skip to main content
10.1145/3383313.3418481acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrecsysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Smart Targeting: A Relevance-driven and Configurable Targeting Framework for Advertising System

Published:22 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Targeting system is an essential part of computational advertising. It allows advertisers to select and reach their targeted users. Due to various advertising goals and the demand for making budget plans, advertisers have a strong will to configure the final targeting results, or they can become very cautious in spending money on advertising campaigns. Meanwhile, to guarantee the advertising performance, the targeted users should also be relevant to the ads of the advertisers. Recent targeting methods are mainly based on tags produced by the Data Management Platform (DMP) which is easy for the advertisers to configure the targeting results. However, in such methods, the relevance between the targeted users and ads is not technically evaluated and cannot be guaranteed. The biggest challenge is that it is hard for a machine learning model to both model the relevance and take account of the advertiser’s configuration demands. In this paper, we propose a novel relevance-driven and configurable targeting framework called Smart Targeting to solve the problem. Specifically, different from Tag-wise Targeting, we first use a relevance model to retrieve the most relevant users for the ads. To further enable the advertisers to configure the final results, we develop a Delay Intervention Mechanism to leverage the power of DMP. As far as we know, this is the first attempt of combining relevance modeling and advertiser intervention into a unified targeting system. We implement and evaluate our framework on JD.com platform with over 300 million users and the results show that it can bring significant improvements to the core indicators such as CTR and eCPM. The long term monitoring also demonstrates that Smart Targeting gradually becomes the most popular targeting tool after its release.

References

  1. Jianqing Chen and Jan Stallaert. 2014. An economic analysis of online advertising using behavioral targeting. Mis Quarterly 38, 2 (2014), 429–A7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Heng-Tze Cheng, Levent Koc, Jeremiah Harmsen, Tal Shaked, Tushar Chandra, Hrishi Aradhye, Glen Anderson, Greg Corrado, Wei Chai, Mustafa Ispir, 2016. Wide & deep learning for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on deep learning for recommender systems. 7–10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Paul Covington, Jay Adams, and Emre Sargin. 2016. Deep neural networks for youtube recommendations. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on recommender systems. 191–198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. G Thomas Des Jardins, David Markley, Vinayak Raghuvamshi, and Thomas W Macisaac. 2015. Audio/video advertising network. US Patent 9,104,669.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Pavan Kumar Desikan, Lawrence Ip, Timothy James, Sanjeev Kulkarni, Prasenjit Phukan, Dmitriy Portnov, and Gokul Rajaram. 2010. Reviewing the suitability of Websites for participation in an advertising network. US Patent 7,788,132.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Charles Eldering, John Schlack, Michael Plotnick, and Robert Deitrich. 2003. Targeted advertising in on demand programming. US Patent App. 10/068,771.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayman Farahat and Michael C Bailey. 2012. How effective is targeted advertising?. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web. 111–120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Scott Frank, Robert Starr, John Ruckart, Steven Tischer, and Samuel Zellner. 2013. Location-based targeting. US Patent 8,559,968.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Huifeng Guo, Ruiming Tang, Yunming Ye, Zhenguo Li, and Xiuqiang He. 2017. DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.04247(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. John S Hendricks and Alfred E Bonner. 2004. Method and apparatus for targeted advertising. US Patent 6,738,978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Efosa C Idemudia. 2010. The Extended Advertising Network Model.. In AMCIS. 185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ganesh Iyer, David Soberman, and J Miguel Villas-Boas. 2005. The targeting of advertising. Marketing Science 24, 3 (2005), 461–476.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Bernard J Jansen, Kathleen Moore, and Stephen Carman. 2013. Evaluating the performance of demographic targeting using gender in sponsored search. Information Processing & Management 49, 1 (2013), 286–302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Yuchin Juan, Yong Zhuang, Wei-Sheng Chin, and Chih-Jen Lin. 2016. Field-aware factorization machines for CTR prediction. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 43–50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Ahmad A Kardan and Maryam Hooman. 2013. Targeted advertisement in social networks using recommender systems. In 7th International Conference on e-Commerce in Developing Countries: with focus on e-Security. IEEE, 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kenneth Knowlson. 2003. Targeted advertising. US Patent App. 10/011,953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Tao Lei, Yu Zhang, Sida I Wang, Hui Dai, and Yoav Artzi. 2017. Simple recurrent units for highly parallelizable recurrence. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.02755(2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Anand Madhavan and Shyam Kapur. 2010. Temporal targeting of advertisements. US Patent 7,672,937.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Steffen Rendle. 2010. Factorization machines. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 995–1000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Imdad Ullah, Roksana Boreli, Mohamed Ali Kaafar, and Salil S Kanhere. 2014. Characterising user targeting for in-app mobile ads. In 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS). IEEE, 547–552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 5998–6008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Guorui Zhou, Chengru Song, Xiaoqiang Zhu, Xiao Ma, Yanghui Yan, Xingya Dai, Han Zhu, Junqi Jin, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2017. Deep Interest Network for Click-Through Rate Prediction. (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Han Zhu, Daqing Chang, Ziru Xu, Pengye Zhang, Xiang Li, Jie He, Han Li, Jian Xu, and Kun Gai. 2019. Joint optimization of tree-based index and deep model for recommender systems. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3973–3982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Han Zhu, Xiang Li, Pengye Zhang, Guozheng Li, Jie He, Han Li, and Kun Gai. 2018. Learning tree-based deep model for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1079–1088.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    RecSys '20: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    September 2020
    796 pages
    ISBN:9781450375832
    DOI:10.1145/3383313

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 September 2020

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate254of1,295submissions,20%

    Upcoming Conference

    RecSys '24
    18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems
    October 14 - 18, 2024
    Bari , Italy
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)12
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format