skip to main content
10.1145/3430895.3460144acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesl-at-sConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Using Social Norms to Promote Actions Beyond the Course

Published:08 June 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Educators and researchers in online education have grappled with not only how to increase course completion but also how to make a broader impact that goes beyond online courses, such as course participants' real-world applications of the learned knowledge and skills. Research in social psychology and behavioral science suggests that social norms interventions, which convey norms shared in the community that people belong in to promote desirable behaviors, can offer a low-cost and scalable approach to encourage actions beyond the courses (ABCs). We tested three social norm interventions that presented a weekly normative message (descriptive, dynamic, or injunctive norm) with aggregate information about course participants' ABCs in the prior week. Randomized experiments in three online courses found effects on ABCs to be weak and moderated by norm message type and the complexity of the target behavior. Although the interventions did not improve course completion, the dynamic norm message was more effective at promoting ABCs for complex behaviors, such as developing environmental education activities.

References

  1. Icek Ajzen. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50, 2 (1991), 179--211.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashton Anderson, Daniel Huttenlocher, Jon Kleinberg, and Jure Leskovec. 2014. Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. 687--698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Lorraine M Angelino, Frankie Keels Williams, and Deborah Natvig. 2007. Strategies to engage online students and reduce attrition rates. Journal of Educators Online 4, 2 (2007), n2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Joshua D Angrist and Alan B Krueger. 1999. Empirical strategies in labor economics. In Handbook of labor economics. Vol. 3. Elsevier, 1277--1366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Michael Baiocchi and René Kizilcec. 2018. Criteria-Based Randomization: Explicit and Exact Control in Multi-Arm Trials. Available at SSRN 3339748 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Alan D Berkowitz. 2005. An overview of the social norms approach. Changing the culture of college drinking: A socially situated health communication campaign 1 (2005), 193--214.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hart Blanton, Anne E Stuart, and Regina JJM Van den Eijnden. 2001. An introduction to deviance-regulation theory: The effect of behavioral norms on message framing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 7 (2001), 848--858.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Mary J Bresnahan and Jie Zhuang. 2016. Effects of normative antismoking messages in China-a brief report. Health communication 31, 3 (2016), 374--378.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David Card. 1999. The causal effect of education on earnings. Handbook of labor economics 3 (1999), 1801--1863.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Damon Centola and Tayler Lord. 2018. The truth about behavioral change. MIT Sloan Management Review.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Guanliang Chen, Dan Davis, Claudia Hauff, and Geert-Jan Houben. 2016. Learning transfer: Does it take place in MOOCs? An investigation into the uptake of functional programming in practice. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 409--418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Ji Yong Cho, Yue Li, Marianne E Krasny, Alex Russ, and René F Kizilcec. in press. Online Learning and Social Norms: Evidence from a Cross-Cultural Field Experiment in a Course for a Cause. Computer-Based Learning in Context (in press).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Robert B Cialdini, Linda J Demaine, Brad J Sagarin, Daniel W Barrett, Kelton Rhoads, and Patricia L Winter. 2006. Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social influence 1, 1 (2006), 3--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Robert B Cialdini, Carl A Kallgren, and Raymond R Reno. 1991. A focus theory of normative conduct: A theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. In Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 24. Elsevier, 201--234.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robert B Cialdini, Raymond R Reno, and Carl A Kallgren. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of personality and social psychology 58, 6 (1990), 1015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Robert B Cialdini and Melanie R Trost. 1998. Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. (1998).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Derrick Coetzee, Armando Fox, Marti A Hearst, and Björn Hartmann. 2014. Should your MOOC forum use a reputation system?. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 1176--1187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Joseph Crawford, Kerryn Butler-Henderson, Jürgen Rudolph, Bashar Malkawi, Matt Glowatz, Rob Burton, Paulo Magni, and Sophia Lam. 2020. COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching 3, 1 (2020), 1--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Dan Davis, Ioana Jivet, René F Kizilcec, Guanliang Chen, Claudia Hauff, and Geert-Jan Houben. 2017. Follow the successful crowd: raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. In Proceedings of the seventh international learning analytics & knowledge conference. 454--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Katherine Farrow, Gilles Grolleau, and Lisette Ibanez. 2017. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: A review of the evidence. Ecological Economics 140 (2017), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Susanne Gaube, Dimitrios Tsivrikos, Daniel Dollinger, and Eva Lermer. 2018. How a smiley protects health: A pilot intervention to improve hand hygiene in hospitals by activating injunctive norms through emoticons. PloS one 13, 5 (2018), e0197465.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Alan S Gerber and Todd Rogers. 2009. Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody's voting and so should you. The Journal of Politics 71, 1 (2009), 178--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Noah J Goldstein, Robert B Cialdini, and Vladas Griskevicius. 2008. A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of consumer Research 35, 3 (2008), 472--482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Monica Green and Margaret Somerville. 2015. Sustainability education: Researching practice in primary schools. Environmental Education Research 21, 6 (2015), 832--845.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Suzanne Higgs, Jinyu Liu, EIM Collins, and JM Thomas. 2019. Using social norms to encourage healthier eating. Nutrition Bulletin 44, 1 (2019), 43--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Matthew J Hornsey. 2008. Social identity theory and self-categorization theory: A historical review. Social and personality psychology compass 2, 1 (2008), 204--222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. René F. Kizilcec and Geoffrey L. Cohen. 2017. Eight-minute self-regulation intervention raises educational attainment at scale in individualist but not collectivist cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 17 (2017), 4348--4353. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611898114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. René F Kizilcec and Sherif Halawa. 2015. Attrition and achievement gaps in online learning. In Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale. 57--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. René F. Kizilcec, Justin Reich, Michael Yeomans, Christoph Dann, Emma Brunskill, Glenn Lopez, Selen Turkay, Joseph Jay Williams, and Dustin Tingley. 2020. Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, 26 (2020), 201921417. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1921417117Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. René F Kizilcec, Andrew J Saltarelli, Justin Reich, and Geoffrey L Cohen. 2017. Closing global achievement gaps in MOOCs. Science 355, 6322 (2017), 251--252.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. René F Kizilcec, Emily Schneider, Geoffrey L Cohen, and Daniel A McFarland. 2014. Encouraging forum participation in online courses with collectivist, individualist and neutral motivational framings. EMOOCS 2014, Proceedings of the European MOOC stakeholder summit (2014), 80--87.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Marianne E Krasny, Zahra Golshani, Brittney López Hampton, Juan Felipe Restrepo Mesa Coleman, Michael Schrenk, Masango Roderick Warakula, Gail Woon, and Yueyang Yu. 2019. MOOC Contributions to a "Better Place for All". MOOCs and Open Education in the Global South: Challenges, Successes, and Opportunities (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Irma Triasih Kurniawan, Ben Seymour, Deborah Talmi, Wako Yoshida, Nick Chater, and Raymond J Dolan. 2010. Choosing to make an effort: the role of striatum in signaling physical effort of a chosen action. Journal of neurophysiology 104, 1 (2010), 313--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Maria Knight Lapinski and Rajiv N Rimal. 2005. An explication of social norms. Communication theory 15, 2 (2005), 127--147.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Youngju Lee and Jaeho Choi. 2011. A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development 59, 5 (2011), 593--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Yue Li and Marianne E Krasny. 2019. Practice change in environmental education: lessons from professional development. Environmental Education Research 25, 7 (2019), 1119--1136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. David D. Loschelder, Henrik Siepelmeyer, Daniel Fischer, and Julian A. Rubel. 2019. Dynamic norms drive sustainable consumption: Norm-based nudging helps café customers to avoid disposable to-go-cups. Journal of Economic Psychology 75, June 2018 (2019), 102146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Chad R Mortensen, Rebecca Neel, Robert B Cialdini, Christine M Jaeger, Ryan P Jacobson, and Megan M Ringel. 2019. Trending norms: A lever for encouraging behaviors performed by the minority. Social Psychological and Personality Science 10, 2 (2019), 201--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Alyssa Napier, Elizabeth Huttner-Loan, and Justin Reich. 2018. From online learning to offline action: using MOOCs for job-embedded teacher professional development. In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. H Perkins. 2003. The social norms approach to preventing school and college age substance abuse: A handbook for educators, counselors, and clinicians. Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Allecia E Reid, Robert B Cialdini, and Leona S Aiken. 2010. Social norms and health behavior. In Handbook of behavioral medicine. Springer, 263--274.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Todd Rogers and Avi Feller. 2016. Discouraged by peer excellence: Exposure to exemplary peer performance causes quitting. Psychological science 27, 3 (2016), 365--374.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. P Wesley Schultz, Jessica M Nolan, Robert B Cialdini, Noah J Goldstein, and Vladas Griskevicius. 2007. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological science 18, 5 (2007), 429--434.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Joanne R Smith, Winnifred R Louis, Deborah J Terry, Katharine H Greenaway, Miranda R Clarke, and Xiaoliang Cheng. 2012. Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology 32, 4 (2012), 353--361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Gregg Sparkman and Gregory M Walton. 2017. Dynamic norms promote sustainable behavior, even if it is counternormative. Psychological science 28, 11 (2017), 1663--1674.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Corrine I Voils, YunKyung Chang, Jamie Crandell, Jennifer Leeman, Margarete Sandelowski, and Matthew L Maciejewski. 2012. Informing the dosing of interventions in randomized trials. Contemporary clinical trials 33, 6 (2012), 1225--1230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Corrine I Voils, Heather A King, Matthew L Maciejewski, Kelli D Allen, William S Yancy Jr, and Jonathan A Shaffer. 2014. Approaches for informing optimal dose of behavioral interventions. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 48, 3 (2014), 392--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Yuan Wang, Luc Paquette, and Ryan Baker. 2014. A longitudinal study on learner career advancement in MOOCs. Journal of Learning Analytics 1, 3 (2014), 203--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Michael Yeomans and Justin Reich. 2017. Planning prompts increase and forecast course completion in massive open online courses. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (2017), 464--473. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027416Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Using Social Norms to Promote Actions Beyond the Course

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        L@S '21: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale
        June 2021
        380 pages
        ISBN:9781450382151
        DOI:10.1145/3430895

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 June 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate117of440submissions,27%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader