skip to main content
10.1145/3406522.3446020acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Query Suggestions as Summarization in Exploratory Search

Published:14 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Query suggestions have been shown to benefit users performing information retrieval tasks. In exploratory search, however, users may lack the necessary domain knowledge to assess the relevance of query suggestions with respect to their information needs. In this article, we investigate the use of alternative queries in exploratory search. Alternative queries are queries that would retrieve similar search results to those currently visible on-screen. They are independent of the original search query and can, therefore, be updated dynamically as users scroll through search results. In addition to being follow-on queries, alternative queries serve as keyword summaries of the current search results page to help users assess whether results are inline with their search intents. We investigated the use of alternative queries in scientific literature search and their impact on user behavior and perception. In a user study, participants inspected half as many documents per query when alternative queries were present, but were exposed to over 40% more search results overall. Despite using them extensively as follow-on queries, user feedback focused on the summarization properties offered by alternative queries; finding it reassuring that documents were relevant to their search goals.

References

  1. Jae-wook Ahn, Peter Brusilovsky, Jonathan Grady, Daqing He, and Radu Florian. 2010. Semantic annotation based exploratory search for information analysts. Information processing & management , Vol. 46, 4 (2010), 383--402.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kumaripaba Athukorala, Dorota Głowacka, Giulio Jacucci, Antti Oulasvirta, and Jilles Vreeken. 2016a. Is exploratory search different? A comparison of information search behavior for exploratory and lookup tasks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology , Vol. 67, 11 (2016), 2635--2651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Kumaripaba Athukorala, Alan Medlar, Antti Oulasvirta, Giulio Jacucci, and Dorota Glowacka. 2016b. Beyond relevance: adapting exploration/exploitation in information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 359--369.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Kumaripaba Athukorala, Antti Oulasvirta, Dorota Głowacka, Jilles Vreeken, and Giulio Jacucci. 2014. Narrow or broad?: Estimating subjective specificity in exploratory search. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 819--828.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Santosh Kumar Bharti and Korra Sathya Babu. 2017. Automatic keyword extraction for text summarization: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.03242 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sumit Bhatia, Debapriyo Majumdar, and Prasenjit Mitra. 2011. Query suggestions in the absence of query logs. In Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval . 795--804.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. John Brooke et almbox. 1996. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry , Vol. 189, 194 (1996), 4--7.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Huanhuan Cao, Daxin Jiang, Jian Pei, Qi He, Zhen Liao, Enhong Chen, and Hang Li. 2008. Context-aware query suggestion by mining click-through and session data. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 875--883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Claudio Carpineto, Renato De Mori, Giovanni Romano, and Brigitte Bigi. 2001. An information-theoretic approach to automatic query expansion. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) , Vol. 19, 1 (2001), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Duen Horng Chau, Aniket Kittur, Jason I Hong, and Christos Faloutsos. 2011. Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 167--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dongho Choi. 2017. A Study of Information Seeking Behavior: Investigating Exploratory Behavior in Physical & Online Spaces .Rutgers The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Fernando Diaz, Bhaskar Mitra, and Nick Craswell. 2016. Query Expansion with Locally-Trained Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . 367--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Marian Dörk, Sheelagh Carpendale, Christopher Collins, and Carey Williamson. 2008. Visgets: Coordinated visualizations for web-based information exploration and discovery. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 14, 6 (2008), 1205--1212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Tamas E Doszkocs. 1978. AID, an associative interactive dictionary for online searching. Online Review , Vol. 2, 2 (1978), 163--173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Dorota Glowacka, Tuukka Ruotsalo, Ksenia Konuyshkova, Samuel Kaski, Giulio Jacucci, et almbox. 2013. Directing exploratory search: Reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Intelligent user interfaces. ACM, 117--128.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Brynjar Gretarsson, John O?donovan, Svetlin Bostandjiev, Tobias Höllerer, Arthur Asuncion, David Newman, and Padhraic Smyth. 2012. Topicnets: Visual analysis of large text corpora with topic modeling. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) , Vol. 3, 2 (2012), 1--26.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Qi He, Daxin Jiang, Zhen Liao, Steven CH Hoi, Kuiyu Chang, Ee-Peng Lim, and Hang Li. 2009. Web query recommendation via sequential query prediction. In 2009 IEEE 25th international conference on data engineering. IEEE, 1443--1454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Geoffrey E Hinton and Ruslan R Salakhutdinov. 2006. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science , Vol. 313, 5786 (2006), 504--507.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation , Vol. 9, 8 (1997), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. K Sparck Jones, Steve Walker, and Stephen E. Robertson. 2000. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments. Information processing & management , Vol. 36, 6 (2000), 779--840.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Rosie Jones, Benjamin Rey, Omid Madani, and Wiley Greiner. 2006. Generating query substitutions. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM, 387--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mika K"aki. 2005. Findex: search result categories help users when document ranking fails. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems . 131--140.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Antti Kangasr"a"asiö , Yi Chen, Dorota Głowacka, and Samuel Kaski. 2016. Interactive Modeling of Concept Drift and Errors in Relevance Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization. ACM, 185--193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Diane Kelly, Karl Gyllstrom, and Earl W Bailey. 2009. A comparison of query and term suggestion features for interactive searching. In Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 371--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jürgen Koenemann and Nicholas J Belkin. 1996. A case for interaction: A study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Saar Kuzi, Anna Shtok, and Oren Kurland. 2016. Query expansion using word embeddings. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM international on conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, 1929--1932.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Quoc Le and Tomas Mikolov. 2014. Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 1188--1196.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Matteo Lissandrini, Davide Mottin, Themis Palpanas, and Yannis Velegrakis. 2020. Graph-Query Suggestions for Knowledge Graph Exploration. In Proceedings of The Web Conference 2020. 2549--2555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Shixia Liu, Michelle X Zhou, Shimei Pan, Yangqiu Song, Weihong Qian, Weijia Cai, and Xiaoxiao Lian. 2012. Tiara: Interactive, topic-based visual text summarization and analysis. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST) , Vol. 3, 2 (2012), 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Chao Ma and Bin Zhang. 2018. A New Query Recommendation Method Supporting Exploratory Search Based on Search Goal Shift Graphs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering , Vol. 30, 11 (2018), 2024--2036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. G. Marchionini. 2006. Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM , Vol. 49, 4 (2006), 41--46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Justin Matejka, Tovi Grossman, and George Fitzmaurice. 2012. Citeology: visualizing paper genealogy. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 181--190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Alan Medlar and Dorota Glowacka. 2018. How Consistent is Relevance Feedback in Exploratory Search?. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 1615--1618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Alan Medlar, Kalle Ilves, Ping Wang, Wray Buntine, and Dorota Glowacka. 2016. PULP: A system for exploratory search of scientific literature. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 1133--1136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Alan Medlar, Joel Pyykkö, and Dorota Glowacka. 2017. Towards Fine-Grained Adaptation of Exploration/Exploitation in Information Retrieval. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Limassol, Cyprus) (IUI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 623--627. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025171.3025205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Tomas Mikolov, Ilya Sutskever, Kai Chen, Greg S Corrado, and Jeff Dean. 2013. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3111--3119.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Mandar Mitra, Amit Singhal, and Chris Buckley. 1998. Improving automatic query expansion. In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. ACM, 206--214.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Saeed Mohajeri, Hamman W Samuel, Osmar R Zalane, and Davood Rafiei. 2016. BubbleNet: An innovative exploratory search and summarization interface with applicability in health social media. In 2016 International Conference on Digital Economy (ICDEc). IEEE, 37--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Atsushi Otsuka, Yohei Seki, Noriko Kando, and Tetsuji Satoh. 2012. QAque: faceted query expansion techniques for exploratory search using community QA resources. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. 799--806.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Pearl Pu, Li Chen, and Rong Hu. 2011. A user-centric evaluation framework for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 157--164.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Joseph John Rocchio. 1971. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. The SMART retrieval system: experiments in automatic document processing (1971), 313--323.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Tuukka Ruotsalo, Giulio Jacucci, and Samuel Kaski. 2020. Interactive faceted query suggestion for exploratory search: Whole-session effectiveness and interaction engagement. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Mark Sanderson and Bruce Croft. 1999. Deriving concept hierarchies from text. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval . 206--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Hinrich Schütze, Christopher D Manning, and Prabhakar Raghavan. 2008. Introduction to information retrieval . Vol. 39. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Milad Shokouhi. 2013. Learning to personalize query auto-completion. In Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval . 103--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Hossein Vahabi, Christina Lioma, Jakob Grue Simonsen, and Jian-Yun Nie. 2015. A hierarchical recurrent encoder-decoder for generative context-aware query suggestion. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management . 553--562.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Ryen W White, Mikhail Bilenko, and Silviu Cucerzan. 2007. Studying the use of popular destinations to enhance web search interaction. In Proceedings of the 30th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval. 159--166.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Ryen W White and Resa A Roth. 2009. Exploratory search: Beyond the query-response paradigm. Synthesis lectures on information concepts, retrieval, and services , Vol. 1, 1 (2009), 1--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Hamed Zamani and W Bruce Croft. 2017. Relevance-based word embedding. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 505--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Jian Zhao, Christopher Collins, Fanny Chevalier, and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2013. Interactive exploration of implicit and explicit relations in faceted datasets. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , Vol. 19, 12 (2013), 2080--2089.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Jianling Zhong, Weiwei Guo, Huiji Gao, and Bo Long. 2020. Personalized Query Suggestions. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval . 1645--1648.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Query Suggestions as Summarization in Exploratory Search

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHIIR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval
          March 2021
          384 pages
          ISBN:9781450380553
          DOI:10.1145/3406522

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 14 March 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate55of163submissions,34%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader