Myounghoon Jeon
Heejin Jeong
Christian P. Janssen
ABSTRACT
Computational modeling has great advantages in human behavior research, such as abstracting the problem space, simulating the situation by varying critical variables, and predicting future outcomes. Although much research has been conducted on driver behavior modeling, relatively little modeling research has appeared at the Auto-UI Conferences. If any, most work has focused on qualitative models about manual driving. In this workshop, we will first describe why computational driver behavior modeling is crucial for automotive research and then, introduce recent driver modeling research to researchers, practitioners, and students. By identifying research gaps and exploring solutions together, we expect to form the basis of a new modeling special interest group combining the Auto-UI community and the computational modeling community. The workshop will be closed with suggestions on the directions for future transdisciplinary work.
- D. P. Brumby, C. P. Janssen, T. Kujala, and D. D. Salvucci, “Computational models of user multitasking,” Computational Interaction Design, pp. 341-362, 2018.Google Scholar
- A. Oulasvirta, “It's time to rediscover HCI models,” Interactions, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 52-56, 2019.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Schneegaß, B. Pfleging, D. Kern, and A. Schmidt, "Support for modeling interaction with automotive user interfaces," In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 71-78), 2011.Google Scholar
- K. R. May, B. E. Noah, and B. N. Walker, "Driving acceptance: Applying structural equation modeling to in-vehicle automation acceptance," In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (pp. 190-194), 2017.Google Scholar
- J. L. McClelland, “The place of modeling in cognitive science,” Topics in Cognitive Science, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 11-38, 2009.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Newell, “Unified theories of cognition”, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. R. Anderson, How can the human mind occur in the physical universe?: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
- W. D. Gray, Integrated models of cognitive systems: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Salvucci, and N. Taatgen, "Oxford series on cognitive models and architectures," The multitasking mind. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
- S. K. Card, T. P. Moran, and A. Newell, "The psychology of human-computer interaction. 1983," Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1983.Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Kieras, “Model-based Evaluation,” In J. A. Jacko (Ed.). The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook (3rd ed., pp. 1299–1318). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis, 2012.Google Scholar
- A. D. McDonald, H. Alambeigi, J. Engström, G. Markkula, T. Vogelpohl, J. Dunne, and N. Yuma, “Toward computational simulations of behavior during automated driving takeovers: a review of the empirical and modeling literatures,” Human Factors, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 642-688, 2019.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. A. Michon, "A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we do?," Human Behavior and Traffic Safety, pp. 485-524: Springer, 1985.Google Scholar
- E. Boer, "A driver model of attention management and task scheduling: Satisficing decision making with dynamic mental models."Google Scholar
- D. Taylor, “DRIVERS'GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE AND THE RISK OF ACCIDENT,” Ergonomics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 439-451, 1964.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. G. Adams, “Risk and freedom: the record of road safety regulation,” 1985.Google Scholar
- R. Fuller, “A conceptualization of driving behaviour as threat avoidance,” Ergonomics, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 1139-1155, 1984.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. J. Wilde, “The theory of risk homeostasis: implications for safety and health,” Risk analysis, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 209-225, 1982.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Näätänen, and H. Summala, “Road-user behaviour and traffic accidents,” Publication of: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1976.Google Scholar
- R. Fuller, “Towards a general theory of driver behaviour,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 461-472, 2005.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Fuller, “Psychology and the highway engineer,” Fuller & Santos, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Jeon, “Towards affect-integrated driving behaviour research,” Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 553-585, 2015.Google ScholarCross Ref
- X. Wu, L. N. Boyle, and D. Marshall, "Drivers’ avoidance strategies when using a forward collision warning (FCW) system," In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 61, no. 1. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. (pp. 1939-1943), 2017.Google Scholar
- M. Hu, Y. Liao, W. Wang, G. Li, B. Cheng, and F. Chen, “Decision tree-based maneuver prediction for driver rear-end risk-avoidance behaviors in cut-in scenarios,” Journal of advanced transportation, vol. 2017, 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. D. Salvucci, “Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture,” Human Factors, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 362-380, 2006.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. D. Salvucci, “Rapid prototyping and evaluation of in-vehicle interfaces,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1-33, 2009.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. Zhang, and C. Wu, "Modeling the Effects of Warning Lead Time, Warning Reliability and Warning Style on Human Performance Under Connected Vehicle Settings," In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 62. no. 1. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, (pp. 701-701), 2018.Google Scholar
- Y. Zhang, C. Wu, and J. Wan, “Mathematical modeling of the effects of speech warning characteristics on human performance and its application in transportation cyberphysical systems,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 3062-3074, 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. Jeong, and Y. Liu, “Modeling of stimulus-response secondary tasks with different modalities while driving in a computational cognitive architecture,” In Proceedings of the 9th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design (pp. 58-64), 2017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- H. Jeong, and Y. Liu, “Cognitive Modeling of Remote-manual and Voice Controls for In-vehicle Human-automation Systems,” In Proceedings of the Companion of the 13th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp.135-136), 2018.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. P. Janssen, L. N. Boyle, A. L. Kun, W. Ju, and L. L. Chuang, “A hidden markov framework to capture human–machine interaction in automated vehicles,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 947-955, 2019.Google Scholar
- C. Gold, R. Happee, and K. Bengler, “Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 116, pp. 3-13, 2018.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ko, Y. Zhang, and M. Jeon, "Modeling the effects of auditory display takeover requests on drivers' behavior in autonomous vehicles," In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications: Adjunct Proceedings (pp. 392-398), 2019.Google Scholar
- C. P. Janssen, S. J. Gould, S. Y. Li, D. P. Brumby, and A. L. Cox, “Integrating knowledge of multitasking and interruptions across different perspectives and research methods,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 79, pp. 1-5, 2015.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Riener, M. Jeon, and M. Reiner, “Theory and technological implications of subliminal perception research,” Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. iii-vii, 2014.Google Scholar
- A. Riener, M. Jeon, I. Alvarez, and F. Zambonelli, “Special issue on “The social car: socially-inspired mechanisms for future mobility services,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 14, pp. 66, 2014.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. P. Janssen, S. T. Iqbal, A. L. Kun, and S. F. Donker, “Interrupted by my car? Implications of interruption and interleaving research for automated vehicles,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 130, pp. 221-233, 2019.Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. P. Janssen, L. N., Boyle, W. Ju, A. Riener, and I. Alvarez, “Agents, environments, scenarios: A framework for examining models and simulations of human-vehicle interaction,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 8, 100214, 2020.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Ko, K. Kutchek, Y. Zhang, and M. Jeon, “Effects of non-speech auditory cues on control transition behaviors in semi-automated vehicles: Empirical study, modeling, and validation,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Online First Version 2021.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Computational Modeling of Driving Behaviors: Challenges and Approaches
Recommendations
Driver Classification Based on Driving Behaviors
IUI '16: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User InterfacesIn this paper we develop a model capable of classifying drivers from their driving behaviors sensed by only low level sensors. The sensing platform consists of data available from the diagnostic outlet (OBD) of the car and smartphone sensors. We develop ...
Autonomous Driving: Investigating the Feasibility of Bimodal Take-Over Requests
Autonomous vehicles will need de-escalation strategies to compensate when reaching system limitations. Car-driver handovers can be considered one possible method to deal with system boundaries. The authors suggest a bimodal auditory and visual handover ...
Lane Change Decision Making for Automated Driving
HRI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionFor the success of automated vehicles, in addition to legal, safety, and technical aspects, user acceptance and trust in automation systems are considered to have a significant impact. The driving style can decisively influence these factors. Besides ...
Comments