skip to main content
10.1145/3457335.3461712acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Safe CPS from unsafe controllers

Published:29 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Modern cyber-physical systems (CPS) interact with the physical world, hence their correctness is important. In this work, we build upon the Simplex Architecture, where control authority may switch from an unverified and potentially unsafe advanced controller to a verified-safe baseline controller in order to maintain system safety. We take the approach further by lifting the requirement that the baseline controller must be verified or even correct, instead also treating it as a black-box component. This change is important; there are many types of powerful control techniques---model predictive control and neural network controllers---that often work well in practice, but are unlikely to be formally proven correct due to complexity. We prove such an architecture maintains safety, and present case studies where model-predictive control provides safety for multi-robot coordination, and unverified neural networks provably prevent collisions for groups of F-16 aircraft.

References

  1. Stanley Bak, Taylor T. Johnson, Marco Caccamo, and Lui Sha. 2014. Real-Time Reachability for Verified Simplex Design. In 35th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS 2014). IEEE Computer Society, Rome, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Matthew Clark, Xenofon Koutsoukos, Joseph Porter, Ratnesh Kumar, George Pappas, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee, and Lee Pike. 2013. A study on run time assurance for complex cyber physical systems. Technical Report. Air Force Research Laboratory, Aerospace Systems Directorate.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Mykel J Kochenderfer and JP Chryssanthacopoulos. 2011. Robust airborne collision avoidance through dynamic programming. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lincoln Laboratory, Project Report ATC-371 130 (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Qin Lin, Xin Chen, Aman Khurana, and John Dolan. 2020. ReachFlow: An Online Safety Assurance Framework for Waypoint-Following of Self-driving Cars. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Usama Mehmood, Stanley Bak, Scott A. Smolka, and Scott D. Stoller. 2021. Safe CPS from Unsafe Controllers. arXiv:2102.12981 [cs.SE]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. L. Sha. 2001. Using Simplicity to Control Complexity. IEEE Software 18, 4 (2001), 20--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CAADCPS '21: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computation-Aware Algorithmic Design for Cyber-Physical Systems
    May 2021
    36 pages
    ISBN:9781450383998
    DOI:10.1145/3457335

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 29 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader