skip to main content
10.1145/3456415.3456525acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccbnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Semantic Segmentation with DenseNets for Breast Tumor Detection

Published:06 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Breast cancer is one of the cancers with highest mortality rate, which are impairing the health of millions of women globally. Nowadays, the detection method of breast tumors based on breast ultrasound images (BUI) is semi-automatic. The localization of a region of interest (ROI) and the delineation of breast tumors within ROI need to be manually performed by an experienced doctor. In this work, we propose a fully automatic approach based on semantic segmentation to add contextual information in the complete image interpretation and avoid the ROI definition. The densely connected convolutional neural network is used for this approach to generate the feature maps. Dataset with 200 breast tumor images from Institute of Oncology in Warsaw was used to evaluate the performance of this approach. For DenseNet, the accuracy of our method is 99.2%. For traditional fully convolutional network, this accuracy is 85.60%. For the results of segmentation, the dice coefficient is equal to 0.8329. The results have demonstrated that the proposed method is accurate and objective for the segmentation of breast tumors in BUIs. Moreover, the robustness and generalization capacity of the method have been proven in this dataset.

References

  1. Siegel R L, Miller K D, Jemal A, Cancer statistics[J]. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2015, 65: 5-29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Fan L, Strasser W K, Li J J, Louis J S, Finkelstein D M, Breast in China[J], Lancet Oncol. 2014,15(7): e279-289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Drukker K, Giger M L, Vyborny C J, Computerized detection and classification of cancer on breast ultrasound[J]. Academic Radiology, 2004, 11(5): 526-535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Shi C, Cheng Y, Liu F, Wang Y, Bai J, Tamura S, A hierarchical local region-based sparse shape composition for liver segmentation in CT scans[J], Pattern Recognition, 2016, 50: 88-106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Shi C, Cheng Y, Wang J, Low-rank and sparse decomposition based shape model and probabilistic atlas for automatic pathological organ segmentation[J]. Medical Image Analysis, 2017, 38(7): 30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cheng H D, Shan J, Ju W, Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: a survey[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2010, 43(1): 299-317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Xian M, Zhang Y, Cheng H D, Breast ultrasound image segmentation: a survey[J]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology & Surgery, 2018, 12(3): 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Yap M H, Edirisinghe E A, Bez H E, Fully automatic lesion boundary detection in ultrasound breast images[C]. The International Society for Optical Engineering, 2007, 6512:10.1117/12.708625.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Yap M H, Edirisinghe E A, Bez H E, A novel algorithm for initial lesion detection in ultrasound breast images[J]. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2008, 9(4): 2741.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Kwak J, Kim S, Kim N, Rd-based seeded region growing for extraction of breast tumor in an ultrasound volume[J]. Springer, 2005, pp: 799-808.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Huang Y L, Chen D R, Watershed segmentation for breast tumor in 2D sonography[J], Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2004, 30(5): 625-632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Zhou Z, Wu W, Wu S, Semi-automatic breast ultrasound image segmentation based on mean shift and graph cuts[J], Ultrasonic Imaging, 2014, 36(4): 256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Srinivasan S S, Swaminathan R, Semi automatic segmentation of breast thermograms using variational level set method[C]. The 15st International Conference on Biomedical Engineering: Springer, 2014, pp: 231–234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Boukerroui D, Basset O, Nicole G, Multiresolution texture based adaptive clustering algorithm for breast lesion segmentation[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 1998, 8(2): 135-144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Boukerroui D, Baskurt A, Noble J A, Segmentation of ultrasound image multiresolution 2D and 3D algorithm based on global and local statistics[J]. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2003, 24(4/5): 779-790.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gou X, Brady M, Segmentation of ultrasound B-mode images with intensity inhomogeneity correction.[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002, 21(1): 48-48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Yezzi A, Kichenassamy S, Kumar A, A geometric snake model for segmentation of medical imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2002, 16(2): 199-209.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Ashton E A, Parker K J, Multiple resolution bayesian segmentation of ultrasound images[J]. Ultrasonic Imaging, 1995, 17(4): 291-304.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Xian M, Zhang Y, Cheng H D, Fully automatic segmentation of breast ultrasound images based on breast characteristics in space and frequency domains[J]. Pattern Recognition, 2015, 48(2): 485-497.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Madabhushi A, Metaxas D N, Automatic boundary extraction of ultrasonic breast lesions[C]. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: IEEE, 2002, pp: 601-604.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ikedo Y, Fukuoka D, Hara T, Development of a fully automatic scheme for detection of masses in whole breast ultrasound images[J]. Medical Physics, 2007, 34(11): 4378-4388.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Huang Y L, Chen D R, Watershed segmentation for breast tumor in 2D sonography[J]. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, 2004, 30(5): 625-632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Almajalid R, Shan J, Du Y, Development of a deep-learning-based method for breast ultrasound image segmentation[C]. 2018 17st IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications: IEEE, 2018, pp: 1103-1108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Zhang Y, Liu Y, Cheng H, Fully multi-target segmentation for breast ultrasound image based on fully convolutional network[J]. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 2020, 58(1): 2049–2061.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Huang G, Liu Z, Laurens V D M, Densely connected convolutional networks[C]. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition:IEEE, 2016, pp: 2261-2269.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Pons G, Joan M, Robert M, Breast-lesion segmentation combining B-mode and elastography ultrasound[J]. Ultrasonic Imaging, 2015, 38(2016): 209-224.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Xian M, Huang J, Zhang Y, Multiple-domain knowledge based MRF model for tumor segmentation in breast ultrasound images[C]. International Conference on Image Processing:IEEE, 2012, pp: 2021-2024.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCBN '21: Proceedings of the 2021 9th International Conference on Communications and Broadband Networking
    February 2021
    342 pages
    ISBN:9781450389174
    DOI:10.1145/3456415

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format