skip to main content
10.1145/3461778.3462085acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Designing Visual Cards for Digital Mental Health Research with Ethnic Minorities

Published:28 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Gaining an understanding of people's diverse mental health needs is essential for informing the design of inclusive mental health technologies. However, conversations about mental health experiences can be challenging for both researchers and participants. We present the design of visual cards that illustrate an inclusive mental health concept to support researchers and participants in understanding and sharing mental health experiences. We illustrate the iterative design of the visual cards with our reflections and feedback from ethnically diverse participants. We found that designing the visual cards fostered insightful reflections within the design team regarding the roles of identity, gender, and ethnicity in designing culturally sensitive content and research. Participants from minority ethnic backgrounds valued the illustrative elements of the visual cards and highlighted the importance of supporting different languages and visual cultures. We discuss use cases for the visual cards and implications for designing culturally sensitive mental health technologies.

References

  1. Adkins, E.C. 2017. Exploring the potential of technology-based mental health services for homeless youth: A qualitative study. Psychological services. 14, 2 (2017), 238.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, M.H. 2020. Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) Alliance Against COVID-19: One Step Forward. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 7, 5 (Oct. 2020), 822–828. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-020-00837-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Alkhuzai, K. and Denisova, A. 2021. Evaluating the Use of Persuasive Design Cards for Novice Designers. Journal of Usability Studies. 16, 2 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anyan, F. 2013. The Influence of Power Shifts in Data Collection and Analysis Stages: A Focus on Qualitative Research Interview. Qualitative Report. 18, (2013), 36.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayobi, A. 2016. Reflections on 5 Years of Personal Informatics: Rising Concerns and Emerging Directions. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), 2774–2781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ayobi, A. 2020. Trackly: A Customisable and Pictorial Self-Tracking App to Support Agency in Multiple Sclerosis Self-Care. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’20) (2020).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Bekker, T. and Antle, A.N. 2011. Developmentally situated design (DSD) making theoretical knowledge accessible to designers of children's technology. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011), 2531–2540.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Braun, V. and Clarke, V. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 2 (Jan. 2006), 77–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Cotterill, P. 1992. Interviewing women: Issues of frienship, vulnerability, and power. Women's Studies International Forum (1992), 593–606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Davis, H. and Waycott, J. 2015. Ethical Encounters: HCI Research in Sensitive and Complex Settings. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction (New York, NY, USA, Dec. 2015), 667–669.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Deng, Y. 2014. Tango cards: a card-based design tool for informing the design of tangible learning games. Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Designing interactive systems (2014), 695–704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dibitonto, M. 2018. The IoT Design Deck: A Tool for the Co-design of Connected Products. Advances in Usability and User Experience (Cham, 2018), 217–227.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Duarte, A.M.B. 2018. Participatory Design and Participatory Research: An HCI Case Study with Young Forced Migrants. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 25, 1 (Feb. 2018), 3:1-3:39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/3145472.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ertl, T. 2020. Psychosocial ICT: The Potential, Challenges and Benefits of Self-help Tools for Refugees with Negative Mental Stress. (2020). DOI:https://doi.org/10.18420/ecscw2020_ep11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Foronda, C.L. 2008. A Concept Analysis of Cultural Sensitivity. Journal of Transcultural Nursing. 19, 3 (Jul. 2008), 207–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659608317093.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Galderisi, S. 2015. Toward a new definition of mental health. World Psychiatry. 14, 2 (Jun. 2015), 231–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jagtap, S. 2021. Co-design with marginalised people: designers’ perceptions of barriers and enablers. CoDesign. 0, 0 (Feb. 2021), 1–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2021.1883065.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirchner, S. 2021. “They don't always think about that”: Translational Needs in the Design of Personal Health Informatics Applications. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama Japan, May 2021), 1–16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Kirmayer, L.J. 2012. Rethinking cultural competence. Transcultural Psychiatry. 49, 2 (Apr. 2012), 149–164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461512444673.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Knifton, L. 2010. Community conversation: addressing mental health stigma with ethnic minority communities. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 45, 4 (Apr. 2010), 497–504. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-009-0095-4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Linney, C. 2020. “Crazy person is crazy person. It doesn't differentiate”: an exploration into Somali views of mental health and access to healthcare in an established UK Somali community. International Journal for Equity in Health. 19, 1 (Dec. 2020), 190. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01295-0.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Logler, N. 2018. Metaphor cards: A how-to-guide for making and using a generative metaphorical design toolkit. Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2018), 1373–1386.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Luger, E. 2015. Playing the Legal Card: Using Ideation Cards to Raise Data Protection Issues within the Design Process. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’15 (Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2015), 457–466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Nunes, F. 2015. Self-Care Technologies in HCI: Trends, Tensions, and Opportunities. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 22, 6 (Dec. 2015), 33:1-33:45. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2803173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pfefferbaum, B. and North, C.S. 2020. Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine. 383, 6 (2020), 510–512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Robinson, L. 2015. Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society. 18, 5 (May 2015), 569–582. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Rodriguez, C. 2003. Hair story: Untangling the roots of black hair in America. Transforming Anthropology. 11, 2 (2003), 64–65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Schneider, H. 2018. Empowerment in HCI - A Survey and Framework. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2018), 244:1-244:14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Tachtler, F. 2020. Supporting the Supporters of Unaccompanied Migrant Youth: Designing for Socialecological Resilience. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2020), 1–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Talhouk, R. 2019. Involving Syrian Refugees in Design Research: Lessons Learnt from the Field. Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (New York, NY, USA, Jun. 2019), 1583–1594.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Talhouk, R. 2019. Refugees & HCI SIG: Situating HCI Within Humanitarian Research. Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, May 2019), 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Urquhart, L.D. and Craigon, P.J. 2021. The Moral-IT Deck: a tool for ethics by design. Journal of Responsible Innovation. (2021), 1–33.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, N. 2011. A comparison of Chinese and British tea culture. Asian Culture and History. 3, 2 (2011), 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Wetzel, R. 2017. Developing ideation cards for mixed reality game design. Transactions of the Digital Games Research Association. 3, 2 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Zhang, L.E. and Guttormsen, D.S. 2016. ‘Multiculturality'as a key methodological challenge during in-depth interviewing in international business research. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management. (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    DIS '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    June 2021
    2082 pages
    ISBN:9781450384766
    DOI:10.1145/3461778

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

    Upcoming Conference

    DIS '24
    Designing Interactive Systems Conference
    July 1 - 5, 2024
    IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader