skip to main content
10.1145/3394171.3413757acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Integrating Semantic Segmentation and Retinex Model for Low-Light Image Enhancement

Published:12 October 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Retinex model is widely adopted in various low-light image enhancement tasks. The basic idea of the Retinex theory is to decompose images into reflectance and illumination. The ill-posed decomposition is usually handled by hand-crafted constraints and priors. With the recently emerging deep-learning based approaches as tools, in this paper, we integrate the idea of Retinex decomposition and semantic information awareness. Based on the observation that various objects and backgrounds have different material, reflection and perspective attributes, regions of a single low-light image may require different adjustment and enhancement regarding contrast, illumination and noise. We propose an enhancement pipeline with three parts that effectively utilize the semantic layer information. Specifically, we extract the segmentation, reflectance as well as illumination layers, and concurrently enhance every separate region, i.e. sky, ground and objects for outdoor scenes. Extensive experiments on both synthetic data and real world images demonstrate the superiority of our method over current state-of-the-art low-light enhancement algorithms.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3394171.3413757.mp4

mp4

10.2 MB

References

  1. M. Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M. H. Kabir, M. A. Akber Dewan, and O. Chae. 2007. A Dynamic Histogram Equalization for Image Contrast Enhancement. IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 53, 2 (May 2007), 593--600.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. T. Arici, S. Dikbas, and Y. Altunbasak. 2009. A histogram modification framework and its application for image contrast enhancement. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 18, 9 (2009), 1921--1935.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. G. Brostow, J. Shotton, J. Fauqueur, and R. Cipolla. 2008. Segmentation and Recognition Using Structure from Motion Point Clouds. In Proc. IEEE European Conf. Computer Vision. 44--57.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Cai, S. Gu, and L. Zhang. 2018. Learning a deep single image contrast enhancer from multi-exposure images. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 27, 4 (April 2018), 2049--2062.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. Cai, W. Zuo, and L. Zhang. 2019. Extreme Channel Prior Embedded Network for Dynamic Scene Deblurring. arXiv, Vol. abs/1903.00763 (2019). arxiv: 1903.00763Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. C. Chen, Q. Chen, J. Xu, and V. Koltun. 2018. Learning to See in the Dark. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Cordts, M. Omran, S. Ramos, T. Rehfeld, M. Enzweiler, R. Benenson, U. Franke, S. Roth, and B. Schiele. 2016. The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. K. Dabov, A. Foi, V. Katkovnik, and K. Egiazarian. 2007. Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 16, 8 (Aug 2007), 2080--2095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. X. Fu, Y. Sun, M. LiWang, Y. Huang, X. Zhang, and X. Ding. 2014. A novel retinex based approach for image enhancement with illumination adjustment. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 1190--1194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. X. Fu, D. Zeng, Y. Huang, Y. Liao, X. Ding, and J. Paisley. 2016a. A fusion-based enhancing method for weakly illuminated images. Signal Processing, Vol. 129 (2016), 82 -- 96.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. X. Fu, D. Zeng, Y. Huang, X. P. Zhang, and X. Ding. 2016b. A Weighted Variational Model for Simultaneous Reflectance and Illumination Estimation. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2782--2790.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. X. Guo, Y. Li, and H. Ling. 2017. LIME: Low-Light Image Enhancement via Illumination Map Estimation. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 26, 2 (Feb 2017), 982--993.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. H. Ibrahim and N. S. Pik Kong. 2007. Brightness Preserving Dynamic Histogram Equalization for Image Contrast Enhancement. IEEE Trans. on Consumer Electronics, Vol. 53, 4 (Nov 2007), 1752--1758.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Y. Jiang, X. Gong, D. Liu, Y. Cheng, C. Fang, X. Shen, J. Yang, P. Zhou, and Z. Wang. 2019. EnlightenGAN: Deep Light Enhancement without Paired Supervision. arXiv e-prints (June 2019), arXiv:1906.06972. arxiv: 1906.06972Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. Jobson, Z. Rahman, and G. Woodell. 1997 a. A multiscale retinex for bridging the gap between color images and the human observation of scenes. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 6, 7 (Jul 1997), 965--976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. D. Jobson, Z. Rahman, and G. Woodell. 1997 b. Properties and performance of a center/surround retinex. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 6, 3 (Mar 1997), 451--462.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. G. Kim, D. Kwon, and J. Kwon. 2019. Low-Lightgan: Low-Light Enhancement Via Advanced Generative Adversarial Network With Task-Driven Training. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Processing. 2811--2815.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. E. Land. 1977. The retinex theory of color vision. Sci. Amer (1977), 108--128.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. C. Lee, J. Kim, C. Lee, and C. Kim. 2014a. Optimized Brightness Compensation and Contrast Enhancement for Transmissive Liquid Crystal Displays. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 24, 4 (April 2014), 576--590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. C. Lee, C. Lee, and C. Kim. 2013a. Contrast Enhancement Based on Layered Difference Representation of 2D Histograms. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 22, 12 (Dec 2013), 5372--5384.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. C. Lee, J. Shih, C. Lien, and C. Han. 2013b. Adaptive multiscale retinex for image contrast enhancement. In Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS), 2013 International Conference on. IEEE, 43--50.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Lee, C. Lee, J. Sim, and C. Kim. 2014b. Depth-guided adaptive contrast enhancement using 2D histograms. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Processing. 4527--4531.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Li, R. Wang, W. Wang, and W. Gao. 2015. A low-light image enhancement method for both denoising and contrast enlarging. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Processing. 3730--3734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. M. Li, J. Liu, W. Yang, X. Sun, and Z. Guo. 2018. Structure-Revealing Low-Light Image Enhancement Via Robust Retinex Model. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 27, 6 (June 2018), 2828--2841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Y. Loh and C. Chan. 2019. Getting to know low-light images with the Exclusively Dark dataset. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Vol. 178 (2019), 30 -- 42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. K. Lore, A. Akintayo, and S. Sarkar. 2017. LLNet: A deep autoencoder approach to natural low-light image enhancement. Pattern Recognition, Vol. 61 (2017), 650--662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. F. Lv, F. Lu, J. Wu, and C. Lim. 2018. MBLLEN: Low-light Image/Video Enhancement Using CNNs. In British Machine Vision Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. B. Mildenhall, J. Barron, J. Chen, D. Sharlet, R. Ng, and R. Carroll. 2018. Burst Denoising With Kernel Prediction Networks. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2502--2510.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. A. Mittal, R. Soundararajan, and A. Bovik. 2013. Making a "Completely Blind" Image Quality Analyzer. IEEE Signal Process. Lett., Vol. 20, 3 (2013), 209--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. K. Nakai, Y. Hoshi, and A. Taguchi. 2013. Color image contrast enhacement method based on differential intensity/saturation gray-levels histograms. In International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communications Systems. 445--449.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. S. Pizer, R. Johnston, J. Ericksen, B. Yankaskas, and K. Muller. 1990. Contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization: speed and effectiveness. In Proc. of Conf. on Visualization in Biomedical Computing. 337--345.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. W. Ren, S. Liu, L. Ma, Q. Xu, X. Xu, X. Cao, J. Du, and M. Yang. 2019. Low-Light Image Enhancement via a Deep Hybrid Network. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 28, 9 (Sep. 2019), 4364--4375.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. X. Ren, M. Li, W. Cheng, and J. Liu. 201 Joint Enhancement and Denoising Method via Sequential Decomposition. In IEEE Int'l Symposium on Circuits and Systems. 1--5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Y. Ren, Z. Ying, T. Li, and G. Li. 2019. LECARM: Low-Light Image Enhancement Using the Camera Response ModelIEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Techn., Vol. 29, 4 (2019), 968--981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. L. Shen, Z. Yue, F. Feng, Q. Chen, S. Liu, and J. Ma. 2017. MSR-net:Low-light Image Enhancement Using Deep Convolutional Network. ArXiv e-prints (November 2017). arxiv: cs.CV/1711.02488Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. L. Tao, C. Zhu, G. Xiang, Y. Li, H. Jia, and X. Xie. 2017. LLCNN: A convolutional neural network for low-light image enhancement. In Proc. IEEE Visual Communication and Image Processing. 1--4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. L. Wang, L. Xiao, H. Liu, and Z. Wei. 2014. Variational Bayesian Method for Retinex. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 23, 8 (Aug 2014), 3381--3396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. R. Wang, Q. Zhang, C. Fu, X. Shen, W. Zheng, and J. Jia. 2019. Underexposed Photo Enhancement Using Deep Illumination Estimation. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. S. Wang, J. Zheng, H. M. Hu, and B. Li. 2013. Naturalness Preserved Enhancement Algorithm for Non-Uniform Illumination Images. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 22, 9 (Sept 2013), 3538--3548.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. W. Wang, C. Wei, W. Yang, and J. Liu. 2018. GLADNet: Low-Light Enhancement Network with Global Awareness. In Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition (FG 2018), 2018 13th IEEE International Conference. IEEE, 751--755.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Y. Wang, Y. Cao, Z. Zha, J. Zhang, Z. Xiong, W. Zhang, and F. Wu. 2019. Progressive Retinex: Mutually Reinforced Illumination-Noise Perception Network for Low Light Image Enhancement. In ACM Trans. Multimedia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Z. Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing, Vol. 13, 4 (April 2004), 600--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. C. Wei, W. Wang, W. Yang, and J. Liu. 2018. Deep Retinex Decomposition for Low-Light Enhancement. In British Machine Vision Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. X. Wu, X. Liu, K. Hiramatsu, and K. Kashino. 2017. Contrast-accumulated histogram equalization for image enhancement. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Image Processing. 3190--3194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. W. Yang, S. Wang, Y. Fang, Y. Wu, and J. Liu. 2020. From Fidelity to Perceptual Quality: A Semi-Supervised Approach for Low-Light Image Enhancement. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Z. Ying, G. Li, and W. Gao. 2017. A Bio-Inspired Multi-Exposure Fusion Framework for Low-light Image Enhancement. ArXiv e-prints (November 2017). arxiv: cs.CV/1711.00591Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Z. Ying, G. Li, Y. Ren, R. Wang, and W. Wang. 2017. A New Image Contrast Enhancement Algorithm Using Exposure Fusion Framework. In Proc. Int'l Conf. Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. 36--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Y. Yuan, W. Yang, W. Ren, J. Liu, W. Scheirer, and Z. Wang. 2019. UG2+ Track 2: A Collective Benchmark Effort for Evaluating and Advancing Image Understanding in Poor Visibility Environments. arXiv e-prints (Apr 2019), arXiv:1904.04474.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. X. Zhang, P. Shen, L. Luo, L. Zhang, and J. Song. 2012. Enhancement and noise reduction of very low light level images. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Pattern Recognition. 2034--2037.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Y. Zhang, Y. Tian, Y. Kong, B. Zhong, and Y. Fu. 2018. Residual Dense Network for Image Super-Resolution. In Proc. IEEE Int'l Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, and X. Guo. 2019. Kindling the Darkness: A Practical Low-light Image Enhancer. In Proc. ACM Int'l Conf. Multimedia.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Integrating Semantic Segmentation and Retinex Model for Low-Light Image Enhancement

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MM '20: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 2020
      4889 pages
      ISBN:9781450379885
      DOI:10.1145/3394171

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 12 October 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      MM '24
      MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
      October 28 - November 1, 2024
      Melbourne , VIC , Australia

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader