skip to main content
10.1145/3412841.3441933acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Incorporating spatial context into remaining-time predictive process monitoring

Published:22 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Predictive business process monitoring aims to accurately predict a variable of interest (e.g. remaining time) or the future state of the process instance (e.g. outcome or next step). It is an important topic both from a research and practitioner perspective. For example, existing research suggests that even when problems occur with service provision, providing accurate estimates around process completion time is positively correlated with increasing customer satisfaction. The quest for models with higher predictive power has led to the development of a variety of novel techniques. However, though the location of events is a crucial explanatory variable in many business processes, as yet there have been no studies which have incorporated spatial context into the predictive process monitoring framework. This paper seeks to address this problem by introducing the concept of a spatial event log which records location details at a trace or event level.

The predictive utility of spatial contextual features is evaluated vis-à-vis other contextual features. An approach is proposed to predict the remaining time of an in-flight process instance by calculating the buffer distances between the location of events in a spatial event log to capture spatial proximity and connectedness. These distances are subsequently utilised to construct a regression model which is then used to predict the remaining time for events in the test dataset. The proposed approach is benchmarked against existing approaches using five real-life event logs and demonstrates that spatial features improve the predictive power of business process monitoring models.

References

  1. Bennett L., D'Acosta J. and Vale F. (2018) in 'Spatial Data Mining II: A Deep Dive Into Space-Time Analysis' [Online] Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aV6HHwJuo4&t=364s [Accessed 30 May 2019]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Breuker, D., Matzner, M., Delfmann, P. and Becker, J., 2016. Comprehensible Predictive Models for Business Processes. Mis Quarterly, 40(4), pp.1009--1034.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cesario E., Folino F., Guarascio M., Pontieri L. (2016) A Cloud-Based Prediction Framework for Analyzing Business Process Performances. In: Buccafurri F., Holzinger A., Kieseberg P., Tjoa A., Weippl E. (eds) Availability, Reliability, and Security in Information Systems. CD-ARES 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9817. Springer, Cham Dua, S and Chowriappa, P (2012) Data Mining for Bioinformatics, Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. de Leoni, M. (Massimiliano); Mannhardt, Felix (2015): Road Traffic Fine Management Process. 4TU.ResearchData. Dataset. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Evermann, J., Rehse, J.R. and Fettke, P., 2017. Predicting process behaviour using deep learning. Decision Support Systems, 100, pp.129--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Folino F., Guarascio M., Pontieri L. (2012) Discovering Context-Aware Models for Predicting Business Process Performances. In: Meersman R. et al. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7565. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Hengl, T., Nussbaum, M., Wright, M.N., Heuvelink, G.B. and Gräler, B., 2018. Random forest as a generic framework for predictive modeling of spatial and spatio-temporal variables. PeerJ, 6, p.e5518.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Longley, P.A., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J. and Rhind, D.W., 2015. Geographic information science and systems. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Miller, H.J., 2004. Tobler's first law and spatial analysis. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2), pp.284--289.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Pasquadibisceglie, V., Appice, A., Castellano, G. and Malerba, D., 2019, June. Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Predictive Process Analytics. In 2019 International Conference on Process Mining (ICPM) (pp. 129--136). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogge-Solti, A. and Weske, M., 2013, December. Prediction of remaining service execution time using stochastic petri nets with arbitrary firing delays. In International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (pp. 389--403). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rozinat, A., Wynn, M.T., van der Aalst, W.M., ter Hofstede, A.H. and Fidge, C.J. (2009) 'Workflow simulation for operational decision support.' Data & Knowledge Engineering, 68(9), pp.834--850.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Senderovich A., Di Francescomarino C., Ghidini C., Jorbina K., Maggi F.M. (2017) 'Intra and Inter-case Features in Predictive Process Monitoring: A Tale of Two Dimensions'. In: Carmona J., Engels G., Kumar A. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10445. Springer, ChamGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Tax, N., Verenich, I., La Rosa, M. and Dumas, M., 2017, June. Predictive business process monitoring with LSTM neural networks. In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (pp. 477--492). Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Tobler, W.R., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic geography, 46(sup1), pp.234--240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Van der Aalst, W.M. (2016) Process Mining: Data Science in Action. 2nd edition. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Veldhoen, J. (2011) The Applicability of Short-term Simulation of Business Processes for the Support of Operational Decisions, Masters Thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Available at: http://alexandria.tue.nl/extra2/afstversl/tm/Veldhoen%202011.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. van Dongen, B.F. (Boudewijn) (2017) BPI Challenge 2017. Eindhoven University of Technology. Dataset. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. van Dongen, Boudewijn (2019): BPI Challenge 2019. 4TU.ResearchData. Dataset. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. van Dongen, B.F. (Boudewijn) (2020) BPI Challenge 2020. 4TU.Centre for Research Data. Dataset. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Verenich, I., Nguyen, H., La Rosa, M., & Dumas, M. (2017) White-box prediction of process performance indicators via flow analysis. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Software and System Process Pages, ACM, Paris, France, pp. 85--94.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Verenich, I., Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Maggi, F.M. and Teinemaa, I., 2019. Survey and cross-benchmark comparison of remaining time prediction methods in business process monitoring. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 10(4), pp.1--34.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Incorporating spatial context into remaining-time predictive process monitoring

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SAC '21: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing
        March 2021
        2075 pages
        ISBN:9781450381048
        DOI:10.1145/3412841

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 April 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader