Melquizedequi, C, Santos
ABSTRACT
Information systems (IS) are directly linked to the organizational processes of public or private organizations. In the context of Brazilian federal public organizations (OPFB), the information technology acquisition (ATI) process is one of the key to supporting IS in OPFB. The problem raised in this research is that existing ITA standards have limitations related to the procedures for continuous improvement. There are indications that there are challenges to be understood that may affect the quality of the ITA process, and consequently, of the IS generated from this process. The goal is to identify key challenges and thereby support IT managers when they are continually improving their ATI and IS related processes. For this, semi-structured interviews were conducted, analyzed through Grounded Theory techniques, together with managers and IT specialists from Brazilian federal public organizations. Some challenges emerged in the form of hypotheses such as: nature of hiring, process time, IT planning, communication, etc.
- Samsul Islam and M. Daud Ahmed. 2012. Business process improvement of credit card department: case study of a multinational bank. Business Process Management Journal, 18, 2 (April 2012), 284–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151211225207Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sharfuddin A. Khan, Mohamad A. Kaviani, Brian J. Galli, and Palvisha Ishtiaq. 2019. Application of continuous improvement techniques to improve organization performance: A case study. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma 10, 2 (May 2019), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-05-2017-0048Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharfuddin, Khan. 2012. Ranking of Manufacturing Systems Criteria. International Journal of Engineering Science & Technology 6, 2933–2942.Google Scholar
- Bullen, Christine and Rockart, John. A primer on critical success factors. 1981. Report (Alfred P. Sloan School of Management, Center for Information Systems Research), no. 69, Working papers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.Google Scholar
- Wasana, Bandara, Guy, Gable, and Michael, Rosemann. 2005. Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study. European Journal of Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 347–360. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000546Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xiang-Hua Lu, Li-Hua Huang and Michael S. H. Heng. 2006. Critical success factors of interorganizational information systems—A case study of Cisco and Xiao Tong in China. Information & Management 43, 3(April 2006), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.06.007Google Scholar
- Thilini, Ariyachandra and Mark, Frolick. 2008. Critical Success Factors in Business Performance Management—Striving for Success. Information Systems Management 25, 2 (March 2008), 113–120. 10.1080/10580530801941504.Google Scholar
- Han, Chiu, Liu, Yaw, Chi, Lu, Yen, Ping. 2011. Study on Correlation between Critical Successful Factors of IT Governance and Governance Performance. Journal of Convergence Information Technology 6, 5, 329–338. 10.4156/jcit.vol6.issue5.38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- PeterTrkman. 2010. The critical success factors of business process management. International Journal Of Information Management 30, 2, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.003Google ScholarDigital Library
- Syaiful, Ali and Peter, Green. 2009. IT Governance Mechanisms in Public Sector Organisations: An Australian Context. Journal of Global Information Management 15. 41–63. 10.4018/jgim.2007100103Google Scholar
- Patrick Lückmann and Carsten Feldmann. 2017. Success Factors for Business Process Improvement Projects in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Empirical Evidence. Computer Science 121, 439–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.059Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniela S. L. Marzagão and Marly M. Carvalho. 2016. Critical success factors for Six Sigma projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34, 8, 1505–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.08.005Google ScholarCross Ref
- Edephonce N. Nfuka and Lazar Rusu. 2011. The effect of critical success factors on IT governance performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems 111, 9, 1418–1448. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111182773Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pedro C. Oprime, Glauco H. Sousa Mendes and Márcio L. Pimenta. 2011. Continuous improvement: critical factors in Brazilian industrial companies. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61, 1, 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211187516Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lei 8.666. 1993. Institui normas para licitações e contratos da Administração Pública e dá outras providências. Presidência da República, BRASIL, http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8666cons.htmGoogle Scholar
- IN04. 2014. Dispõe sobre o processo de contratação de Soluções de Tecnologia da Informação pelos órgãos integrantes da Administração Pública Federal. MPOG/SLTI Nº 4/2014, https://www.governoeletronico.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/1%20-%20IN%204%20%2011-9-14.pdfGoogle Scholar
- SISP. 2017. Órgãos do Sistema de Administração dos Recursos de Tecnologia da Informação. http://sisp.gov.br/ct-gcie/lista-orgaos-sisp#content-wrapperGoogle Scholar
- IN01. 2019. Dispõe sobre o processo de contratação de soluções de Tecnologia da Informação e Comunicação - TIC pelos órgãos e entidades integrantes do Sistema de Administração dos Recursos de Tecnologia da Informação - SISP do Poder Executivo Federal. IN01/2019. http://www.in.gov.br/materia/-/asset_publisher/Kujrw0TZC2Mb/content/id/70267659/do1-2019-04-05-instrucao-normativa-n-1-de-4-de-abril-de-2019-70267535Google Scholar
- PAINEL_CGU. 2017. Painel Gastos de TI. Ministério da Transparência e Controladoria-Geral da União (CGU). http://paineis.cgu.gov.br/gastosti/index.htmGoogle Scholar
- AUD_TI_TCU. 2015. Auditorias na gestão de contratos de TI. Tribunal de Contas da União, Secretaria de Fiscalização de Tecnologia da Informação, Brasil, 36, TCU. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/lumis/portal/file/fileDownload.jsp?fileId=8A8182A250D20C480150F29AC0BE34A6.Google Scholar
- TCU. 2019. Tribunal de Contas da União. https://portal.tcu.gov.br/inicio/index.htmGoogle Scholar
- Cláudio S. Cruz, Edméia L. P. Andrade and Rejane M. C. Figueiredo. 2014. Processo de contratação de serviços de tecnologia da informação para organizações públicas. Brasília, MCT/SPI, 214, http://www.11icfex.eb.mil.br/images/orientar_e_controlar/Licitacoes_e_contratos/ProcessoContratacaoTI.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Luiz P. S. Sobrinho, Rejane M. C. Figueiredo, Elaine Venson, Luiz M. Ribeiro, Thatiany Souza and Ricardo A. D. Kosloski. 2015. Application Of The Scrum Agile Framework To The Management Process Of Software Development Outsourcing In A Brazilian Government Agency. In: 12th CONTECSI International Conference on Information Systems and Technology Management. 10.5748/9788599693117-12-12CONTECSI/RF-3140Google Scholar
- Thayse S. F. Pinheiro, Rodrigo L. Pinheiro, Camila K. S. Silva and Luciana P. S. Rita. 2016. Aquisição de Bens e Serviços em Tecnologia da Informação: O Caso de uma Instituição Federal de Ensino Superior. Simpósio Internacional de Gestão de Projetos, Inovação e Sustentabilidade (V SINGEP), 20–21.Google Scholar
- PERFIL_GOV_TI. 2016. Levantamento de Governança de TI. Tribunal de Contas da União (TCU). https://www.ifsertao-pe.edu.br/index.php/portarias-proadi/finish/325-dgti/5611-perfilgov2016Google Scholar
- GUIA_TCU. 2012. Guia de boas práticas em contratação de soluções de tecnologia da informação: riscos e controles para o planejamento da contratação. Tribunal de Contas da União, Versão 1.0, Brasília. TCU. https://www.governoeletronico.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/Guia%20de%20contratacao%20de%20solucoes%20de%20TI%20-%20TCU.pdf/viewGoogle Scholar
- GUIA_MPOG. 2017. Guia de Boas Práticas em Contratação de Soluções de Tecnologia da Informação. Versão 3.0, Ministério Do Planejamento, Desenvolvimento E Gestão – MPOG. https://www.governodigital.gov.br/documentos-e-arquivos/Guia_de_Boas_Praticas_v3.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Wylliams Santos, Adson Cunha, Hermano Moura and Margaria Tiziana. 2017. Towards a Theory of Simplicity in Agile Software Development: A Qualitative Study. In 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, Vienna, pp. 40–43, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA.2017.38Google ScholarCross Ref
- SLTI/MPOG. 2015. Secretaria de Logística e Tecnologia da Informação. http://www.planejamento.gov.br/publicacoesGoogle Scholar
- ISO9001. 2015. Quality Management Systems – Requirements. ISO 9001:2015.Google Scholar
- Alec Sharp and Patrick Mcdermott. Development, Workflow Modeling: Tools for Process Improvement and Application. Artech House, Boston, MA, 2001.Google Scholar
- GUIA GESPUBLICA. 2011. Guia de Gestão de Processos de Governo. Programa Nacional de Gestão Pública e Desburocratização – GESPÚBLICA. Ministério da Fazenda Brasília, 2011. http://www.gespublica.gov.br/sites/default/files/documentos/guia_de_gestao_de_processos_de_governo_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
- CBOK. 2013. Guia para o gerenciamento de processos de negócio: corpo comum de conhecimento. Association of Business Process Management Professionals, CBOK V3.0, ed. 1.Google Scholar
- Fábio S. Ferreira, Carina F. Alves and Rosa C. Cavalcanti. 2016. R-BPM: Uma Metodologia para Gerenciamento de Processos de Negócios Consciente dos Riscos. iSys - Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação 9, 4, ISSN 1984-2902, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
- André F. L. Santana and Carina F. Alves. 2016. BPMG – Um Modelo Conceitual para Governança em BPM – Aplicação numa Organização Pública. iSys – Revista Brasileira de Sistemas de Informação 9, 1, 139–167. http://www.seer.unirio.br/index.php/isys/article/view/5318/5042Google Scholar
- Jugraj S. Randhawa, Inderpreet S. Ahuja. 17. 5S–a quality improvement tool for sustainable performance: literature review and directions. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 34, 3, 334–361. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2015-0045Google Scholar
- Kwai‐Sang Chin, Boris L. Chan and Ping‐Kit Lam. 2008. Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for coopetition strategy. Industrial Management & Data Systems 108, 4, 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570810868326Google ScholarCross Ref
- Steve Easterbrook, Janice Singer, Margaret-Anne Storey and Daniela Damian. 2008. Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research. Springer-Verlag, London.Google Scholar
- Marina A. Marconi and Eva M. Lakatos. 2008. Metodologia Científica. 6. ed., São Paulo: Atlas.Google Scholar
- Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 2008. Pesquisa qualitativa: técnicas e procedimentos para o desenvolvimento de teoria fundamentada. 2ª ed., Porto Alegre, Artmed.Google Scholar
- Mark N.K. Saunders, Adrian Thornhill and Philip Lewis. 2009. Research Methods for Business Students. 5th Edition, Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar
- Kathleenm Eisenhardt. 1989 . Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Managment Review 14, 4, 532–550.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharan B. Merriam. 2009. Qualitative Research: a guide to design and implementation. The Jossey-Bass, 2º.Google Scholar
- James S. Coleman. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, JSTOR 94, 95–120. www.jstor.org/stable/2780243.Google Scholar
- Maryan S. Schall. 1983. communications-rules approach to organizational culture. Administrative Science Quarterly 28, 4, 557.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morton Deutsch. 1990. Sixty years of conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management 1, 3, 237–263.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mary Welch and Paul R. Jackson. 2007. Rethinking internal communication: a stakeholder approach. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12, 2, 77–198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Howard Smith and Peter Fingar. 2003. Business Process Management (BPM): The Third Wave. Tampa, FL:Meghan-Kiffer Press.Google Scholar
- Brian Hackett. 2002. Beyond Knowledge Management – New Ways to Work. in Bontis, N. e Choo, W. C. The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge , Nova Iorque, Oxford University Press, 725–738.Google Scholar
- Jens M. Unger, Andreas Rauch, Michael Frese and Nina Rosenbusch. 2011. Human capital and entrepreneurial success: a meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing 26, 3, 341–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.09.004Google ScholarCross Ref
- James R. Detert, Roger G. Schroeder, John J. Mauriel. 2000. A Framework for Linking Culture and Improvement Initiatives in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 25, 4, 850–863. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3707740Google ScholarCross Ref
- SENADO. 2018. Senado Federal. https://www12.senado.leg.br/orcamento/legislacao-orcamentariaGoogle Scholar
- José S. D. B. Pires, Paulo M. Rosa and Almir T. Silva. 2010. Um modelo de alocação de recursos orçamentários baseado em desempenho acadêmico para universidades públicas. In ASAA -Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting 3, 2, 239-270.Google Scholar
- Amadou Diallo Denis Thuillier. 2005. The success of international development projects, trust and communication: an African perspective. International Journal of Project Management 23, 3, 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.10.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- PMI. 2013. Project Management Institute. The High Cost Of Low Performance: The Essential Role Of Communications. Pulse Of The Profession In-depth Report.Google Scholar
Recommendations
A framework for continuous improvement of the IT acquisition process at Brazilian federal public organisations: an action-research study
Information technology acquisition (ITA) is essential to support activities and processes in public and private organisations. In the context of Federal Public Organizations (FPO) in Brazil, the existent norms possess limitations regarding a continuous ...
Public online consultation of federal ministries and federal regulatory agencies in Brazil
ICEGOV '09: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governanceThe adoption of Internet based tools for public consultation had increased in recent years. Regulatory agencies and ministries use such features as a means to broaden and deepen citizen participation, transparency and social engagement in shaping ...
Process Management Challenges in Swedish Public Sector: A Bottom Up Initiative
EGOV 2013: Proceedings of the 12th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference on Electronic Government - Volume 8074Public administration is under pressure to work more effectively and increase effectiveness with regards to internal administrative processes as well as level of service towards citizens. This paper identifies process management challenges encountered ...
Comments