Katie Seaborn
Peter Pennefather
ABSTRACT
Gender is increasingly being explored as a social characteristic ascribed to robots by people. Yet, research involving social robots that may be gendered tends not to address gender perceptions, such as through pilot studies or manipulation checks. Moreover, research that does address gender perceptions has been limited by a reliance on the human gender binary model of feminine and masculine, prescriptive response options, and/or researcher assumptions and/or ascriptions of participant gendering. In response, we conducted an online pilot categorization study (n=55) wherein we provided gender-expansive response options for rating four robots ranging across four levels of anthropomorphism. Findings indicate that people gender robots in diverse ways, and not necessarily in relation to the gender binary. Additionally, less anthropomorphic robots and the childlike humanoid robot were deemed masculine, while the iconic robot was deemed gender neutral, fluid, and/or ambiguous. We discuss implications for future work on all humanoid robots.
Supplemental Material
- Simone Alesich and Michael Rigby. 2017. Gendered robots: Implications for our humanoid future. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 36, 2, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2017.2696598Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Christoph Bartneck, Dana Kulić, Elizabeth Croft, and Susana Zoghbi. 2009. Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics 1, 1, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-008-0001-3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sofie Ingeman Behrens, Anne Katrine Kongsgaard Egsvang, Michael Hansen, and Anton Mikkonen Møllegård-Schroll. 2018. Gendered Robot Voices and Their Influence on Trust. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 63-64. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3177009Google Scholar
- Jasmin Bernotat, Friederike Eyssel, and Janik Sachse. 2017. Shape it – The influence of robot body shape on gender perception in robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Social Robotics (ICSR 2017), 75-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_8Google ScholarCross Ref
- De'Aira Bryant, Jason Borenstein, and Ayanna Howard. 2020. Why should we gender? The effect of robot gendering and occupational stereotypes on human trust and perceived competency. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’20), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374778Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meia Chita-Tegmark, Monika Lohani, and Matthias Scheutz. 2019. Gender effects in perceptions of robots and humans with varying emotional intelligence. In Proceedings of the 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’19), 230-238. https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673222Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charles Chu and Ashley E. Martin. 2021. The primacy of communality in humanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 97, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104224Google ScholarCross Ref
- Charles R. Crowell, Michael Villanoy, Matthias Scheutzz, and Paul Schermerhornz. 2009. Gendered voice and robot entities: Perceptions and reactions of male and female subjects. In Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2009), 3735-3741. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2009.5354204Google ScholarCross Ref
- Arturo Cruz-Maya and Adriana Tapus. 2017. Learning users’ and personality-gender preferences in close human-robot interaction. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN 2017), 791-798. https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2017.8172393Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malene Flensborg Damholdt, Christina Vestergaard, and Johanna Seibt. 2021. Ascribing gender to a social robot. In Culturally Sustainable Social Robotics: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2020 (Robophilosophy 2020), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA200921Google Scholar
- Brian R. Duffy. 2003. Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 3-4, 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz, and John T. Cacioppo. 2007. On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114, 4, 864.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Friederike Eyssel and Frank Hegel. 2012. (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42, 9, 2213-2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Francesca Ferrando. 2014. Is the post-human a post-woman? Cyborgs, robots, artificial intelligence and the futures of gender: a case study. European Journal of Futures Research 2, 1, 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40309-014-0043-8Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susan T. Fiske. 2018. Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science 27, 2, 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417738825Google ScholarCross Ref
- Markus Häring, Dieta Kuchenbrandt, and Elisabeth André. 2014. Would you like to play with me? How robots’ group membership and task features influence human–robot interaction. In 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’14), 9-16.Google Scholar
- Janet Shibley Hyde, Rebecca S. Bigler, Daphna Joel, Charlotte Chucky Tate, and Sari M. van Anders. 2019. The future of sex and gender in psychology: Five challenges to the gender binary. American Psychologist 74, 2, 171-193. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000307Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ryan Blake Jackson, Tom Williams, and Nicole Smith. 2020. Exploring the role of gender in perceptions of robotic noncompliance. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’20), 559-567. https://doi.org/10.1145/3319502.3374831Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Hwa Jung, T. Franklin Waddell, and S. Shyam Sundar. 2016. Feminizing robots: User responses to gender cues on robot body and screen. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’16), 3107-3113. https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892428Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dieta Kuchenbrandt, Markus Häring, Jessica Eichberg, and Friederike Eyssel. 2012. Keep an eye on the task! How gender typicality of tasks influence human–robot interactions. In Social Robotics (ICSR 2012), 448-457. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_45Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eun Ju Lee, Clifford Nass, and Scott Brave. 2000. Can computer-generated speech have gender?: An experimental test of gender stereotype. In Proceedings of the CHI’00 Extended Abstracts on Human factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’00), 289-290. https://doi.org/10.1145/633292.633461Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ashley E. Martin and Michael L. Slepian. 2021. The primacy of gender: Gendered cognition underlies the Big Two dimensions of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science 16, 6, 1143-1158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620904961Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clifford Ivar Nass and Scott Brave. 2005. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Clifford Nass, Youngme Moon, and Nancy Green. 1997. Are machines gender neutral? Gender-stereotypic responses to computers with voices. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27, 10, 864-876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Clifford Nass, Erica Robles, Charles Heenan, Hilary Bienstock, and Marissa Treinen. 2003. Speech-based disclosure systems: Effects of modality, gender of prompt, and gender of user. International Journal of Speech Technology 6, 2, 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022378312670Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shuichi Nishio, Hiroshi Ishiguro, and Norihiro Hagita. 2007. Geminoid: Teleoperated android of an existing person. Humanoid robots: New developments 14, 343-352.Google Scholar
- Tatsuya Nomura. 2017. Robots and Gender. In Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine (3rd ed.), Marianne J. Legato (ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, 695-703. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803506-1.00042-5Google Scholar
- Tatsuya Nomura. 2019. A possibility of inappropriate use of gender studies in human-robot Interaction. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00913-yGoogle Scholar
- Mako Okanda and Kosuke Taniguchi. 2021. Is a robot a boy? Japanese children's and adults’ gender-attribute bias toward robots and its implications for education on gender stereotypes. Cognitive Development 58, 101044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101044Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jahna Otterbacher and Michael Talias. 2017. S/he's too warm/agentic! The influence of gender on uncanny reactions to robots. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’17), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1145/2909824.3020220Google Scholar
- Kantwon Rogers, De'Aira Bryant, and Ayanna Howard. 2020. Robot gendering: Influences on trust, occupational competency, and preference of robot over human. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’20), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382930Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anara Sandygulova and Gregory M.P. O'Hare. 2015. Children's responses to genuine child synthesized speech in child-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts (HRI ’15 Companion), 81-82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2701973.2702058Google Scholar
- Anara Sandygulova and Gregory M.P. O'Hare. 2016. Investigating the impact of gender segregation within observational pretend play interaction. In The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction, 399-406.Google Scholar
- Katie Seaborn and Alexa Frank. 2022. What pronouns for Pepper? A critical review of gender/ing in research. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’22), accepted. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501996Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katie Seaborn and Peter Pennefather. 2022. Neither “hear” nor “their”: Interrogating gender neutrality in robots. In Companion of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI ’22 Companion), accepted.Google Scholar
- Carol A. Seavey, Phyllis A. Katz, and Sue Rosenberg Zalk. 1975. Baby X: The effect of gender labels on adult responses to infants. Sex Roles 1, 2, 103-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00288004Google ScholarCross Ref
- Roger Andre Søraa. 2017. Mechanical genders: How do humans gender robots? Gender, Technology and Development 21, 1-2, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2017.1385320Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicolas Spatola, Nolwenn Anier, Sandrine Redersdorff, Ludovic Ferrand, Clément Belletier, Alice Normand, and Pascal Huguet. 2019. National stereotypes and robots’ perception: The “made in” effect. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6, 21. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2019.00021Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katta Spiel, Oliver L. Haimson, and Danielle Lottridge. 2019. How to do better with gender on surveys: A guide for HCI researchers. Interactions 26, 4, 62-65. https://doi.org/10.1145/3338283Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andy Stirling. 2010. Keep it complex. Nature 468, 7327, 1029-1031. https://doi.org/10.1038/4681029aGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Selina Jeanne Sutton. 2020. Gender Ambiguous, not Genderless: Designing Gender in Voice User Interfaces (VUIs) with Sensitivity. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI ’20), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406123Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cara Tannenbaum, Robert P. Ellis, Friederike Eyssel, James Zou, and Londa Schiebinger. 2019. Sex and gender analysis improves science and engineering. Nature 575, 7781, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1657-6Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Gender Neutrality in Robots: An Open Living Review Framework
HRI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionGender is a primary characteristic by which people organize themselves. Previous research has shown that people tend to unknowingly ascribe gender to robots based on features of their embodiment. Yet, robots are not necessarily ascribed the same, or any,...
Exploring the Effects of Robot Gender on Child-Robot Interaction
HRI '18: Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionDespite the increase of research and applications for child-robot interactions, little is known about children»s responses to a robot»s gender across age and gender groups. This paper presents an exploratory study intended to examine whether the ...
Feminizing Robots: User Responses to Gender Cues on Robot Body and Screen
CHI EA '16: Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRobots are increasingly being deployed in a number of domains typically associated with female workers, e.g., caregiving. Although past robot morphology has favored a machine-like appearance that is often perceived as masculine, monitor-based robots ...
Comments