skip to main content
10.1145/3450614.3463389acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesumapConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Towards Personalized Social Recommendations for Cultural Heritage Activities: Methods and technology to enable cohesive and inclusive recommendations

Published:22 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The aim of the SPICE project is to build social cohesion, both between and within citizen communities, by developing tools and methods to support citizen curation. We define citizen curation as a process in which cultural objects are used as a resource by citizens to develop their own personal interpretations. Within communities, citizens can use their interpretations to build a representation of themselves and their shared perspective on culture. Interpretations can also be used to support social cohesion across groups. In this short position paper we outline the methodologies and technologies needed to be built in order to build a recommender system of cultural objects that will implement these goals of social cohesion and inclusion.

References

  1. Adler, A. (1964). Social interest: A challenge to mankind. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/9b74/b49ded04bf31b46f13068dd7738ed1d588df.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbieri, F., Ballesteros, M., Ronzano, F., & Saggion, H. (2018). Multimodal emoji prediction. NAACL HLT 2018 - 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, 2, 679–686. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n18-2107Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bruni, L. E., Diaz, L., Gangemi, A., Daga, E., Kuflik, T., Mulholland, P., Pescarin, S., Damiano, R., Lieto, A., Peroni, S., & Wecker, A. (2020). Towards advanced interfaces for citizen curation. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2687.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cena, F., Likavec, S., & Rapp, A. (2019). Real World User Model: Evolution of User Modeling Triggered by Advances in Wearable and Ubiquitous Computing. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(5), 1085–1110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9818-3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Daiber, J., Jakob, M., Hokamp, C., & Mendes, P. N. (2013). Improving efficiency and accuracy in multilingual entity extraction. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1145/2506182.2506198Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ellwood, E., Estes-Smargiassi, K., Graham, N., Takeuchi, G., Hendy, A., Porter, M., & Lindsey, E. (2018). Project Paleo: Citizen Curation and Community Science at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 2, e25980. https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.2.25980Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Fortunato, S. (2010). Community detection in graphs. Physics Reports, 486(3–5), 75–174,. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kotkov, D., Veijalainen, J., & Wang, S. (2020). How does serendipity affect diversity in recommender systems? A serendipity-oriented greedy algorithm. Computing, 102(2), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-018-0687-5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kuflik, T., Wecker, A. J., Lanir, J., & Stock, O. (2014). An integrative framework for extending the boundaries of the museum visit experience: linking the pre, during and post visit phases. Information Technology & Tourism, 1–31.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mokatren, M., Wecker, A., Bogina, V., & Kuflik, T. (2019). A museum visitors classification based on behavioral and demographic features. ACM UMAP 2019 Adjunct - Adjunct Publication of the 27th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. https://doi.org/10.1145/3314183.3323864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Musto, C., Semeraro, G., Lovascio, C., De Gemmis, M., & Lops, P. (2018). A framework for holistic user modeling merging heterogeneous digital footprints. UMAP 2018 - Adjunct Publication of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization, 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1145/3213586.3226218Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Neill, R. O. (2017). The Rise of the Citizen Curator: Participation as Curation on the Web. October.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robinson, J., & Carletti, L. (2019). International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media Our Theatre Royal Nottingham: co-creation and co-curation of a digital performance collection with citizen scholars. Taylor & Francis, 15(2), 128–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2019.1633106Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sprugnoli, R. (2020). MultiEmotions-it: A new dataset for opinion polarity and emotion analysis for Italian. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2769. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/83/93/d6/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wecker, A. J., & Kuflik, T. (2015). Strategies for coping with multiple narratives. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Personalized Access to Cultural Heritage-Volume 1352, 41–43.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Xu, D., & Tian, Y. (2015). A Comprehensive Survey of Clustering Algorithms. Ann. Data. Sci, 2, 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-015-0040-1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Yang, Z., Algesheimer, R., & Tessone, C. (2016). A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks. Sci Rep, 6, 30750. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30750Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards Personalized Social Recommendations for Cultural Heritage Activities: Methods and technology to enable cohesive and inclusive recommendations
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          UMAP '21: Adjunct Proceedings of the 29th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
          June 2021
          431 pages
          ISBN:9781450383677
          DOI:10.1145/3450614

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 June 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate162of633submissions,26%

          Upcoming Conference

        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format