skip to main content
10.1145/3405755.3406119acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

What Can I Say?: Effects of Discoverability in VUIs on Task Performance and User Experience

Published:22 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Discoverability, the ability for users to find and execute features through a user interface, is a recurrent problem with Voice User Interface (VUI) design that makes it difficult for users to understand what commands are supported by a newly encountered system. We studied the effects of two different discoverability strategies proposed in literature, one which provides informational prompts automatically and one which provides help only when the user requests it by asking 'What Can I Say?'. Our study adopted a Wizard of Oz approach that allowed users to order food delivery by voice. Through statistical analysis, we confirmed the beneficial nature of both strategies, with significantly better task performance and higher usability scores in comparison to a baseline. This suggests designers should consider the use of a discoverability strategy in the design of VUIs. While no significant differences were found between the strategies, a majority of the participants highlighted their preference for the 'What Can I Say?' strategy if they were to use the VUI more frequently. Finally, we reflect on the implications for the design of VUIs, highlighting the need to distinguish between initial use and longer-term use in the selection of a strategy.

References

  1. Amazon Inc. 2019. Alexa Design Guide. Retrieved 2020-02-13 from https://developer.amazon.com/docs/alexa-design/get-started.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Frank Bentley, Chris Luvogt, Max Silverman, Rushani Wirasinghe, Brooke White, and Danielle Lottridge. 2018. Understanding the Long-Term Use of Smart Speaker Assistants. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2, 3, Article 91 (9 2018), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3264901Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Daniel G Bobrow, Ronald M Kaplan, Martin Kay, Donald A Norman, Henry Thompson, and Terry Winograd. 1977. GUS, a frame-driven dialog system. Artificial Intelligence 8, 2 (1977), 155--173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(77)90018-2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A 'quick and dirty' usability scale. In Usability Evaluation In Industry (1 ed.), Patrick W Jordan, Bruce Thomas, Bernard A Weerdmeester, and Ian L McClelland (Eds.). CRC Press, London, UK, Chapter 21, 189--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Graham Button and Wes Sharrock. 1995. On simulacrums of conversation: Toward a clarification of the relevance of conversation analysis for human-computer interaction. In The Social and Interactional Dimensions of Human-Computer Interface, Pete J Thomas (Ed.). Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Chapter 6, 107--125.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Hyunji Chung, Michaela Iorga, Jeffrey Voas, and Sangjin Lee. 2017. "Alexa, Can I Trust You?". Computer 50, 9 (2017), 100--104. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2017.3571053Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Michael H Cohen, James P Giangola, and Jennifer Balogh. 2004. Voice User Interface Design. Addison Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Redwood City, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Eric Corbett and Astrid Weber. 2016. What can I say? Addressing User Experience Challenges of a Mobile Voice User Interface for Accessibility. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 72--82. https://doi.org/10.1145/2935334.2935386Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Nils Dahlbäck, Arne Jönsson, and Lars Ahrenberg. 1993. Wizard of Oz studies---Why and how. Knowl.-Based Syst. 6 (12 1993), 258--266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950--7051(93)90017-NGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michael V Ellis. 1999. Repeated Measures Designs. The Counseling Psychologist 27, 4 (1999), 552--578. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000099274004Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jinjuan Feng, Clare-Marie Karat, and Andrew Sears. 2004. How productivity improves in hands-free continuous dictation tasks: lessons learned from a longitudinal study. Interacting with Computers 17, 3 (07 2004), 265--289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2004.06.013Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, Martin Porcheron, and Rein Ove Sikveland. 2019. Progressivity for Voice Interface Design. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 26, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342788Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Norman M Fraser and Nigel Gilbert. 1991. Simulating speech systems. Computer Speech & Language 5, 1 (1991), 81--99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885--2308(91)90019-MGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Anushay Furqan, Chelsea Myers, and Jichen Zhu. 2017. Learnability through Adaptive Discovery Tools in Voice User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1617--1623.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Debjyoti Ghosh, Pin Sym Foong, Shan Zhang, and Shengdong Zhao. 2018. Assessing the Utility of the System Usability Scale for Evaluating Voice-Based User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium of Chinese CHI (Montreal, QC, Canada) (ChineseCHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 11--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3202667.3204844Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jaakko Hakulinen, Markku Turunen, and Esa-Pekka Salonen. 2005. Software Tutors for Dialogue Systems. In Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2005), Václav Matoušek, Pavel Mautner, and Tomáš Pavelka (Eds.). Springer, Berlin, Germany, 412--419. https://doi.org/10.1007/11551874_53Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Ruimin Hu, Shaojian Zhu, Jinjuan Feng, and Andrew Sears. 2011. Use of Speech Technology in Real Life Environment. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services (UAHCI 11). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 62--71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978--3-642-21657-2_7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. KAMITIS. 2016. Intelligent Personal Assistant --- Products, Technologies and Market: 2017--2022. Technical Report. KAMITIS, Lyon, France.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Laura Klein. 2015. Design for Voice Interfaces (1 ed.). O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Brian Krisler and Richard Alterman. 2008. Training towards Mastery: Overcoming the Active User Paradox. In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Building Bridges (Lund, Sweden) (NordiCHI '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 239--248. https://doi.org/10.1145/1463160.1463186Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Gabriel Lyons, Vinh Tran, Carsten Binnig, Ugur Cetintemel, and Tim Kraska. 2016. Making the Case for Query-by-Voice with EchoQuery. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management of Data (San Francisco, California, USA) (SIGMOD '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2129--2132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2882903.2899394Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Nikolas Martelaro and Wendy Ju. 2017. WoZ Way: Enabling Real-Time Remote Interaction Prototyping & Observation in On-Road Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 169--182. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998293Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. MeasuringU. 2011. Measuring Usability with the System Usability Scale (SUS). Retrieved 2020-02-13 from https://measuringu.com/sus/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Chelsea Myers, Anushay Furqan, Jessica Nebolsky, Karina Caro, and Jichen Zhu. 2018. Patterns for How Users Overcome Obstacles in Voice User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 6, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173580Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Americo Talarico Neto, Renata Pontin M. Fortes, and Adalberto G. da Silva Filho. 2008. Multimodal Interfaces Design Issues: The Fusion of Well-Designed Voice and Graphical User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (SIGDOC '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 277--278. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456536.1456597Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jakob Nielsen. 1994. Enhancing the Explanatory Power of Usability Heuristics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '94). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 152--158. https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Cathy Pearl. 2016. Designing Voice User Interfaces: Principles of Conversational Experiences (1 ed.). O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003768Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 640, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, and Michel Valstar. 2020. NottReal: A tool for voice-based Wizard of Oz studies. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Bilbao, Spain) (CUI '20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406168Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Stuart Reeves. 2019. Conversation considered harmful?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI '19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Dirk Schnelle and Fernando Lyardet. 2006. Voice User Interface Design Patterns. In Eleventh European Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, (EuroPLoP' 2006). Hillside Europe, Munich, Germany, 27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Andrew Sears, Jinhuan Feng, Kwesi Oseitutu, and Clare-Marie Karat. 2003. Hands-Free, Speech-Based Navigation During Dictation: Difficulties, Consequences, and Solutions. Human-Computer Interaction 18 (2003), 229--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Ben Shneiderman. 2000. The Limits of Speech Recognition. Commun. ACM 43, 9 (Sept. 2000), 63--65. https://doi.org/10.1145/348941.348990Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Ben Shneiderman, Catherine Plaisant, Maxine Cohen, Steven Jacobs, Niklas Elmqvist, and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2016. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction (6 ed.). Pearson, Harlow, UK. 616 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Hannu Soronen, Santtu Pakarinen, Mervi Hansen, Markku Turunen, Jaakko Hakulinen, Juho Hella, Juha-Pekka Rajaniemi, Aleksi Melto, and Tuuli Laivo. 2009. User Experience of Speech Controlled Media Center for Physically Disabled Users. In Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (Tampere, Finland) (MindTrek '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2--5. https://doi.org/10.1145/1621841.1621843Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Marilyn A Walker, Jeanne Fromer, Giuseppe Di Fabbrizio, Craig Mestel, and Don Hindle. 1998. What Can I Say? Evaluating a Spoken Language Interface to Email. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Los Angeles, CA, USA) (CHI '98). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 582--589. https://doi.org/10.1145/274644.274722Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Nicole Yankelovich. 1996. How Do Users Know What to Say? interactions 3, 6 (12 1996), 32--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/242485.242500Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicole Yankelovich, Gina-Anne Levow, and Matt Marx. 1995. Designing SpeechActs: Issues in Speech User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '95). ACM/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 369--376. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223952Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. What Can I Say?: Effects of Discoverability in VUIs on Task Performance and User Experience

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          CUI '20: Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces
          July 2020
          271 pages
          ISBN:9781450375443
          DOI:10.1145/3405755

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 July 2020

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Acceptance Rates

          CUI '20 Paper Acceptance Rate13of39submissions,33%Overall Acceptance Rate34of100submissions,34%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader