skip to main content
10.1145/3428658.3430973acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebmediaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Ontology-based Information Model for Multi-Domain Semantic Modeling and Analysis of Smart City Data

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Smart city services are typically defined according to domains (e.g., health, education, safety) and supported by different systems. Consequently, the analysis of smart city data is often domain-specific, thus limiting the capabilities of the offered services and hampering decision-making that relies on isolated domain information. To support a suitable analysis across multiple domains, it is necessary having a unified data model able to handle the inherent heterogeneity of smart city data and take into account both geographic and citizen information. This paper presents an ontology-based information model to support multi-domain analysis in smart cities to foster interoperability and powerful automated reasoning upon unambiguous information. The proposed information model follows Linked Data principles and takes advantage of ontologies to define information semantically. The semantic relationships and properties defined in the model also allow inferring new pieces of information that improve accuracy when analyzing multiple city domains. This paper reports an evaluation of the information model through ontological metrics and competence questions.

References

  1. J. G. Almeida, J. Silva, T. Batista, and E. Cavalcante. 2020. A Linked Data-based service for integrating heterogeneous data sources in smart cities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 1. SciTePress, Portugal, 205--212. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009422802050212Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Apache Software Foundation. [n.d.]. Apache Jena. https://jena.apache.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P. Barnaghi, W. Wang, C. Henson, and K. Taylor. 2012. Semantics for the Internet of Things: Early progress and back to the future. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems 8, 1 (Jan. 2012), 1--21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. S. Bischof, A. Karapantelakis, C. Nechifor, A. P. Sheth, A. Mileo, and P. M. Barnaghi. 2014. Semantic modelling of smart city data. In Proceedings of the W3C Workshop on the Web of Things.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. C. Bizer, T. Heath, and T. Berners-Lee. 2011. Linked Data - The story so far. In Semantic services, interoperability and Web applications, Amit P. Sheth (Ed.). IGI Global, USA, 205--227. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-593-3.ch008Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. B.Rocha, E. Cavalcante, T. Batista, and J. Silva. 2019. A Linked Data-Based Semantic Information Model for Smart Cities. In 2019 IX Brazilian Symposium on Computing Systems Engineering (SBESC). 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. E. Cavalcante, N. Cacho, F. Lopes, and T. Batista. 2017. Challenges to the development of smart city systems: A system-of-systems view. In Proceedings of the 31st Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering. ACM, USA, 244--249. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131151.3131189Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Consoli, M. Mongiovic, A. G. Nuzzolese, S. Peroni, V. Presutti, D. Recupero, and D. Spampinato. 2015. A smart city data model based on semantics best practice and principles. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, USA, 1395--1400. https://doi.org/10.1145/2740908.2742133Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. d'Aquin, J. Davies, and E. Motta. 2015. Smart cities' data: Challenges and opportunities for semantic technologies. IEEE Internet Computing 19, 6 (Nov.-Dec. 2015), 66--70. https://doi.org/10.1109/mic.2015.130Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. A. Degbelo, C. Granell, S. Trilles, D. Bhattacharya, S. Casteleyn, and C. Kray. 2016. Opening up smart cities: Citizen-centric challenges and opportunities from GIScience. International Journal of Geo-Information 5, 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Gupta, A. Padhy, A. Adhikari, and A. Dutta. 2016. A Semantic Web and Linked Data based framework for Smart City data management. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology. IEEE, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. K. Hashimoto, K. Yamada, K. Tabata, M. Oda, T. Suganuma, A. Rahim, P. Vlacheas, V. Stavroulaki, D. Kelaidonis, and A. Georgakopoulos. 2015. iKaaS data modeling: A data model for community services and environment monitoring in smart city. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing. IEEE, USA, 301--306. https://doi.org/10.1109/icac.2015.64Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. T. Heath and C. Bizer. 2011. Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a global data space. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. S. Jain and V. Meyer. 2018. Evaluation and refinement of Emergency Situation Ontology. International Journal of Information and Education Technology 8 (Jan. 2018), 713--719.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. B. Lantow. 2016. OntoMetrics: Putting metrics in use for ontology evaluation. In Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management. SciTePress, Portugal, 186--191. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006084601860191Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Mishra and S.Jain. 2020. Ontologies as a semantic model in IoT. International Journal of Computers and Applications 42, 3 (2020), 233--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. M. Musen. 2015. The Protégé Project: A look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1, 4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2757001.2757003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. P. Nesi, C. Badii, P. Bellini, D. Cenni, G. Martelli, and M. Paolucci. 2016. Km4City Smart City API: An integrated support for mobility services. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing. IEEE, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/smartcomp.2016.7501702Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. N. F. Noy and D. L. Mcguinness. 2001. Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Technical Report. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. M. Poveda-Villalón, A. Gómez-Pérez, and M. Suárez-Figueroa. 2014. OOPS! (OntOlogy Pitfall Scanner!): An on-line tool for ontologyevaluation. International Journal on Semantic Web & Information Systems 10, 2 (Apr. 2014), 7--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. T. Qamar, N. Bawany, S. Javed, and S. Amber. 2019. Smart City Services Ontology (SCSO): Semantic modeling of smart city applications. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Digital Information Processing and Communications. IEEE, USA, 52--56. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdipc.2019.8723785Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. M. Rani, S. Alekh, A. Bhardwaj, A. Gupta, and O. P. Vyas. 2016. Ontology-based classification and analysis of non-emergency smart-city events. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Computational Techniques in Information and Communication Technologies. IEEE, USA, 509--514. https://doi.org/10.1109/icctict.2016.7514633Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. E. Santana, A. P. Chaves, M. Gerosa, F. Kon, and D. S. Milojičić. 2017. Software platforms for smart cities: Concepts, requirements, challenges, and a unified reference architecture. Comput. Surveys 50, 6 (Nov. 2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3124391Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Suárez-Figueroa, A. Gómez-Pérez, and B. Villazán-Terrazas. 2009. How to write and use the Ontology Requirements Specification Document. In Proceedings of On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2009, Robert Meersman, Tharam Dillon, and Pilar Herrero (Eds.). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5871. Springer, Germany, 966--982. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05151-7_16Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. I. Toma, E. Simperl, and G. Hench. 2009. A joint roadmap for semantic technologies and the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the Third STI Roadmapping Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. S. Turchi, F. Paganelli, L. Bianchi, and D. Giuli. 2014. A lightweight Linked Data implementation for modeling the Web of Things. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops. IEEE, USA, 123--128. https://doi.org/10.1109/percomw.2014.6815177Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. A. Venceslau, R. Andrade, V. Vidal, T. Nogueira, and V. Pequeno. 2019. IoT semantic interoperability: A systematic mapping study. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Vol. 1. SciTePress, Portugal, 535--544. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007732605350544Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. W3C. 2013. SPARQL 1.1 Overview. https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An Ontology-based Information Model for Multi-Domain Semantic Modeling and Analysis of Smart City Data

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      WebMedia '20: Proceedings of the Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web
      November 2020
      364 pages
      ISBN:9781450381963
      DOI:10.1145/3428658

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 November 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      WebMedia '20 Paper Acceptance Rate34of87submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate270of873submissions,31%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader