ABSTRACT
Today’s home environment is affected by multiple screen technologies designed for personal and home use, making family members audience of the omnipresent technologies. We investigate how the past decades’ increasingly technology saturated home environment influences home practices and parents’ mediation of their rules of conduct for children’s access and use. We conducted a two-part interview study with parents from different nuclear families, and found parental mediation of screen technologies to have become a complex and emotional process with continuous mediation of when to use or not use screens. Despite a shared goal of decreasing the role of screen technology, the parents differentiated between rules, regulations, and limitations, which could provide tensions within the family and between different families if attitudes and/or practices were not consistent. As such, we argue internal family rules and regulations to be a continuous negotiation between parents and children, where personal principles and external expectations impact a family’s code of conduct. Our study contributes to a better understanding of screen technology practices, leading to design guidelines for screenbased home technology.
- Morgan G. Ames, Janet Go, Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye, and Mirjana Spasojevic. 2011. Understanding Technology Choices and Values through Social Class. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Hangzhou, China) (CSCW ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 55–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958834Google ScholarDigital Library
- Edward Anstead, Steve Benford, and Robert J. Houghton. 2014. Many-Screen Viewing: Evaluating an Olympics Companion Application. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video(Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 103–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602304Google ScholarDigital Library
- Louise Barkhuus. 2009. Television on the Internet: New Practices, New Viewers. In CHI ’09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI EA ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2479–2488. https://doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520351Google ScholarDigital Library
- Louise Barkhuus and Barry Brown. 2009. Unpacking the Television: User Practices around a Changing Technology. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 16, 3, Article 15 (Sept. 2009), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1592440.1592444Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindsay Blackwell, Emma Gardiner, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. Managing Expectations: Technology Tensions among Parents and Teens. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1390–1401. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819928Google ScholarDigital Library
- Moira Bovill and Sonia Livingstone. 2001. Bedroom culture and the privatization of media use. In Children and Their Changing Media Environment : a European Comparative Study.LEA’s communication series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J., USA, 179–200.Google Scholar
- Anders Bruun, Rikke Hagensby Jensen, Jesper Kjeldskov, Jeni Paay, Camilla Mejlby Hansen, Katarína Leci Sakácová, and Mette Hyllested Larsen. 2020. Exploring the Non-Use of Mobile Devices in Families through Provocative Design. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 813–826. https://doi.org/10.1145/3357236.3395428Google ScholarDigital Library
- Juliet Corbin and Anselm Strauss. 2015. Basics of Qualitative Research. Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (sageed.). The MIT Press, Thousand Oaks, CA. (book).Google Scholar
- Cédric Courtois and Evelien D’heer. 2012. Second Screen Applications and Tablet Users: Constellation, Awareness, Experience, and Interest. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Berlin, Germany) (EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325646Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henriette Cramer and Maia L. Jacobs. 2015. Couples’ Communication Channels: What, When & Why?Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 709–712. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702356Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evelien D’heer, Cédric Courtois, and Steve Paulussen. 2012. Everyday Life in (Front of) the Screen: The Consumption of Multiple Screen Technologies in the Living Room Context. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Berlin, Germany) (EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325654Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah E. Domoff, Jenny S. Radesky, Kristen Harrison, Hurley Riley, Julie C. Lumeng, and Alison L. Miller. 2019. A Naturalistic Study of Child and Family Screen Media and Mobile Device Use. Journal of Child and Family Studies 28 (2019), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1275-1Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Geerts, Rinze Leenheer, Dirk De Grooff, Joost Negenman, and Susanne Heijstraten. 2014. In Front of and behind the Second Screen: Viewer and Producer Perspectives on a Companion App. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (TVX ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2602299.2602312Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arup Kumar Ghosh, Karla Badillo-Urquiola, Mary Beth Rosson, Heng Xu, John M. Carroll, and Pamela J. Wisniewski. 2018. A Matter of Control or Safety? Examining Parental Use of Technical Monitoring Apps on Teens’ Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173768Google ScholarDigital Library
- Janet A. Gingold, Alan E. Simon, and Kenneth C. Schoendorf. 2014. Excess Screen Time in US Children: Association With Family Rules and Alternative Activities. Clinical Pediatrics 53, 1 (2014), 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922813498152 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922813498152PMID: 23922251.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Clark F Greer and Douglas A Ferguson. 2015. Tablet computers and traditional television (TV) viewing: Is the iPad replacing TV?Convergence 21, 2 (2015), 244–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541928 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856514541928Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ellie Harmon and Melissa Mazmanian. 2013. Stories of the Smartphone in Everyday Discourse: Conflict, Tension & Instability. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1051–1060. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466134Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jan Hess, Benedikt Ley, Corinna Ogonowski, Tim Reichling, Lin Wan, and Volker Wulf. 2012. New Technology@home: Impacts on Usage Behavior and Social Structures. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video (Berlin, Germany) (EuroITV ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1145/2325616.2325653Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alexis Hiniker, Sarita Y. Schoenebeck, and Julie A. Kientz. 2016. Not at the Dinner Table: Parents’ and Children’s Perspectives on Family Technology Rules. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1376–1389. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819940Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christian Holz, Frank Bentley, Karen Church, and Mitesh Patel. 2015. ”I’m Just on My Phone and They’re Watching TV”: Quantifying Mobile Device Use While Watching Television. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Brussels, Belgium) (TVX ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745197.2745210Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Huisman, Allison Edwards, and Susan Catapano. 2012. The impact of technology on families. International Journal of Education and Psychology in the Community 2, 1 (Jan. 2012), 44–62.Google Scholar
- Maia Jacobs, Henriette Cramer, and Louise Barkhuus. 2016. Caring About Sharing: Couples’ Practices in Single User Device Access. In GROUP ’16 Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work(Florence, Italy). ACM, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1145/2957276.2957296Google ScholarDigital Library
- Simone Lanette, Phoebe K. Chua, Gillian Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2018. How Much is ’Too Much’? The Role of a Smartphone Addiction Narrative in Individuals’ Experience of Use. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 2, CSCW, Article 101 (Nov. 2018), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274370Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linda Little, Elizabeth Sillence, and Pam Briggs. 2009. Ubiquitous Systems and the Family: Thoughts about the Networked Home. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (Mountain View, California, USA) (SOUPS ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/1572532.1572540Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sonia Livingstone. 2007. From family television to bedroom culture: Young people’s media at home. SAGE Publications, London, UK, 302–321.Google Scholar
- James Lull. 1999. Family Communication Patterns and the Social Uses of Television. Communication Research 7, 319 (Jan. 1999), 27––45. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365028000700303Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rachel M. Magee, Denise E. Agosto, and Andrea Forte. 2017. Four Factors That Regulate Teen Technology Use in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 511–522. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998310Google ScholarDigital Library
- Melissa Mazmanian and Simone Lanette. 2017. ”Okay, One More Episode”: An Ethnography of Parenting in the Digital Age. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CSCW ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2273–2286. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998218Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert D. Putnam. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster Inc., New York, NY. 357 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990 (book).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob M. Rigby, Duncan P. Brumby, Sandy J.J. Gould, and Anna L. Cox. 2017. Media Multitasking at Home: A Video Observation Study of Concurrent TV and Mobile Device Usage. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Hilversum, The Netherlands) (TVX ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3077548.3077560Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lisa Tang, Gerarda Darlington, David W L Ma, and Jess Haines. 2018. Mothers’ and fathers’ media parenting practices associated with young children’s screen-time: a cross-sectional study. BMC Obesity 5 (12 2018).Google Scholar
- Jeroen Vanattenhoven and David Geerts. 2015. Broadcast, Video-on-Demand, and Other Ways to Watch Television Content: A Household Perspective. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (Brussels, Belgium) (TVX ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2745197.2745208Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alladi Venkatesh, Erik Kruse, and Eric Chuan-Fong Shih. 2003. The networked home: an analysis of current developments and future trends. Cogn Tech Work 5 (Feb. 2003), 23––32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-002-0113-8Google Scholar
- Svetlana Yarosh and Gregory D. Abowd. 2011. Mediated parent-child contact in work-separated families. In CHI 2011 - 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Conference Proceedings and Extended Abstracts(Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings). 29th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011 ; Conference date: 07-05-2011 Through 12-05-2011, Canada, 1185–1194. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979120Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bieke Zaman, Marije Nouwen, Jeroen Vanattenhoven, Evelien de Ferrerre, and Jan Van Looy. 2016. A Qualitative Inquiry into the Contextualized Parental Mediation Practices of Young Children’s Digital Media Use at Home. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 60, 1 (2016), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2015.1127240Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Parental mediation, cyberbullying, and cybertrolling
Researchers are concerned with identifying the risk and protective factors associated with adolescents' involvement in cyberharassment. One such factor is parental mediation of children's electronic technology use. Little attention has been given to how ...
A qualitative study into parental mediation of adolescents' internet use
The vast majority of studies on parental mediation are quantitative by nature, which leads to a lack of in-depth understanding of how parents define and perform their role as socializing agents in this area. The present study offers new insights into ...
Longitudinal association of adolescents’ perceptions of parental mediations and compulsive Internet use
AbstractToday's adolescents do not know a life without the Internet, which is here to stay. Much of adolescents' Internet consumption takes place at home. Accordingly, it is imperative that parents are centrally positioned to aid adolescents to maximize ...
Highlights- Parental encouragement reduced adolescents' compulsive Internet use (CIU).
- CIU constantly triggered parental worry in all time periods.
- CIU predicted parental monitoring only across the school years.
- CIU instigated parental ...
Comments