skip to main content
10.1145/3404983.3409996acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Speech-based interaction for map editing on mobile devices: a scenario-based study

Published:06 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Speech-based interfaces on mobile phones are growing in popularity, yet mostly limited to helping users retrieve information. There is an untapped potential for using speech to help users contribute new information. This work discusses opportunities and challenges of map editing on mobile devices. It also presents results from a study (N=20) that evaluated 11 speech-based commands for map data enriching and urban fault reporting on mobile devices. Feedback from the users indicated that speech-based information editing is feasible: usability was rated as `good', while user experience ratings produced slightly mitigated results.

References

  1. Aaron Bangor, Philip Kortum, and James Miller. 2009. Determining what individual SUS Scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies 4, 3 (2009), 114--123.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aaron Bangor, Philip T. Kortum, and James T. Miller. 2008. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 24, 6 (jul 2008), 574--594. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Matthias Bluhm, Antonia van Eek, and Wilden Martin. 2018. Sag "Hallo" zu deiner Karte. In Umweltinformationssysteme 2018 - Umweltbeobachtung: Nah und Fern, Ulrike Fretag, Frank Fuchs-Kittowski, Friedhelm Hosenfeld, Andreas Abecker, and Anja Reineke (Eds.). CEUR-WS.org, Nürnberg, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Richard A. Bolt. 1980. "Put-that-there": voice and gesture at the graphics interface. ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 14, 3 (jul 1980), 262--270. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. John Brooke. 1995. SUS - A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry 189 (1995), 4--7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Andreas Bulling and Hans Gellersen. 2010. Toward mobile eye-based human-computer interaction. IEEE Pervasive Computing 9, 4 (2010), 8--12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Paul Cairns. 2016. Experimental methods in human-computer interaction. In The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction (2nd ed.), Mads Soegaard and Rikke Friis Dam (Eds.). Chapter 34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. John M. Carroll. 1999. Five reasons for scenario-based design. In Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society, Maui, Hawai, USA, 3051.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Leigh Clark, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Emer Gilmartin, Stephan Schlögl, Jens Edlund, Matthew Aylett, João Cabral, Cosmin Munteanu, Justin Edwards, and Benjamin R Cowan. 2019. The state of speech in HCI: trends, themes and challenges. Interacting with Computers (sep 2019). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Auriol Degbelo, Jan Kruse, and Max Pfeiffer. 2019. Interactive maps, productivity and user experience: A user study in the e-mobility domain. Transactions in GIS 23, 6 (sep 2019), 1352--1373. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Thore Fechner, Dennis Wilhelm, and Christian Kray. 2015. Ethermap - real-time collaborative map editing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '15, Bo Begole, Jinwoo Kim, Kori Inkpen, and Woontack Woo (Eds.). ACM Press, Seoul, South Korea, 3583--3592. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Georges W Furnas, Thomas K Landauer, Louis M Gomez, and Susan Dumais. 1987. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM 30, 11 (nov 1987), 964--971. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Ioannis Giannopoulos, Andreas Komninos, and John Garofalakis. 2017. Interacting with large maps using HMDs in VR settings. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services - MobileHCI '17, Matt Jones, Manfred Tscheligi, Yvonne Rogers, and Roderick Murray-Smith (Eds.). ACM Press, Vienna, Austria, 1--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Michael F Goodchild. 2007. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69, 4 (2007), 211--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Ken Hinckley. 2009. Input technologies and techniques. In Human-Computer Interaction Fundamentals, Andrew Sears and Julie A Jacko (Eds.). Taylor & Francis, 138--152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Sven G Kratz, Ivo Brodien, and Michael Rohs. 2010. Semi-automatic zooming for mobile map navigation. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services MobileHCI 2010), Marco de Sá, Luís Carriço, and Nuno Correia (Eds.). ACM, Lisbon, Portugal, 63--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. James R. Lewis. 2018. The System Usability Scale: past, present, and future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 34, 7 (jul 2018), 577--590. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Mapbox.com. 2020. Maps and location for developers. https://www.mapbox.com/ accessed: July 08, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Mozilla. 2020. Web Speech API. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Speech_API accessed: July 08, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. OpenStreetMap. 2020. OpenStreetMap stats report run at 2020-07-07. https://www.openstreetmap.org/stats/data_stats.html accessed: July 08, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Antti Oulasvirta, Sara Estlander, and Antti Nurminen. 2009. Embodied interaction with a 3D versus 2D mobile map. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 4 (may 2009), 303--320. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Antti Oulasvirta, Annu-Maaria Nivala, Ville Tikka, Lassi Liikkanen, and Antti Nurminen. 2005. Understanding users' strategies with mobile maps. In Mobile Maps 2005 Workshop (in conjuction with Mobile HCI 2005). Salzburg, Austria.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. 2002. Scenario-based design. In The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, Julie Jacko and Andrew Sears (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Chapter 53, 1032--1050.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Robert E. Roth. 2013. An empirically-derived taxonomy of interaction primitives for interactive cartography and geovisualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19, 12 (2013), 2356--2365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Alexander I. Rudnicky, Alexander G. Hauptmann, and Kai-Fu Lee. 1994. Survey of current speech technology. Commun. ACM 37, 3 (mar 1994), 52--57. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Falko Schmid, Colin Kuntzsch, Stephan Winter, Aisan Kazerani, and Benjamin Preisig. 2010. Situated local and global orientation in mobile you-are-here maps. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI 2010), Marco de Sá, Luís Carriço, and Nuno Correia (Eds.). ACM, Lisbon, Portugal, 83--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Martin Schrepp. 2018. UEQ Data Analysis Tool. Available at. https://www.ueq-online.org/ accessed: May 31, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jorg Thomaschewski. 2017. Construction of a benchmark for the user experience questionnaire (UEQ). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 4 (2017), 40--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Martin Schrepp, Andreas Hinderks, and Jorg Thomaschewski. 2017. Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence 4, 6 (2017), 103. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Shneiderman. 1983. Direct manipulation: a step beyond programming languages. Computer 16, 8 (aug 1983), 57--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Statista. 2020. Share of the mobile internet users in total online population in China from 2007 to 2018. https://www.statista.com/statistics/795193/china-share-of-mobile-internet-users-in-total-online-population/ accessed: July 08, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Matthias Stein, Morin Ostkamp, and Andreas Wytzisk. 2018. Geoinformationssysteme mit Sprache steuern - eine erste Evaluation. In Mensch und Computer 2018 - Workshopband, Raimund Dachselt and Gerhard Weber (Eds.). Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., Bonn, Germany. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. W3C. 2020. W3C Geolocation API. https://www.w3.org/2008/Talks/0904-fit2008/geoloc-ms/slides.html accessed: July 08, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. W3C. 2020. Web Share API. https://w3c.github.io/web-share/#share-method accessed: July 08, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Speech-based interaction for map editing on mobile devices: a scenario-based study

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            MuC '20: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2020
            September 2020
            523 pages
            ISBN:9781450375405
            DOI:10.1145/3404983

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 6 September 2020

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • short-paper

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader