Stevan Gostojić
ABSTRACT
The technological and following economic, political and social changes that have characterised the last decades have been accompanied with new forms of relationships between governments and citizens. Proliferation of transparent and accountable democratic practices and innovative tools aims to offer a response to a corrosion of democracy and its deformations into autocratic and illiberal regimes. New digital solutions may bring increased citizens participation at the local level, by upgrading the work processes of municipal institutions in a more transparent and inclusive manner. The focus of this paper is on the analysis of an innovative approach in digitalization of municipal, city and regional parliaments in Serbia, by developing e-parliament as a unique software solution for supporting management of parliamentary sessions. First, the benefits of the digitalization process are presented, both for parliaments and citizens. Then, scope of the system is described and high-level design principles are set. The scope was limited to legislative and oversight functions of the parliament. The most important principles were to develop a highly configurable and customizable solution, by using a modular design, open standards and platform-independent open-source components. Organizational and technical issues that have risen during the implementation process are also briefly described in the paper. The lessons learned are summed up as good practices that can hopefully guide parliament digitalization initiatives in other countries. Finally, the paper is concluded with plans to improve the software in the future.
- Andy Williamson. 2016. World e-Parliament Report 2016. Inter-Parliamentary Union, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Hryhorii Sorochan, Nadiia Virna. 2016. Open Parliament Data: from a trend to a necessity. Available at https://www.oporaua.org/en/news/parliament/vidkritii-parlament/42391-open-parliament-data-from-a-trend-to-a-necessity (accessed October 7, 2019).Google Scholar
- Executive Board of the United Nations Development Programme. 2015. Country Programme Document for Serbia (2016-2020). United Nations Development Programme, New York, USA.Google Scholar
- M. Vintar, M. Kunstelj, M. Dečman, and B. Berčič. 2003. Development of e-government in Slovenia. Information Polity, 8, 3--4, 133--149.Google Scholar
- P. M. Kanthawongs. 2004. An analysis of the information needs for e-Parliament systems. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications 1, 5, 1237--1242.Google Scholar
- Robert C. Johansen. 2006. The E-Parliament: Global governance to serve the human interest. Widener L. Rev. 13, 319--345.Google Scholar
- Roxanne Missingham. 2011. E-parliament: Opening the door. Government Information Quarterly 28, 3, 426--434.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aspasia Papaloi and Dimitris Gouscos. 2011. E-Parliaments and Novel Parliament-to-Citizen services. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government 3, 1, 80--98.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tess Kingham. 2003. e-Parliaments. World Bank Institute, Washington DC, USA.Google Scholar
- The Law on Local Self-government. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 129/2007, 83/2014 - other law, 101/2016 - other law and 47/2018.Google Scholar
- Regulation on Electronic Office Operations. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 40/2010 and 42/2017Google Scholar
- Law on Electronic Document. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 94/2017Google Scholar
- Law on Information Security. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, no. 6/2016 and 94/2017.Google Scholar
- Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards. 2019. OASIS LegalDocumentML (LegalDocML) TC. Available at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/legaldocml (accessed October 7, 2019).Google Scholar
- Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards. 2019. OASIS. Available at http://www.oasis-open.org/ (accessed October 7, 2019).Google Scholar
- Office for IT and eGovernment. 2019. Office for IT and eGovernment. Available at https://www.ite.gov.rs/ (accessed October 7, 2019).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Digitizing parliaments: a case study of Serbia
Recommendations
The Bangladesh Justice Audit
ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceThe Bangladesh Constitution guarantees human rights, freedom, equality, justice and rule of law for all citizens. Article 33(1) ensures the rights for each citizen to legal support and article 35(3) affirms that every person accused of a criminal ...
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
Special issue on Open Government and Public Participation: Issues and Challenges in Creating Public ValueWe argue that the Obama Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs distinctions between e-democracy and e-government by incorporating historically democratic practices. now enabled by emerging technology. within administrative agencies. We ...
Open government and e-government: democratic challenges from a public value perspective
dg.o '11: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference: Digital Government Innovation in Challenging TimesWe consider open government (OG) within the context of e-government and its broader implications for the future of public administration. We argue that the current US Administration's Open Government Initiative blurs traditional distinctions between e-...
Comments