Nenad Tomasev
ABSTRACT
Advances in algorithmic fairness have largely omitted sexual orientation and gender identity. We explore queer concerns in privacy, censorship, language, online safety, health, and employment to study the positive and negative effects of artificial intelligence on queer communities. These issues underscore the need for new directions in fairness research that take into account a multiplicity of considerations, from privacy preservation, context sensitivity and process fairness, to an awareness of sociotechnical impact and the increasingly important role of inclusive and participatory research processes. Most current approaches for algorithmic fairness assume that the target characteristics for fairness---frequently, race and legal gender---can be observed or recorded. Sexual orientation and gender identity are prototypical instances of unobserved characteristics, which are frequently missing, unknown or fundamentally unmeasurable. This paper highlights the importance of developing new approaches for algorithmic fairness that break away from the prevailing assumption of observed characteristics.
- Mohsen Abbasi, Sorelle A Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasubramanian. 2019. Fairness in representation: Quantifying stereotyping as a representational harm. In Proceedings of the 2019 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 801--809.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Roberto L Abreu and Maureen C Kenny. 2018. Cyberbullying and LGBTQ youth: A systematic literature review and recommendations for prevention and intervention. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, Vol. 11, 1 (2018), 81--97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William Agnew, Samy Bengio, Os Keyes, Margaret Mitchell, Shira Mitchell, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, David Vazquez, and Raphael Gontijo Lopes. 2018. Queer in AI 2018 Workshop. https://queerai.github.io/QueerInAI/QinAIatNeurIPS.html. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- William Agnew, Natalia Bilenko, and Raphael Gontijo Lopes. 2019. Queer in AI 2019 Workshop. https://sites.google.com/corp/view/queer-in-ai/neurips-2019/. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Mohammad Al-Rubaie and J Morris Chang. 2019. Privacy-preserving machine learning: Threats and solutions. IEEE Security & Privacy, Vol. 17, 2 (2019), 49--58.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Amnesty International. n.d.. Troll Patrol. https://decoders.amnesty.org/projects/troll-patrol. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Amnesty International Canada. 2015. LGBTI Rights. https://www.amnesty.ca/our-work/issues/lgbti-rights. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- McKane Andrus, Elena Spitzer, Jeffrey Brown, and Alice Xiang. 2020. `What we can't measure, we can't understand': Challenges to demographic data procurement in the pursuit of fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.02282 (2020), 1--12.Google Scholar
- Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine bias: There's software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it's biased against blacks. https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing.Google Scholar
- Sherry R Arnstein. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 35, 4 (1969), 216--224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Florence Ashley. 2019. Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising. Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 45, 7 (2019), 480--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Imran Awan. 2014. Islamophobia and Twitter: A typology of online hate against Muslims on social media. Policy & Internet, Vol. 6, 2 (2014), 133--150.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kimberly F Balsam, Yamile Molina, Blair Beadnell, Jane Simoni, and Karina Walters. 2011. Measuring multiple minority stress: the LGBT People of Color Microaggressions Scale. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, Vol. 17, 2 (2011), 163.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Bamman, Brendan O'Connor, and Noah Smith. 2012. Censorship and deletion practices in Chinese social media. First Monday (2012).Google Scholar
- Solon Barocas, Moritz Hardt, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Fairness and Machine Learning. http://www.fairmlbook.org.Google Scholar
- Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress. 2001. Principles of Biomedical Ethics .Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
- Tom Begley, Tobias Schwedes, Christopher Frye, and Ilya Feige. 2020. Explainability for fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07389 (2020), 1--15.Google Scholar
- Joel Bellenson. 2019. 122 Shades of Gray. https://www.geneplaza.com/app-store/72/preview. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Nikhil Bhattasali and Esha Maiti. 2015. Machine `gaydar': Using Facebook profiles to predict sexual orientation.Google Scholar
- Reuben Binns. 2018. Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. 149--159.Google Scholar
- Kuteesa R Bisaso, Godwin T Anguzu, Susan A Karungi, Agnes Kiragga, and Barbara Castelnuovo. 2017. A survey of machine learning applications in HIV clinical research and care. Computers in Biology and Medicine, Vol. 91 (2017), 366--371.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuteesa R Bisaso, Susan A Karungi, Agnes Kiragga, Jackson K Mukonzo, and Barbara Castelnuovo. 2018. A comparative study of logistic regression based machine learning techniques for prediction of early virological suppression in antiretroviral initiating HIV patients. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, Vol. 18, 1 (2018), 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Raphaël Bize, Erika Volkmar, Sylvie Berrut, Denise Medico, Hugues Balthasar, Patrick Bodenmann, and Harvey J Makadon. 2011. Access to quality primary care for LGBT people. Revue Medicale Suisse, Vol. 7, 307 (2011), 1712--1717.Google Scholar
- Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir, Walter Bockting, Sunmoo Yoon, and Dawn W Dowding. 2019. Nurse documentation of sexual orientation and gender identity in home healthcare: A text mining study. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, Vol. 37, 4 (2019), 213--221.Google Scholar
- Miranda Bogen, Aaron Rieke, and Shazeda Ahmed. 2020. Awareness in practice: Tensions in access to sensitive attribute data for antidiscrimination. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 492--500.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tolga Bolukbasi, Kai-Wei Chang, James Y Zou, Venkatesh Saligrama, and Adam T Kalai. 2016. Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4349--4357.Google Scholar
- Keith Bonawitz, Vladimir Ivanov, Ben Kreuter, Antonio Marcedone, H Brendan McMahan, Sarvar Patel, Daniel Ramage, Aaron Segal, and Karn Seth. 2017. Practical secure aggregation for privacy-preserving machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 1175--1191.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael J Bosia, Sandra M McEvoy, and Momin Rahman. 2020. The Oxford Handbook of Global LGBT and Sexual Diversity Politics .Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Lisa Bowleg. 2020. We're not all in this together: On COVID-19, intersectionality, and structural inequality. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 110, 7 (2020), 917.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brook. n.d.. Gender: A few definitions. https://www.brook.org.uk/your-life/gender-a-few-definitions/. Accessed: 2020--10-01.Google Scholar
- Tom B Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165 (2020), 1--75.Google Scholar
- Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. 77--91.Google Scholar
- Ian Burn. 2018. Not all laws are created equal: Legal differences in state non-discrimination laws and the impact of LGBT employment protections. Journal of Labor Research, Vol. 39, 4 (2018), 462--497.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph Burridge. 2004. `I am not homophobic but...': Disclaiming in discourse resisting repeal of Section 28. Sexualities, Vol. 7, 3 (2004), 327--344.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Judith Butler. 2011. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex .Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Tapabrata Chakraborti, Arijit Patra, and J Alison Noble. 2020. Contrastive fairness in machine learning. IEEE Letters of the Computer Society, Vol. 3, 2 (2020), 38--41.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hongyan Chang and Reza Shokri. 2020. On the privacy risks of algorithmic fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03731 (2020), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Bobby Chesney and Danielle Citron. 2019. Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. Calif. L. Rev., Vol. 107 (2019), 1753.Google Scholar
- Jill M Chonody, Scott Edward Rutledge, and Scott Smith. 2012. `That's so gay': Language use and antigay bias among heterosexual college students. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, Vol. 24, 3 (2012), 241--259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandra Chouldechova, Diana Benavides-Prado, Oleksandr Fialko, and Rhema Vaithianathan. 2018. A case study of algorithm-assisted decision making in child maltreatment hotline screening decisions. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. 134--148.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Cobbe. 2019. Algorithmic censorship on social platforms: Power, legitimacy, and resistance. Legitimacy, and Resistance (2019).Google Scholar
- Sarah Cook. 2017. The Battle for China's Spirit: Religious Revival, Repression, and Resistance under Xi Jinping .Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Sam Corbett-Davies and Sharad Goel. 2018. The measure and mismeasure of fairness: A critical review of fair machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.00023 (2018), 1--25.Google Scholar
- Marta R Costa-jussà. 2019. An analysis of gender bias studies in natural language processing. Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 1, 11 (2019), 495--496.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elliot Creager, Jörn-Henrik Jacobsen, and Richard Zemel. 2020. Exchanging lessons between algorithmic fairness and domain generalization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07249 (2020).Google Scholar
- Kimberlé Crenshaw. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (1989), 139.Google Scholar
- J Crocker, B Major, and C Steele. 1998. Social stigma. In The Handbook of Social Psychology, Daniel Todd Gilbert, Susan T Fiske, and Gardner Lindzey (Eds.), Vol. 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Natasha Culzac. 2014. Egypt's police ?using social media and apps like Grindr to trap gay people'. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/egypt-s-police-using-social-media-and-apps-grindr-trap-gay-people-9738515.html.Google Scholar
- Christina DeJong and Eric Long. 2014. The death penalty as genocide: The persecution of `homosexuals' in Uganda. In Handbook of LGBT Communities, Crime, and Justice. Springer, 339--362.Google Scholar
- Laure Delisle, Alfredo Kalaitzis, Krzysztof Majewski, Archy de Berker, Milena Marin, and Julien Cornebise. 2019. A large-scale crowdsourced analysis of abuse against women journalists and politicians on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03093 (2019), 1--13.Google Scholar
- Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi, Omer Reingold, and Richard Zemel. 2012. Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference. 214--226.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wayne R Dynes. 2014. The Homophobic Mind .Lulu.com.Google Scholar
- Jesse M Ehrenfeld, Keanan Gabriel Gottlieb, Lauren Brittany Beach, Shelby E Monahan, and Daniel Fabbri. 2019. Development of a natural language processing algorithm to identify and evaluate transgender patients in electronic health record systems. Ethnicity & Disease, Vol. 29, Suppl 2 (2019), 441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tom Embury-Dennis. 2020. Bullied and blackmailed: Gay men in Morocco falling victims to outing campaign sparked by Instagram model. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/gay-men-morocco-dating-apps-grindr-instagram-sofia-taloni-a9486386.html. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Kawin Ethayarajh. 2020. Is your classifier actually biased? Measuring fairness under uncertainty with Bernstein bounds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.12332 (2020), 1--6.Google Scholar
- European Commission. n.d.. What personal data is considered sensitive? https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/reform/rules-business-and-organisations/legal-grounds-processing-data/sensitive-data/what-personal-data-considered-sensitive_en. Accessed: 2020--10-07.Google Scholar
- Drew Fudenberg and David K Levine. 2012. Fairness, risk preferences and independence: Impossibility theorems. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 81, 2 (2012), 606--612.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andrea Ganna, Karin JH Verweij, Michel G Nivard, Robert Maier, Robbee Wedow, Alexander S Busch, Abdel Abdellaoui, Shengru Guo, J Fah Sathirapongsasuti, Paul Lichtenstein, et al. 2019. Large-scale GWAS reveals insights into the genetic architecture of same-sex sexual behavior. Science, Vol. 365, 6456 (2019), eaat7693.Google Scholar
- Andrew Gelman, G Marrson, and Daniel Simpson. 2018. Gaydar and the fallacy of objective measurement. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from http://www.stat.columbia.edu/gelman/research/unpublished/gaydar2.pdf.Google Scholar
- Oguzhan Gencoglu. 2020. Cyberbullying detection with fairness constraints. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.06625 (2020), 1--11.Google Scholar
- Alessandra Gomes, Dennys Antonialli, and Thiago Dias Oliva. 2019. Drag queens and artificial intelligence: Should computers decide what is `toxic' on the internet? https://www.internetlab.org.br/en/freedom-of-expression/drag-queens-and-artificial-intelligence-should-computers-decide-what-is-toxic-on-the-internet/. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Vincent Grari, Sylvain Lamprier, and Marcin Detyniecki. 2020. Adversarial learning for counterfactual fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.13122 (2020), 1--11.Google Scholar
- Maya Gupta, Andrew Cotter, Mahdi Milani Fard, and Serena Wang. 2018. Proxy fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.11212 (2018), 1--12.Google Scholar
- Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M Branham. 2018. Gender recognition or gender reductionism? The social implications of embedded gender recognition systems. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Hanna, Emily Denton, Andrew Smart, and Jamila Smith-Loud. 2020. Towards a critical race methodology in algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 501--512.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexander Hans, Daniel Schneegaß, Anton Maximilian Sch"afer, and Steffen Udluft. 2008. Safe exploration for reinforcement learning. In ESANN. 143--148.Google Scholar
- Tatsunori Hashimoto, Megha Srivastava, Hongseok Namkoong, and Percy Liang. 2018. Fairness without demographics in repeated loss minimization. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1929--1938.Google Scholar
- Hoda Heidari and Andreas Krause. 2018. Preventing disparate treatment in sequential decision making. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2248--2254.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andrew Critch, Jerry Li, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020 a. Aligning AI with shared human values. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.02275 (2020), 1--29.Google Scholar
- Dan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou, Mantas Mazeika, Dawn Song, and Jacob Steinhardt. 2020 b. Measuring massive multitask language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.03300 (2020), 1--27.Google Scholar
- Gregory M Herek, Douglas C Kimmel, Hortensia Amaro, and Gary B Melton. 1991. Avoiding heterosexist bias in psychological research. American Psychologist, Vol. 46, 9 (1991), 957.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Leora Hoshall. 2012. Afraid of who you are: No promo homo laws in public school sex education. Tex. J. Women & L., Vol. 22 (2012), 219.Google Scholar
- Kimberly A Houser. 2019. Can AI solve the diversity problem in the tech ondustry: Mitigating noise and bias in employment decision-making. Stan. Tech. L. Rev., Vol. 22 (2019), 290.Google Scholar
- Ning Hsieh and Matt Ruther. 2016. Sexual minority health and health risk factors: Intersection effects of gender, race, and sexual identity. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 50, 6 (2016), 746--755.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Human Rights Watch. 2018. US: LGBT people face healthcare barriers. https://www.hrw.org/news/2018/07/23/us-lgbt-people-face-healthcare-barriers. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Human Rights Watch. n.d.. Maps of anti-LGBT laws country by country. http://internap.hrw.org/features/features/lgbt_laws/. Accessed: 2020--10-06.Google Scholar
- Intertech LGBT+ Diversity Forum. n.d. Intertech LGBT+ Diversity Forum. https://intertechlgbt.interests.me/. Accessed: 2020--10-07.Google Scholar
- Abigail Z Jacobs and Hanna Wallach. 2019. Measurement and fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.05511 (2019), 1--11.Google Scholar
- Matthew Jagielski, Michael Kearns, Jieming Mao, Alina Oprea, Aaron Roth, Saeed Sharifi-Malvajerdi, and Jonathan Ullman. 2019. Differentially private fair learning. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 3000--3008.Google Scholar
- Emma A Jane. 2020. Online abuse and harassment. The International Encyclopedia of Gender, Media, and Communication (2020), 1--16.Google Scholar
- Bargav Jayaraman and David Evans. 2019. Evaluating differentially private machine learning in practice. In 28th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 19). 1895--1912.Google Scholar
- Disi Ji, Padhraic Smyth, and Mark Steyvers. 2020. Can I trust my fairness metric? Assessing fairness with unlabeled data and Bayesian inference. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 33 (2020).Google Scholar
- Ti John, William Agnew, Alex Markham, Anja Meunier, Manu Saraswat, Andrew McNamara, and Raphael Gontijo Lopes. 2020. Queer in AI 2020 Workshop. https://sites.google.com/corp/view/queer-in-ai/icml-2020. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Christopher Jung, Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, Logan Stapleton, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2019. Eliciting and enforcing subjective individual fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10660 (2019), 1--33.Google Scholar
- Shanna K Kattari, Miranda Olzman, and Michele D Hanna. 2018. `You look fine!' Ableist experiences by people with invisible disabilities. Affilia, Vol. 33, 4 (2018), 477--492.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Kearns, Seth Neel, Aaron Roth, and Zhiwei Steven Wu. 2018. Preventing fairness gerrymandering: Auditing and learning for subgroup fairness. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2564--2572.Google Scholar
- Os Keyes. 2018. The misgendering machines: Trans/HCI implications of automatic gender recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--22.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aparup Khatua, Erik Cambria, Kuntal Ghosh, Nabendu Chaki, and Apalak Khatua. 2019. Tweeting in support of LGBT? A deep learning approach. In Proceedings of the ACM India Joint International Conference on Data Science and Management of Data. 342--345.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Kim, Omer Reingold, and Guy Rothblum. 2018. Fairness through computationally-bounded awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 31 (2018), 4842--4852.Google Scholar
- Tania King, Zoe Aitken, Allison Milner, Eric Emerson, Naomi Priest, Amalia Karahalios, Anne Kavanagh, and Tony Blakely. 2018. To what extent is the association between disability and mental health in adolescents mediated by bullying? A causal mediation analysis. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 47, 5 (2018), 1402--1413.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Kondakov. 2019. The censorship `propaganda' legislation in Russia. State-Sponsored Homophobia (2019).Google Scholar
- Victoria Krakovna, Jonathan Uesato, Vladimir Mikulik, Matthew Rahtz, Tom Everitt, Ramana Kumar, Zac Kenton, Jan Leike, and Shane Legg. 2020. Specification gaming: The flip side of AI ingenuity. https://deepmind.com/blog/article/Specification-gamingthe-flip-side-of-AI-ingenuity.Google Scholar
- Michael W Kraus, Brittany Torrez, Jun Won Park, and Fariba Ghayebi. 2019. Evidence for the reproduction of social class in brief speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, 46 (2019), 22998--23003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Matt J Kusner, Joshua Loftus, Chris Russell, and Ricardo Silva. 2017. Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4066--4076.Google Scholar
- Preethi Lahoti, Alex Beutel, Jilin Chen, Kang Lee, Flavien Prost, Nithum Thain, Xuezhi Wang, and Ed H Chi. 2020. Fairness without demographics through adversarially reweighted learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.13114 (2020), 1--15.Google Scholar
- Victoria R LeCroy and Joshua S Rodefer. 2019. The influence of job candidate LGBT association on hiring decisions. North American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 21, 2 (2019).Google Scholar
- Jong Soo Lee, Elijah Paintsil, Vivek Gopalakrishnan, and Musie Ghebremichael. 2019. A comparison of machine learning techniques for classification of HIV patients with antiretroviral therapy-induced mitochondrial toxicity from those without mitochondrial toxicity. BMC Medical Research Methodology, Vol. 19, 1 (2019), 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lesbians Who Tech. n.d.. Lesbians Who Tech. https://lesbianswhotech.org/. Accessed: 2020--10-07.Google Scholar
- LGBT Technology Institute. n.d.. LGBT Technology Institute. https://www.lgbttech.org/. Accessed: 2020--10-07.Google Scholar
- Danielle Li, Lindsey R Raymond, and Peter Bergman. 2020. Hiring as exploration. Technical Report. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Chen Liang, Dena Abbott, Y Alicia Hong, Mahboubeh Madadi, and Amelia White. 2019. Clustering help-seeking behaviors in LGBT online communities: A prospective trial. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Springer, 345--355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William M Liu and Saba R Ali. 2008. Social class and classism: Understanding the psychological impact of poverty and inequality. Handbook of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 4 (2008), 159--175.Google Scholar
- Yujia Liu, Weiming Zhang, and Nenghai Yu. 2017. Protecting privacy in shared photos via adversarial examples based stealth. Security and Communication Networks, Vol. 2017 (2017).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi-Ling Liu. 2020. How a dating app helped a generation of Chinese come out of the closet. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/05/magazine/blued-china-gay-dating-app.html.Google Scholar
- Shen Lu and Katie Hunt. 2016. China bans same-sex romance from TV screens. http://www.https://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/03/asia/china-bans-same-sex-dramas/index.html. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Julia L Marcus, Leo B Hurley, Douglas S Krakower, Stacey Alexeeff, Michael J Silverberg, and Jonathan E Volk. 2019. Use of electronic health record data and machine learning to identify candidates for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis: A modelling study. The Lancet HIV, Vol. 6, 10 (2019), e688--e695.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Donald Martin Jr., Vinod Prabhakaran, Jill Kuhlberg, Andrew Smart, and William S Isaac. 2020. Participatory problem formulation for fairer machine learning through community based system dynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.07572 (2020), 1--6.Google Scholar
- Vickie M Mays and Susan D Cochran. 2001. Mental health correlates of perceived discrimination among lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 91, 11 (2001), 1869--1876.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joseph McCormick. 2015. WARNING: These Grindr profiles are actually robots trying to steal your info. https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2015/08/11/warning-these-grindr-profiles-are-actually-robots-trying-to-steal-your-info/. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Melissa D McCradden, Shalmali Joshi, Mjaye Mazwi, and James A Anderson. 2020. Ethical limitations of algorithmic fairness solutions in health care machine learning. The Lancet Digital Health, Vol. 2, 5 (2020), e221--e223.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elizabeth McDermott. 2015. Asking for help online: Lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans youth, self-harm and articulating the `failed' self. Health, Vol. 19, 6 (2015), 561--577.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mental Health Foundation. 2020. Mental health statistics: LGBT people. https://www.mentalhealth.org.uk/statistics/mental-health-statistics-lgbt-people. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Ilan H Meyer. 1995. Minority stress and mental health in gay men. Journal of Health and Social Behavior (1995), 38--56.Google Scholar
- Ilan H Meyer. 2003. Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 129, 5 (2003), 674.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eva Moore, Amy Wisniewski, and Adrian Dobs. 2003. Endocrine treatment of transsexual people: A review of treatment regimens, outcomes, and adverse effects. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Vol. 88, 8 (2003), 3467--3473.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G Cristina Mora. 2014. Making Hispanics: How activists, bureaucrats, and media constructed a new American. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kevin L Nadal, Marie-Anne Issa, Jayleen Leon, Vanessa Meterko, Michelle Wideman, and Yinglee Wong. 2011. Sexual orientation microaggressions: `Death by a thousand cuts' for lesbian, gay, and bisexual youth. Journal of LGBT Youth, Vol. 8, 3 (2011), 234--259.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Milad Nasr, Reza Shokri, and Amir Houmansadr. 2018. Machine learning with membership privacy using adversarial regularization. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 634--646.Google ScholarDigital Library
- National Health Service. n.d.. Gender dysphoria. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/gender-dysphoria/. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Kathryn O'Neill. 2020. Health vulnerabilities to COVID-19 among LGBT adults in California. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8hc4z2gb. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Nancy Ordover. 2003. American Eugenics: Race, Queer Anatomy, and the Science of Nationalism .U of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
- Out in Tech. n.d.. Out in Tech. https://outintech.com/. Accessed: 2020--10-07.Google Scholar
- Mike C Parent, Cirleen DeBlaere, and Bonnie Moradi. 2013. Approaches to research on intersectionality: Perspectives on gender, LGBT, and racial/ethnic identities. Sex Roles, Vol. 68, 11--12 (2013), 639--645.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ji Ho Park, Jamin Shin, and Pascale Fung. 2018. Reducing gender bias in abusive language detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.07231 (2018), 1--6.Google Scholar
- Vinicius Gomes Pereira. 2018. Using supervised machine learning and sentiment analysis techniques to predict homophobia in Portuguese tweets. Ph.D. Dissertation. Fundacc ao Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
- Adam Poulsen, Eduard Fosch-Villaronga, and Roger Andre Søraa. 2020. Queering machines. Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 2, 3 (2020), 152--152.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mattia Prosperi, Yi Guo, Matt Sperrin, James S Koopman, Jae S Min, Xing He, Shannan Rich, Mo Wang, Iain E Buchan, and Jiang Bian. 2020. Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare. Nature Machine Intelligence, Vol. 2, 7 (2020), 369--375.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Meghan Romanelli and Kimberly D Hudson. 2017. Individual and systemic barriers to health care: Perspectives of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender adults. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Vol. 87, 6 (2017), 714.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas Rossler, Davide Cozzolino, Luisa Verdoliva, Christian Riess, Justus Thies, and Matthias Nießner. 2019. Faceforensics+: Learning to detect manipulated facial images. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 1--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan A Roth, Gorjan Radevski, Catia Marzolini, Andri Rauch, Huldrych F Günthard, Roger D Kouyos, Christoph A Fux, Alexandra U Scherrer, Alexandra Calmy, Matthias Cavassini, et al. 2020. Cohort-derived machine learning models for individual prediction of chronic kidney disease in people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus: A prospective multicenter cohort study. The Journal of Infectious Diseases (2020).Google Scholar
- Punyajoy Saha, Binny Mathew, Pawan Goyal, and Animesh Mukherjee. 2019. HateMonitors: Language agnostic abuse detection in social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12642 (2019), 1--8.Google Scholar
- Maria C Sanchez and Linda Schlossberg. 2001. Passing: Identity and Interpretation in Sexuality, Race, and Religion. Vol. 29. NYU Press.Google Scholar
- Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Kandrea Wade, Caitlin Lustig, and Jed R Brubaker. 2020. How we've taught algorithms to see identity: Constructing race and gender in image databases for facial analysis. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 4, CSCW1 (2020), 1--35.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anna Schmidt and Michael Wiegand. 2017. A survey on hate speech detection using natural language processing. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Social Media. 1--10.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jason S Schneider, Vincent MB Silenzio, and Laura Erickson-Schroth. 2019. The GLMA Handbook on LGBT Health. ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
- Dominic Scicchitano. 2019. The `real' Chechen man: Conceptions of religion, nature, and gender and the persecution of sexual minorities in postwar Chechnya. Journal of Homosexuality (2019), 1--18.Google Scholar
- Brad Sears and Christy Mallory. 2011. Documented evidence of employment discrimination & its effects on LGBT people.Google Scholar
- Andrew D Selbst, Danah Boyd, Sorelle A Friedler, Suresh Venkatasubramanian, and Janet Vertesi. 2019. Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 59--68.Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Semerdjian, Konstantinos Lykopoulos, Andrew Maas, Morgan Harrell, Julie Priest, Pedro Eitz-Ferrer, Connor Wyand, and Andrew Zolopa. 2018. Supervised machine learning to predict HIV outcomes using electronic health record and insurance claims data. In AIDS 2018 Conference.Google Scholar
- Katherine Sender. 2018. The gay market is dead, long live the gay market: From identity to algorithm in predicting consumer behavior. Advertising & Society Quarterly, Vol. 18, 4 (2018).Google Scholar
- Emily Sheng, Kai-Wei Chang, Premkumar Natarajan, and Nanyun Peng. 2020. Towards controllable biases in language generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.00268 (2020), 1--16.Google Scholar
- Mark Sherry. 2019. Disablist hate speech online. Disability Hate Speech: Social, Cultural and Political Contexts (2019).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonia Singh, Ruiguang Song, Anna Satcher Johnson, Eugene McCray, and H Irene Hall. 2018. HIV incidence, prevalence, and undiagnosed infections in US men who have sex with men. Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 168, 10 (2018), 685--694.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brij Mohan Lal Srivastava, Aurélien Bellet, Marc Tommasi, and Emmanuel Vincent. 2019 a. Privacy-preserving adversarial representation learning in ASR: Reality or illusion?. In 20th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar
- Megha Srivastava, Hoda Heidari, and Andreas Krause. 2019 b. Mathematical notions vs. human perception of fairness: A descriptive approach to fairness for machine learning. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2459--2468.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stonewall. n.d.. The truth about trans. https://www.stonewall.org.uk/truth-about-trans. Accessed: 2021-04--19.Google Scholar
- Yolande Strengers, Lizhen Qu, Qiongkai Xu, and Jarrod Knibbe. 2020. Adhering, steering, and queering: Treatment of gender in natural language generation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Derek H Suite, Robert La Bril, Annelle Primm, and Phyllis Harrison-Ross. 2007. Beyond misdiagnosis, misunderstanding and mistrust: Relevance of the historical perspective in the medical and mental health treatment of people of color. Journal of the National Medical Association, Vol. 99, 8 (2007), 879.Google Scholar
- Seyed Amin Tabatabaei, Mark Hoogendoorn, and Aart van Halteren. 2018. Narrowing reinforcement learning: Overcoming the cold start problem for personalized health interventions. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. Springer, 312--327.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rima S Tanash, Zhouhan Chen, Tanmay Thakur, Dan S Wallach, and Devika Subramanian. 2015. Known unknowns: An analysis of Twitter censorship in Turkey. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. 11--20.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margit Tavits and Efrén O Pérez. 2019. Language influences mass opinion toward gender and LGBT equality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, 34 (2019), 16781--16786.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Elliot A Tebbe and Bonnie Moradi. 2016. Suicide risk in trans populations: An application of minority stress theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol. 63, 5 (2016), 520.Google ScholarCross Ref
- The Trevor Project. 2020. National survey on LGBTQ youth mental health 2020. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2020/. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- The Trevor Project. n.d.. The Trevor Project. https://www.thetrevorproject.org/. Accessed: 2020-09--10.Google Scholar
- Crispin Thurlow. 2001. Naming the “outsider within”: Homophobic pejoratives and the verbal abuse of lesbian, gay and bisexual high-school pupils. Journal of Adolescence, Vol. 24, 1 (2001), 25--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R Jay Turner and Samuel Noh. 1988. Physical disability and depression: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior (1988), 23--37.Google Scholar
- Aaron van Dorn, Rebecca E Cooney, and Miriam L Sabin. 2020. COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US. Lancet, Vol. 395, 10232 (2020), 1243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Veale and Reuben Binns. 2017. Fairer machine learning in the real world: Mitigating discrimination without collecting sensitive data. Big Data & Society, Vol. 4, 2 (2017), 1--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Athanasios Voulodimos, Nikolaos Doulamis, Anastasios Doulamis, and Eftychios Protopapadakis. 2018. Deep learning for computer vision: A brief review. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, Vol. 2018 (2018).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barbara C Wallace and Erik Santacruz. 2017. Addictions and substance abuse in the LGBT community: New approaches. LGBT Psychology and Mental Health: Emerging Research and Advances (2017), 153--175.Google Scholar
- Yuanyuan Wang, Zhishan Hu, Ke Peng, Ying Xin, Yuan Yang, Jack Drescher, and Runsen Chen. 2019. Discrimination against LGBT populations in China. The Lancet Public Health, Vol. 4, 9 (2019), e440--e441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yilun Wang and Michal Kosinski. 2018. Deep neural networks are more accurate than humans at detecting sexual orientation from facial images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 114, 2 (2018), 246.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael Weinberg. 2009. LGBT-inclusive language. English Journal, Vol. 98, 4 (2009), 50.Google Scholar
- Gregor Wolbring. 2001. Where do we draw the line? Surviving eugenics in a technological world. Disability and the Life Course: Global Perspectives (2001), 38--49.Google Scholar
- Mengzhou Xia, Anjalie Field, and Yulia Tsvetkov. 2020. Demoting racial bias in hate speech detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.12246 (2020), 1--8.Google Scholar
- Elad Yom-Tov, Guy Feraru, Mark Kozdoba, Shie Mannor, Moshe Tennenholtz, and Irit Hochberg. 2017. Encouraging physical activity in patients with diabetes: Intervention using a reinforcement learning system. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 19, 10 (2017), e338.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jillian York. 2015. Privatising censorship online. Global Information Society Watch 2015: Sexual rights and the internet (2015), 26--29.Google Scholar
- Sean D Young, Wenchao Yu, and Wei Wang. 2017. Toward automating HIV identification: Machine learning for rapid identification of HIV-related social media data. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, Vol. 74, Suppl 2 (2017), S128.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jiaming Zhang, Jitao Sang, Xian Zhao, Xiaowen Huang, Yanfeng Sun, and Yongli Hu. 2020. Adversarial privacy-preserving filter. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 1423--1431.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Fairness for Unobserved Characteristics: Insights from Technological Impacts on Queer Communities
Recommendations
Pathological narcissism, cyberbullying victimization and offending among homosexual and heterosexual participants in online dating websites
Homosexual individuals are exposed to high levels of victimization. However, no studies have examined personality risk factors for cyberbullying victimization and offending among this population. This study investigated the relationships between ...
Gender identity and sexual orientation perceived oppressions in digital systems user interfaces: an exploratory study
IHC '15: Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsBoosted by feminist movements, research in HCI has been covering more about gender and sexuality. However, few studies are dedicated to the experience of lesbian, bisexual, gay and transgender people (LGBT). There is also little formulation regarding ...
Cyberbullying and traditional bullying involvement among heterosexual and non-heterosexual adolescents, and their associations with age and gender
IntroductionTraditional (offline) bullying and cyberbullying involvement are associated with severe psychosocial problems. Non-heterosexual (LGBQ) youth are more often victimized by traditional bullying than heterosexual (non-LGBQ) youth, but little ...
Comments