skip to main content
other

Spatial encoding strategy theory: the relationship between spatial skill and STEM achievement

Published:13 February 2020Publication History
First page image

References

  1. Alibali, M.W., and Nathan, M.J. Embodied cognition in learning and teaching: Action, observation, and imagination. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, and P. Reimann (Eds.), International Handbook of the Learning Sciences. (New York, NY: Routledge, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Anderson, J.R. ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. American Psychologist 51, 4 (1996), 355.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Anderson, J.R. Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. 8th ed. (New York, NY: MacMillan, 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Baddeley, A. Working memory. Science 255, 5044 (1992), 556--559.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Baddeley, A. Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology 63, (2012), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Barke, H.-D. and Engida, T. Structural chemistry and spatial ability in different cultures. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 2, 3 (2001), 227--239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Bellmund, J.L., Gärdenfors, P., Moser, E.I., and Doeller, C.F. Navigating cognition: Spatial codes for human thinking. Science 362, 6415 (2018), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A., and Cocking, R. How People Learn: Mind, Brain, Experience, and School. (Washington, DC: National Research Council, 1999).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Carbonneau, K.J., Marley, S.C., and Selig, J.P. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology 105, 2 (2013), 380--400.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Carter, C.S., Larussa, M.A., and Bodner, G.M. A study of two measures of spatial ability as predictors of success in different levels of general chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24, 7 (1987), 645--657.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Caissie, A.F., Vigneau, F., and Bors, D.A. What does the Mental Rotation Test measure? An analysis of item difficulty and item characteristics. Open Psychology Journal 2, 1 (2009), 94--102.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Entrance Examination Board [Psychometric Instrument] (1939).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Chang, J.S.K. The design and evaluation of embodied interfaces for supporting spatial ability. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (ACM, 2017), 681--684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Chiu, P.T., Wauck, H., Xiao, Z., Yao, Y., and Fu, W.T. Supporting spatial skill learning with gesture-based embodied design. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM, 2018), 67--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Cohen, C. and Hegarty, M. Individual differences in use of external visualization to perform an internal visualization task. Applied Cognitive Psychology 21, (2007), 701--711.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Coluccia, E., and Louse, G. Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24, 3 (2004), 329--340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Constantinescu, A.O., O'Reilly, J.X., and Behrens, T.E. Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a gridlike code. Science 352, 6292 (2016), 1464--1468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Cooper, S., Wang, K., Israni, M., and Sorby, S. Spatial skills training in introductory computing. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research (ACM, 2015), 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Cowan, N. The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why?. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19, 1 (2010), 51--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Cox, A., Fisher, M., and O'Brien, P. Theoretical considerations on navigating codespace with spatial cognition. In Proceedings of the 17th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group. (2005).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Cuendet, S., Bumbacher, E., and Dillenbourg, P. Tangible vs. virtual representations: When tangibles benefit the training of spatial skills. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense through Design (ACM, 2012), 99--108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Détienne, F., and Soloway, E. An empirically-derived control structure for the process of program understanding. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 33, 3 (1990), 323--342.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Dorval, M., and Pepin, M. Effect of playing a video game on a measure of spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills 62, 1 (1986), 159--162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Du Boulay, B. Some difficulties of learning to program. Journal of Educational Computing Research 2, 1 (1986), 57--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Ekstrom, R.B., Dermen, D., and Harman, H.H. Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Vol. 102 (1976). [Psychometric Instrument], Educational Testing Service Princeton, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Engle, R.W., Kane, M.J., and Tuholski, S.W. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. Miyake and P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control (Cambridge University Press, 1999), 102--134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ericsson, K.A., Delaney, P.F., Weaver, G., and Mahadevan, R. Uncovering the structure of a memorist's superior "basic" memory capacity. Cognitive Psychology 49, 3 (2004), 191--237.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Ericsson, K.A., and Kintsch, W. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102, (1995), 211--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Feng, J., Spence, I., and Pratt, J. Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science 18, 10 (2007), 850--855.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Fennema, E., and Sherman, J. Sex-related differences in mathematics achievement, spatial visualization and affective factors. American Educational Research Journal 14, 1 (1977), 51--71.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Fincher, S., Baker, B., Box, I., Cutts, Q., de Raadt, M., Haden, P., … Tutty, J. Programmed to succeed?: A multi-national, multi-institutional study of introductory programming courses. (2005) Retrieved from https://www.cs.kent.ac.uk/people/staff/saf/experiment-kits/tr/brace-tr.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Fisher, M., Cox, A., and Zhao, L. Using sex differences to link spatial cognition and program comprehension. In 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (IEEE, 2006), 289--298.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Green, C.S., and Bavelier, D. Effect of action video games on the spatial distribution of visuospatial attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32, 6 (2006), 1465--1478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Green, C. S., and Bavelier, D. Learning, attentional control, and action video games. Current Biology 22, 6 (2012), 197--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Jeffery, K.J. The hippocampus: from memory, to map, to memory map. Trends in Neurosciences 41, 2 (2018), 64--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Jones, S.J., and Burnett, G.E. Spatial skills and navigation of source code. In Proceedings of Innovations and Technology in Computer Science Education (ACM, 2007), 231--235.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Jones, S.J., and Burnett, G.E. Spatial ability and learning to program. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments 4, 1 (2008), 47--61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Klauer, K.C., and Zhao, Z. Double dissociations in visual and spatial short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133, (2004), 355--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Kölling, M., Quig, B., Patterson, A., and Rosenberg, J. The BlueJ system and its pedagogy. Computer Science Education 13, 4 (2003), 249--268.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., and Mayer, R.E. Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition and Instruction 20, 1 (2002), 47--77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M.A., and Hegarty, M. Spatial visualization in physics problem solving. Cognitive Science 31, 4 (2007), 549--579.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Lubinski, D. Spatial ability and STEM: A sleeping giant for talent identification and development. Personality and Individual Differences 49, 4 (2010). 344--351.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Luxton-Reilly, A., Albluwi, I., Becker, B., Giannakos, M., Kumar, A., Ott, L., … and Szabo, C. Introductory Programming: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the ACM Innovations and Technology in Computer Science Education Working Group Reports, (Larnaca, Cyprus: ACM, 2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Miller, G.A. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63, 2 (1956), 81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Rettinger, D.A., Shah, P., and Hegarty, M. How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130, 4 (2001), 621--640.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Moyer-Packenham, P.S., and Bolyard, J.J. Revisiting the definition of a virtual manipulative. In International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives (Springer, 2016), 3--23.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Nelson, G.L., and Ko, A.J. On use of theory in computing education research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ACM, 2018), 31--39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Newcombe, N.S. Picture this: Increasing math and science learning by improving spatial thinking. American Educator 34, 2 (2010), 29.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Norman, K.L. Spatial visualization-A gateway to computer-based technology. Journal of Special Educational Technology 7, 3 (1994), 195--206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. O'Keefe, J., Burgess, N., Donnett, J.G., Jeffery, K.J., and Maguire, E.A. Place cells, navigational accuracy, and the human hippocampus. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 353, 1373 (1998), 1333--1340.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Pallrand, G.J., and Seeber, F. Spatial ability and achievement in introductory physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21, 5 (1984), 507--516.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Parker, M.C., Solomon, A., Pritchett, B., Illingworth, D., Margulieux, L.E., and Guzdial, M. Socioeconomic status and computer science achievement: Spatial ability as a mediating variable in a novel model of understanding. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research (ACM, 2018), 97--105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Parkinson, J., and Cutts, Q. Investigating the relationship between spatial skills and computer science. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research (ACM, 2018), 106--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Robins, A., Margulieux, L.E., and Morrison, B.B. Cognitive Sciences for Computing Education. In S. Fincher and A. Robins (Eds.), Handbook of Computing Education Research (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019), 231--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Sabourin, J., Kosturko, L., and McQuiggan, S. SpatialCS: CS to Support Spatial Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (ACM, 2018), 1095--1095.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Schulte, C. Block Model: An educational model of program comprehension as a tool for a scholarly approach to teaching. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Computing Education Research (ACM, 2008), 149--160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Shepard, R.N., and Metzler, J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171, 3972 (1971), 701--703.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Sherry, D.F., and Schacter, D.L. The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychological Review 94, 4 (1987), 439--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Shute, V.J., Ventura, M., and Ke, F. The power of play: The effects of Portal 2 and Lumosity on cognitive and noncognitive skills. Computers and Education 80, (2015), 58--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Simons, D.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Gathercole, S.E., Chabris, C.F., Hambrick, D.Z., and Stine-Morrow, E.A. Do "brain-training" programs work? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 17, 3 (2016), 103--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  61. Solomon, A., Guzdial, M., DiSalvo, B., and Shapiro, B.R. Applying a Gesture Taxonomy to Introductory Computing Concepts. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (ACM, 2018), 250--257.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Smith, I.M. Spatial Ability- Its Educational and Social Significance. (London: The University of London Press, 1964).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Sorby, S.A. Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education 31, 3 (2009), 459--480.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Sorby, S.A. and Baartmans, B. J. A course for the development of 3-D spatial visualization skills. Engineering Design Graphics Journal 60, 1 (1996), 13--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Sorby, S., Veurink, N., and Streiner, S. Does spatial skill instruction improve STEM outcomes? The answer is 'yes'. Learning and Individual Differences 67, (2018), 209--222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Sorva, J. Notional machines and introductory programming education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 13, 2 (2013), 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. Stieff, M. A localized model of spatial cognition in chemistry (Doctoral dissertation, 2004). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Stieff, M. Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction 17, 2 (2007), 219--234.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Stieff, M., Dixon, B.L., Ryu, M., Kumi, B.C., and Hegarty, M. Strategy training eliminates sex differences in spatial problem solving in a stem domain. Journal of Educational Psychology 106, 2 (2014), 390--402.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Stieff, M., and Raje, S. (2008). Expertise and spatial reasoning in advanced scientific problem solving. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on International Conference for the Learning Sciences-Volume 2 (International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2008), 366--373.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Stieff, M., Ryu, M., and Dixon, B. Students' use of multiple strategies for spatial problem solving. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences-Volume 1 (International Society of the Learning Sciences, 2010), 765--772.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Stieff, M., and Uttal, D.H. How much can spatial training improve STEM achievement? Educational Psychology Review 27, 4 (2015), 607--615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Terlecki, M.S., Newcombe, N.S., and Little, M. Durable and generalized effects of spatial experience on mental rotation: Gender differences in growth patterns. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22, 7 (2008), 996--1013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Thompson, C.P., Cowan, T.M., and Frieman, J. Memory Search by a Memorist. (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Uttal, D.H., and Cohen, C.A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: When, why, and how?. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 57, 2012, Academic Press), 147--181.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Uttal, D.H., Meadow, N.G., Tipton, E., Hand, L.L., Alden, A.R., Warren, C., and Newcombe, N.S. The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin 139, 2 (2013), 352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Uttal, D.H., Scudder, K.V., and DeLoache, J.S. Manipulatives as symbols: A new perspective on the use of concrete objects to teach mathematics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 18, 1 (1997), 37--54.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. Veurink, N., and Sorby, S.A. Raising the bar? Longitudinal study to determine which students would benefit most from spatial training. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education 2011 Annual Conference and Exposition, (Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2011).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  79. Wai, J., Lubinski, D., and Benbow, C.P. Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. Journal of Educational Psychology 101, 4 (2009), 817.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. Wauck, H., Xiao, Z., Chiu, P.T., and Fu, W.T. Untangling the relationship between spatial skills, game features, and gender in a video game. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM, 2017), 125--136Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., and Klauda, S.L. Expectancy-value theory. In K. Wentzel and D. Miele, (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School. (New York, NY: Routledge, 2009), 55--75.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Woodworth, R.S., and Thorndike, E.L. The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. Psychological Review 8, 3 (1901), 247--261.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Xiao, Z., Wauck, H., Peng, Z., Ren, H., Zhang, L., Zuo, S., … and Fu, W.T. Cubicle: An Adaptive Educational Gaming Platform for Training Spatial Visualization Skills. In 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (ACM, 2018), 91--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Yang, E.-M., Andre, T., and Greenbowe, T.J. Spatial ability and the impact of visualization/animation on learning electrochemistry. International Journal of Science Education 25, 3 (2003), 329--349.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  85. Yoon, S. Revised Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations (Revised PSVT: R, 2001) [Psychometric Instrument].Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM Inroads
    ACM Inroads  Volume 11, Issue 1
    March 2020
    73 pages
    ISSN:2153-2184
    EISSN:2153-2192
    DOI:10.1145/3383646
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2020 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 February 2020

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • other
    • Popular
    • Refereed

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format