skip to main content
10.1145/3404687.3404703acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicbdcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Multi-Task Representation Learning Network for Trajectory Recovery

Authors Info & Claims
Published:30 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Trajectory recovery can benefit many applications such as migration pattern studies of animal and finding hot routes in the urban city. It is necessary to recover trajectory with limited trajectory points to utilize collected trajectory data in a reasonable and efficient way and to provide the better location based service for users. However, the trajectory data involves complex and nonlinear spatial-temporal impacts which cannot be captured by traditional trajectory recovery methods. Moreover, the existing methods consider little about the correlations between trajectory and traffic pattern in the urban city. The superiority of deep neural network makes it possible to recover trajectory with low data quality. We propose a Multi-Task Representation Learning Network (MRL-Net) framework which models the complex nonlinear spatial-temporal correlations in trajectory data with representation learning technique and capture the dependencies of trajectory points with recurrent neural networks. To the best of our knowledge, it is the first paper to address the trajectory recovery problem with representation learning and multi-task learning. Experiments on real-world trajectory data show that our model is superior to state-of-the-art methods.

References

  1. Ozdemir, E., Topcu, A. E., & Ozdemir, M. K. (2018). A hybrid HMM model for travel path inference with sparse GPS samples. Transportation, 45(1), 233--246.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Hunter, T., Abbeel, P., & Bayen, A. (2013). The path inference filter: model-based low-latency map matching of probe vehicle data. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(2), 507--529.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. 2015. Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 39(6), 1137--1149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Devlin, J., Chang, M. W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. 2018. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Li, X., Zhao, K., Cong, G., Jensen, C. S., & Wei, W. (2018, April). Deep representation learning for trajectory similarity computation. In 2018 IEEE 34th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) (pp. 617--628). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Maaten, L. V. D., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-SNE. Journal of machine learning research, 9(Nov), 2579--2605.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation, 9(8), 1735--1780.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tang, J., Qu, M., Wang, M., Zhang, M., Yan, J., & Mei, Q. 2015. Line: Large-scale information network embedding. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web, 1067--1077.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Zheng, K., Zheng, Y., Xie, X., & Zhou, X. (2012, April). Reducing uncertainty of low-sampling-rate trajectories. In 2012 IEEE 28th International Conference on Data Engineering (pp. 1144--1155). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Nair, V., & Hinton, G. E. 2010. Rectified linear units improve restricted boltzmann machines. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on machine learning, 807--814.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Park, S. H., Kim, B., Kang, C. M., Chung, C. C., & Choi, J. W. (2018, June). Sequence-to-sequence prediction of vehicle trajectory via LSTM encoder-decoder architecture. In 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (pp. 1672--1678). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Li, Y., Fu, K., Wang, Z., Shahabi, C., Ye, J., & Liu, Y. 2018. Multi-task representation learning for travel time estimation. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, 1695--1704.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Schuster, M., & Paliwal, K. K. (1997). Bidirectional recurrent neural networks. IEEE transactions on Signal Processing, 45(11), 2673--2681.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Multi-Task Representation Learning Network for Trajectory Recovery

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICBDC '20: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Big Data and Computing
        May 2020
        133 pages
        ISBN:9781450375474
        DOI:10.1145/3404687

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 30 July 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)14
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader