skip to main content
10.1145/3400806.3400831acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

Populism by the people: An analysis of online comments in Portugal and Spain*

Published:22 July 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

There exists a gap in research on populism which tends to focus on politicians rather than on the people. This research addresses that by assessing the prevalence of populism and analyses citizens’ populist discourse in online comments in Portugal and Spain. The methodological approach is based on quantitative content analysis and co-occurrence textual analysis. The main findings point to a similar salience of anti-elitism in both countries, despite the different levels of electoral success of populist parties. These findings suggest that more attention should be paid to the views of citizens in populism research.

References

  1. Sina Blassnig, Sven Engesser, Nicole Ernst and Frank Esser. 2019. Hitting a Nerve: Populist News Articles Lead to More Frequent and More Populist Reader Comments. Political Communication, 36, 4, 629–651.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Benjamin De Cleen. 2019. The populist political logic and the analysis of the discursive construction of ‘the people’ and ‘the elite’. In Jan Zienkowski and Ruth Breeze (Eds.) Imagining the Peoples of Europe. Populist discourses across the political spectrum. John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 19-42.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Manuela Caiani and Paolo Graziano. 2019. Understanding varieties of populism in times of crises.  West European Politics, 42, 6, 1141-1158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Johan Farkas, Jannick Schou and Christina Neumayer. 2018. Platformed antagonism: racist discourses on fake Muslim Facebook pages. Critical Discourse Studies, 15, 5, 463-480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Belén Fernández-García, B. and Óscar G. Luengo. 2018. Populist parties in Western Europe. An analysis of the three core elements of populism. Communication & Society, 31, 3, 57-76.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Michael Hameleers. 2019. The Populism of Online Communities: Constructing the Boundary Between “Blameless” People and ‘Culpable” Others’. Communication Culture & Critique, 12, 147–165.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Michael Hameleers, M., Bos, L., Fawzi, N., Reinemann, C., Andreadis, I., Corbu, N., Schemer, C. Schulz, A., Shaefer, T., Aalberg, T., Axelsson, S., Berganza, R., Cremonesi, C., Dahlberg, S., de Vreese, C. H., Hess, A., Kartsounidou, E., Kasprowicz, D., Matthes, J., Negrea-Busuioc, E., Ringdal, S., Salgado, S., Sanders, K., Schmuck, D., Stromback, J., Suiter,J., Boomgaarden, J. Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., and Weiss-Yaniv, N. 2018. Start Spreading the News: A Comparative Experiment on the Effects of Populist Communication on Political Engagement in Sixteen European Countries. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23, 4, 517-538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kirk A. Hawkins, Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser and Ioannis Andreadis. 2020. The Activation of Populist Attitudes. Government and Opposition, 55, 283–307.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Koichi Higuchi. 2016. KH Coder 3 Reference Manual, March 16. Available at: https://khcoder.net/en/manual_en_v3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gilles Ivaldi, 2017. Varieties of Populism across a Left-Right Spectrum: The Case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement. Swiss Political Science Review, 23, 4, 354-376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Jan Jagers and Stefaan Walgrave. 2007. Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 3, 319–45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Michael Kazin. 1995. The Populist Persuasion. An American History. Ithaca and London, Cornell University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Michal Krzyżanowski and Per Ledin. 2017. Uncivility on the web. Populism in/and the borderline discourses of exclusion. Journal of Language and Politics, 16, 4, 566-581.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Óscar G. Luengo and Belén Fernández-García. 2019. Campaign Coverage in Spain: Populism, Emerging Parties, and Personalization. In Susana Salgado (Ed.) Mediated Campaigns and Populism in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, p. 99-121.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Luke March. 2017. Left and right populism compared: The British case, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19, 2, 282–303.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Cas Mudde and Cristobal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2013. Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America. Government and Opposition, 48, 2, 147–174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Matthijs Rooduijn. 2014. The Mesmerising Message: The Diffusion of Populism in Public Debates in Western European Media. Political Studies, 62, 726–744.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Guillem Rico, Marc Guinjoan and Eva Anduiza. 2019. Empowered and enraged: Political efficacy, anger and support for populism in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Ian Rowe. 2015. Deliberation 2.0: Comparing the Deliberative Quality of Online News User Comments Across Platforms. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 4, 539-555.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Susana Salgado. 2019. The 2015 Election News Coverage: Beyond the Populism Paradox, the Intrinsic Negativity of Political Campaigns in Portugal. In Susana Salgado (Ed.) Mediated Campaigns and Populism in Europe, Palgrave Macmillan, p. 75-98.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Susana Salgado and Yannis Stavrakakis. 2019. Introduction: Populist discourses and political communication in southern Europe. European Political Science, 18, 1, 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Susana Salgado. 2019. Where's populism? Online media and the diffusion of populist discourses and styles in Portugal. European Political Science, 18, 1, 53-65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Susana Salgado and José Pedro Zúquete. 2017. Portugal: discreet populisms amid unfavorable contexts and stigmatization. In Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Strömbäck, Claes de Vreese, (Eds.) Populist Political Communication in Europe. London & New York, Routledge, p. 235-248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. James Stanyer, Susana Salgado and Jesper Stromback. 2017. Populist Actors as Communicators or Political Actors as Populist Communicators: A Cross-National Findings and Perspectives. In Toril Aalberg, Frank Esser, Carsten Reinemann, Jesper Strömbäck, Claes de Vreese, (Eds.) Populist Political Communication in Europe. London & New York, Routledge, p. 353-364.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Diogo Torres and Susana Salgado. 2019. Algorithm for online information collection. Version 1. observador. py. (FCT Research Project: IF/01451/2014/CP1239/CT0004).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Stuart J. Turnbull-Dugarte. 2019. Explaining the end of Spanish exceptionalism and electoral support for Vox. Research and Politics, 1-8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Susana Salgado. 2005. O poder da comunicação ou a comunicação do poder (The power of communication or the communication of power). Media & Jornalismo, 7, 79-94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    SMSociety'20: International Conference on Social Media and Society
    July 2020
    317 pages
    ISBN:9781450376884
    DOI:10.1145/3400806

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 July 2020

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format