ABSTRACT
Research competencies have been gaining more importance in university spaces. At the undergraduate level, it is also essential that students achieve efficient development of academic literacy. This research aims to show how research skills can be fostered to develop academic literacy through innovative models. For the present study, the mixed research method was used. The design of this research was sequential explanatory Quan-Qual in two phases. It is intended that the results allow the design of an innovative training model that establishes research competences to develop academic literacy. The stages of this research correspond to the theoretical framework, contextual framework and an approach to the method.
- Tecnológico de Monterrey. Investigación: 2020. https://tec.mx/es/investigacion?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI24Ta0sTt6gIVBdbACh3YEgaGEAAYASAAEgLl3fD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds.Google Scholar
- M. S. Ramírez-Montoya. 13 septiembre 2020. Resultados de la Semana i 2017: OpenergyLab Laboratorio de recursos educativos abiertos de sustentabilidad energética. Web site http://hdl.handle.net/11285/627906Google Scholar
- F. J. García-Peñalvo, A. García-Holgado, and M. S. Ramírez-Montoya. 2019. Track 16: TEEM 2019 Doctoral Consortium. In TEEM’19 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (Leon, Spain, October 16th-18th, 2019), M.Á. Conde-González, F.J. Rodríguez-Sedano, C. Fernández-Llamas and F.J. García-Peñalvo Eds. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 920-924. DOI:10.1145/3362789.3362958.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tecnológico de Monterrey (2020). Semanas Tec, una pausa intensiva para tu crecimiento integral. Web site https://tec.mx/es/profesional/somostecGoogle Scholar
- M.S. Ramírez-Montoya. 2016. Investigar: oportunidad para la generación de nuevo conocimiento. Competencias transversales para una sociedad basada en conocimiento. J.R. Valenzuela, ed. Cengage Learning Editors. 67–87.Google Scholar
- S. Figueroa, D. Granados, and J. López. (2019). Investigación en estudiantes universitarios de psicología: experiencia formativa intramuros. Enseñanza & Teaching, 37, 135–145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14201/et2019372135145Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. L. Scott. 2015. El futuro del aprendizaje 2 ¿Qué tipo de aprendizaje se necesita en el siglo XXI? Investigación y Prospectiva En Educación.Google Scholar
- J. de Pablos-Pons, P. Colás-Bravo, T. González-Ramírez, and J. Conde-Jiménez. 2015. Dimensiones en las que fundamentar la formación investigadora en Tecnología Educativa - Dimensions that support the research training in Educational Technology. RELATEC. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnología Educativa, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.17398/1695-288X.14.1.57Google Scholar
- C. Spinzi Blanco, D. Sosa, L. González and B. Aquino. 2015. A investigar se aprende investigando: Programa de Jóvenes Investigadores. Sinéctica. 44 (2015), 1–11.Google Scholar
- M. Oropeza, A. Mena, y G. Soto. 2013. La formación y desarrollo de la competencia investigativa en docentes en ejercicio de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla * The Formation and Development of the Investigative Universidad Autónoma de Puebla. Revista de La Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales, 15, 43–59. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6622334Google Scholar
- García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2018). Identidad digital como investigadores. La evidencia y la transparencia de la producción científica [Digital Identity as Researchers. The Evidence and Transparency of Scientific Production]. Education in the Knowledge Society, 19(2), 7-28. doi:10.14201/eks2018192728Google ScholarCross Ref
- L. I. González-Pérez, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2018. Identidad digital 2.0: Posibilidades de la gestión y visibilidad científica a través de repositorios institucionales de acceso abierto. In Ecosistemas del Conocimiento Abierto, J.A. Merlo Vega Ed. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, España, 197-206.Google Scholar
- P. Carlino. 2013. Alfabetización académica diez años después. Revista Mexicana de Investigacion Educativa, 18(57), 355–381.Google Scholar
- J. A. Beltrán, R. I. García, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, and J. Tánori. 2019. Factores que influyen en la integración del programa de inclusión y alfabetización digital. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 21(3), 1-10. Web site https://redie.uabc.mx/redie/article/view/2088 Retrieved from: https://repositorio.tec.mx/handle/11285/636012Google Scholar
- Association of College and Research Libraries. 2016. Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education.Google Scholar
- F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2018. Ecosistemas tecnológicos universitarios. In UNIVERSITIC 2017. Análisis de las TIC en las Universidades Españolas, J. Gómez Ed. Crue Universidades Españolas, Madrid, España, 164-170.Google Scholar
- A. García-Holgado and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2017. A metamodel proposal for developing learning ecosystems. In Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Novel Learning Ecosystems. 4th International Conference, LCT 2017. Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017. Proceedings, Part I, P. Zaphiris and A. Ioannou Eds. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 100-109. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-58509-3_10.Google Scholar
- A. García-Holgado and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2019. Validation of the learning ecosystem metamodel using transformation rules. Future Generation Computer Systems 91, 300-310. DOI:10.1016/j.future.2018.09.011.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Ferrari. 2013. DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in EuropeGoogle Scholar
- M. Zabalza, and A. Zabalza. 2012. Innovación y cambio en las instituciones educativas. Homo Sapiens Ediciones.Google Scholar
- A. Cerezo-Narváez, I. de los Ríos Carmenado, A. Pastor-Fernández, J. L. Yagüe Blanco, y M. Otero-Mateo. 2019. Project management competences by teaching and research staff for the sustained success of engineering education. Education Sciences, 9 (1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9010044Google ScholarCross Ref
- K. Gallardo, A. Lozano, y J. Elizondo. 2019. Innovación educativa en estudios de psicología educativa: un mapeo sistemático. In M.S. Ramírez-Montoya and J. R. Valenzuela González (Eds.), Innovación educativa: tendencias globales de investigación e implicaciones prácticas (1st ed., pp. 23–37). Octaedro.Google Scholar
- J. M. Romero-Rodríguez, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, I. Aznar-Díaz, and J. Hinojo-Lucena. 2020. Social appropriation of knowledge as a key factor for local development and open Innovation: A Systematic Review. Journal of Open Innovation. Technology, Marketing & Complexity, 6(44), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020044 Retrieved from: https://hdl.handle.net/11285/636411Google Scholar
- L. N. Ramírez-Ramírez, y M. S. Ramírez-Montoya. 2018. El papel de las estrategias innovadoras en educación superior: retos en las sociedades del conocimiento. Revista de Pedagogía, 39(104), 147-170. Web site http://hdl.handle.net/11285/630729Google Scholar
- L. I. González-Pérez, L. D. Glasserman Morales, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2017. Repositorios como soportes para diseminar experiencias de innovación educativa. In Innovación Educativa. Investigación, formación, vinculación y visibilidad, M.S. Ramírez-Montoya and J.R. Valenzuela González Eds. Síntesis, Madrid, España, 259-272.Google Scholar
- L. I. González-Pérez, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2018. User experience in institutional repositories: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP) 9, 1, 70-86. DOI:10.4018/IJHCITP.2018010105.Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. I. González-Pérez, M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, F. J. García-Peñalvo, H. Gibrán Ceballos, and E. A. Juárez Ibarra. 2018. RITEC & CRIS: Interoperabilidad para visibilidad y medición del impacto de la producción científica energética. In Innovación y sustentabilidad energética: Implementaciones con cursos masivos abiertos e investigación educativa, M.S. Ramírez-Montoya and A. Mendoza-Domínguez Eds. Narcea, Madrid, España, 55-73.Google Scholar
- M. S. Ramírez-Montoya and F. J. García-Peñalvo. 2018. Co-creation and open innovation: Systematic literature review. Comunicar 26, 54, 9-18. DOI:10.3916/C54-2018-01.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. S. Ramírez-Montoya, F. J. García-Peñalvo, and R. Mcgreal. 2018. Shared Science and Knowledge. Open Access, Technology and Education. Comunicar 26, 54, 1-5.Google Scholar
- B. Fecher and S. Friesike. 2014. Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought. In Opening Science. The Evolving Guide on How the Web is Changing Research, Collaboration and Scholarly S. Bartling and F. S. Eds. Springer, Cham, 17-47. DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2.Google Scholar
- J. Solé Blanch. 2020. The educational change in front of the technological innovation, the pedagogy of competences and the discourse of the emotional education. A critical approach. Teoría de La Educación, 32 (1), 101–121. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.20945Google Scholar
- S. Vincent-Lancrin, S. Kar, J. Urgel, and G. Jacotin. 2019. Measuring Innovation in Education 2019: What has changed in the classroom? https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264215696-enGoogle Scholar
- K. Panetta. 2017. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and smart things promise an intelligent future. Smarter with Gartner.Google Scholar
- H. Tutar 2019. Management of innovations in education: student's satisfaction and career adoptability. Marketing and Management of Innovations. 4 (2019), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2019.4-25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. García-González, and M. S. Ramírez-Montoya. 2019. Systematic Mapping of Scientific Production on Open Innovation (2015–2018): Opportunities for Sustainable Training Environments. Sustainability.Google Scholar
- M. S. Ramírez-Montoya. 2020. Challenges for Open Education with Educational Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, Sustainability, 12(17), 7053; doi:10.3390/su12177053Google Scholar
- J. Creswell 2013. Best Practices for Mixed Methods Research in the Health Sciences John W. Creswell, Ann Carroll Klassen, Vicki L. Plano Clark, Katherine Clegg Smith for the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research: Qualitative Methods Overview Jo Moriarty. Qualitative Social Work. 12, 4 (2013), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013493540a.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. J. Onwuegbuzie, and J. P. Combs. 2015. Emergent Data Analysis Techniques in Mixed Methods Research: A Synthesis. SAGEGoogle Scholar
- J. W. Creswell, and V. L. Plano Clark. 2011. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE.Google Scholar
- M. Harwell. 2014. Research Design in Qualitative/Quantitative/Mixed Methods. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
- M.S. Ramírez-Montoya, and J. Lugo-Ocando. 2020. Systematic review of mixed methods in the framework of educational innovation. [Revisión sistemática de métodos mixtos en el marco de la innovación educativa]. Comunicar, 65, 111349. https://doi.org/10.3916/C65-2020-01 Web site: https://hdl.handle.net/11285/636432 https://hdl.handle.net/11285/636431Google Scholar
- U. Flick. 2018. Doing triangulation and mixed methods research. London, England: SAGE.Google Scholar
- D. Silvio-Donolo. 2009. Triangulación: Procedimiento incorporado a nuevas metodologías de investigación. Revista Digital Universitaria, 10(8), 2–10. Web site http://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.10/num8/art53/int53.htm%5Cnhttp://www.revista.unam.mx/vol.10/num8/art53/art53.pdfGoogle Scholar
- N. K. Denzin. 1989. The research act (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Original work published 1970, 1st ed., Chicago, IL: Aldine).Google Scholar
Recommendations
Embedding Academic Literacy Support Within the Electrical Engineering Curriculum: A Case Study
This paper reports the integration of supplementary training in academic literacy, for those without the assumed entry standard, into a standard electrical engineering program without compromising any other educational objectives. All students who ...
A Practice-Based Approach to Developing First-Year Higher Education Students' Digital Literacy: A Case Study in a Developing Country
This paper contributes to the conceptualisation of digital literacy as a social practice. While previous studies have focused on student digital skills and digital practices in well-resourced environments, there is a research gap concerning digital ...
Comments