative Acts to Achieve Contextual Embodied Agents at the Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS). ACM, New York, NY, US, 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreas Armborst. 2017. Thematic Proximity in Content Analysis. Sage Open 7, 2 (2017), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 1 (2009), 71–81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Timothy Bickmore, Daniel Schulman, and Langxuan Yin. 2009. Engagement vs. Deceit: Virtual Humans with Human Autobiographies. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 6–19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard A Block. 2003. Psychological Timing Without a Timer: The Roles of Attention and Memory. In Time and Mind II: Information Processing Perspectives. Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, Göttingen, Germany, 41–59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Susan E Brennan and Maurice Williams. 1995. The Feeling of Another’s Knowing: Prosody and Filled Pauses as Cues to Listeners About the Metacognitive States of Speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 34, 3 (1995), 383–398.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Stephen Buetow and Katharine Wallis. 2019. The Beauty in Perfect Imperfection. Journal of Medical Humanities 40, 3 (2019), 389–394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ondřej Burkert, Cyril Brom, Rudolf Kadlec, and Jiří Lukavskỳ. 2010. Timing in Episodic Memory: Virtual Characters in Action. In Remembering Who We Are – Human Memory for Artificial Agents Symposium. De Montfort University, Leicester, UK, 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. James Carifio and Rocco Perla. 2008. Resolving the 50-Year Debate Around Using and Misusing Likert Scales. Medical Education 42, 12 (2008), 1150–1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. W Crawford. 2008. Place and Time Adverbials in Native and Non-Native English Student Writing. In Corpora and Discourse: The Challenges of Different Settings. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 267–289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David Crystal. 1966. Specification and English Tenses. Journal of Linguistics 2, 1 (1966), 1–34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. DeepL. 2021. DeepL Translate: The World’s Most Accurate Translator. https://www.deepl.com/en/translator. Accessed: 2021-12-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Virginie Demeure, Radosław Niewiadomski, and Catherine Pelachaud. 2011. HHow Is Believability of a Virtual Agent Related to Warmth, Competence, Personification, and Embodiment?Presence 20, 5 (2011), 431–448.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Joao Dias, Wan Ching Ho, Thurid Vogt, Nathalie Beeckman, Ana Paiva, and Elisabeth André. 2007. I Know What I Did Last Summer: Autobiographic Memory in Synthetic Characters. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 606–617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Alexander Eiselmayer, Chat Wacharamanotham, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, and Wendy E. Mackay. 2019. Touchstone2: An Interactive Environment for Exploring Trade-Offs in HCI Experiment Design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, New York, NY, US, 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Eisko. 2018. Animatable Digital Double of Louise by Eisko©. www.eisko.comGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas Erickson, Catalina M. Danis, Wendy A. Kellogg, and Mary E. Helander. 2008. Assistance: The Work Practices of Human Administrative Assistants and Their Implications for IT and Organizations. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW). ACM, New York, NY, US, 609–618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Lisa Ferro. 2001. TIDES Instruction Manual for the Annotation of Temporal Expressions. Technical Report. The MITRE Corporation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. W. Friedman. 2005. Developmental and Cognitive Perspectives on Humans’ Sense of the Times of Past and Future Events. Learning and Motivation 36 (2005), 145–158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. William J Friedman. 2004. Time in Autobiographical Memory. Social Cognition 22, 5: Special issue (2004), 591–605.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Wael H Gomaa and Aly A Fahmy. 2013. A Survey of Text Similarity Approaches. international Journal of Computer Applications 68, 13(2013), 13–18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. P Gomes, Ana Paiva, and Carlos Martinho. 2010. Episodic Memory Retrieval Through Re-appraisal of Past Events. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) - Supplementary Materials. Springer, Philadelphia, US, 26–27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Paulo F Gomes, Carlos Martinho, and Ana Paiva. 2011. I’ve Been Here Before! Location and Appraisal in Memory Retrieval. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) - Volume 3. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, US, 1039–1046.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Google. 2021. Dialogflow | Google Cloud. cloud.google.com/dialogflow/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Google. 2021. Google Translate. https://translate.google.com/. Accessed: 2021-12-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Google. 2021. Speech-to-Text: Automatic Speech Recognition | Google Cloud. cloud.google.com/speech-to-text/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Google. 2021. Text-to-Speech: Lifelike Speech Synthesis | Google Cloud. cloud.google.com/text-to-speech/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Robert J Graham. 1981. The Role of Perception of Time in Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research 7, 4 (1981), 335–342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. David Graus, Paul N Bennett, Ryen W White, and Eric Horvitz. 2016. Analyzing and Predicting Task Reminders. In Proceedings of the Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP). ACM, New York, NY, US, 7–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Simon Grondin. 2010. Timing and Time Perception: A Review of Recent Behavioral and Neuroscience Findings and Theoretical Directions. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 3 (2010), 561–582.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Charles Hampden-Turner, Fons Trompenaars, and Charles Hampden-Turner. 2020. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, Boston, MA, US.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin Haspelmath. 1997. From Space to Time. Lincom Europa, München, Germany, Newcastle, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wan Ching Ho and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2008. Towards a Narrative Mind: The Creation of Coherent Life Stories for Believable Virtual Agents. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 59–72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Margaret J Intons-Peterson and JoAnne Fournier. 1986. External and Internal Memory Aids: When and How Often Do We Use Them?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115, 3 (1986), 267.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Margaret Jean Intons-Peterson and George L Newsome. 1992. External Memory Aids: Effects and Effectiveness. In Memory Improvement. Springer, New York, NY, US, 101–121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Steve MJ Janssen, Antonio G Chessa, and Jaap MJ Murre. 2006. Memory for Time: How People Date Events. Memory & Cognition 34, 1 (2006), 138–147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Ryota Kanai, Mia Yuan Dong, Bahador Bahrami, and Geraint Rees. 2011. Distractibility in Daily Life Is Reflected in the Structure and Function of Human Parietal Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 31, 18 (2011), 6620–6626.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Zerrin Kasap, Maher Ben Moussa, Parag Chaudhuri, and Nadia Magnenat-Thalmann. 2009. Making Them Remember—Emotional Virtual Characters With Memory. Computer Graphics and Applications 29, 2 (2009), 20–29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Charlyn M Laserna, Yi-Tai Seih, and James W Pennebaker. 2014. Um... Who Like Says You Know: Filler Word Use as a Function of Age, Gender, and Personality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 33, 3 (2014), 328–338.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Douglas B Lenat. 2009. Building a Machine Smart Enough to Pass the Turing Test. In Parsing the Turing Test. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 261–282.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Willem JM Levelt, Graham Richardson, and Wido La Heij. 1985. Pointing and Voicing in Deictic Expressions. Journal of Memory and Language 24, 2 (1985), 133–164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Robert V Levine and Ara Norenzayan. 1999. The Pace of Life in 31 Countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 30, 2 (1999), 178–205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Microsoft. 2021. Windows Virtual Desktop | Remote Desktop | Microsoft Azure. azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/virtual-desktop/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. George A Miller. 1995. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (1995), 39–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Miro. 2021. The Visual Collaboration Platform for Every Team: Miro. https://miro.com/. Accessed: 2021-12-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Geoff Norman. 2010. Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the “Laws” of Statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education 15, 5 (2010), 625–632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Nahal Norouzi, Gerd Bruder, Brandon Belna, Stefanie Mutter, Damla Turgut, and Greg Welch. 2019. A Systematic Review of the Convergence of Augmented Reality, Intelligent Virtual Agents, and the Internet of Things. In Artificial Intelligence in IoT. Springer, Cham, 1–24.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Nahal Norouzi, Kangsoo Kim, Jason Hochreiter, Myungho Lee, Salam Daher, Gerd Bruder, and Greg Welch. 2018. A Systematic Survey of 15 Years of User Studies Published in the Intelligent Virtual Agents Conference. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA). ACM, New York, NY, US, 17–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Rafael E Núñez, Benjamin A Motz, and Ursina Teuscher. 2006. Time After Time: The Psychological Reality of the Ego-and Time-Reference-Point Distinction in Metaphorical Construals of Time. Metaphor and Symbol 21, 3 (2006), 133–146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Asher R Pacht. 1984. Reflections on Perfection. American Psychologist 39, 4 (1984), 386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Deborah Richards and Karla Bransky. 2014. Forgetmenot: What and How Users Expect Intelligent Virtual Agents to Recall and Forget Personal Conversational Content. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 72, 5 (2014), 460–476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. José I Rojas-Méndez, Gary Davies, Omer Omer, Paitoon Chetthamrongchai, and Canan Madran. 2002. A Time Attitude Scale for Cross Cultural Research. Journal of Global Marketing 15, 3-4 (2002), 117–147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Xin Rong, Adam Fourney, Robin N Brewer, Meredith Ringel Morris, and Paul N Bennett. 2017. Managing Uncertainty in Time Expressions for Virtual Assistants. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, New York, NY, US, 568–579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Roser Saurı, Jessica Littman, Bob Knippen, Robert Gaizauskas, Andrea Setzer, and James Pustejovsky. 2006. TimeML Annotation Guidelines Version 1.2.1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Susanne Schmidt, Oscar Ariza, and Frank Steinicke. 2020. Intelligent Blended Agents: Reality–Virtuality Interaction with Artificially Intelligent Embodied Virtual Humans. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 4, 4 (2020), 85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Susanne Schmidt, Gerd Bruder, and Frank Steinicke. 2018. Effects of Embodiment on Generic and Content-Specific Intelligent Virtual Agents as Exhibition Guides. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments (ICAT-EGVE). Eurographics Association, Geneve, Switzerland, 13–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Susanne Schmidt, Oscar Javier Ariza Nunez, and Frank Steinicke. 2019. Blended Agents: Manipulation of Physical Objects within Mixed Reality Environments and Beyond. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (SUI). ACM, New York, NY, US, 1–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Anna Sircova, Fons JR Van De Vijver, Evgeny Osin, Taciano L Milfont, Nicolas Fieulaine, Altinay Kislali-Erginbilgic, Philip G Zimbardo, 2015. Time Perspective Profiles of Cultures. In Time Perspective Theory; Review, Research and Application. Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 169–187.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Carlota S Smith. 1978. The Syntax and Interpretation of Temporal Expressions in English. Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 1 (1978), 43–99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. SurveyCircle. 2021. The Largest Community for Online Research. www.surveycircle.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Charles P Thompson. 1982. Memory for Unique Personal Events: The Roommate Study. Memory & Cognition 10, 4 (1982), 324–332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Charles P Thompson, John J Skowronski, and D John Lee. 1988. Telescoping in Dating Naturally Occurring Events. Memory & Cognition 16, 5 (1988), 461–468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Catherine Tinsley. 1998. Models of Conflict Resolution in Japanese, German, and American Cultures. Journal of Applied Psychology 83, 2 (1998), 316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Hegler Tissot, Marcos Didonet Del Fabro, Leon Derczynski, and Angus Roberts. 2019. Normalisation of Imprecise Temporal Expressions Extracted From Text. Knowledge and Information Systems 61, 3 (2019), 1361–1394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Jean-Claude G Usunier. 1991. Business Time Perceptions and National Cultures: A Comparative Survey. MIR: Management International Review 31, 3 (1991), 197–217.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Bart Van Den Hooff. 2004. Electronic Coordination and Collective Action: Use and Effects of Electronic Calendaring and Scheduling. Information & Management 42, 1 (2004), 103–114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Isaac Wang, Jesse Smith, and Jaime Ruiz. 2019. Exploring Virtual Agents for Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). ACM, New York, NY, US, 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Dan Zakay and Richard A Block. 2004. Prospective and Retrospective Duration Judgments: An Executive-Control Perspective. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis 64, 3 (2004), 319–328.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Gal Zauberman, B Kyu Kim, Selin A Malkoc, and James R Bettman. 2009. Discounting Time and Time Discounting: Subjective Time Perception and Intertemporal Preferences. Journal of Marketing Research 46, 4 (2009), 543–556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Qing Zhou and Richard Fikes. 2002. A Reusable Time Ontology. In Proceeding of the AAAI Workshop on Ontologies for the Semantic Web. The AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, US, 35–40.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. XiaoJia Zhou, HaoMin Li, XuDong Lu, and HuiLong Duan. 2011. Temporal Expression Recognition and Temporal Relationship Extraction from Chinese Narrative Medical Records. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering (ICBBE). IEEE, New York, NY, US, 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Simulating Human Imprecision in Temporal Statements of Intelligent Virtual Agents

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2022
          10459 pages
          ISBN:9781450391573
          DOI:10.1145/3491102

          Copyright © 2022 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 29 April 2022

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          Upcoming Conference

          CHI '24
          CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          May 11 - 16, 2024
          Honolulu , HI , USA

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format