skip to main content
10.1145/3441000.3441013acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Temporal Impact on Cognitive Distraction Detection for Car Drivers using EEG

Published:15 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Electroencephalography (EEG) has the potential to measure a person’s cognitive state, however, we still only have limited knowledge about how well-suited EEG is for recognising cognitive distraction while driving. In this paper, we present DeCiDED, a system that uses EEG in combination with machine learning to detect cognitive distraction in car drivers. Through DeCiDED, we investigate the temporal impact, of the time between the collection of training and evaluation data, and the detection accuracy for cognitive distraction. Our results indicate, that DeCiDED can recognise cognitive distraction with high accuracy when training and evaluation data are originating from the same driving session. Further, we identify a temporal impact, resulting in reduced classification accuracy, of an increased time-span between different drives on the detection accuracy. Finally, we discuss our findings on cognitive attention recognition using EEG how to complement it to categorise different types of distractions.

References

  1. Yomna Abdelrahman, Eduardo Velloso, Tilman Dingler, Albrecht Schmidt, and Frank Vetere. 2017. Cognitive Heat: Exploring the Usage of Thermal Imaging to Unobtrusively Estimate Cognitive Load. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 1, 3, Article 33 (Sept. 2017), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130898Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Vahid Alizadeh and Omid Dehzangi. 2016. The impact of secondary tasks on drivers during naturalistic driving: Analysis of EEG dynamics. In Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on. IEEE, 2493–2499.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. H. S. Almahasneh, N. Kamel, A. S. Malik, N. Wlater, and Weng Tink Chooi. 2014. EEG based driver cognitive distraction assessment. In 2014 5th International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems (ICIAS). 1–4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Kenneth Majlund Bach, Mads Gregers Jæger, Mikael B Skov, and Nils Gram Thomassen. 2009. Interacting with in-vehicle systems: understanding, measuring, and evaluating attention. In Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology. British Computer Society, 453–462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Shadan Sadeghian Borojeni, Lewis Chuang, Wilko Heuten, and Susanne Boll. 2016. Assisting drivers with ambient take-over requests in highly automated driving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. 237–244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Lex Fridman, Bryan Reimer, Bruce Mehler, and William T. Freeman. 2018. Cognitive Load Estimation in the Wild. (2018), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174226Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. V. Goverdovsky, D. Looney, P. Kidmose, and D. P. Mandic. 2016. In-Ear EEG From Viscoelastic Generic Earpieces: Robust and Unobtrusive 24/7 Monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 1 (Jan 2016), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2471183Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. AJ Ibáñez-Molina and S Iglesias-Parro. 2014. Fractal characterization of internally and externally generated conscious experiences. Brain and cognition 87(2014), 69–75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Brit Susan Jensen, Mikael B. Skov, and Nissanthen Thiruravichandran. 2010. Studying Driver Attention and Behaviour for Three Configurations of GPS Navigation in Real Traffic Driving. (2010), 1271–1280. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753517Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Lisheng Jin, Qingning Niu, Haijing Hou, Huacai Xian, Yali Wang, and Dongdong Shi. 2012. Driver cognitive distraction detection using driving performance measures. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society 2012 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. John D Lee, Joshua D Hoffman, and Elizabeth Hayes. 2004. Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 65–72.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Chin-Teng Lin, Chun-Hsiang Chuang, Scott Kerick, Tim Mullen, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Li-Wei Ko, Shi-An Chen, Jung-Tai King, and Kaleb McDowell. 2016. Mind-wandering tends to occur under low perceptual demands during driving. Scientific reports 6(2016), 21353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. OpenBCI. 2017. Open Source Brain-Computer Interfaces.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. World Health Organization. 2018. World Health Organization: Top 10 causes of death. http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/causes_death/top_10/en/. Accessed: 2018-7-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas A Ranney, Elizabeth Mazzae, Riley Garrott, and Michael J Goodman. 2000. NHTSA driver distraction research: Past, present, and future. In Driver distraction internet forum, Vol. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dario D Salvucci. 2013. Distraction beyond the driver: predicting the effects of in-vehicle interaction on surrounding traffic. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3131–3134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Martyn Shuttleworth. 2009. Counterbalanced Measures Design. explorable.com/counterbalanced-measures-designGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. SmartCap. 2017. Life by SmartCap.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Andreas Sonnleitner, Matthias Sebastian Treder, Michael Simon, Sven Willmann, Arne Ewald, Axel Buchner, and Michael Schrauf. 2014. EEG alpha spindles and prolonged brake reaction times during auditory distraction in an on-road driving study. Accident Analysis & Prevention 62 (2014), 110–118.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. David L Strayer, Jonna Turrill, Joel M Cooper, James R Coleman, Nathan Medeiros-Ward, and Francesco Biondi. 2015. Assessing cognitive distraction in the automobile. Human factors 57, 8 (2015), 1300–1324.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Benjamin Tag, Andrew W. Vargo, Aman Gupta, George Chernyshov, Kai Kunze, and Tilman Dingler. 2019. Continuous Alertness Assessments: Using EOG Glasses to Unobtrusively Monitor Fatigue Levels In-The-Wild. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300694Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Patrick Tchankue, Janet Wesson, and Dieter Vogts. 2011. The impact of an adaptive user interface on reducing driver distraction. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, 87–94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Patricia Trbovich and Joanne L Harbluk. 2003. Cell phone communication and driver visual behavior: The impact of cognitive distraction. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 728–729.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Yu-Kai Wang, Tzyy-Ping Jung, and Chin-Teng Lin. 2015. EEG-based attention tracking during distracted driving. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering 23, 6(2015), 1085–1094.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Avinash Wesley, Dvijesh Shastri, and Ioannis Pavlidis. 2010. A novel method to monitor driver’s distractions. In CHI’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4273–4278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kathrin Zeeb, Axel Buchner, and Michael Schrauf. 2016. Is take-over time all that matters? The impact of visual-cognitive load on driver take-over quality after conditionally automated driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention 92 (2016), 230–239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format