ABSTRACT
Gaining an understanding of people's diverse mental health needs is essential for informing the design of inclusive mental health technologies. However, conversations about mental health experiences can be challenging for both researchers and participants. We present the design of visual cards that illustrate an inclusive mental health concept to support researchers and participants in understanding and sharing mental health experiences. We illustrate the iterative design of the visual cards with our reflections and feedback from ethnically diverse participants. We found that designing the visual cards fostered insightful reflections within the design team regarding the roles of identity, gender, and ethnicity in designing culturally sensitive content and research. Participants from minority ethnic backgrounds valued the illustrative elements of the visual cards and highlighted the importance of supporting different languages and visual cultures. We discuss use cases for the visual cards and implications for designing culturally sensitive mental health technologies.
- Adkins, E.C. 2017. Exploring the potential of technology-based mental health services for homeless youth: A qualitative study. Psychological services. 14, 2 (2017), 238.Google Scholar
- Ahmed, M.H. 2020. Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) Alliance Against COVID-19: One Step Forward. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 7, 5 (Oct. 2020), 822–828. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00837-0.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alkhuzai, K. and Denisova, A. 2021. Evaluating the Use of Persuasive Design Cards for Novice Designers. Journal of Usability Studies. 16, 2 (2021).Google Scholar
- Anyan, F. 2013. The Influence of Power Shifts in Data Collection and Analysis Stages: A Focus on Qualitative Research Interview. Qualitative Report. 18, (2013), 36.Google Scholar
- Ayobi, A. 2016. Reflections on 5 Years of Personal Informatics: Rising Concerns and Emerging Directions. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2774–2781.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ayobi, A. 2020. Trackly: A Customisable and Pictorial Self-Tracking App to Support Agency in Multiple Sclerosis Self-Care. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20) (2020).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bekker, T. and Antle, A.N. 2011. Developmentally situated design (DSD) making theoretical knowledge accessible to designers of children's technology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 2531–2540.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cotterill, P. 1992. Interviewing women: Issues of frienship, vulnerability, and power. Women's Studies International Forum (1992), 593–606.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Davis, H. and Waycott, J. 2015. Ethical Encounters: HCI Research in Sensitive and Complex Settings. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Dec. 2015), 667–669.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deng, Y. 2014. Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (2014), 695–704.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dibitonto, M. 2018. The IoT Design Deck: A Tool for the Co-design of Connected Products. Advances in Usability and User Experience (Cham, 2018), 217–227.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Duarte, A.M.B. 2018. Participatory Design and Participatory Research: An HCI Case Study with Young Forced Migrants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 25, 1 (Feb. 2018), 3:1-3:39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3145472.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ertl, T. 2020. Psychosocial ICT: The Potential, Challenges and Benefits of Self-help Tools for Refugees with Negative Mental Stress. (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2020_ep11.Google Scholar
- Foronda, C.L. 2008. A Concept Analysis of Cultural Sensitivity. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 19, 3 (Jul. 2008), 207–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659608317093.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Galderisi, S. 2015. Toward a new definition of mental health. World Psychiatry. 14, 2 (Jun. 2015), 231–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20231.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jagtap, S. 2021. Co-design with marginalised people: designers’ perceptions of barriers and enablers. CoDesign. 0, 0 (Feb. 2021), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1883065.Google Scholar
- Kirchner, S. 2021. “They don't always think about that”: Translational Needs in the Design of Personal Health Informatics Applications. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama Japan, May 2021), 1–16.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kirmayer, L.J. 2012. Rethinking cultural competence. Transcultural Psychiatry. 49, 2 (Apr. 2012), 149–164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461512444673.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Knifton, L. 2010. Community conversation: addressing mental health stigma with ethnic minority communities. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 45, 4 (Apr. 2010), 497–504. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0095-4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Linney, C. 2020. “Crazy person is crazy person. It doesn't differentiate”: an exploration into Somali views of mental health and access to healthcare in an established UK Somali community. International Journal for Equity in Health. 19, 1 (Dec. 2020), 190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01295-0.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Logler, N. 2018. Metaphor cards: A how-to-guide for making and using a generative metaphorical design toolkit. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2018), 1373–1386.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Luger, E. 2015. Playing the Legal Card: Using Ideation Cards to Raise Data Protection Issues within the Design Process. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15 (Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2015), 457–466.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nunes, F. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 6 (Dec. 2015), 33:1-33:45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2803173.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pfefferbaum, B. and North, C.S. 2020. Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 383, 6 (2020), 510–512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robinson, L. 2015. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society. 18, 5 (May 2015), 569–582. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rodriguez, C. 2003. Hair story: Untangling the roots of black hair in America. Transforming Anthropology. 11, 2 (2003), 64–65.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schneider, H. 2018. Empowerment in HCI - A Survey and Framework. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 244:1-244:14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tachtler, F. 2020. Supporting the Supporters of Unaccompanied Migrant Youth: Designing for Socialecological Resilience. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2020), 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Talhouk, R. 2019. Involving Syrian Refugees in Design Research: Lessons Learnt from the Field. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2019), 1583–1594.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Talhouk, R. 2019. Refugees & HCI SIG: Situating HCI Within Humanitarian Research. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1–4.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Urquhart, L.D. and Craigon, P.J. 2021. The Moral-IT Deck: a tool for ethics by design. Journal of Responsible Innovation. (2021), 1–33.Google Scholar
- Wang, N. 2011. A comparison of Chinese and British tea culture. Asian Culture and History. 3, 2 (2011), 13.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wetzel, R. 2017. Developing ideation cards for mixed reality game design. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association. 3, 2 (2017).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Zhang, L.E. and Guttormsen, D.S. 2016. ‘Multiculturality'as a key methodological challenge during in-depth interviewing in international business research. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. (2016).Google Scholar
Recommendations
Prototyping a Mental Health Smartphone Application
Design, User Experience, and Usability. Case Studies in Public and Personal Interactive SystemsAbstractMental illness among young people has reached epidemic proportions. One solution proposed for addressing this issue is increasing their mental health literacy, which research has found to be negatively correlated with the chance of developing a ...
Comments