skip to main content
10.1145/3450148.3450173acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesic4eConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Teachers Initiatives and Perceived Parental Involvement Practices among Filipino Junior High School Students

Published:13 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic brought considerable changes in education system, particularly the non-face to face implementation of classes. Hence, this case study aims at assessing the changes in both parents and teacher's involvement and practices, respectively as perceived by students. Ten parents, their respective children from an intact class of Grade 8 students in a public high school were randomly selected as respondents of the study. Five teachers from the same grade levels were also interviewed. A validated interview questionnaire was used as guide to illicit responses from the respondents through Google Meet and personal messaging. Answers were transcribed and thematically analyzed though qualitative software Quirkos. Quirk size per themes were basis for tabulation and referred for further grouping per category. Results showed that material and emotional support of the parents were recognized as the primary parental involvement in the schooling of the child at home. Parents value to continue education and recognize the need to adapt in the new normal of schooling. Monitoring offline and online activities at home, teaching the concept, and building communication with the child are strategies employed to help understand science concept. Parents perceived communication with school through teachers for updates as the most important factor for them to execute their roles. Teachers are easy to deal with and can easily resolved problems regarding academic issues of the child however they are challenged with teacher's availability, attitudes, time constraints and internet connections. Teachers involved stakeholders, initiate, and reciprocate the communication stablished by parents through messaging and portal through social media platform but are confronted with parents and students who seldom goes online. The use of various learning materials and assessment delivered in various modalities are teachers’ mechanism to strengthen science concept the way parents recognize teachers’ pedagogic capabilities. Students highly appreciate actions taken both by parents and teachers and acknowledge the need for parental program to be beneficial. Internet connectivity, knowledge on the use of technology for distance learning and capacity on digital literacy are factors that limits the three group of respondents. Developing differentiated and inclusive communication strategies for parents, giving focus on designing resilient, flexible and self-directed asynchronous learning with parental involvement experiences and standardizing minimum requirement for a learning space at home are recommended for implementation in the next phase of this research.

References

  1. Abulon, E. L. R., & Saquilabon, J. D. F. (2016). Enhancing academic performance through parental involvement strategies. The Normal Lights, 33–49. Retrieved from http://[email protected]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, D., Harris, A., & Jones, M. S. (2016). Teacher-Parent Collaboration for an Inclusive Classroom: Success for Every Child. Teacher-Parent Collaboration for an Inclusive Classroom: Success for Every Child, 4(3), 58–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. An, G., Wang, J., Yang, Y., & Du, X. (2019). A study on the effects to students’ STEM academic achievement with chinese parents’ participative styles in school education. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2019.1.0180Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Barger, M. M., Kim, E. M., Kuncel, N. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2019). The Relation Between Parents’ Involvement in Children's Schooling and Children's Adjustment: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 855–890. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Bartolome, M. T., Mamat, N., & Masnan, A. H. (2017). Parental involvement in the Philippines: A review of literatures. Southeast Asia Early Childhood Journal, 6, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.37134/saecj.vol6.5.2017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Bouchaib, B. (2016). Exploring Teachers’ Assessment Practices and Skills. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 4(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.254581Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Cluver, L., Lachman, J. M., Sherr, L., Wessels, I., Krug, E., Rakotomalala, S. McDonald, K. (2020). Parenting in a time of COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10231), e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30736-4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Deslandes, R. (2019). A framework for school-family collaboration integrating some relevant factors and processes. Aula Abierta, 48(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.1.2019.11-18Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Erdener, M. A., & Knoeppel, R. C. (2018). Parents’ perceptions of their involvement in schooling. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.369197Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fisher, C. B., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Parental Involvement in Education. Encyclopedia of Applied Developmental Science, (April). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412950565.n302Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Garcia, A. (2018). Parental involvement among low-income Filipinos: A phenomenological inquiry. Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: Humanities and Social Sciences, 79(9-A (E)), No-Specified. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=psyc14&NEWS=N&AN=2018-30340-231Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Koch, K. A. (2020). “The Voice of the Parent Cannot be Undervalued”: Pre-Service Teachers’ Observations after Listening to the Experiences of Parents of Students with Disabilities. Societies, 10(3), 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10030050Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Lapada, A. A., Miguel, F. F., Robledo, D. A. R., & Alam, Z. F. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 Awareness, Distance Learning Education Experiences and Perceptions towards Institutional Readiness and Challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.8Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Lara, L., & Saracostti, M. (2019). Effect of parental involvement on children's academic achievement in Chile. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JUN), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01464Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Lau, E. Y. H., & Power, T. G. (2018). Parental involvement during the transition to primary school: Examining bidirectional relations with school adjustment. Children and Youth Services Review, 88(March), 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.03.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Miguel, F. F., & Abulon, E. L. R. (2016). Teacher-Parent Collaborative Efforts in Facilitating Students’ Homework. The Normal Lights- Journal on Teachers Education Special Issue 2016, 18–32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Mutodi, P., & Ngirande, H. (2014). The impact of parental involvement on student performance: A case study of a South African secondary school. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(8), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n8p279Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Otani, M. (2019). Relationships between parental involvement and adolescents’ academic achievement and aspiration. International Journal of Educational Research, 94(November 2018), 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Palces, K. R. E. I. M., Abulencia, A. S., & Reyes, W. M. (2015). Predicting the Priorities of Multicultural Education in a Philippine Teacher Education Institution: An Exploratory Study. Educare, 8(August), 63–72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pavalache-Ilie, M., & Ţîrdia, F.-A. (2015). Parental Involvement and Intrinsic Motivation with Primary School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187, 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.113Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Robinson, C. D., Lee, M. G., Dearing, E., & Rogers, T. (2018). Reducing Student Absenteeism in the Early Grades by Targeting Parental Beliefs. American Educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1163–1192. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218772274Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Sa, S. O., & Costa-Lobo, C. (2019). Evaluate the pedagogical practice of the teachers of higher education: A proposal. REICE. Revista Iberoamericana Sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio En Educacion, 17(1), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.15366/reice2019.17.1.003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Silinskas, G., & Kikas, E. (2019). Math homework: Parental help and children's academic outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 59(June), 101784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101784Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Wei, J., Pomerantz, E. M., Ng, F. F. Y., Yu, Y., Wang, M., & Wang, Q. (2019). Why does parents’ involvement in youth's learning vary across elementary, middle, and high school? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 56(December 2018), 262–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.12.007Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Yulianti, K., Denessen, E., Droop, M., & Veerman, G. J. (2020). School efforts to promote parental involvement: the contributions of school leaders and teachers. Educational Studies, 00(00), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1740978Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Zolkoski, S., Sayman, D., & Lewis-Chiu, C. (2018). Considerations in Promoting Parent and Family Involvement. Diversity, Social Justice, and the Educational Leader, 2(2), 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Teachers Initiatives and Perceived Parental Involvement Practices among Filipino Junior High School Students
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            IC4E '21: Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning
            January 2021
            410 pages
            ISBN:9781450388542
            DOI:10.1145/3450148

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 13 June 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format