skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445438acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

As cities grow, their people become increasingly distanced from nature except within private and public green spaces. Sensing technologies provide a means to harness curiosity about the animals living in these spaces, and possibly also connect interest to care. Yet little is known as to how people may use these technologies, or the implications for human-nature relations. To learn more, we gave commercial camera traps to ten adult participants to understand how they explored their gardens, what they wanted to learn, and what they did with this knowledge. We discovered trade-offs between control and care; the usefulness of different media and mystery; the temporalities of engaging in natural sensing practice; and a prevalence of sharing media within households. We discuss design for convivial cohabitation with the creatures in our garden. This research contributes to better human-nature relations through citizen sensing, as well as HCI for urban biodiversity conservation.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Ashraful Alam, Andrew McGregor, Donna Houston. 2018. Photo-response: Approaching participatory photography as a more-than-human research method. Area. 50, 2: 256-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/area.12368Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Philip Armstrong. 2011. "The Gaze of Animals". In Theorizing Animals: Re-thinking Humanimal Relations, N Taylor and T Signal (eds.). BRILL, 175- 202.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. M. F. Aronson, F. A. La Sorte, C. H. Nilon, M. Katti, M. A. Goddard, C. A. Lepczyk, P. S. Warren, N. S. Williams, S. Cilliers, B. Clarkson, C. Dobbs, R. Dolan, M. Hedblom, S. Klotz, J. L. Kooijmans, I. Kühn, I. Macgregor-Fors, M. McDonnell, U. Mörtberg, P. Pysek, S. Siebert, J. Sushinsky, P. WernerM. Winter. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. R. Soc. B. 281, 1780: 20133330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3330Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Myla F. J. Aronson, Christopher A. Lepczyk, Karl L. Evans, Mark A. Goddard, Susannah B. Lerman, J. Scott MacIvor, Charles H. Nilon, Timothy Vargo. 2017. Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Front Ecol Environ. 15, 4: 189-196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fee.1480Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Fredrik Aspling, Oskar Juhlin. 2017. Theorizing animal–computer interaction as machinations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 98, C: 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.05.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. J. Amy Belaire, Christopher J. Whelan, Emily S. Minor. 2014. Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape. Ecol. Appl. 24, 8: 2132-2143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/13-2259.1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Graham Burnett. 2008. Permaculture: A beginner's guide. Spiralseed. Westcliff on Sea, UKGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Rachel Clarke, Sara Heitlinger, Ann Light, Laura Forlano, Marcus Foth, Carl DiSalvo. 2019. More-than-human participation: design for sustainable smart city futures. Interactions. 26, 3: 60-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3319075Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Paul Coulton, Joseph Galen Lindley. 2019. More-Than Human Centred Design: Considering Other Things. The Design Journal. 22, 4: 463-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1614320Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Tshering Dema, Margot Brereton, Jessica L. Cappadonna, Paul Roe, Anthony Truskinger, Dan Zhang. 2017. Collaborative exploration and sensemaking of big environmental sound data. Comp Support Comp W. 26, 4-6: 693-731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-017-9286-9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Tshering Dema, Margot Brereton, Michael Esteban, Alessandro Soro, Sherub Sherub, Paul Roe. 2020. "Designing in the Network of Relations for Species Conservation: The Playful Tingtibi Community Birdhouse". In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Honolulu, HI, USA. 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376713Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Jacques Derrida, David Wills. 2002. The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow). Crit. Inq. 28, 2: 369-418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Finis Dunaway. 2000. Hunting with the Camera: Nature Photography, Manliness, and Modern Memory, 1890-1930. J. Am. Stud. 34, 2: 207-230.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Laura Forlano. 2016. Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities. Des. Issues. 32, 42-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. A. Foster, I.M. Dunham, C. Kaylor. 2017. Citizen Science for Urban Forest Management? Predicting the Data Density and Richness of Urban Forest Volunteered Geographic Information. Urban Sci. 1, 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1030030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Adrian Franklin. 2017. The more-than-human city. Am. Sociol. Rev. 65, 2: 202-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jennifer Gabrys. 2014. Programming Environments: Environmentality and Citizen Sensing in the Smart City. 32, 1: 30-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/d16812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Nadinè J. Galle, Sophie A. Nitoslawski, Francesco Pilla. 2019. The Internet of Nature: How taking nature online can shape urban ecosystems. Anthropocene Rev. 6, 3: 279-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2053019619877103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. William Gaver, Andy Boucher, Michail Vanis, Andy Sheen, Dean Brown, Liliana Ovalle, Naho Matsuda, Amina Abbas-Nazari, Robert Phillips. 2019. "My Naturewatch Camera: Disseminating Practice Research with a Cheap and Easy DIY Design". In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland Uk. Paper 302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300532Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Mark Goddard, Andrew Dougill, Tim Benton. 2009. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 90-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Edgar Gómez Cruz, Eric T. Meyer. 2012. Creation and Control in the Photographic Process: iPhones and the emerging fifth moment of photography. Photographies. 5, 2: 203-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17540763.2012.702123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Daniel Gooch, Matthew Barker, Lorraine Hudson, Ryan Kelly, Gerd Kortuem, Janet Van Der Linden, Marian Petre, Rebecca Brown, Anna Klis-Davies, Hannah Forbes, Jessica Mackinnon, Robbie MacphersonClare Walton. 2018. Amplifying Quiet Voices: Challenges and Opportunities for Participatory Design at an Urban Scale. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 25, Article 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3139398Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Elizabeth Goodman. 2009. "Three environmental discourses in human-computer interaction". In Proceedings of the (CHI EA '09) Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2535-2544. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1520340.1520358Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Kelly Greenop. 2008. "Uncanny Brisbane: new ways of looking at urban indigenous place". In Proceedings of the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand (SAHANZ) Annual Conference, Geelong, Australia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Bjørn Grinde, Grete Grindal Patil. 2009. Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 6, 9: 2332-2343. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6092332Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Donna J. Haraway. 2007. When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press. MinneapolisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Donna J. Haraway. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Judith Heerwagen. 2009. "Biophilia, health, and well-being". In Restorative commons: creating health and well-being through urban landscapes, L Campbell and A Wiesen (eds.). U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 38-57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sara Heitlinger, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Rob Comber. 2018. Connected seeds and sensors: co-designing internet of things for sustainable smart cities with urban food-growing communities. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3210604.3210620Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Timothy Hodgetts, Jamie Lorimer. 2014. Methodologies for animals’ geographies: cultures, communication and genomics. Cult. Geogr. 22, 2: 285-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474474014525114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Donna Houston, Jean Hillier, Diana MacCallum, Wendy Steele, Jason Byrne. 2017. Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’ in planning theory. Plan. Theory. 17, 2: 190-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Christopher D. Ives, Pia E. Lentini, Caragh G. Threlfall, Karen Ikin, Danielle F. Shanahan, Georgia E. Garrard, Sarah A. Bekessy, Richard A. Fuller, Laura Mumaw, Laura Rayner, Ross Rowe, Leonie E. ValentineDave Kendal. 2016. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1: 117-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12404Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. D. S. Kirk, A. J. Sellen, C. Rother, K. R. Wood, Understanding photowork, 2006. p. 761-770.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Christopher Lepczyk, Frank La Sorte, Myla Aronson, Mark Goddard, Ian MacGregor-Fors, Charles Nilon, Paige Warren. 2017. "Global Patterns and Drivers of Urban Bird Diversity". In Ecology and Conservation of Birds in Urban Environments, E Murgui and M Hedblom (eds.). Springer, Cham, 13-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43314-1_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jamie Lorimer. 2010. Moving image methodologies for more-than-human geographies. Cult. Geogr. 17, 2: 237-258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Cecily Maller, Leila Farahani. 2018. "Snakes in the city: understanding urban residents' responses to greening interventions for biodiversity". In Proceedings of the 8th State of Australian Cities National Conference, Adelaide, Australia. http://dx.doi.org/10.4225/50/5b2dc36e758f5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Clara Mancini, Jussi Lehtonen. 2018. "The Emerging Nature of Participation in Multispecies Interaction Design". In Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Hong Kong, China. 907–918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Paul D. Meek, Guy-Anthony Ballard, Peter J. S. Fleming, Michael Schaefer, Warwick Williams, Greg Falzon. 2014. Camera Traps Can Be Heard and Seen by Animals. PLOS ONE. 9, 10: e110832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0110832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Charles Nilon, Myla Aronson, S. Cilliers, Cynnamon Dobbs, Lauren Frazee, Mark Goddard, Karen O'Neill, Debra Roberts, Emilie Stander, Peter Werner, Marten WinterKen Yocom. 2017. Planning for the Future of Urban Biodiversity: A Global Review of City-Scale Initiatives. BioScience. 67, 332-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Allan F. O'Connell, James D. Nichols, K. Ullas Karanth. 2011. Camera traps in animal ecology: Methods and analyses. Springer Japan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-99495-4Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. William E. Odum. 1982. Environmental Degradation and the Tyranny of Small Decisions. BioScience. 32, 9: 728-729. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1308718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Jessica L. Oliver, Margot Brereton, Selen Turkay, David M. Watson, Paul Roe, Exploration of aural & visual media about birds informs lessons for citizen science design, in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference2020, Association for Computing Machinery: Eindhoven, Netherlands. p. 1687–1700.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Louise Gwenneth Phillips. 2018. T Bunda. Research through, with and as storying. (First edition. ed.) Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. London ;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. R. Phillips, R. Anderson, A. Abbas-Nazari, B. Gaver, A. Boucher. 2020. "‘Urban and suburban nature interactions’, Impacts and serendipitous narratives of the My Naturewatch project". In Proceedings of the Design Society: DESIGN Conference, 2109-2118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Bernd Ploderer, Tuck Leong. 2012. "A process of engagement: engaging with the process". In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2012, Newcastle, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2317992Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Kerith Power, Margaret Somerville. 2015. "The fence as technology of (post-)colonial childhood in contemporary australia". In Unsettling the Colonial Places and Spaces of Early Childhood Education, V Pacini-Ketchabaw and A Taylor (eds.). 63-77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Jennifer Preece. 2017. How two billion smartphone users can save species. Interactions. 24, 2: 26-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3043702Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Maria Puig de la Bellacasa. 2015. Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45, 5: 691-716. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312715599851Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. María Puig de la Bellacasa. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More than Human Worlds. University of Minnesota Press. MinneapolisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Astrid Schrader. 2015. Abyssal intimacies and temporalities of care: How (not) to care about deformed leaf bugs in the aftermath of Chernobyl. Soc. Stud. Sci. 45, 5: 665-690. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312715603249Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Nancy Smith, Shaowen Bardzell, Jeffrey Bardzell. 2017. "Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design". In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO, USA. 1714-1725. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025948Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Alessandro Soro, Margot Brereton, Tshering Dema, Jessica L. Oliver, Min Zhen Chai, Aloha May Hufana Ambe. 2018. "The ambient birdhouse: An IoT device to discover birds and engage with nature". In Proceedings of the CHI '18: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173971Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Brian L. Sullivan, Christopher L. Wood, Marshall J. Iliff, Rick E. Bonney, Daniel Fink, Steve Kelling. 2009. eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences. Biol. Conserv. 142, 10: 2282-2292. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Don E. Swann, Nic Perkins. 2014. "Camera trapping fo animal monitoring and management: A review of applications". In Camera Trapping: Wildlife Management and Research P Meek, P Fleming, and G Ballard (eds.). CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Victoria, 27-140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Alexandra Swanson, Margaret Kosmala, Chris Lintott, Robert Simpson, Arfon Smith, Craig Packer. 2015. Snapshot Serengeti, high-frequency annotated camera trap images of 40 mammalian species in an African savanna. Sci. Data. 2, 1: 150026. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.26Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Hollis Taylor. 2017. "Marginalized voices: Zoömusicology through a participatory lens". In Participatory Research in More-than-Human Worlds, M Bastian, (eds.). Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London; New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315661698Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Mardie Townsend. 2006. Feel blue? Touch green! Participation in forest/woodland management as a treatment for depression. Urban For. Urban Gree. 5, 3: 111-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2006.02.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. T. van Dooren, D.B. Rose. 2012. Storied-places in a multispecies city. Humanimalia. 3, 2: 1-27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Gavan Peter Longley Watson. 2011. Field birding and digital objects: immaterial technologies and their implications for one practice of coming to know the more-than-human. Environ. Educ. Res. 17, 6: 789-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.618623Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Karl Weick, Kathleen Sutcliffe, David Obstfeld. 2005. Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organ. Sci. 16, 4: 409-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Human-Nature Relations in Urban Gardens: Explorations with Camera Traps
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      10862 pages
      ISBN:9781450380966
      DOI:10.1145/3411764

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format