skip to main content
10.1145/3452918.3458808acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

To Use or Not to Use: Mediation and Limitation of Digital Screen Technologies within Nuclear Families

Published:23 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Today’s home environment is affected by multiple screen technologies designed for personal and home use, making family members audience of the omnipresent technologies. We investigate how the past decades’ increasingly technology saturated home environment influences home practices and parents’ mediation of their rules of conduct for children’s access and use. We conducted a two-part interview study with parents from different nuclear families, and found parental mediation of screen technologies to have become a complex and emotional process with continuous mediation of when to use or not use screens. Despite a shared goal of decreasing the role of screen technology, the parents differentiated between rules, regulations, and limitations, which could provide tensions within the family and between different families if attitudes and/or practices were not consistent. As such, we argue internal family rules and regulations to be a continuous negotiation between parents and children, where personal principles and external expectations impact a family’s code of conduct. Our study contributes to a better understanding of screen technology practices, leading to design guidelines for screenbased home technology.

References

  1. Morgan G. Ames, Janet Go, Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Understanding Technology Choices and Values through Social Class. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Hangzhou, China) (CSCW ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958834Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Edward Anstead, Steve Benford, and Robert J. Houghton. 2014. Many-Screen Viewing: Evaluating an Olympics Companion Application. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602304Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Louise Barkhuus. 2009. Television on the Internet: New Practices, New Viewers. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI EA ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2479–2488. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520351Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Louise Barkhuus and Barry Brown. 2009. Unpacking the Television: User Practices around a Changing Technology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 3, Article 15 (Sept. 2009), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592440.1592444Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Lindsay Blackwell, Emma Gardiner, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. Managing Expectations: Technology Tensions among Parents and Teens. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1390–1401. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Moira Bovill and Sonia Livingstone. 2001. Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In Children and Their Changing Media Environment : a European Comparative Study.LEA’s communication series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., USA, 179–200.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Anders Bruun, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, Jeni Paay, Camilla Mejlby Hansen, Katarína Leci Sakácová, and Mette Hyllested Larsen. 2020. Exploring the Non-Use of Mobile Devices in Families through Provocative Design. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395428Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (sageed.). The MIT Press, Thousand Oaks, CA. (book).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cédric Courtois and Evelien D’heer. 2012. Second Screen Applications and Tablet Users: Constellation, Awareness, Experience, and Interest. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Berlin, Germany) (EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325646Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Henriette Cramer and Maia L. Jacobs. 2015. Couples’ Communication Channels: What, When & Why?Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 709–712. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702356Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Evelien D’heer, Cédric Courtois, and Steve Paulussen. 2012. Everyday Life in (Front of) the Screen: The Consumption of Multiple Screen Technologies in the Living Room Context. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Berlin, Germany) (EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325654Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sarah E. Domoff, Jenny S. Radesky, Kristen Harrison, Hurley Riley, Julie C. Lumeng, and Alison L. Miller. 2019. A Naturalistic Study of Child and Family Screen Media and Mobile Device Use. Journal of Child and Family Studies 28 (2019), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1275-1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. David Geerts, Rinze Leenheer, Dirk De Grooff, Joost Negenman, and Susanne Heijstraten. 2014. In Front of and behind the Second Screen: Viewer and Producer Perspectives on a Companion App. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Arup Kumar Ghosh, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Mary Beth Rosson, Heng Xu, John M. Carroll, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2018. A Matter of Control or Safety? Examining Parental Use of Technical Monitoring Apps on Teens’ Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173768Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Janet A. Gingold, Alan E. Simon, and Kenneth C. Schoendorf. 2014. Excess Screen Time in US Children: Association With Family Rules and Alternative Activities. Clinical Pediatrics 53, 1 (2014), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922813498152 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922813498152PMID: 23922251.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Clark F Greer and Douglas A Ferguson. 2015. Tablet computers and traditional television (TV) viewing: Is the iPad replacing TV?Convergence 21, 2 (2015), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541928 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541928Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ellie Harmon and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Stories of the Smartphone in Everyday Discourse: Conflict, Tension & Instability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466134Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Jan Hess, Benedikt Ley, Corinna Ogonowski, Tim Reichling, Lin Wan, and Volker Wulf. 2012. New Technology@home: Impacts on Usage Behavior and Social Structures. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Berlin, Germany) (EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325653Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Alexis Hiniker, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Not at the Dinner Table: Parents’ and Children’s Perspectives on Family Technology Rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1376–1389. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Christian Holz, Frank Bentley, Karen Church, and Mitesh Patel. 2015. ”I’m Just on My Phone and They’re Watching TV”: Quantifying Mobile Device Use While Watching Television. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Brussels, Belgium) (TVX ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745197.2745210Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sarah Huisman, Allison Edwards, and Susan Catapano. 2012. The impact of technology on families. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community 2, 1 (Jan. 2012), 44–62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Maia Jacobs, Henriette Cramer, and Louise Barkhuus. 2016. Caring About Sharing: Couples’ Practices in Single User Device Access. In GROUP ’16 Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work(Florence, Italy). ACM, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957296Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Simone Lanette, Phoebe K. Chua, Gillian Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2018. How Much is ’Too Much’? The Role of a Smartphone Addiction Narrative in Individuals’ Experience of Use. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 101 (Nov. 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274370Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Linda Little, Elizabeth Sillence, and Pam Briggs. 2009. Ubiquitous Systems and the Family: Thoughts about the Networked Home. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (Mountain View, California, USA) (SOUPS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1572532.1572540Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Sonia Livingstone. 2007. From family television to bedroom culture: Young people’s media at home. SAGE Publications, London, UK, 302–321.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. James Lull. 1999. Family Communication Patterns and the Social Uses of Television. Communication Research 7, 319 (Jan. 1999), 27––45. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700303Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Rachel M. Magee, Denise E. Agosto, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Four Factors That Regulate Teen Technology Use in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998310Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Melissa Mazmanian and Simone Lanette. 2017. ”Okay, One More Episode”: An Ethnography of Parenting in the Digital Age. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2273–2286. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998218Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Robert D. Putnam. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster Inc., New York, NY. 357 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990 (book).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Jacob M. Rigby, Duncan P. Brumby, Sandy J.J. Gould, and Anna L. Cox. 2017. Media Multitasking at Home: A Video Observation Study of Concurrent TV and Mobile Device Usage. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Hilversum, The Netherlands) (TVX ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077548.3077560Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Lisa Tang, Gerarda Darlington, David W L Ma, and Jess Haines. 2018. Mothers’ and fathers’ media parenting practices associated with young children’s screen-time: a cross-sectional study. BMC Obesity 5 (12 2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeroen Vanattenhoven and David Geerts. 2015. Broadcast, Video-on-Demand, and Other Ways to Watch Television Content: A Household Perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Brussels, Belgium) (TVX ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745197.2745208Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Alladi Venkatesh, Erik Kruse, and Eric Chuan-Fong Shih. 2003. The networked home: an analysis of current developments and future trends. Cogn Tech Work 5 (Feb. 2003), 23––32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-002-0113-8Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Svetlana Yarosh and Gregory D. Abowd. 2011. Mediated parent-child contact in work-separated families. In CHI 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts(Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 ; Conference date: 07-05-2011 Through 12-05-2011, Canada, 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979120Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Bieke Zaman, Marije Nouwen, Jeroen Vanattenhoven, Evelien de Ferrerre, and Jan Van Looy. 2016. A Qualitative Inquiry into the Contextualized Parental Mediation Practices of Young Children’s Digital Media Use at Home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60, 1 (2016), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IMX '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
    June 2021
    331 pages
    ISBN:9781450383899
    DOI:10.1145/3452918

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 June 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate69of245submissions,28%

    Upcoming Conference

    IMX '24

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format