S E Egorova
ABSTRACT
Business risks growing associated with the probability of losses in a business unit sales process due to possible goods rejection by the consumer identified the problem of current assets management model formation. So the inventory information, the information on debts and money resources is gathered and evaluated with the use of risk-oriented approach. The article proposes two approaches to risk identification and quantification in current assets management. The first approach is based on the use of a system of indicators of marketing analysis, where internal and external parameters are linked together. These parameters characterize current assets turnover by means of use of marketing environment indicators. The second approach is based on linking the added value indicators, focused on the basic parameters of economic activity, and added value, focused on demand and consumer preferences. The authors proved the influence of economic cycle of a country on the current assets turnover and justified the use of financial robustness level as a summarizing indicator of risk level in current assets management. The paper also states that the results of risk level assessment are taken into account in the two important processes for current assets management: budgeting and reservation.
- O. M. <u>Chubka</u>, M. P. <u>Politylo</u> and N. V. Moroz. 2018. Management of current assets in the context of macroeconomic development. Financial and credit activity-problems of theory and practice, 2, Issue 25, 165--174.Google Scholar
- O. H. <u>Golovko</u> and V. D. Koltyukova. 2017. Features of management of current assets of the enterprise. Financial and credit activity-problems of theory and practice, 1, Issue 22, 182--188.Google Scholar
- E. G. Kichigina. 2015. Features of the modern management of the working capital of the enterprise in the conditions of the economic crisis. Modern scientific research and innovation, 5, Part 3 [Electronic source]. Available at: http://web.snauka.ru/issues/2015/05/52543. Date of reference: 25.04.2019.Google Scholar
- H. Karadag. 2018. Cash, receivables and inventory management practices in small enterprises: their associations with financial performance and competitiveness. Small enterprise research, 25, Issue 1, Special issue SI, 69--89. Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Egorova. 2014. Analysis of the impact of the risk of unclaimed products on the content and the result of a comprehensive examination of an economic entity. Audit and financial analysis, 3, 82--91.Google Scholar
- S. E. Egorova and L. A. Yudanova. 2015. Risks as an object of accounting and management. Accounting. Analysis. Audit, 1, 82--91.Google Scholar
- V. P. <u>Poluyanov</u> and N. S. <u>Palamarchuk.</u> 2017. <u>Integrated Assessment of the Policy of Working Capital Management in Housing and Utilities Enterprises.</u> Ekonomikaregiona-economy of region, 13, Issue 2, 489--499. Google ScholarCross Ref
- I. V. Babenko. 2013. The use of a systematic approach in the management of working capital of industrial enterprises. Izvestia of South-West State University. Series Economics, Sociology, Management, 3, 116--123.Google Scholar
- A. R. Gorevaya. 2017. Modern methods of managing working capital of the company. Irkutsk State University, 119--123 [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sovremennye-metody-upravleniya-oborotnymi-sredstvami-kompanii. Date of reference: 25.04.2019. 1. 16--18. Date of reference: 25.04.2019.Google Scholar
- V. S. Yarygina. 2017. Management of working capital of enterprises. Young scientist, 14, 491--493 [Electronic resource]. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/148/41863/. Date of reference: 26.04.2019.Google Scholar
- P. M. R. <u>Jonkergouw</u>, T. G. <u>Watson</u>, A. D. <u>Erskine and</u> M. <u>Petrie.</u> Infrastructure risk management: A probabilistic approach to asset management. Integrating water systems 10th International Conference on Computing and Control for the Water Industry Sheffield. England. 631.Google Scholar
- S. G. Rafael, V. L. Pedro, O. A. Alejandra and N. S. Edwin. 2018. Riskmanagement: the recurrent absence ofbusinessadministration. Ciencia unemi. January-April, 11, Issue 26, 51--62.Google Scholar
- S. Egorova. 2012. Information support of marketing analysis. Management accounting, 8, 33--38.Google Scholar
- L. V. Popov. 2017. The political economy of Vladimir Putin. Under general editorship. E.G. Draft. SPb.: Publishing house of S.-Petersburg. Un-ta, 330.Google Scholar
- V. Bhagwan, S. S. Grobbelaar and W. G. Bam. <u>2018. A systematic review of the</u>duediligencestage of mergers and acquisitions: towards a conceptual framework. South african journal of industrial engineering. November, 2018, 29, 3, 217--234. Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. B. Porsgaard, M. Haubjergand and Z. N. L. Hansen. 2018. A framework for operationalduediligence. Production engineering-research and development, 12, 5, 633--645. Google ScholarCross Ref
- O. Novikov, M. Dubinina and V. Kuzoma. 2018. Due diligence: essence and possible prospects of development. Baltic journal of economic studies, 4, Issue 2, 141--146. Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. L. Nachescu and A. C. Mataragiu. 2010. Due diligence in the mergers and acquisitions activity. AMIS - proceedings of the 5th international conference, accounting and management information systems <u>Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies</u>, 296--318.Google Scholar
- Jung-Ho Eom, Seon-Ho Park, Young-Ju Han and Tai-Myoung Chung. 2007. Risk assessment method based on business process-oriented assets evaluation for information system security. Computational science. Conference: 7th International Conference on Computational Science. ICCS 2007. Beijing. Peoples R China, 3, 4489, 1024.Google Scholar
- S. E. Egorova. 2014. Analysis of the effect of the risk of the lack of demand for products on the content and the result of a comprehensive examination of the economic entity. Audit and financial analysis, 3, 180--185.Google Scholar
- K. Klimczak. 2017. Cross-country Differences in Reporting Practices - the Case of Provisions for Liabilities. Journal of management and business administration-central Europe, 25, Issue 3, 20--33. Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Gheorghe. 2008. Provisions, Contingent liabilities and contingent assets - IAS 37. Metalurgia International. 2008. 13. Issue 12. 96--100.Google Scholar
- H. Usul and F. O. Kece. 2016. Accounting of provisions, contingent liabilities, contingent assets in scope of IAS37. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy university economics and administrative sciences faculty, 3, Issue 5, 49--60.Google Scholar
- G. Michalski. 2008. <u>Operational risk in current assets investment decisions: Portfolio management approach in accounts receivable.</u> Agricultural economics-zemedelskaekonomika, 54, Issue 1, 12--19.Google Scholar
- O. M. Kyiashko. 2009. Necessity of accounting support in enterprise receivables management. Actual problems of economics, Issue 93, 190--196.Google Scholar
- A. Siekelova and E. Gregova. 2016. Receivables Management as a Tool to Minimize Credit Risk and its Algorithm. International Conference On Information And Business Management. ISSGBM-IB, 2016, 61, 67--72.Google Scholar
- M. K. Shad, F. W. Lai, C. L. Fatt, J. J. Klemes and A. Bokhari. 2019. Integrating sustainability reporting into enterpriseriskmanagementand its relationship with businessperformance: A conceptual framework. Journal of cleaner production, 208, 415--425. Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Using a risk-oriented approach incurrent assets management
Recommendations
Uncertainty, Capital Investment, and Risk Management
We use forward-looking and exogenous measures of output price uncertainty to examine the effect of price uncertainty on firm-level capital investment, risk management, and debt issuance. The effects of uncertainty vary significantly by firm size. When ...
The Impacts of Advertising Assets and R&D Assets on Reducing Bankruptcy Risk
Research has shown that advertising assets and R&D research and development assets increase shareholder value. Although one might conclude that their impacts on bankruptcy risk are merely the inverse of their impacts on shareholder value, we argue ...
Comments