Mark Warner
Laura Lascau
Anna L Cox
Duncan P Brumby
Ann Blandford
ABSTRACT
Message deletion in mobile messaging apps allows people to “unsay” things they have said. This paper explores how and why people use (or do not use) this feature within remediation strategies after a communication error is identified. We present findings from a multi-stage survey designed to explore people’s general experiences of the message deletion feature (N = 401), peoples’ experiences of using this feature during the remediation of an error (N = 70), and receivers’ perceptions around recent message deletions (N = 68). While people are typically aware of the deletion feature, it is infrequently used. When used, it is primarily done so to improve conversations by reducing confusion between conversation partners. We found people being aware of message deletions creating information-gaps which can provoke curiosity in recipients, causing them to develop narratives to help address the uncertainty. We found concerns amongst senders that these narratives would be of a negative nature, having an undesirable impact on how others perceive them. We use our findings to suggest ways in which mobile messaging apps could improve conversational experiences around erroneous and regrettable messages.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Hazim Almuhimedi, Shomir Wilson, Bin Liu, Norman Sadeh, and Alessandro Acquisti. 2013. Tweets are forever: a large-scale quantitative analysis of deleted tweets. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 897–908.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Hans Rutger Bosker, Anne-France Pinget, Hugo Quené, Ted Sanders, and Nivja H De Jong. 2013. What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing 30, 2 (2013), 159–175.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eliane M Boucher, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Philip J Dunham. 2008. Interpersonal sensitivity in computer-mediated and face-to-face conversations. Media Psychology 11, 2 (2008), 235–258.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dathan, Matt. 2015. David Cameron makes another gaffe: ’This election is all about my career... sorry, I mean country’. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/david-cameron-makes-another-gaffe-this-election-is-all-about-my-career-sorry-i-mean-country-10218341.html [Online; accessed 18-August-2020].Google Scholar
- Nicole Ellison, Rebecca Heino, and Jennifer Gibbs. 2006. Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of computer-mediated communication 11, 2 (2006), 415–441.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shelly D. Farnham and Elizabeth F. Churchill. 2011. Faceted Identity, Faceted Lives: Social and Technical Issues with Being Yourself Online. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (Hangzhou, China) (CSCW ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958880Google ScholarDigital Library
- GitHub. [n.d.]. Managing disruptive comments. https://docs.github.com/en/github/building-a-strong-community/managing-disruptive-comments. Accessed: 2020-09-09.Google Scholar
- Erving Goffman 1978. The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth London.Google Scholar
- Russell Golman and George Loewenstein. 2015. Curiosity, information gaps, and the utility of knowledge. Information Gaps, and the Utility of Knowledge (April 16, 2015) (2015), 96–135.Google Scholar
- Shion Guha, Eric PS Baumer, and Geri K Gay. 2018. Regrets, I’ve had a few: When regretful experiences do (and don’t) compel users to leave Facebook. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork. ACM, 166–177.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andreas Gutmann and Mark Warner. 2019. Fight to be forgotten: Exploring the efficacy of data erasure in popular operating systems. In Annual Privacy Forum. Springer, 45–58.Google Scholar
- P Hovey. 2010. Real-time recovery and visualization of deleted tweets. Master’s thesis, University of California(2010).Google Scholar
- Hunt, Elle. 2017. I sent a compromising message to the wrong person. How will I ever recover?https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2017/apr/28/i-sent-a-compromising-message-to-the-wrong-person-how-will-i-ever-recover.Google Scholar
- Simon Jones and Eamonn O’Neill. 2011. Contextual Dynamics of Group-Based Sharing Decisions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1777–1786. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979200Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sara Kiesler, Jane Siegel, and Timothy W McGuire. 1984. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication.American psychologist 39, 10 (1984), 1123.Google Scholar
- Mark L. Knapp, Laura Stafford, and John A. Daly. 1986. Regrettable Messages: Things People Wish They Hadn’t Said. Journal of Communication 36, 4 (1986), 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1986.tb01449.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Kuebelback, Amy. 1991. Getting the Message : E-Mail is fast and efficient. But it isn’t always private–and that can mean big trouble for users.https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1991-09-04-vw-1539-story.html [Online; accessed 18-August-2020].Google Scholar
- Myron W Lustig, Jolene Koester, and Rona Halualani. 2006. Intercultural competence: Interpersonal communication across cultures. Pearson/A and B.Google Scholar
- Nora McDonald, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Andrea Forte. 2019. Reliability and Inter-rater Reliability in Qualitative Research: Norms and Guidelines for CSCW and HCI Practice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–23.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Margaret L Mclaughun, Michael J Cody, and H Dan O’Hair. 1983. The management of failure events: Some contextual determinants of accounting behavior. Human Communication Research 9, 3 (1983), 208–224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sarah McRoberts, Haiwei Ma, Andrew Hall, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2017. Share first, save later: Performance of self through Snapchat stories. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6902–6911.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra Metts and William R Cupach. 1989. Situational influence on the use of remedial strategies in embarrassing predicaments. Communications Monographs 56, 2 (1989), 151–162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janet R Meyer. 2011. Regretted messages: Cognitive antecedents and post hoc reflection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 30, 4 (2011), 376–395.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Janet R Meyer and Kyra Rothenberg. 2004. Repairing regretted messages: Effects of emotional state, relationship type, and seriousness of offense. Communication Research Reports 21, 4 (2004), 348–356.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bradley M Okdie, Rosanna E Guadagno, Frank J Bernieri, Andrew L Geers, and Amber R Mclarney-Vesotski. 2011. Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions. Computers in human behavior 27, 1 (2011), 153–159.Google Scholar
- Theodor Schnitzler, Christine Utz, Florian M Farke, Christina Pöpper, and Markus Dürmuth. 2018. User Perception and Expectations on Deleting Instant Messages - or - “What Happens If I Press This Button?”. In European Workshop on Usable Security (EuroUSEC).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Peter Schönbach. 1980. A category system for account phases. European Journal of Social Psychology 10, 2 (1980), 195–200.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marvin B Scott and Stanford M Lyman. 1968. Accounts. American sociological review(1968), 46–62.Google Scholar
- Manya Sleeper, Justin Cranshaw, Patrick Gage Kelley, Blase Ur, Alessandro Acquisti, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Norman Sadeh. 2013. I read my Twitter the next morning and was astonished: A conversational perspective on Twitter regrets. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 3277–3286.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Statista. 2019. Most popular messaging apps 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/258749/most-popular-global-mobile-messenger-apps/ [Online; accessed 06-September-2019].Google Scholar
- Statista. 2019. U.S. WhatsApp users 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/558290/number-of-whatsapp-users-usa/ [Online; accessed 06-September-2019].Google Scholar
- James T Tedeschi and Marc Reiss. 1981. Verbal strategies in impression management. The psychology of ordinary explanations of social behavior 271, 309(1981), 792–799.Google Scholar
- Catalina L Toma and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2010. Reading between the lines: linguistic cues to deception in online dating profiles. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. 5–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Catalina L Toma and Jeffrey T Hancock. 2012. What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication 62, 1 (2012), 78–97.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jeffrey W Treem, Paul M Leonardi, and Bart van den Hooff. 2020. Computer-Mediated Communication in the Age of Communication Visibility. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 25, 1 (01 2020), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmz024 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article-pdf/25/1/44/32961193/zmz024.pdfGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Yang Wang, Gregory Norcie, Saranga Komanduri, Alessandro Acquisti, Pedro Giovanni Leon, and Lorrie Faith Cranor. 2011. I regretted the minute I pressed share: A qualitative study of regrets on Facebook. In Proceedings of the seventh symposium on usable privacy and security. ACM, 10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Warner, Andreas Gutmann, M Angela Sasse, and Ann Blandford. 2018. Privacy Unraveling Around Explicit HIV Status Disclosure Fields in the Online Geosocial Hookup App Grindr. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW(2018), 181.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Warner, Agnieszka Kitkowska, Jo Gibbs, Juan F Maestre, and Ann Blandford. 2020. Evaluating’Prefer not to say’Around Sensitive Disclosures. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google Scholar
- Mark Warner, Juan F Maestre, Jo Gibbs, Chia-Fang Chung, and Ann Blandford. 2019. Signal Appropriation of Explicit HIV Status Disclosure Fields in Sex-Social Apps used by Gay and Bisexual Men. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 692.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Warner and Victoria Wang. 2019. Self-censorship in social networking sites (SNSs)–privacy concerns, privacy awareness, perceived vulnerability and information management. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society (2019).Google Scholar
- Pamela Wisniewski, Heather Lipford, and David Wilson. 2012. Fighting for my space: Coping mechanisms for SNS boundary regulation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 609–618.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lu Zhou, Wenbo Wang, and Keke Chen. 2016. Tweet Properly: Analyzing Deleted Tweets to Understand and Identify Regrettable Ones. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW ’16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1145/2872427.2883052Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- “Oops...”: Mobile Message Deletion in Conversation Error and Regret Remediation
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Multi-Channel Topic-Based Mobile Messaging in Romantic Relationships
With recent shifts from email to messaging apps for personal communication, many communication partners are no longer able to converse using multiple threads within one platform as they used to via email. Romantic couples are the most frequently messaged ...
A Study on How Older People Use Emojis
Interacción '18: Proceedings of the XIX International Conference on Human Computer InteractionThe great expansion of smartphones has enriched our ways of communication. Not only people have direct voice and video communication capabilities, but also written communications are having more and more importance. Instant messaging applications like ...
SeeSaw: I See You Saw My Video Message
MobileHCI '15: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and ServicesWe developed a prototype called SeeSaw that explored using reaction video and auto reply to create an engaging video messaging experience. When viewing a video message, reaction video captures a video of the viewer's reaction to share back with the ...
Comments