Wa'el Mohsen
ABSTRACT
Ontology is widely used in the areas of knowledge engineering, web-based data mining, and others. The process of developing and evolving inter-organizational domain ontologies is easy to get much redundant information. PowerSets can be used to reduce the attributes of ontologies. In this paper, "Rule Finding Uniqueness," RFU is proposed for learning a set of rules in order to refine an ontology. The algorithm's primary goal is to generate unique rules that not only cover the initial set but also enhance reasoning. The claimed technique compresses Ontologies after it is already built or during the evolving process of the inter-organizational cooperative domain ontology. The proposed method can also be used to strengthen automatic and semi-automatic operations to develop and evolve ontologies. We can consider this approach as a maintenance operation that could be done periodically based on the ontology evolution frequency rate.
- J. Ashraf, E. Chang, O. K. Hussain, and F. K. Hussain, "Ontology usage analysis in the ontology lifecycle: A state-of-the-art review," Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 80. pp. 34--47, 2015.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- F. Zablith et al., Ontology Evolution: A Process Centric Survey, vol. 00. 2013.Google Scholar
- R. Djedidi and M.-A. Aufaure, "Ontology Evolution: State of the Art and Future Directions," Ontol. Theory, Manag. Des. Adv. Tools Model., vol. 7, pp. 179--207, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. A. and K. E. Wa'el Mohsen, "The Scrum Framework for Cooperative Ontology Evolution," 2017.Google Scholar
- Z. Pawlak and A. Skowron, "Rudiments of rough sets," Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 3--27, 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Q. Liu, L. Chen, J. Zhang, and F. Min, "Knowledge Reduction in Inconsistent Decision Tables," in ADMA 2006. Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4093, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006, pp. 626--635.Google Scholar
- K. Schwaber, "Nexus Guide - The Definitive Guide to scaling Scrum with Nexus: The Rules of the Game," Scrum.org, 2018.Google Scholar
- H. Mirkil and P. R. Halmos, "Naive Set Theory.," Am. Math. Mon., 1961.Google Scholar
- M. Stenbeck, R. K. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan, and H. J. Rogers, "Fundamentals of Item Response Theory.," Contemp. Sociol, 1992.Google Scholar
- A. Kanamori, "Set Theory from Cantor to Cohen," in Philosophy of Mathematics, 2009.Google Scholar
- J. Issa, "Set Theory," Aγαη, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.encyclopedia.com/science-and-technology/mathematics/mathematics/set-theory.Google Scholar
- P. Kruszyński and K. Napiórkowski, "On the independence of local algebras II," Reports Math. Phys., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 303--306, 1973.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Troullinou et al., "Ontology understanding without tears: The-summarization approach," Semant. Web, 2017.Google Scholar
- D. Ślęzak, "Searching for dynamic reducts in inconsistent decision tables," in Seventh International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU'98), 1998, p. Volume: 2.Google Scholar
- P.-C. WANG, "Dynamic Reducts Generation Using Cascading Hashes" Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci., vol. 25, no. 02, pp. 219--246,2014.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. Q. Miao, Y. Zhao, Y. Y. Yao, H. X. Li, and F. F. Xu, "Relative reducts in consistent and inconsistent decision tables of the Pawlak rough set model," Inf. Sci. (Ny)., vol. 179, no. 24, pp. 4140--4150, 2009.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Kryszkiewicz, "Comparative study of alternative types of knowledge reduction in inconsistent systems," Int. J. Intell. Syst., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 105--120, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Hunter and S. Konieczny, "Approaches to Measuring Inconsistent Information," Inconsistency Toler., vol. LNCS 3300, pp. 191--236, 2010.Google Scholar
- L. J. Halbeisen, "Axioms of set theory," in Springer Monographs in Mathematics, 2017.Google Scholar
- Zermelo-Fraenkel, "Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zermelo-Fraenkel_set_theory.Google Scholar
- O. Verhodubs, "Ontology as a Source for Rule Generation," ArXiv, Apr. 2014.Google Scholar
- "UC Irvine Machine Learning Repository," 2019. [Online]. Available: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/index.php.Google Scholar
- AberOWL, "AberOWL ontology repository and semantic search engine," 2019. [Online]. Available: http://aber-owl.net.Google Scholar
- The University Of Manchester, "Protege Matrix," 2019. [Online]. Available: https://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Matrix.Google Scholar
- C. Ochs, J. Geller, Y. Perl, and M. A. Musen, "A unified software framework for deriving, visualizing, and exploring abstraction networks for ontologies," J. Biomed. Inform., 2016.Google ScholarDigital Library
- The University Of Manchester, "Protege Matrix," 2019.Google Scholar
- M. Horridge and S. Bechhofer, "The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies," Semant. Web, 2011.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Krammer, B. Heinrich, M. Henneberger, and F. Lautenbacher, "Granularity of Services," Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng., 2011.Google Scholar
- D. Shadija, M. Rezai, and R. Hill, "Microservices: Granularity vs. Performance," in UCC 2017 Companion - Companion Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, 2017.Google Scholar
- Wikipedia, "Application lifecycle management," Wikipedia, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Application_lifecycle_management.Google Scholar
- SMARTBEAR, "SoapUI | The Leading Open Source API Testing Tool," 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.soapui.org/open-source.html.Google Scholar
- SMARTBEAR, "SoapUI | The Leading Open Source API Testing Tool," 2015.Google Scholar
- W. Mohsen, M. Aref, and K. ElBahnasy, "Software metrics for cooperative scrum based ontology analysis," in 2017 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Applications, ICKEA 2017, 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 60--70.Google Scholar
- N. Guarino and C. A. Welty, "An Overview of OntoClean," in Handbook on Ontologies, 2009.Google Scholar
- S. Tartir and I. B. Arpinar, "Ontology evaluation and ranking using OntoQA," in ICSC 2007 International Conference on Semantic Computing, 2007.Google Scholar
- A. Lozano-Tello and A. Gómez-Pérez, "ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropriate Ontology," J. Database Manag., 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. García, F. J. García-Peñalvo, and R. Therón, "A survey on ontology metrics," in Communications in Computer and Information Science, 2010.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Cooperative Domain Ontology Reduction Based on Power Sets
Recommendations
Research on the Evolution Method of Domain Ontology Based on DBpedia
Domain ontology is a model that regulates the core knowledge of domain description and semantic organization, which changes along with the change of domain knowledge. Automated or semi-automated evolution approaches are the hot researches in the dynamic ...
Model-based domain ontology engineering
SBPM '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Business Process ManagementBusiness Process Models describe sequences of activities, expressed in a certain modeling language, with the model elements being labeled following the business terminology in use in the applicable domain. In case no predefined vocabulary or rules for ...
Domain Ontology Component-Based Semantic Information Integration
ETCS '09: Proceedings of the 2009 First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science - Volume 03Research on architecture of domain ontology component-based information semantic representation and integration is studied. Domain ontology component, a "loosely coupled" approach in the use of ontology, is advocated. As a case study, a prototype for ...
Comments