Farhan Asif Chowdhury
Koustuv Saha
ABSTRACT
Online social media enables mass-level, transparent, and democratized discussion on numerous socio-political issues. Due to such openness, these platforms often endure manipulation and misinformation - leading to negative impacts. To prevent such harmful activities, platform moderators employ countermeasures to safeguard against actors violating their rules. However, the correlation between publicly outlined policies and employed action is less clear to general people.
In this work, we examine violations and subsequent moderations related to the 2020 U.S. President Election discussion on Twitter. We focus on quantifying plausible reasons for the suspension, drawing on Twitter's rules and policies by identifying suspended users (Case) and comparing their activities and properties with (yet) non-suspended (Control) users. Using a dataset of 240M election-related tweets made by 21M unique users, we observe that Suspended users violate Twitter's rules at a higher rate (statistically significant) than Control users across all the considered aspects - hate speech, offensiveness, spamming, and civic integrity. Moreover, through the lens of Twitter's suspension mechanism, we qualitatively examine the targeted topics for manipulation.
- H. Gil de Zúñiga, N. Jung, and S. Valenzuela, "Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation," Journal of computer-mediated communication, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 319--336, 2012.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- A. Bessi and E. Ferrara, "Social bots distort the 2016 us presidential election online discussion," First Monday, vol. 21, no. 11-7, 2016.Google Scholar
- S. C. Woolley and P. N. Howard, Computational propaganda: political parties, politicians, and political manipulation on social media. Oxford University Press, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Congress-Hearing, "https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115shrg27398/pdf/CHRG-115shrg27398.pdf," 2017.Google Scholar
- Mueller-Report, "https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf," 2019.Google Scholar
- Facebook-Update, "https://about.fb.com/news/2017/09/information-operations-update/," 2017.Google Scholar
- Twitter-Update, "https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/2016-election-update.html," 2018.Google Scholar
- Bias, "https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/11/18/conservatives-accuse-twitter-of-liberal-bias/94037802/," 2016.Google Scholar
- Bias, "https://www.wired.co.uk/article/twitter-political-account-ban-us-mid-term-elections," 2020.Google Scholar
- Twitter-Safety, "https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/how-twitter-is-fighting-spam-and-malicious-automation.html," 2021.Google Scholar
- Twitter-Policy, "https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/2020-election-changes.html," 2021.Google Scholar
- K. F. Schulz and D. A. Grimes, "Case-control studies: research in reverse," The Lancet, vol. 359, no. 9304, pp. 431--434, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Thomas, C. Grier, D. Song, and V. Paxson, "Suspended accounts in retrospect: an analysis of twitter spam," in Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement conference, 2011, pp. 243--258.Google Scholar
- A. A. Amleshwaram, A. N. Reddy, S. Yadav, G. Gu, and C. Yang, "Cats: Characterizing automation of twitter spammers." 2021.Google Scholar
- H. Le, G. Boynton, Z. Shafiq, and P. Srinivasan, "A postmortem of suspended twitter accounts in the 2016 us presidential election," in 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 2019, pp. 258--265.Google Scholar
- F. A. Chowdhury, L. Allen, M. Yousuf, and A. Mueen, "On twitter purge: A retrospective analysis of suspended users," in Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, 2020, pp. 371--378.Google Scholar
- E. Ferrara, "Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 french presidential election," arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00086, 2017.Google Scholar
- J. Im, E. Chandrasekharan, J. Sargent, P. Lighthammer, T. Denby, A. Bhargava, L. Hemphill, D. Jurgens, and E. Gilbert, "Still out there: Modeling and identifying russian troll accounts on twitter," in 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, 2020, pp. 1--10.Google Scholar
- A. Badawy, E. Ferrara, and K. Lerman, "Analyzing the digital traces of political manipulation: The 2016 russian interference twitter campaign," in 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, 2018, pp. 258--265.Google Scholar
- S. Zannettou, T. Caulfield, E. De Cristofaro, M. Sirivianos, G. Stringhini, and J. Blackburn, "Disinformation warfare: Understanding state-sponsored trolls on twitter and their influence on the web," in Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, 2019, pp. 218--226.Google Scholar
- D. Lewinski and M. R. Hasan, "Russian troll account classification with twitter and facebook data," 2021.Google Scholar
- A. Olteanu, C. Castillo, F. Diaz, and S. Vieweg, "Crisislex: A lexicon for collecting and filtering microblogged communications in crises," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 8, no. 1, 2014.Google Scholar
- N. Abu-El-Rub and A. Mueen, "Botcamp: Bot-driven interactions in social campaigns," in The World Wide Web Conference, 2019, pp. 2529--2535.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Olteanu, C. Castillo, N. Diakopoulos, and K. Aberer, "Comparing events coverage in online news and social media: The case of climate change," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 9, no. 1, 2015.Google Scholar
- Website, "https://sites.google.com/view/us-election20-twitter-suspend," 2021.Google Scholar
- C. M. Rivers and B. L. Lewis, "Ethical research standards in a world of big data," F1000Research, vol. 3, 2014.Google Scholar
- F. A. Chowdhury, Y. Liu, K. Saha, N. Vincent, L. Neves, N. Shah, and M. W. Bos, "Ceam: The effectiveness of cyclic and ephemeral attention models of user behavior on social platforms," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 15, 2021, pp. 117--128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- TwitterRules, "https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/twitter-rules," 2021.Google Scholar
- A. Founta, C. Djouvas, D. Chatzakou, I. Leontiadis, J. Blackburn, G. Stringhini, A. Vakali, M. Sirivianos, and N. Kourtellis, "Large scale crowdsourcing and characterization of twitter abusive behavior," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 12, no. 1, 2018.Google Scholar
- T. Davidson, D. Warmsley, M. Macy, and I. Weber, "Automated hate speech detection and the problem of offensive language," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 11, no. 1, 2017.Google Scholar
- Twitter-Integrity, "https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/election-integrity-policy," 2021.Google Scholar
- E. Ferrara, H. Chang, E. Chen, G. Muric, and J. Patel, "Characterizing social media manipulation in the 2020 us presidential election," First Monday, 2020.Google Scholar
- FactCheck, "https://www.factcheck.org/2017/07/websites-post-fake-satirical-stories/," 2021.Google Scholar
- Politifact, "https://www.politifact.com/article/2017/apr/20/politifacts-guide-fake-news-websites-and-what-they/," 2021.Google Scholar
- F. Benevenuto, G. Magno, T. Rodrigues, and V. Almeida, "Detecting spammers on twitter," 2010.Google Scholar
- K.-C. Yang, O. Varol, P.-M. Hui, and F. Menczer, "Scalable and generalizable social bot detection through data selection," in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 34, no. 01, 2020, pp. 1096--1103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Badawy, A. Addawood, K. Lerman, and E. Ferrara, "Characterizing the 2016 russian ira influence campaign," Social Network Analysis and Mining, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 31, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- AllSides, "https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-ratings," 2021.Google Scholar
- MediaBias, "https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/," 2021.Google Scholar
- Twitter-Measures, "https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2018/how-twitter-is-fighting-spam-and-malicious-automation.html," 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Bruns and J. E. Burgess, "The use of twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics," in Proceedings of the 6th European consortium for political research (ECPR) general conference 2011, 2011.Google Scholar
- A. Arif, L. G. Stewart, and K. Starbird, "Acting the part: Examining information operations within# blacklivesmatter discourse," Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 2, no. CSCW, pp. 1--27, 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Eisenstein, A. Ahmed, and E. P. Xing, "Sparse additive generative models of text," 2011.Google Scholar
- K. Saha, Y. Liu, N. Vincent, F. A. Chowdhury, L. Neves, N. Shah, and M. W. Bos, "Advertiming matters: Examining user ad consumption for effective ad allocations on social media," in Proc. CHI, 2021.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Trump-Ban, "https://blog.twitter.com/en_us/topics/company/2020/suspension.html," 2020.Google Scholar
- K. Saha and A. Sharma, "Causal factors of effective psychosocial outcomes in online mental health communities," in Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, vol. 14, 2020, pp. 590--601.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Examining factors associated with Twitter account suspension following the 2020 U.S. presidential election
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
On tweets, retweets, hashtags and user profiles in the 2016 American Presidential Election Scene
dg.o '17: Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government ResearchTwitter is a microblogging where users can publish short messages restricted to 140 characters. It has been used in the political scene from different perspectives. One of them is predicting election results. In this area, many researchers have drawn ...
Linguistic Factors Associated With Propagation of Political Opinions in Twitter
In the last decade, social networks have emerged as a significant media platform for dissemination of political information. In this article, we characterize linguistic factors that affect the dissemination of a political message on Twitter. This is ...
A sentiment analysis of audiences on twitter: who is the positive or negative audience of popular twitterers?
ICHIT'11: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Convergence and hybrid information technologyMicroblogging is a new informal communication medium of blogging that differs from a traditional blog in which content is much shorter. Microbloggers post about topics that describe their current status. Twitter is a popular microblogging service and ...
Comments