skip to main content
10.1145/3437075.3437087acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Data Analytics Project Methodologies: Which One to Choose?

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Developments in big data have led to an increase in data analytics projects conducted by organizations. Such projects aim to create value by improving decision making or enhancing business processes. However, many data analytics projects still fail to deliver the expected value. The use of process models or methodologies is recommended to increase the success rate of these projects. Nevertheless, organizations are hardly using them because they are considered too rigid and hard to implement. The existing methodologies often do not fit the specific project characteristics. Therefore, this research suggests grouping different project characteristics to identify the most appropriate project methodology for a specific type of project. More specifically, this research provides a structured description that helps to determine what type of project methodology works for different types of data analytics projects. The results of six different case studies show that continuous projects would benefit from an iterative methodology.

References

  1. V. Grover, R. H. L. Chiang, T. Liang, and D. Zhang, "Creating Strategic Business Value from Big Data Analytics: A Research Framework," J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 388--423, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. B. H. Wixom, B. Yen, and M. Relich, "Maximizing Value from Business Analytics," MISQ Exec., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111--123, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. Mariscal, Ó. Marbán, and C. Fernández, "A survey of data mining and knowledge discovery process models and methodologies," Knowl. Eng. Rev., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 137--166, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. S. Saltz and I. Shamshurin, "Big data team process methodologies: A literature review and the identification of key factors for a project's success," in Proceedings - 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2016, pp. 2872--2879.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Baijens and R. W. Helms, "Developments in Knowledge Discovery Processes and Methodologies: Anything New ?," in Twenty-fifth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2019, pp. 1 -10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Larson and V. Chang, "A review and future direction of agile, business intelligence, analytics and data science," Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 700--710, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. C. Dremel, M. M. Herterich, J. Wulf, J.-C. Waizmann, and W. Brenner, "How Audi AG established big data analytics in its digital transformation," MIS Q. Exec., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 81--100, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. F. K. Y. Chan and J. Y. L. Thong, "Acceptance of agile methodologies: A critical review and conceptual framework," Decis. Support Syst., vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 803--814, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. Gao, A. Koronios, and S. Selle, "Towards a process view on critical success factors in Big Data analytics projects," 2015 Am. Conf. Inf. Syst. AMCIS 2015, pp. 1--14, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H.-M. Chen, R. Schütz, R. Kazman, and F. Matthes, "How Lufthansa Capitalized on Big Data for Business Model Renovation," MIS Q. Exec., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 299--320, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. J. S. Saltz, D. Wild, N. Hotz, and K. Stirling, "Exploring Project Management Methodologies Used Within Data Science Teams," in Twenty-fourth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New Orleans, 2018, 2018, pp. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. J. Saltz, I. Shamshurin, and C. Connors, "Predicting data science sociotechnical execution challenges by categorizing data science projects," J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 2720--2728, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. Li, M. A. Thomas, and K. M. Osei-Bryson, "A snail shell process model for knowledge discovery via data analytics," Decis. Support Syst., vol. 91, pp. 1--12, Nov. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. J. Gao, A. Koronios, and S. Selle, "Towards a process view on critical success factors in Big Data analytics projects," in 2015 Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2015, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. U. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, and P. Smyth, "From Data Mining to Knowledge Discovery in Databases," AI Mag., vol. 17, no. 3, p. 37, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. P. Chapman et al., "Crisp-Dm 1.0," 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. C. Schmidt and W. N. Sun, "Synthesizing Agile and Knowledge Discovery: Case Study Results," J. Comput. Inf. Syst., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 142--150, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. S. Ahangama and D. C. C. Poo, "Designing a Process Model for Health Analytic Projects," in PACIS 2015 Proceedings. 3., 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Sharma, K.-M. Osei-Bryson, and G. M. Kasper, "Evaluation of an integrated Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining process model," Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 39, no. 13, pp. 11335--11348, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. O. Marbán, J. Segovia, E. Menasalvas, and C. Fernández-Baizán, "Toward data mining engineering: A software engineering approach," Inf. Syst., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 87--107, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. S. Angee, "Towards an Improved ASUM-DM Process Methodology for Cross-Disciplinary Multi-organization Big Data & Analytics Projects," in International Conference on Knowledge Management in Organizations, 2018, vol. 877, pp. 613--624.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. S. Ahangama and D. C. C. Poo, "Unified Structured Process for Health Analytics," Int. J. Medical, Heal. Biomed. Bioeng. Pharm. Eng., vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 768--776, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. G. S. do Nascimento and A. A. de Oliveira, "An Agile Knowledge Discovery in Databases Software Process," in The Second International Conference on Advances in Information Mining and Management compliance, 2012, pp. 343--351.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. J. Baijens, R. Helms, and D. Iren, "Applying Scrum in Data Science Projects," in IEEE 22nd Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 2020, pp. 30--38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. S. Saltz, I. Shamshurin, and K. Crowston, "Comparing Data Science Project Management Methodologies via a Controlled Experiment," in Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017, pp. 1013 -1022.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. L. Williams, "Agile Software Development Methodologies and Practices," Adv. Comput., vol. 80, pp. 1--44, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. N. W. Grady, J. A. Payne, and H. Parker, "Agile big data analytics: AnalyticsOps for data science," in Proceedings 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 2017, pp. 2331--2339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. J. S. Saltz and A. Sutherland, "SKI: An Agile Framework for Data Science," in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), 2019, pp. 3468--3476.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. S. Saltz, R. Heckman, and I. Shamshurin, "Exploring How Different Project Management Methodologies Impact Data Science Students," in Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Guimarães, Portugal, 2017, pp. 2939--2948.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. F. Martínez-Plumed et al., "CRISP-DM Twenty Years Later: From Data Mining Processes to Data Science Trajectories," in IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2019, pp. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. M. Das, R. Cui, D. R. Campbell, G. Agrawal, and R. Ramnath, "Towards methods for systematic research on big data," Proc. - 2015 IEEE Int. Conf. Big Data, IEEE Big Data 2015, pp. 2072--2081, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. S. Viaene and A. Van den Bunder, "The secrets to managing business analytics projects," MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 65--69, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. F. Provost and T. Fawcett, "Data Science for Business," Book, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. M. H. Jensen, P. A. Nielsen, and J. S. Persson, "Managing Big Data Analytics Projects: The Challenges of Realizing Value," Proc. 27th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst., no. May, pp. 0--15, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. W. Ayele, "Adapting CRISP-DM for Idea Mining," Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 20--32, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. D. J. Power, C. Heavin, J. McDermott, and M. Daly, "Defining business analytics: an empirical approach," J. Bus. Anal., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 40--53, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. P. Darke, G. Shanks, and M. Broadbent, "Successfully completing case study research: combining rigour, relevance and pragmatism," Inf. Syst. J., vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 273--289, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. R. K. Yin, "Robert K. Yin. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 282 pages." Can. J. Progr. Eval., no. March 2016, pp. 1--5, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. R. k Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE Publications, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. J. Dul and T. Hak, Case Study Methodology in Business Research. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. M. Saunders, P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill, Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson Education LTD, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. A. L. Strauss, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge university press, 1987.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. T. J. Burant, C. Gray, E. Ndaw, V. McKinney-Keys, and G. Allen, "The Rhythms of a Teacher Research Group," Multicult. Perspect., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 10--18, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. J. Saldaña, The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Data Analytics Project Methodologies: Which One to Choose?

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICBDM 2020: Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Big Data in Management
      May 2020
      143 pages
      ISBN:9781450375061
      DOI:10.1145/3437075

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 January 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader