skip to main content
10.1145/3397536.3422252acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Predictive Collision Management for Time and Risk Dependent Path Planning

Published:13 November 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Autonomous agents such as self-driving cars or parcel robots need to recognize and avoid possible collisions with obstacles in order to move successfully in their environment. Humans, however, have learned to predict movements intuitively and to avoid obstacles in a forward-looking way. The task of collision avoidance can be divided into a global and a local level. Regarding the global level, we propose an approach called "Predictive Collision Management Path Planning" (PCMP). At the local level, solutions for collision avoidance are used that prevent an inevitable collision. Therefore, the aim of PCMP is to avoid unnecessary local collision scenarios using predictive collision management. PCMP is a graph-based algorithm with a focus on the time dimension consisting of three parts: (1) movement prediction, (2) integration of movement prediction into a time-dependent graph, and (3) time and risk-dependent path planning. The algorithm combines the search for a shortest path with the question: is the detour worth avoiding a possible collision scenario? We evaluate the evasion behavior and the results show that a risk-sensitive agent can avoid 47.3% of the collision scenarios while making a detour of 1.3%. A risk-averse agent avoids up to 97.3% of the collision scenarios with a detour of 39.1%. Thus, an agent's evasive behavior can be controlled actively and risk-dependent using PCMP.

References

  1. A. Alahi, K. Goel, V. Ramanathan, A. Robicquet, L. Fei-Fei, and S. Savarese. 2016. Social LSTM: Human Trajectory Prediction in Crowded Spaces. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Samer Ammoun and Fawzi Nashashibi. 2009. Real time trajectory prediction for collision risk estimation between vehicles. In ICCP 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. C. Barrios and Yuichi Motai. 2011. Improving Estimation of Vehicle's Trajectory Using the Latest Global Positioning System With Kalman Filtering. IEEE T. Instrumentation and Measurement 60 (12 2011), 3747--3755.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Eidehall and L. Petersson. 2008. Statistical Threat Assessment for General Road Scenes Using Monte Carlo Sampling. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 9, 1 (March 2008), 137--147. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Fulgenzi, A. Spalanzani, C. Laugier, and C. Tay. 2010. Risk based motion planning and navigation in uncertain dynamic environment. Research Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. T. Gindele, S. Brechtel, and R. Dillmann. 2015. Learning Driver Behavior Models from Traffic Observations for Decision Making and Planning. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine 7, 1 (Spring 2015), 69--79.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nico Kaempchen, K. Weiss, M. Schaefer, and K.C.J. Dietmayer. 2004. IMM object tracking for high dynamic driving maneuvers. 825--830.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. O. Khatib. 1985. Real-time obstacle avoidance for manipulators and mobile robots. In Proceedings. 1985 IEEE Intl Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. B. Kim, C. Kang, J. Kim, S. Lee, C. Chung, and J. Choi. 2017. Probabilistic vehicle trajectory prediction over occupancy grid map via recurrent neural network. In 2017 IEEE 20th Intl Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Kushleyev and M. Likhachev. 2009. Time-bounded lattice for efficient planning in dynamic environments. In 2009 IEEE Intl Conf. on Robotics and Automation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. S. LaValle. 1998. Rapidly-exploring random trees: a new tool for path planning.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. S. Lefevre, D. Vasquez, and C. Laugier. 2014. A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles. Robomech Journal 1 (07 2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Seong Park, ByeongDo Kim, Chang Kang, Chung Chung, and Jun Choi. 2018. Sequence-to-Sequence Prediction of Vehicle Trajectory via LSTM Encoder-Decoder Architecture. 1672--1678. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2018.8500658Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Roland Philippsen, Björn Jensen, and Roland Siegwart. 2006. Toward Online Probabilistic Path Replanning in Dynamic Environments. 2876--2881.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. David Silver. 2005. Cooperative Pathfinding. (01 2005). http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/d.silver/web/Publications_files/coop-path-AIWisdom.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Q. Tran and J. Firl. 2014. Online maneuver recognition and multimodal trajectory prediction for intersection assistance using non-parametric regression. In 2014 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings. 918--923.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. van den Berg, D. Ferguson, and J. Kuffner. 2006. Anytime path planning and replanning in dynamic environments. In Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006. 2366--2371.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Pu Zhang, Wanli Ouyang, Pengfei Zhang, Jianru Xue, and Nanning Zheng. 2019. SR-LSTM: State Refinement for LSTM towards Pedestrian Trajectory Prediction. arXiv:1903.02793 [cs.CV]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Liang Zhao, Tatsuya Ohshima, and Hiroshi Nagamochi. 2008. A* Algorithm for the time-dependent shortest path problem. (01 2008).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Predictive Collision Management for Time and Risk Dependent Path Planning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGSPATIAL '20: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems
      November 2020
      687 pages
      ISBN:9781450380195
      DOI:10.1145/3397536

      Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 November 2020

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate220of1,116submissions,20%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader