skip to main content
10.1145/3407982.3408019acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescompsystechConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Robotic Technology for Inclusive Education: A Cyber-Physical System Approach to Pedagogical Rehabilitation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:25 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The paper presents a novel cognitive architecture RELA - robot-enhanced learning architecture - intended to be implemented in inclusive education via a cyber-physical system for pedagogical rehabilitation. The specific aspect is that it aims to account for some cognitive deficiencies as seen in special education.

RELA is intended to help the learning process of children with various learning needs in inclusive education. It can account for both the need for technological support, as well as the need for teaching artistic performance as a learning method in the classroom. The paper presents the main features of RELA architecture.

References

  1. Eduard Fosch-Villaronga and Jordi Albo-Canals. 2019. "I'll take care of you," said the robot. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 10, 77--93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Maya Dimitrova. 2016. Cognitive Theories for Socially-Competent Robotics in Education. Lambert Academic Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Frank Broz, Chrystopher L Nehaniv, Hatice Kose and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2019. Interaction Histories and Short-Term Memory: Enactive Development of Turn-Taking Behaviours in a Childlike Humanoid Robot. Philosophies, 4(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies4020026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. John M. Gardiner and Rosalind I. Java. 1993. Recognition memory and awareness: An experiential approach. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5:3, 337--346, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449308520122Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Maya Dimitrova, Niko Vegt, and Emilia Barakova. 2012. Designing a system of interactive robots for training collaborative skills to autistic children.In 15th International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), IEEE, 1--8, DOI: 10.1109/ICL.2012.6402179Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Gabriela Walker and Jeni Venker Weidenbenner. 2019. Social and emotional learning in the age of virtual play: technology, empathy, and learning. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 116--132.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-03--2019--0046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nathan Emery. 2000. The eyes have it: the neuroethology, function and evolution of social gaze. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 24, 6, 581--604, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149--7634(00)00025-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Victoria Leong and Leonhard Schilbach. 2019. The promise of two-person neuroscience for developmental psychiatry: Using interaction-based sociometrics to identify disorders of social interaction. British Journal of Psychiatry, 215(5), 636--638. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2019.73Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Marco Casazza and Luca Gioppo. 2020. A playwriting technique to engage on a shared reflective enquiry about the social sustainability of robotization and artificial intelligence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248: 119201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119201Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Maya Dimitrova. 2015. Gestalt processing in human-robot interaction: a novel account for autism research. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 6. 1-2, 30--42, http://www.brain.edusoft.ro/index.php/brain/article/view/506Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Maya Dimitrova. 2016. Towards design of high-level synthetic sensors for socially-competent computing systems. Revolutionizing Education through Web-Based Instruction. IGI Global, 20--34, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9932-8.ch002Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Coralie Chevallier, Gregor Kohls, Vanessa Troiani, Edward S.Brodkin, and Robert T.Schultz. 2012. The social motivation theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 4, 231--239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.02.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Maya Dimitrova, Hiroaki Wagatsuma, Gyanendra Nath Tripathi, and Guangyi Ai. 2020. Learner Attitudes Towards Humanoid Robot Tutoring Systems: Measuring of Cognitive and Social Motivation Influences. In Cyber-Physical Systems for Social Applications, IGI Global, 62--85, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7879-6.ch004Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sergei S. Korsakoff, 1889. Etude médico-psychologique sur une forme des maladies de la mémoire. Revue Philosophique 28.501 (1889) e530.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Michael W. Eysenk and Mark T. Keane. Cognitive psychology: A student's handbook. Taylor & Francis, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Elizabeth Chua, Daniel Schacter and Reisa Sperling. 2008. Neural Correlates of Metamemory: A Comparison of Feeling-of-Knowing and Retrospective Confidence Judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 21. 1751--65. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21123Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Alan D. Baddeley. 1990. Human memory: Theory and practice. Allyn & Bacon.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Maya Dimitrova and Hiroaki Wagatsuma. 2015. Designing Humanoid Robots with Novel Roles and Social Abilities. Lovotics, 3(112), 2. https://www.omicsonline.org/open-access/designing-humanoid-robots-with-novel-roles-and-social-abilities-2090-9888-1000112.php?aid=67398Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Vassilis G. Kaburlasos and Eleni Vrochidou. 2019. Social robots for pedagogical rehabilitation: trends and novel modeling principles. In Cyber-Physical Systems for Social Applications. IGI Global, 1--21, DOI: http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7879-6.ch001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Roman Zahariev and Nina Valchkova. (2019). Existing Robotics Technologies for Implementation of Special Education. In Cyber-Physical Systems for Social Applications. IGI Global, 44--61, DOI: http://10.4018/978-1-5225-7879-6.ch003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Maya Dimitrova, Anna Lekova, Snezhana Kostova, Chavdar Roumenin, Milena Cherneva, Aleksandar Krastev and Ivan Chavdarov. 2016. A multi-domain approach to design of CPS in special education: Issues of Evaluation and Adaptation. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop of the MPM4CPS COST Action, 196--205, http://mpm4cps.eu/workshops/16.11.24-25.Malaga/material/MPM4CPS-MalagaP-2016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Chris Lytridis, Christos Bazinas, George A. Papakostas, Vassilis Kaburlasos. 2020. On Measuring Engagement Level During Child-Robot Interaction in Education. In: Merdan M., Lepuschitz W., Koppensteiner G., Balogh R., Obdržálek D. (eds) Robotics in Education. RiE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1023. Springer, Cham, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26945-6_1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. David V. Lu. 2012. Ontology of Robot Theatre. In: Proceedings of the Workshop Robotics and Performing Arts: Reciprocal Influences, ICRA. http://wustl.probablydavid.com/publications/ontology.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Fumihide Tanaka, Kyosuke Isshiki, K., Fumiki Takahashi, Manabu Uekusa, Rumiko Sei, & Kaname Hayashi. 2015. Pepper learns together with children: Development of an educational application. In 2015 IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) (pp. 270--275). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7363546Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Neil D. Fleming and Coleen Mills. 1992. Helping students understand how they learn. In: The Teaching Professor, Vol. 7 No. 4, (44--63). Magma Publications, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Robotic Technology for Inclusive Education: A Cyber-Physical System Approach to Pedagogical Rehabilitation

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        CompSysTech '20: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies
        June 2020
        343 pages
        ISBN:9781450377683
        DOI:10.1145/3407982

        Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

        This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 25 August 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        CompSysTech '20 Paper Acceptance Rate46of72submissions,64%Overall Acceptance Rate241of492submissions,49%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader