skip to main content
10.1145/3460421.3478816acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Mindless Load Changer: A Method for Manipulating Load Perception by Feedback of Myoelectricity Sensor Information

Published:21 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Various systems that present myoelectricity sensor information have been used to understand the load of the body. In this study, we verify the existence of a psychological phenomenon where a user’s load perception changes unconsciously by simply viewing myoelectricity sensor information. In addition, we propose a method, Mindless Load Changer, to manipulate load perception by presenting myoelectricity sensor information that differs from the actual measured sensor value and is simulated values as a specific load such as a high or low load. We implemented a prototype system and conducted experiments for weight perception when handling objects. The results demonstrate a psychological phenomenon that user’s load perception is changed unconsciously to match the displayed myoelectric value and the feasibility of the proposed method to manipulate the psychological phenomenon intentionally. This is the first study to focus on psychological phenomena caused by viewing myoelectricity sensor information while performing load-related tasks.

References

  1. Alexander T Adams, Jean Costa, Malte F Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. Mindless computing: designing technologies to subtly influence behavior. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 719–730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E Aiello, DH Gates, BL Patritti, KD Cairns, M Meister, EA Clancy, and P Bonato. 2006. Visual EMG biofeedback to improve ankle function in hemiparetic gait. In 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 7703–7706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Yuki Ban, Takuji Narumi, Tatsuya Fujii, Sho Sakurai, Jun Imura, Tomohiro Tanikawa, and Michitaka Hirose. 2013. Augmented endurance: controlling fatigue while handling objects by affecting weight perception using augmented reality. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 69–78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Edda Battaglia, Anna Maria Serra, Giuseppina Buonafede, Luca Dughera, Fabio Chistolini, Antonio Morelli, Giorgio Emanuelli, and Gabrio Bassotti. 2004. Long-term study on the effects of visual biofeedback and muscle training as a therapeutic modality in pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow-transit constipation. Diseases of the colon & rectum 47, 1 (2004), 90–95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gavin Buckingham, Nathalie S Ranger, and Melvyn A Goodale. 2011. The material–weight illusion induced by expectations alone. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73, 1 (2011), 36–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Jean Costa, Alexander T Adams, Malte F Jung, François Guimbretière, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2016. EmotionCheck: leveraging bodily signals and false feedback to regulate our emotions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 758–769.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jean Costa, Alexander T Adams, Malte F Jung, François Guimbretière, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2017. EmotionCheck: A Wearable Device to Regulate Anxiety through False Heart Rate Feedback. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 21, 2(2017), 22–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Jean Costa, François Guimbretière, Malte F Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2019. BoostMeUp: Improving Cognitive Performance in the Moment by Unobtrusively Regulating Emotions with a Smartwatch. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3, 2 (2019), 40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jean Costa, Malte F Jung, Mary Czerwinski, François Guimbretière, Trinh Le, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2018. Regulating Feelings During Interpersonal Conflicts by Changing Voice Self-perception. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christian Dannecker, Veronika Wolf, Renate Raab, Hermann Hepp, and Christoph Anthuber. 2005. EMG-biofeedback assisted pelvic floor muscle training is an effective therapy of stress urinary or mixed incontinence: a 7-year experience with 390 patients. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 273, 2 (2005), 93–97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Swagata Das, Velika Wongchadakul, and Yuichi Kurita. 2021. SmartAidView Jacket: Providing visual aid to lower the underestimation of assistive forces. In Augmented Humans Conference 2021. 152–156.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Christopher M Davis and William Roberts. 1976. Lifting movements in the size-weight illusion. Perception & Psychophysics 20, 1 (1976), 33–36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. F.Birren. 2006. Color Psychology and Color Therapy: A Factual Study of the Influence of Color on Human Life. (2006).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. KYOSUKE FUTAMI, TSUTOMU TERADA, and MASAHIKO TSUKAMOTO. 2019. A METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ARRIVAL TIME TO PREVENT LATE ARRIVAL BY MANIPULATING VEHICLE TIMETABLE INFORMATION. Journal of Data Intelligence 1, 1 (2019), 001–017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Oonagh M Giggins, Ulrik McCarthy Persson, and Brian Caulfield. 2013. Biofeedback in rehabilitation. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 10, 1(2013), 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. A Holtermann, PJ Mork, LL Andersen, Henrik Baare Olsen, and K Søgaard. 2010. The use of EMG biofeedback for learning of selective activation of intra-muscular parts within the serratus anterior muscle: a novel approach for rehabilitation of scapular muscle imbalance. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 20, 2 (2010), 359–365.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Shunichi Kasahara, Keina Konno, Richi Owaki, Tsubasa Nishi, Akiko Takeshita, Takayuki Ito, Shoko Kasuga, and Junichi Ushiba. 2017. Malleable embodiment: changing sense of embodiment by spatial-temporal deformation of virtual human body. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6438–6448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 272–283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Takanori Komatsu and Seiji Yamada. 2020. Exploring Auditory Information to Change Users’ Perception of Time Passing as Shorter. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. One-bin Lim, Jeong-ah Kim, Si-jeong Song, Heon-seock Cynn, and Chung-hwi Yi. 2014. Effect of selective muscle training using visual EMG biofeedback on infraspinatus and posterior deltoid. Journal of human kinetics 44 (2014), 83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Serge Nicolas, Helen E Ross, and David J Murray. 2012. Charpentier’s papers of 1886 and 1891 on weight perception and the size-weight illusion. Perceptual and motor skills 115, 1 (2012), 120–141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jae-ik Son, One-bin Lim, Hae-rim Han, Heon-seock Cynn, and Chung-hwi Yi. 2015. Selective Muscle Activation With Visual Electromyographic Biofeedback During Scapular Posterior Tilt Exercise in Subjects With Round-Shoulder Posture. Physical Therapy Korea 22, 4 (2015), 17–26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Sandra J Stuckey, Alfred Jacobs, and Jack Goldfarb. 1986. EMG biofeedback training, relaxation training, and placebo for the relief of chronic back pain. Perceptual and motor skills 63, 3 (1986), 1023–1036.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yuki Taima, Yuki Ban, Takuji Narumi, Tomohiro Tanikawa, and Michitaka Hirose. 2014. Controlling fatigue while lifting objects using pseudo-haptics in a mixed reality space. In 2014 IEEE Haptics Symposium (HAPTICS). IEEE, 175–180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Shigeo Yoshida, Tomohiro Tanikawa, Sho Sakurai, Michitaka Hirose, and Takuji Narumi. 2013. Manipulation of an emotional experience by real-time deformed facial feedback. In Proceedings of the 4th Augmented Human International Conference. ACM, 35–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ISWC '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
    September 2021
    220 pages
    ISBN:9781450384629
    DOI:10.1145/3460421

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 September 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

    Upcoming Conference

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format