skip to main content
10.1145/3472813.3473186acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmhiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The Design of a Smartbrush Oral Health Installation for Aged Care Centres in Australia

Published:26 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The oral health of residents in aged care centres in Australia is poor, contributing to infections, hospital admissions, and increased suffering. Although the use of electric toothbrushes has been deployed in many centres, smartbrushes that record and transmit information about brushing patterns and duration are not routinely deployed. Yet, the use of smartbrushes for aged care residents promises better oral care. Thus, a study aimed at investigating the appropriateness and suitability of a smartbrush for aged care residents is currently underway. Due to the peculiarity of the aged care setting, the incorporation of smartbrushes into residents’ care does require careful planning and design considerations. This paper describes an initial design process undertaken through the use of an actor to understand the important elements to be incorporated whilst installing a smartbrush for use in aged care settings. The design covers configuration settings of the brush and app, including ergonomic factors related to brush and smartphone placement. A design science approach led to an installation re-design and a revised protocol for the planned study, the ultimate aim being to design installations to enhance perceived usefulness, ease of use, and attitudes towards the incorporation of smartbrushes for improving oral health care for aged care residents.

References

  1. Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety: Interim Report. 2019 [cited 2020 February 9]; Available from: https://agedcare.royalcommission.gov.au/publications/Pages/interim-report.aspx.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. COAG, Healthy Mouths, Healthy Lives: Australia's National Oral Health Plan 2015–2024. 2015, South Australian Dental Service: Adelaide, South Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Tynan, A., L. Deeth, and D. McKenzie, An integrated oral health program for rural residential aged care facilities: a mixed methods comparative study. BMC health services research, 2018. 18(1): p. 515.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mariño, R.J., P. Marwaha, and S.-y. Barrow, Web-based oral health promotion program for older adults: Development and preliminary evaluation. International journal of medical informatics, 2016. 91: p. e9-e15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Mariño, R., , Teleconsultation and telediagnosis for oral health assessment: an Australian perspective, in Teledentistry. 2015, Springer. p. 101-112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Niessen, L.C. and C.W. Douglass, Preventive actions for enhancing oral health. Clinics in geriatric medicine, 1992. 8(1): p. 201-214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Whitmyer, C.C., , Clinical evaluation of the efficacy and safety of an ultrasonic toothbrush system in an elderly patient population. Geriatric Nursing, 1998. 19(1): p. 29-33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Grossman, E., W. Dembling, and H. Proskin, A comparative clinical investigation of the safety and efficacy of an oscillating/rotating electric toothbrush and a sonic toothbrush. The Journal of clinical dentistry, 1995. 6(1): p. 108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Graetz, C., , Toothbrushing education via a smart software visualization system. 2013. 84(2): p. 186-195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chang, Y.-C., Playful toothbrush: ubicomp technology for teaching tooth brushing to kindergarten children. in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 2008. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Marcon, M., A. Sarti, and S. Tubaro, Toothbrush motion analysis to help children learn proper tooth brushing. Computer Vision Image Understanding, 2016. 148: p. 34-45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wu, P.F., A mixed methods approach to technology acceptance research. Journal of the AIS, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Greenhalgh, T. and J. Russell, Why do evaluations of eHealth programs fail? An alternative set of guiding principles. PLoS Med, 2010. 7(11): p. e1000360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, F.D., User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International journal of man-machine studies, 1993. 38(3): p. 475-487.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hevner, A.R., A three cycle view of design science research. Scandinavian journal of information systems, 2007. 19(2): p. 4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Boger, J., , Using actors to develop technologies for older adults with dementia: A pilot study. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Horsky, J., , Clinical reasoning in the context of active decision support during medication prescribing. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2017. 97: p. 1-11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Mariño, R., , Cost-analysis of teledentistry in residential aged care facilities. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 2016. 22(6): p. 326-332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mariño, R., , Teleconsultation/telediagnosis using teledentistry technology: a pilot feasibility study. International journal on advances in life sciences, 2014. 6(3 & 4): p. 291-299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. The Design of a Smartbrush Oral Health Installation for Aged Care Centres in Australia

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICMHI '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical and Health Informatics
      May 2021
      347 pages
      ISBN:9781450389846
      DOI:10.1145/3472813

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 26 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format