skip to main content
10.1145/3402942.3402953acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfdgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open Access

Why Are We Like This?: The AI Architecture of a Co-Creative Storytelling Game

Published:17 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present Why Are We Like This? (WAWLT), a mixed-initiative, co-creative storytelling game in which two players develop a story transcript by selecting and editing actions to perform and narrativize in an ongoing simulation. In this paper, we lay out the major technical features of WAWLT’s AI architecture—including story sifting via Datalog queries, social simulation, action suggestions, and player-specified but system-understandable author goals—and discuss how these features work together to produce a play experience that facilitates player creativity.

References

  1. Lea Albaugh, April Grow, Chenxi Liu, James McCann, Gillian Smith, and Jennifer Mankoff. 2016. Threadsteading: playful interaction for textile fabrication devices. In 2016 CHI Extended Abstracts. 285–288.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Avery Alder. 2013. The Quiet Year. buriedwithoutceremony.com/the-quiet-year.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Botnik. 2017. Predictive Writer. botnik.org/apps/writer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Kate Compton and Michael Mateas. 2015. Casual creators. In Proc. International Conference on Computational Creativity. 228–235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari. 2018. Re-tellings: the fourth layer of narrative as an instrument for critique. In Proc. ICIDS. Springer, 65–78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mirjam P Eladhari, Anne Sullivan, Gillian Smith, and Josh McCoy. 2011. AI-based game design: enabling new playable experiences. Technical Report. UC Santa Cruz Baskin School of Engineering, Santa Cruz, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Richard Evans and Emily Short. 2013. Versu—a simulationist storytelling system. IEEE TCIAIG 6, 2 (2013), 113–130.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jacob Garbe. 2018. Simulation of history and recursive narrative scaffolding. project.jacobgarbe.com/simulation-of-history-and-recursive-narrative-scaffolding.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Max Kreminski, Devi Acharya, Nick Junius, Elisabeth Oliver, Kate Compton, Melanie Dickinson, Cyril Focht, Stacey Mason, Stella Mazeika, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2019. Cozy Mystery Construction Kit: prototyping toward an AI-assisted collaborative storytelling mystery game. In Proc. FDG.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Max Kreminski, Melanie Dickinson, Michael Mateas, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2020. Why Are We Like This?: Exploring Writing Mechanics for an AI-Augmented Storytelling Game. In Proc. Electronic Literature Organization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Max Kreminski, Melanie Dickinson, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2019. Felt: a simple story sifter. In Proc. ICIDS. Springer, 267–281.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Max Kreminski, Ben Samuel, Edward Melcer, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2019. Evaluating AI-based games through retellings. In Proc. AIIDE, Vol. 15. 45–51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Max Kreminski and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2019. Generative games as storytelling partners. In Proc. FDG.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Antonios Liapis, Georgios N Yannakakis, Constantine Alexopoulos, and Phil Lopes. 2016. Can computers foster human users’ creativity? Theory and praxis of mixed-initiative co-creativity. Digital Culture & Education 8, 2 (2016), 136–153.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Enrique Manjavacas, Folgert Karsdorp, Ben Burtenshaw, and Mike Kestemont. 2017. Synthetic literature: writing science fiction in a co-creative process. In Proc. Computational Creativity in Natural Language Generation (CC-NLG). 29–37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Chris Martens and Matthew A Hammer. 2017. Languages of play: towards semantic foundations for game interfaces. In Proc. FDG. 32–41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. James R Meehan. 1977. TALE-SPIN, an interactive program that writes stories. In Proc. IJCAI. 91–98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nikita Prokopov. 2014. DataScript. github.com/tonsky/datascript.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aaron Reed. 2018. Archives of the Sky. archivesofthesky.textories.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ben Robbins. 2011. Microscope: A Fractal Role-Playing Game of Epic Histories. lamemage.com/microscope.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Melissa Roemmele and Andrew S Gordon. 2015. Creative Help: a story writing assistant. In Proc. ICIDS. Springer, 81–92.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. James Ryan. 2018. Curating Simulated Storyworlds. Ph.D. Dissertation. UC Santa Cruz.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. James Owen Ryan, Michael Mateas, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2015. Open design challenges for interactive emergent narrative. In Proc. ICIDS. Springer, 14–26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James Owen Ryan, Adam Summerville, Michael Mateas, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2015. Toward characters who observe, tell, misremember, and lie. In Proc. AIIDE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Ben Samuel, Michael Mateas, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2016. The design of Writing Buddy: a mixed-initiative approach towards computational story collaboration. In Proc. ICIDS. Springer, 388–396.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Ben Samuel, James Ryan, Adam J Summerville, Michael Mateas, and Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2016. Bad News: an experiment in computationally assisted performance. In Proc. ICIDS. Springer, 108–120.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Robin Sloan. 2016. Writing with the machine. robinsloan.com/notes/writing-with-the-machine.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Ingibergur Sindri Stefnisson and David Thue. 2018. Mimisbrunnur: AI-assisted authoring for interactive storytelling. In Proc. AIIDE. 236–242.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Noah Wardrip-Fruin. 2009. Expressive Processing: Digital Fictions, Computer Games, and Software Studies. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Why Are We Like This?: The AI Architecture of a Co-Creative Storytelling Game

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format