skip to main content
10.1145/3447568.3448542acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

HINT project: a BPM teleconsultation and telemonitoring platform

Published:22 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a novel approach for teleconsultation and telemonitoring in healthcare domain. Teleconsulting for diagnostic images involves much more than merely transmitting images and information between two points called hub and spoke. It needs to accomplish a lot of tasks, among them: rapid access to radiological reports and second opinions, remote consulting among Physicians, improved patient care, access to complex tools for post processing and computer-aided diagnosis, support for research and training projects, ties between isolated healthcare providers and busier or more experienced providers, 24-h coverage.

The HINT project provides a real-time monitoring of the patient's clinical data and alerting in case of emergencies. The application is fully integrated with all IHE compliant RIS and PACS systems. The workflow management system, integrated in the platform, permits to manage a multiplicity of different scenarios in one application, allowing fast prototyping, process changing and reuse of subprocesses.

References

  1. Julian Adler, Chris Yu, and Mineesh Datta. The changing face of radiology: From local practice to global network. Medical Journal of Australia, 190(1):20--23, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ugo Barchetti, Antonio Capodieci, Anna Lisa Guido, and Luca Mainetti. In-formation systems for knowledge workers: the kpeople enterprise 2.0 tool. In International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, pages 804--807. Springer, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Riccardo Bellazzi, Cristiana Larizza, Stefania Montani, Alberto Riva, Mario Ste-fanelli, Giuseppe d'Annunzio, Renata Lorini, Enrique J Gómez, E Hernando, Eulalia Brugués, et al. A telemedicine support for diabetes management: the t-iddm project. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 69(2):147--161, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Adriana Caione, Anna Lisa Guido, Angelo Martella, Roberto Paiano, and Andrea Pandurino. Knowledge base support for dynamic information system manage-ment. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 14(3):533--576, Aug 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Adriana Caione, Anna Lisa Guido, Roberto Paiano, and Andrea Pandurino. A survey of open source workflow management systems. International Journal of Emerging Trends and Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), 4:22--26, Set 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Antonio Capodieci, Giuseppe Del Fiore, and Luca Mainetti. Adopting collaborative business processes to prevent the loss of information in public administration organisations. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Science Index 89, International Journal of Social, Human Science and Engineering, 8(5):54--62, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Stephanie Crossen, Nicole Glaser, Hadley Sauers-Ford, Shelby Chen, Victoria Tran, and James Marcin. Home-based video visits for pediatric patients with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, page 1357633X19828173, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas H Davenport and James E Short. The new industrial engineering: information technology and business process redesign. 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Marlon Dumas, Marcello La Rosa, Jan Mendling, Hajo A Reijers, et al. Fundamentals of business process management, volume 1. Springer, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christopher Eakins, Wendy D Ellis, Sumit Pruthi, David P Johnson, Marta Hernanz-Schulman, Chang Yu, and J Herman Kan. Second opinion interpreta-tions by specialty radiologists at a pediatric hospital: rate of disagreement and clinical implications. American Journal of Roentgenology, 199(4):916--920, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Hampus Eklöf, Eva Radecka, and Per Liss. Teleradiology uppsala--sydney for nighttime emergencies: preliminary experience. Acta Radiologica, 48(8):851--853, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Halit Eren and John G Webster. Telemedicine and Electronic Medicine. CRC Press, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Paul Harmon and Business Process Trends. Business process change: A guide for business managers and BPM and Six Sigma professionals. Elsevier, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Bruce Horn, Danny Chang, Julian Bendelstein, and Jo Carol Hiatt. Implementation of a teleradiology system to improve after-hours radiology services in kaiser permanente southern california. The Permanente Journal, 10(1):47, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Latifa Ilahi, Sonia Ayachi Ghannouchi, and Ricardo Martinho. Healthcare in-formation systems promotion: from an improved management of telemedicine processes to home healthcare processes. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pages 333--338. ACM, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Arjun Kalyanpur, Joy Weinberg, Vladimir Neklesa, James A Brink, and Howard P Forman. Emergency radiology coverage: technical and clinical feasibility of an international teleradiology model. Emergency radiology, 10(3):115--118, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Ferdinand J Kammerer, Matthias Hammon, Philipp M Schlechtweg, Michael Uder, and Siegfried A Schwab. A web based cross-platform application for teleconsultation in radiology. Journal of telemedicine and telecare, 21(6):355--363, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Rebecca S Lewis, Jonathan H Sunshine, and Mythreyi Bhargavan. Radiology practices' use of external off-hours teleradiology services in 2007 and changes since 2003. American Journal of Roentgenology, 193(5):1333--1339, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Carmela Maiolo, Ehab I Mohamed, Cesare M Fiorani, and Antonino De Lorenzo. Home telemonitoring for patients with severe respiratory illness: the italian experience. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9(2):67--71, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Karen L Margolis, Stephen E Asche, Anna R Bergdall, Steven P Dehmer, Sarah E Groen, Holly M Kadrmas, Tessa J Kerby, Krissa J Klotzle, Michael V Maciosek, Ryan D Michels, et al. Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharma-cist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. Jama, 310(1):46--56, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. A Martinon, MA Le Pogam, N Boublay, C Ganne, A Ben Cheikh, C Buron, V Thom-son, Y Berthezène, and C Journé. Teleradiology saves times in cases of vital emer-gencies: A comparative study with on-call radiology in two urban medium-sized french hospitals. European Research in Telemedicine/La Recherche Européenne en Télémédecine, 3(4):151--160, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Birgit Morlion, Christiane Knoop, Manuel Paiva, and Marc Estenne. Internet-based home monitoring of pulmonary function after lung transplantation. Amer-ican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 165(5):694--697, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. GA Naqvi, M Daly, A Dawood, A Kurkuri, and S Kutty. Smart consultation for musculoskeletal trauma: accuracy of using smart phones for fracture diagnosis. The Surgeon, 12(1):32--34, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. World Health Organization, World Health Organization. Ageing, and Life Course Unit. WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. World Health Organiza-tion, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Roberto Paiano and Adriana Caione. A knowledge base guidedapproach for process modeling in complex business domain. In ICSOFT-EA, pages 169--176, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Guy Paré, Mirou Jaana, and Claude Sicotte. Systematic review of home telemoni-toring for chronic diseases: the evidence base. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(3):269--277, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. ER Ranschaert and FH Barneveld Binkhuysen. European teleradiology now and in the future: results of an online survey. Insights into imaging, 4(1):93--102, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Nihir B Shah, Elaine Der, Chris Ruggerio, Paul A Heidenreich, and Barry M Massie. Prevention of hospitalizations for heart failure with an interactive home monitoring program. American heart journal, 135(3):373--378, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. James H Thrall. Teleradiology part i. history and clinical applications. Radiology, 243(3):613--617, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Elcin Zan, David M Yousem, Marco Carone, and Jonathan S Lewin. Second-opinion consultations in neuroradiology. Radiology, 255(1):135--141, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. HINT project: a BPM teleconsultation and telemonitoring platform

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICIST '20: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Systems and Technologies
        June 2020
        292 pages
        ISBN:9781450376556
        DOI:10.1145/3447568

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 March 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader