skip to main content
10.1145/3477206.3477477acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesnanocomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Markov Model for the Flow of Nanobots in the Human Circulatory System

Published:17 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in nanotechnology show possible applications of nano-devices within the human body. For example, technical solutions are under development to make use of nanobots to carry and release drugs via the circulatory system. In this scenario, it is important to study the location and the location distribution of nanobots in the human circulatory system (HCS). However, due to bifurcations and the variety of structures in the human vessels, this problem is rather challenging. In this paper, we address a new methodology based on a Markov chain model to study the distribution of nanobots in the HCS. The transition probabilities are assessed through analogies of their representation with an electric circuit representation of the HCS. Additionally, we conducted simulations in the simulation framework BloodVoyagerS to compare results with the provided Markov model. Our evaluation shows that the new model accounts well for the location of the nano-devices as well as their trajectories.

References

  1. Ian F. Akyildiz, Massimiliano Pierobon, S. Balasubramaniam, and Y. Koucheryavy. 2015. The Internet of Bio-Nano Things. IEEE Communications Magazine (COMMAG) 53, 3 (March 2015), 32--40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7060516Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. David J Brayden. 2003. Controlled release technologies for drug delivery. Drug Discovery Today 8, 21 (Nov. 2003), 976--978. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-6446(03)02874-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Youssef Chahibi, Massimiliano Pierobon, Sang Ok Song, and Ian F. Akyildiz. 2013. A Molecular Communication System Model for Particulate Drug Delivery Systems. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 60, 12 (Dec. 2013), 3468--3483. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.2013.2271503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Yifan Chen, Panagiotis Kosmas, Putri Santi Anwar, and Limin Huang. 2015. A Touch-Communication Framework for Drug Delivery Based on a Transient Microbot System. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience 14, 4 (June 2015), 397--408. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnb.2015.2395539Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Falko Dressler and Stefan Fischer. 2015. Connecting In-Body Nano Communication with Body Area Networks: Challenges and Opportunities of the Internet of Nano Things. Elsevier Nano Communication Networks 6 (June 2015), 29--38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nancom.2015.01.006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Constantine Gatsonis, James S. Hodges, Robert E. Kaas, and Nozer D. Singpur-walla. 2012. Case Studies in Bayesian Statistics. Vol. II. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Regine Geyer, Marc Stelzner, Florian Büther, and Sebastian Ebers. 2018. BloodVoyagerS: Simulation of the Work Environment of Medical Nanobots. In 5th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication (NANOCOM 2018). ACM, Reykjavík, Iceland, 5:1-5:6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233188.3233196Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Arthur C. Guyton and Michael. E. Hall. 2015. Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology (14 ed.). Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. William Hayt, Jack Kemmerly, Jamie Phillips, and Steven Durbin. 2019. Engineering Circuit Analysis (9 ed.). McGraw-Hill Education, New York City, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhe Hu. 2001. HSP. https://de.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/818-hspGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Sophia L. Kalpazidou. 2006. Cycle Representations of Markov Processes. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-36081-6Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Otilia M. Koo, Israel Rubinstein, and Hayat Onyuksel. 2005. Role of nanotechnology in targeted drug delivery and imaging: a concise review. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology Biology and Medicine 1, 3 (Sept. 2005), 193--212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2005.06.004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Anke Kuestner, Lukas Stratmann, Regine Wendt, Stefan Fischer, and Falko Dressler. 2020. A Simulation Framework for Connecting In-Body Nano Communication with Out-of-Body Devices. In 7th ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication (NANOCOM 2020). ACM, Virtual Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411295.3411308Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. MacQueen. 1981. Circuit Processes. The Annals of Probability 9, 4 (Aug. 1981). https://doi.org/10.1214/aop/1176994365Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Tadashi Nakano, Tatsuya Suda, Y. Okaie, M. J. Moore, and A. V. Vasilakos. 2014. Molecular Communication Among Biological Nanomachines: A Layered Architecture and Research Issues. IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience 13, 3 (Sept. 2014), 169--197. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2014.2316674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Paul K. Newton, Jeremy Mason, Kelly Bethel, Lyudmila A. Bazhenova, Jorge Nieva, and Peter Kuhn. 2012. A Stochastic Markov Chain Model to Describe Lung Cancer Growth and Metastasis. PLOS ONE 7, 4 (April 2012), e34637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0034637Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Vincent C. Rideout. 1991. Mathematical and Computer Modeling of Physiological Systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yubing Shi, Patricia Lawford, and Rodney Hose. 2011. Review of Zero-D and 1-D Models of Blood Flow in the Cardiovascular System. BioMedical Engineering OnLine 10, 1 (2011), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-925x-10-33Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. M. F. Snyder and V. C. Rideout. 1969. Computer Simulation Studies of the Venous Circulation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering BME-16, 4 (Oct. 1969), 325--334. https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.1969.4502663Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    NANOCOM '21: Proceedings of the Eight Annual ACM International Conference on Nanoscale Computing and Communication
    September 2021
    179 pages
    ISBN:9781450387101
    DOI:10.1145/3477206

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 17 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    NANOCOM '21 Paper Acceptance Rate13of22submissions,59%Overall Acceptance Rate97of135submissions,72%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader