skip to main content
10.1145/3430524.3444706acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Polymerized Tape

Published:14 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present polymerized sports tape as a general purpose prototyping and sensor-design resource. We use it in a somewhat similar manner to how conductive copper tape is often used for fast production of lo-fi electrical prototypes. However, copper tape has a number of drawbacks if one is prototyping with soft materials, textiles, or even directly on the human body. Because it is not elastic, it does not adhere well to such materials. Sports tape, however, has the desired elastic qualities, and additionally is designed to adhere not only to arbitrary objects, but also to human skin. We polymerize sports tape to make it conductive. The resulting conductive tape has a series of electrical properties which make it an exciting sensor-material. It is piezo-resistive. This means its resistance changes with applied forces. It can also be used to create a voltage gradient, which enables simple and precise position sensing. This unique combination of mechanical and electrical properties makes it an exciting and unique prototyping resource.

References

  1. A. C. Baptista, I. Ropio, B. Romba, J. P. Nobre, C. Henriques, J. C. Silva, J. I. Martins, J. P. Borges, and I. Ferreira. 2018. Cellulose-based electrospun fibers functionalized with polypyrrole and polyaniline for fully organic batteries. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 6, 1 (dec 2018), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA06457HGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Audrey Briot, Cedric Honnet, and Paul Strohmeier. 2020. Stymphalian Birds - Exploring the Aesthetics of A Hybrid Textile. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS’ 20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 437–440. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395840Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Jesse Burstyn, Nicholas Fellion, Paul Strohmeier, and Roel Vertegaal. 2015. PrintPut: Resistive and Capacitive Input Widgets for Interactive 3D Prints. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015, Julio Abascal, Simone Barbosa, Mirko Fetter, Tom Gross, Philippe Palanque, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 332–339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Madeline Gannon, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2015. Tactum: A Skin-Centric Approach to Digital Design and Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1779–1788. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702581Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Madeline Gannon, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2016. ExoSkin: On-Body Fabrication. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 5996–6007. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858576Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Saul Greenberg, Sheelagh Carpendale, Nicolai Marquardt, and Bill Buxton. 2011. Sketching user experiences: The workbook. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David Holman, Audrey Girouard, Hrvoje Benko, and Roel Vertegaal. 2013. The Design of Organic User Interfaces: Shape, Sketching and Hypercontext. Interacting with Computers 25, 2 (03 2013), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iws018 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/25/2/133/2300729/iws018.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Cedric Honnet, Hannah Perner-Wilson, Marc Teyssier, Bruno Fruchard, Jürgen Steimle, Ana C. Baptista, and Paul Strohmeier. 2020. PolySense: Augmenting Textiles with Electrical Functionality Using In-Situ Polymerization. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376841Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Narjes Pourjafarian, Anusha Withana, Joseph A. Paradiso, and Jürgen Steimle. 2019. Multi-Touch Kit: A Do-It-Yourself Technique for Capacitive Multi-Touch Sensing Using a Commodity Microcontroller. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New Orleans, LA, USA) (UIST ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1071–1083. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347895Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Paul Strohmeier. 2015. DIY IR Sensors for Augmenting Objects and Human Skin. In Proceedings of the 6th Augmented Human International Conference (Singapore, Singapore) (AH ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 181–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2735711.2735802Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Paul Strohmeier, Jarrod Knibbe, Sebastian Boring, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2018. ZPatch: Hybrid Resistive/Capacitive ETextile Input. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Stockholm, Sweden) (TEI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173225.3173242Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Paul Strohmeier, Narjes Pourjafarian, Marion Koelle, Cedric Honnet, Bruno Fruchard, and Jürgen Steimle. 2020. Sketching On-Body Interactions Using Piezo-Resistive Kinesiology Tape. In Proceedings of the Augmented Humans International Conference (Kaiserslautern, Germany) (AHs ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 29, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384657.3384774Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Martin Weigel, Tong Lu, Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Carmel Majidi, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. iSkin: Flexible, Stretchable and Visually Customizable On-Body Touch Sensors for Mobile Computing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2991–3000. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Martin Weigel, Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Alex Olwal, and Jürgen Steimle. 2017. SkinMarks: Enabling Interactions on Body Landmarks Using Conformal Skin Electronics. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3095–3105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025704Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Polymerized Tape
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        TEI '21: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction
        February 2021
        908 pages
        ISBN:9781450382137
        DOI:10.1145/3430524

        Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 14 February 2021

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • abstract
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        TEI '21 Paper Acceptance Rate40of136submissions,29%Overall Acceptance Rate393of1,367submissions,29%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format